Answer:
The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.
How did the United States practice "dollar diplomacy" in the wake of World War II?
Answer:
In what became known as “dollar diplomacy,” Taft announced his decision to “substitute dollars for bullets” in an effort to use foreign policy to secure markets and opportunities for American businessmen. ... Taft sent a warship with marines to the region to pressure the government to agree.
Explanation:
United States practiced "dollar diplomacy" in the wake of World War II as it helped them financially.
What is "dollar diplomacy"?"Dollar diplomacy" was a term used to describe the United States postwar foreign policy stance. Some criticized dollar diplomacy for advancing American interests at the expense of local ones, it was a critical tool for the United States in the aftermath of World War II.
The United States used its financial stability to influence regional political and economic decisions, generally with the objective of boosting American business interests.
Dollar diplomacy was founded on the premise of using American economic strength to influence other governments and affect the global political landscape. To accomplish this purpose, the United States offered other countries financial assistance and loans.
Learn more about "dollar diplomacy", here:
https://brainly.com/question/7611874
#SPJ2
What is the primary language in Central America?
Indian
Mestizo
English
Spanish
Why do you think Great Britain (England) pressure the United States back into a war so soon after the U.S. Revolution?
Answer:
To have a chance to weaken the newborn nation while its military arms werent developed.
1. What economic issues existed in Europe before WWII?
Answer:
Before World War II, Germany and France had been in conflict in Europe for almost 80 years, and had fought two large wars, the Franco-Prussian War and World War I (aka The Great War). ... In the 1930s an economic crisis also added to German Dissatisfaction leading to Hitler's rise to power.
Explanation:
Which court case in the United States made racially segregated schools unconstitutional?
A.Frasier v. Frasier
B. Brown v. Board of Education
C. Parks v. Board of Education
D. Douglas v. State of Kansas
Answer:
B. Brown vs. the Board of Education
What was the initial results of the presidential election in 2000?
Answer:
Bush, won the disputed election, defeating Democratic nominee Al Gore, the incumbent vice president. It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first in 112 years, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest elections in US history.
Explanation:
Which of these was most responsible for triggering the U.S. entrance into world war 1
Answer:
A. The discovery of a proposed alliance between Germany and Mexico.
Explanation:
Took the quiz.
Explain why the process of industrialization is called a revolution,and summarize the effects of industrialization on the people of the era.
Will mark brainliest.
Answer:
The process of industrialization revolution was a huge thing at the start of the 19th century. During this revolution all the good's that were produced were produced differently then before. Then the revolution created new technology advancement. When factories were introduced at the beginning of the era it created many new job opportunities.
The term revolution refers to the process of a drastic and extensive change systematized in effective ways. Since industrial revolution brought abrupt transformation in production methods, it is therefore regarded as large-scale industrialization process
Explanation:
Answer:Here
Explanation:
Industrialization is such a revolutionary concept due to the fast production of products and how it forever changed us humans work.
What caused relations between the United States and the Soviet Union to begin to change in the early 1980s? Select two answers.
Answer:
B. Leonid Brezhnev died.
C. Ronald Reagan became president.
Explanation:
But the two events that caused relations between the U.S and the USSR to begin to change in the early 1980's were that Leonid Brezhnev died and Ronald Reagan became president.
Answer:
It's 2 and 4 :)
Explanation:
You were most likely to strike it rich in the California Gold Rush if you:
"Be sure you have watched the assigned BrainPop Video- Gold Rush.
A. ...got to California very quickly after gold had been discovered because the Gold Rush ended in 1853.
B. ...avoided mining camps and stayed in expensive hotels.
C. used devices like metal detectors.
D. ... took the long sea route to California instead of the land route.
Answer:
C I think.
Explanation:
If I'm wrong, tell everyone not to use this answer in the comments.
You were most likely to strike it rich in the California Gold Rush if you used devices like metal detectors. Thus, option C is correct.
What is a California Gold Rush?The gold rush resulted in an enormous influx of laborers to California and was crucial in connecting the city's economy with that of the eastern United States. The discovery of enormous mineral deposits signalled the start of the California Gold Rush.
The practice of making money by selling the miners extortionately priced goods, activities, and food was considerably more prevalent.
Early methods of extracting gold using clay and dirt required human labour as well as water. When searching for gold in California during the gold rush, using tools like detection systems increased ones chances of success.
Therefore, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about California Gold Rush, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7728963
#SPJ2
13 Points! Please help ASAP^^
Please match the word to the correct definition.
Question 1 options:
is a person that is accused of committing a crime or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.
legal reasons, stated in court session, in written and/ or verbal form, based on statutes, regulations, case precedents, and reasoning applied to the facts of the particular situation.
means to be in accordance with the rules, laws, and rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
the official power (of a court) to be able to hear cases and make legal decisions and judgements
The highest ranking or senior member of the court, they preside over the court in its public sessions when the court is hearing arguments of a case and during its private conferences when discussing and deciding cases.
the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court.
the highest judicial court in a state or a country. Is the highest court in the US
comes from the Latin word for city, because in earlier history people identified themselves as belong to cities. It is a legal status that gives you a right to live, work, pay taxes, and vote
anything that a person (or a business) has legal title over. They can be tangible or intangible and ownership give the owner enforceable rights
means to be in violation of one or more of the rules, laws, and/ or rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
a conclusion reached after an evaluation of the facts and the precedent, and law. It is also called a ruling, an opinion, or a judgement.
1.
Property
2.
Citizenship
3.
Supreme Court
4.
Jurisdiction
5.
Plaintiff
6.
Defendant
7.
Chief Justice
8.
Arguments
9.
Decision
10.
Constitutional
11.
Unconstitutional
Answer:
Appellate brief
An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.
Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).
Student brief
A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.
Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.
The parties and how to keep track of them
Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:
Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.
The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.
The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.
For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.
These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.
A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.
A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.
The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.
When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.
At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”
In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.
Student briefs
Explanation:
who is the most famous writer
William Shakespeare I guess
Answer:
William Shakespeare my teacher told me
Why was it necessary to establish formal procedures for making agreements among or between states
Answer:
in order to avoid any form of betrayal or deceipt, they need to set on rules to avoid loopholes or betrayal, it could also provide proof of the agreement and ensure that everything was done efficiently and without mistakes
It necessary to establish formal procedures for making agreements among or between states as to establish regulations to prevent betrayal and deceit, as well as to serve as evidence of the agreement and to guarantee that everything was completed correctly and effectively.
What are the agreements between States?A treaty is any legally binding agreement between governments that falls under international law (countries). A treaty may be referred to as a convention, protocol, pact, agreement, etc.; it is the agreement's terms that define it as a treaty.
No State shall form an Alliance, Confederation, or Treaty; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, create any thing other than gold and silver, mint money, issue bills of credit Create a Tender for Debt Payment; enact any Ex Post Facto Law, Bill of Attainder, Law Improving the Obligation of Contracts, or Grant Any Title.
To learn more about Treaty
https://brainly.com/question/3480993
#SPJ5
What do I do if I want to do something but then I also want to do something else that isn't as fun but its quicker????
Answer:
Do the quicker thing then reward yourself with the fun thing
bc you deserve it :)
Why was John Brown put to death in 1859?
A) He tried to kill General Robert E. Lee.
B) He wrote a book supporting secession. Eliminate
C) He attempted to cause a slave uprising.
D) He attempted to assassinate President Lincoln.
7. Other than textiles, what three industries began to grow in South Carolina?
Answer: The nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw the tremendous growth of the aptly named ''Big Three'' North Carolina industries—tobacco, textiles, and furniture. The manufacture of the many products related to these industries grew naturally from the availability of raw materials in the state.
Explanation:
What conditions were present that led to labor conflicts in the United States?
Answer:
The labor movement in the United States grew out of the need to protect the. The labor movement led efforts to stop child labor, give health benefits. Most notable were the National Labor Union, launched in 1866, and the large numbers of workers hoping to improve their immediate conditions.
Explanation:
Define art and culture.
Culture - A group of people that share attitudes, goals values etc.
Art - A product done by people, something that shows an idea, or an emotion or, experiences.
Answer:
Culture – set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that define a group of people, such as the people of a particular region. ... The arts – vast subdivision of culture, composed of many creative endeavors and disciplines. The arts encompasses visual arts, literary arts and the performing arts.
Who was in charge of the concentration camps
Answer:
Hitler was in charge of the concentration camps in ww2...
In Europe :D
The goal of the Marshall Plan was to help countries in Western Europe resist communism through strong
Answer:
Economies.
Explanation:
The is also referred to as European Recovery Program and it was an assistance program of the United States of America to Western Europe. It was enacted by the 80th US Congress and signed into law on the 3rd of April, 1948 by President Harry S. Truman.
The US-sponspored program was revealed by the U.S Secretary of State, George C. Marshall and it was focused on promoting general welfare, global peace, and national interest through strong economic and financial interventions.
Hence, the goal of the Marshall Plan was to help countries in Western Europe resist communism through strong economies by stimulating an effective level of production and by extension the buying and selling of goods between various countries (world trade).
Answer:
the correct answer is b economies can I have brainliest?
Why was trade taxed in the Ghana Empire?
Answer:
O to reduce the amount of imported goods purchased O to limit the number of outsiders trading in Ghana O to provide support for the government of the empire O to increase the profits made by local merchants
Answer:
to provide support
Explanation:
"In the past two centuries, a revolution has transformed women’s lives. Unlike national revolutions, this social upheaval crosses continents, decades, and ideologies. In place of armed struggle it gradually sows seeds of change, infiltrating our consciousness with the simple premise that women are as capable and valuable as men. To measure the breadth of this ongoing upheaval of old patterns, consider the way feminist movements have transformed law and politics. . . . Or note the change in leadership. . . . Women’s movements have never been so widespread.”
–Estelle B. Freedman,
No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women, 2002
A) Identify ONE specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
B) Identify ANOTHER specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
C) Explain ONE specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text.
Answer:
A) One specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can now run for public office. This connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
B) Another specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can get a post-secondary education now.
C) One specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text is that women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man. This counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Explanation:
These series of Women movement contributed to the creation of woman suffrage, bridge the gender inequality, changing role in the society etc.
What are Women movement?These are series of liberation movement for woman in the 1960s and 1970s that sought for equal rights, opportunities and personal freedom for women and also coincided with the “second wave” of feminism.
Example of change in the roles of women from 1800?A good example of the changing role is that women can now run for public office and this connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
Another example of change in the rights of women?Another good example of the changing role is that that women can get a post-secondary education now.
Example of continuity fight on the rights of women?Till date, the women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man and this counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Read more about Women movement
brainly.com/question/17010685
#SPJ2
Which god did the Egyptians believe was the king of the gods? A. Ra B. Amun C. Anubis D. Osiris
Answer:
A. Ra
Explanation:
Answer:
Amun-Ra
Explanation:
Why did Hannibal's attack on the city of Rome fail?
Answer:
His army was too small to either assault or securely besiege Rome. Rome itself remain defended by two legions and a large, conscriptable population. Marching on and laying siege to Rome was beyond his logistical capacity.
Explanation:
Hope this helped! ヾ(•ω•`)o
Why is it important to let the people elect the Senators?
Answer:Voters have elected their senators in the privacy of the voting booth since 1913. The framers believed that in electing senators, state legislatures would cement their tie with the national government, which would increase the chances for ratifying the Constitution.
Explanation:
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
Which of these was not something Vespasian did during his ten-year reign?
A. reorganized the army to be more loyal and professional
B. promoted construction projects throughout the region
C. enlarged the Senate by adding more advisors
D. expanded the Empire by occupying neighboring territories
What can Congress do about Executive Orders?
Answer:
In the case of the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order.
Explanation:
I need some opinions. what rights given to you by the constitution do you enjoy the most?
Answer:
Well for one i enjoy the right to freedom and for two i enjoy the right to bare arms.
I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
The right to bare arms and the freedom of speech
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!! :)
For our broad lifestyles today, more styles are popular at a time.
True
False
Answer:
it is True
Explanation:
For our broad lifestyles today, more styles are popular at a time.
True
What is the name of the leader who is “picked" off by an American sharpshooter?
Answer:
John F. Kennedy was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald.