Your Brainly Guide
Why is the Chair of the Fed Reserve considered by many to be the
most powerful person in the economic world?
The Chair of the Federal Reserve is considered the most powerful in the economic world due to reasons such as :
Control over Monetary Policy: The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States and has the responsibility of formulating and implementing monetary policy. The Chair of the Fed leads the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which makes decisions on interest rates, money supply, and other measures aimed at stabilizing the economy and promoting growth.
Crisis Management: During times of economic crises or financial instability, the Chair of the Fed plays a critical role in managing the situation. The Fed has the authority to take extraordinary measures, such as injecting liquidity into the financial system, implementing emergency lending programs, and coordinating efforts with other central banks.
Therefore, the chair of the Fed reserve is considered the most powerful in the economic world .
Learn more on Fed Reserve :https://brainly.com/question/14059357
#SPJ4
can anyone help me with these questions please!!! and thank u and i mean all of them because i will give brainy and full stars if anyone can answer each question!!.
Question 2
The United States experienced an era of unprecedented prosperity and economic growth following World War II.
Read the list of statements and identify which social change each statement describes. Match the social change with the correct description.
The growth of suburbs and increased incomes encouraged many Americans to buy cars.
The population increased sharply because of growing confidence in the economy.
Companies began to license individuals with the right to distribute their products, which allowed for increased product sales.
Americans were impacted by a mass media that showed trends of the time that many people followed.
1. Franchising
2. Pop culture
3. Increased mobility
4. Baby boom
Question 24
Which of the following was a direct result of the Soviet Union's 1957 launch of Sputnik?
A: The USA began a period of sharing technology with the Soviet Union
B: The Soviet Union was unable to collect pictures of the USA from their satellite
C: The USA funded an agency dedicated to space exploration
D: The USA could not compete and stopped their development of space exploration
Question 26
The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. Identify two causes and two effects of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Match the following statements as either causes of the collapse of the Soviet Union or effects of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The expensive arms race in the USSR became an enormous burden on the struggling economy.
The Cold War ended, leaving the United States as the world's sole superpower.
Mass demonstrations for democracy put pressure on communist governments.
Independent republics established democratic reforms and free market economies.
1. Causes
2. Effects
Q. 23) 1. Franchising - Companies, 2. Pop culture - Americans, 3. Increased mobility - The growth, 4. Baby boom - The population.
Correct matches are:
Franchising - Companies began to license individuals with the right to distribute their products, which allowed for increased product sales.Pop culture - Americans were impacted by mass media that showed trends of the time that many people followed.Increased mobility - The growth of suburbs and increased incomes encouraged many Americans to buy cars.Baby boom - The population increased sharply because of growing confidence in the economy.Q24) The Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite, in 1957 sparked the space race between the USA and the Soviet Union. Hence, Option (C) is correct
In response to the perceived technological and strategic threat posed by Sputnik, the United States established the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in 1958.
Q25)Causes: The expensive arms race, Mass demonstrations
Effects: The Cold War ended, and Independent republics
Correct matching is:
Causes: 1. The expensive arms race in the USSR became an enormous burden on the struggling economy.
3. Mass demonstrations for democracy put pressure on communist governments.
Effects:
2. The Cold War ended, leaving the United States as the world's sole superpower.
4. Independent republics established democratic reforms and free market economies.
Hence, these are the correct matching regarding the Cold War ending causes and effects.
Learn more about Cold War here:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
How did President Reagan's increase in military spending affect how Americans viewed the government?
A. Americans questioned the spending at first, but were soon convinced of its necessity.
B.Anti-communist sentiment meant that the American people fully supported military spending.
C.Most Americans were disappointed to learn that the spending did not improve military strength.
D. Many people began to resent funds being diverted from social programs, which hurt the most vulnerable Americans.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
How was the African for of socialism unique
To what extent was the Iranian Revolution of 1979 a success? Explain in a thoughtful and thorough paragraph.
Answer:
I think the Iranian Revolution of 1979 was a mixed success. On one hand, it succeeded in overthrowing the repressive regime of the Shah and establishing an Islamic republic. This gave the Iranian people a greater voice in their government and allowed for some social and economic reforms. On the other hand, the new government was also repressive in its own way, with strict enforcement of Islamic law and suppression of political opposition. The revolution also had negative consequences for Iran's relationship with the international community, particularly the United States. Ultimately, the success of the revolution depends on one's perspective and priorities
Directions: For each question, present the answer in complete sentences with supporting information from the Lesson. Do not copy and paste from the Lessons or
Internet resources, but answer in your own words to demonstrate understanding of the material.
1. How has geography affected Japan? Provide specific examples of an event that may cause multiple reactions throughout a country (e.g., geographical,
economical, and/or social implications).
2. In what ways did China influence Japanese culture? Provide specific examples.
3. What was the Shinto religion of Japan based on? How was society in Japan organized during the Middle Ages? What was the result of Japan's isolation from
other societies?
4. Who was at the top of Japanese society during its feudal period? Who held the real power?
5. What were members of the land-owning warrior class called? What was the most powerful samurai called?
6. Describe five significant contributions Japan has made to society.
Can you please complete this for me completely
Answer:
1.because it consists of four main islands as well as countless of smaller ones. There isn't a lot of decent farming land because of the mountainous terrain. The location of Japan meant that the sea was essential to many facets of daily life. For them to acquire the resources they required, trade with China and Korea became crucial.
Explanation:
Profile photo for Sage
Sage
·
AI bot
BETA
An AI bot writing helpful answers
What are the greatest contributions Japan has made to the world?
Profile photo for Sage
Sage
Japan has made many significant contributions to the world in a variety of fields. Some of the most notable contributions include:
Technology: Japan is renowned for its advanced technology and has made significant contributions to the fields of electronics, automobiles, and robotics. Japanese companies such as Sony, Panasonic, and Honda have played a major role in shaping the technology industry.
Fashion: Japan has been a leader in the fashion industry for many years, with brands such as Issey Miyake, Yohji Yamamoto and Comme des Garçons being recognized as some of the most influential in the world.
Cuisine: Japan's cuisine, particularly sushi and ramen, has become very popular around the world. Japanese restaurants can be found in many major cities and have helped to introduce people to new flavors and techniques.
Animation: Japan has a long history of animation and has produced many popular anime series and films that have been enjoyed by audiences around the world.
Literature: Japan has a rich literary tradition and has produced many notable writers such as Haruki Murakami and Yoko Ogawa.
This is just a small selection of the many contributions that Japan has made to the world. Other notable contributions include martial arts, gardening, and architecture.
Answer: The answers for 4 & 5
4. The Emperor was at the top of the Japanese society. The shogun or general held the real power.
5. They were called samurai and the most powerful samurai were called daimyo which means "great name".
Explanation:
:)
All of the following are true about the early Mayans EXCEPT:
a
They were nomads.
b
They were hunters and gatherers.
c
They grew maize, cassava, squash and beans.
d
They had an advanced agricultural system with terraces and irrigation.
HURRY PLEASE
All of the following are true about the early Mayans EXCEPT They had an advanced agricultural system with terraces and irrigation. Thus the correct option is D
The ancient Mayans were able to grow crops like beans, corn, cassava, and squash in the Yucatan Peninsula, Because of their sophisticated agricultural system.
In order to maximize food production in the tropical climate of the Yucatan Peninsula, they devised advanced systems for terrace construction, irrigation, and crop rotation. This allowed them to flourish.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about Mayans, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29770765
#SPJ1
Why does Chief Justice Taney believe that Dred Scott is not a citizen of the United States? Why is this issue important for the case?
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney's reasoning for considering Dred Scott not a citizen of the United States is rooted in his interpretation of the Constitution and his understanding of the legal status of African Americans at the time. In the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, Taney delivered the majority opinion, which had far-reaching implications for the status of African Americans in the United States.
Taney asserted that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not intended to be included as citizens by the framers of the Constitution. He argued that the Constitution's use of the term "citizens" was intended to refer exclusively to "free white persons" and not to individuals of African descent. In his view, African Americans were considered property and lacked the rights and privileges associated with citizenship.
This issue was central to the case because Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, had filed a lawsuit seeking his freedom on the basis that he had resided in free territories and states. The question of whether Scott was a citizen was pivotal in determining his standing to bring the case before the court.
By denying Scott's citizenship, Taney effectively declared that he had no legal right to sue in a federal court. Taney further declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which restricted the expansion of slavery, unconstitutional, asserting that Congress had no authority to regulate slavery in the territories. This ruling had significant implications as it invalidated a major legislative effort to address the issue of slavery and provoked intense political and sectional divisions in the country.
Taney's opinion in the Dred Scott case perpetuated and reinforced the dehumanization and exclusion of African Americans from the rights and privileges of citizenship. It further deepened the divisions between the North and South, fueling tensions that eventually led to the Civil War. The case and Taney's reasoning underscore the significance of how legal interpretations and decisions can shape the course of history and the struggle for civil rights and equality.
for more questions on Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ8
after 1680, chesapeake planters began to rely more heavily on black slave labor than on indentured white servants because
After 1680, Chesapeake planters began to rely more heavily on black slave labor than on indentured white servants because of the decline in Indentured servitude.
Why was there a decline in Indentured servitude?The availability of white indentured servants decreased significantly after 1680. Indentured servitude involved individuals working for a set number of years in exchange for passage to the New World.
However, the supply of indentured servants from England began to decline due to improving economic conditions in England, reduced emigration, and increasing competition for labor in the colonies. Planters found that slave labor provided more long-term profitability and control over the workforce.
Find out more on indentured servitude at https://brainly.com/question/1278960
#SPJ4
In 250 words reflect on the institutional design created by the
Framers in the U.S. Constitution. Is it rational? Explain. Which
features would you have changed and why?
The institutional design created by the Framers in the U.S. Constitution can be viewed as a rational system, given the historical context and objectives they sought to achieve.
The Constitution established a federal system with a separation of powers and a system of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual liberties.
One rational feature of the institutional design is the separation of powers among the three branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This division of powers helps ensure that no single branch becomes too dominant or tyrannical. Each branch has specific powers and limitations, providing a system of checks and balances. For instance, the president can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote.
Additionally, the creation of a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives and the Senate, reflects a rational approach. It strikes a balance between proportional representation and equal representation among the states. The House of Representatives is designed to reflect population size, ensuring that larger states have a proportional voice, while the Senate grants equal representation to all states, regardless of size. This compromise aimed to prevent the domination of smaller states while considering the concerns of larger ones.
Learn more about Constitution link:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ1#SPJ11
what made africa a prosperous continent
Answer:
because.
Explanation:
Africa is rich in natural resources ranging from arable land, water, oil, natural gas, minerals, forests and wildlife. The continent holds a huge proportion of the world's natural resources, both renewables and non-renewables.
Before migration, the labor force of country Canada is 40 million and the wage is $5; the
labor force of the U.S. is 120 million and the wage is $10. After migration, in the U.S. the
wage rate will decrease from $10 to $9, the demand for labour will be 124 million workers,
the supply of labour - 116 million workers; in Canada the wage rate will rise from $5 to $7,
the demand for labour will be 35 million, the supply of labour 43 million workers
Assumptions:
- There is full employment in both countries
- Labor quality is the same in both countries
- Migration (1) has no cost, (2) occurs solely in response to wage differentials, and (3)
is unimpeded by law in both countries
1) Determine the direction of migration [10].
2) Explain why the wages in Canada and the U.S. will not be equalized as a result of
migration [10].
3) Graphically evaluate and compute gains and losses resulted from migration for both
countries and for the world as a whole [40].
4) Conclude on whether labor mobility joins international trade in enhancing the world's
standard of living or not [10].
5) List benefits and costs of migration to the host country [30]
The direction of migration can be determined by comparing the wage differentials before and after migration.
Before migration, the wage rate in the U.S. ($10) is higher than in Canada ($5), indicating that there is an incentive for workers to migrate from Canada to the U.S. in search of higher wages.
Wages in Canada and the U.S. will not be equalized as a result of migration due to several factors. First, migration is assumed to be solely driven by wage differentials. However, even after migration, there will still be wage differences between the two countries. This can be attributed to factors such as differences in labor productivity, market conditions, and labor market institutions. Additionally, migration may not be able to completely eliminate wage differentials due to potential frictions in the labor market, such as information asymmetry and adjustment costs.
To graphically evaluate the gains and losses resulting from migration, we can use the labor supply and demand curves for both countries before and after migration. The gains and losses can be computed by calculating the changes in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus for each country and the world as a whole. A detailed graphical analysis and computation of gains and losses require specific numerical data, including the shape of the supply and demand curves, which are not provided in the given information.
Learn more about migration link:
https://brainly.com/question/17991559
#SPJ11
Why did tecumseh lose faith in an Indian confederation after the battle of tippecanoe
Tecumseh lose faith in an Indian confederation after the battle of Tippecanoe as it led to the destruction of Prophetstown & resulted in the death of Tenskwatawa.
The battle for Tippecanoe is considered one of the major setbacks in the efforts of uniting Native American tribes from American Expansion. Many tribes were not in favor of fighting against the United States & some even sided with the latter. The complete obliteration of Prophetstown was also a major blow to Tecumseh as it was a center for religious & political movements.
After the Battle of Tippecanoe, Tecumseh continued to try to unite the Native American tribes but all were in vain as the momentum before the battle had faded. Tecumseh was killed in battle at the Battle of the Thames in 1813.
To know more about the Battle Of Tippecanoe:
https://brainly.com/question/13337266
https://brainly.com/question/28084796
2. In exactly 250 words, why did the Framers exclude the Bill of
Rights from the original Constitution? Was this a wise decision?
Explain.
The Framers of the U.S. Constitution initially excluded the Bill of Rights from the original document for various reasons, and their decision can be viewed as a wise one considering the historical context and their objectives.
First, it is important to understand the context in which the Constitution was drafted. The Constitutional Convention took place in 1787, just a few years after the American Revolutionary War, and the primary concern of the Framers was to create a strong and effective central government. Many of them believed that explicitly listing individual rights in the Constitution could limit the powers of the federal government and potentially lead to an overly rigid and ineffective governing structure.
Additionally, some Framers argued that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, as they believed that the Constitution itself already protected individual rights through its structural design and the separation of powers. They believed that the limited and enumerated powers granted to the federal government, coupled with the checks and balances between the branches, would naturally safeguard individual liberties.
However, the exclusion of the Bill of Rights sparked significant debate and opposition from those who believed that explicit protections for individual freedoms were essential. As a compromise, many state ratifying conventions expressed the need for a Bill of Rights, and James Madison played a crucial role in drafting and advocating for the amendments that eventually became the Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Constitution link:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ11
Clash of cultures of the Praire
Because it was important during the american Frontier era
The clash of cultures on the American prairie during the Frontier era was significant due to the collision between Native American tribes and European settlers. This clash was fueled by competing interests, differing lifestyles, and conflicting views on land ownership and resource utilization.
1. Native American tribes had a deep spiritual and cultural connection to the land, viewing it as a sacred entity that should be preserved and shared among the community. They relied on hunting, gathering, and sustainable agricultural practices to sustain their way of life.
2. European settlers, on the other hand, held the belief in individual land ownership and sought to exploit the land's resources for economic gain. They practiced intensive farming, introduced domesticated livestock, and implemented industrial methods that often disrupted the delicate balance of the prairie ecosystem.
3. As European settlers encroached upon Native American territories, conflicts arose over land rights and territorial control. Treaties were often signed but frequently broken, leading to further tensions and violence.
4. The clash of cultures also extended to social and religious differences. Native American tribes had their own intricate social structures, traditions, and belief systems, which clashed with the European settlers' customs and religious practices.
5. These clashes of cultures ultimately resulted in numerous conflicts, including the Indian Wars, as well as the forced displacement and cultural assimilation of Native American tribes.
In summary, the clash of cultures on the American prairie during the Frontier era was driven by differences in land ownership, resource utilization, social structures, and religious beliefs. This clash had far-reaching consequences for both Native American tribes and European settlers, shaping the course of American history.
For more such questions on cultures, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30784926
#SPJ8
Which of the following describes the Puritans who settled in New England? They were open and accepting of all religions and started America's move towards becoming a "melting-pot". They were searching for wealth and journeyed across the Atlantic in order to find it. 1 pt O They were excellent farmers who made a lot of money from agriculture. O They were searching for religious freedom for themselves, but were not tolerant of other religions.
Answer:
They were searching for religious freedom for themselves, but were not tolerant of other religions.
Explanation:
if the gini coefficient in kennesania is .41 in 1976, .45 in 1982, .39 in 1987 and .47 in 1990, which year has the highest level of income equality?
The Gini coefficient is a measure of income distribution that ranges from 0 to 1. The closer the value is to 0, the more equal the income distribution, whereas the closer it is to 1, the more unequal it is. A Gini coefficient of 0.41 in 1976, 0.45 in 1982, 0.39 in 1987, and 0.47 in 1990 indicates that Kennesania's income distribution became more unequal over time.
The highest level of income inequality occurred in 1990 when the Gini coefficient was 0.47. When compared to previous years, it was the highest among all the given years. This means that a small percentage of people held a majority of the income in the country during that year, while the rest of the population shared the remaining income. This measure is frequently used by economists to evaluate the effectiveness of policies aimed at reducing inequality. In this instance, policymakers in Kennesania should have responded to the growing inequality by introducing policies aimed at reducing the income gap between the wealthy and the poor. However, this is a theoretical analysis that ignores the historical, social, and political factors that may influence economic policy-making.
To know more about the coefficient visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13431100
#SPJ11
how did betty ford purposefully raised public awareness of screening and treatment options for breast cancer
As a result of Betty Ford's breast Cancer diagnosis in 1974, she purposely raised treatment awareness in the following ways :
Advocating for early detection and regular screenings: Betty Ford emphasized the importance of early detection in successfully treating breast cancer. She encouraged women to undergo regular breast self-examinations and mammograms, promoting the idea that early detection leads to better treatment outcomes.Openly discussing her diagnosis: Betty Ford made the bold decision to publicly share her breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. This was a significant departure from the prevailing societal norms at the time, as breast cancer was often considered a taboo subject.Sharing her personal story: Betty Ford's willingness to share her personal journey with breast cancer helped humanize the disease and reduce the stigma associated with it. She spoke openly about her fears, emotions, and treatment experiences, making breast cancer a more relatable and understandable topic for the general public.Hence, here are some ways she raised breast cancer awareness.
Learn more on breast cancer:https://brainly.com/question/6747562
#SPJ4
what did president woodrow wilson believe would help to avert future wars?
Answer:
He believed that if he Created a League of Nations it would help avert future wars:))
Explanation:
Was the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob biased when compared to police responses to other social justice protests?
Evaluating whether the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob was biased compared to responses to other social justice protests is a subjective assessment and can vary based on individual perspectives and interpretations.
The question of whether the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob was biased compared to responses to other social justice protests is a complex and multifaceted issue. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Differential treatment: There are arguments suggesting that the police response on January 6th exhibited bias. Critics point to perceived differences in the level of force used, preparation, and response time compared to some social justice protests. They highlight that law enforcement appeared to be ill-prepared despite advance warnings.Context and circumstances: It's important to consider the unique context of the January 6th event, where a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol building with the intent to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election. The nature of the event and its potential threat to national security may have influenced the response.Comparative analysis: To assess bias, a comprehensive comparative analysis of various social justice protests and the January 6th incident would be necessary. Factors such as the size of the gathering, historical precedents, violence or destruction involved, and the overall behavior of the crowd should be taken into account.Individual incidents: Examining specific incidents within social justice protests, such as the response to the Black Lives Matter movement or other similar demonstrations, can provide insights into potential discrepancies in law enforcement response.Investigation and accountability: Independent investigations, inquiries, and internal reviews can help determine if there were biases in the police response and identify any systemic issues that need to be addressed.It is important to approach this issue with careful consideration, recognizing that it requires thorough analysis of evidence and specific cases to draw conclusions about potential bias in the police response to the January 6th mob compared to other social justice protests.
For more such question on social justice
https://brainly.com/question/15835405
#SPJ8
Compare and contrast Armstrong's model vs Towers Perrin Total
rewards model.
Both Armstrong's Model and Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model offer frameworks for designing and implementing comprehensive reward systems. While Armstrong's Model focuses on integrating various reward elements to drive performance, Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model takes a broader perspective by considering the entire employment experience.
Here is a comparison and contrast of the two models:
Scope and Focus:
Armstrong's Model: This model provides a comprehensive framework for managing total rewards, including both financial and non-financial aspects such as compensation, benefits, performance management, career development, and work-life balance.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model takes a broader perspective and encompasses all aspects of the employment experience, including compensation, benefits, work environment, learning and development, recognition, and work-life balance.
Structure and Components:
Armstrong's Model: This model consists of six elements: reward strategy, base pay, variable pay, benefits, performance management, and employee development. It emphasizes the integration and alignment of these elements to achieve organizational objectives.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model comprises five elements: compensation, benefits, work-life effectiveness, performance and recognition, and career development. It highlights the need for a balanced and holistic approach to reward management.
Emphasis on Employee Experience:
Armstrong's Model: While it recognizes the importance of employee experience, the model primarily focuses on designing and managing reward systems to drive performance, motivation, and engagement.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model places a significant emphasis on creating a positive employee experience by considering factors beyond monetary rewards. It recognizes the role of work-life balance, career development, and a supportive work environment in attracting and retaining talent.
Implementation Approach:
Armstrong's Model: This model provides a systematic and structured approach to reward management, emphasizing the need for clear strategies, policies, and processes aligned with organizational goals.
Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model: This model emphasizes customization and flexibility to meet the unique needs of organizations and their employees. It encourages organizations to adapt and tailor their reward programs to reflect their specific culture, values, and employee preferences.
In summary, both Armstrong's Model and Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model offer frameworks for designing and implementing comprehensive reward systems. While Armstrong's Model focuses on integrating various reward elements to drive performance, Towers Perrin Total Rewards Model takes a broader perspective by considering the entire employment experience. The choice between the two models depends on the organization's specific goals, culture, and desired emphasis on employee experience.
To know more about culture, click here https://brainly.com/question/30497684
#SPJ11
equally distributed and since the In the United States since 1970 income has become 1970s economic mobility among income groups has more; decreased less; increased less; decreased more; increased None of the above answers is correct because economic mobility among income groups cannot be measured.
None of the above answers is correct because economic mobility among income groups cannot be measured accurately by simply stating whether it has increased or decreased.
Economic mobility is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses various factors, such as income inequality, social mobility, and opportunities for upward or downward mobility. Economic mobility refers to the ability of individuals or households to move up or down the income ladder over time. It is influenced by numerous factors, including education, skills, social networks, economic policies, and structural factors within the economy. Changes in economic mobility cannot be accurately captured by a single statement or a simple comparison of income distribution between two points in time.To assess economic mobility, researchers use various measures and methodologies, such as intergenerational mobility studies, longitudinal data analysis, and mobility indices. These approaches provide a more nuanced understanding of how individuals or households move across income groups and the factors that contribute to upward or downward mobility.Therefore, the statement that economic mobility among income groups has either increased or decreased in the United States since the 1970s is overly simplistic and does not accurately reflect the complexity of the issue.
To know more about economic mobility, click here https://brainly.com/question/2981557
#SPJ11
Who was the father of US
Explanation:
The father of the United States, commonly referred to as the "Founding Father" of the nation, is generally attributed to George Washington. He played a crucial role in the American Revolution and served as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army. Washington was also unanimously elected as the first President of the United States under the newly ratified U.S. Constitution in 1789. His leadership, statesmanship, and commitment to the principles of liberty and democracy were instrumental in shaping the early foundations of the United States.
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
because he done lots of work for the development of the people
True or false A census is a count of citizens used to determine the amount of taxes they would pay
Answer:
False
It determines the funding that will support countries and communities or how they will distribute funds......
Explanation:
Help is due today
Push and Pull Factors for immigration.
This is the topic
The push factors of China are natural disasters, famine and bad economic opportunities. The pull factors of China are gold and economic opportunities in the United States. The push factors of Japan United States annexed in Hawaii and immigration. In the United States, Chinese Immigrants helped to build the transcontinental railroad. They worked jobs like farming, mining, housekeeping and laundry workers.
Push factors encourage people to depart their homes and relocate, whereas pull factors attract migrants to new areas. High unemployment, for example, is a common push factor, whereas an abundance of jobs is an effective pull factor.
Push factors are distinguished from pull factors, which are the conditions that entice people to relocate to a specific location. Both are intertwined, because the push factors motivate people to leave their current location, whereas the pull factors influence their choice of country, state, or municipality.
Learn more about factors, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18831390
#SPJ1
Do you think Mexican Americans and Hutterites have experienced more prejudice than other ethnic minorities in the state? Why or why not?
The extent of prejudice experienced by Mexican Americans, Hutterites, and other ethnic minorities can vary depending on various factors and should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
Prejudice can vary based on various factors such as historical background, cultural dynamics, socioeconomic status, and geographic location.
Mexican Americans, as one of the largest ethnic minority groups in the United States, have faced significant challenges including stereotypes, discrimination, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Hutterites, a religious communal group, may face prejudice due to their distinctive lifestyle and practices.
The extent of prejudice experienced by any ethnic group is influenced by complex societal factors, regional attitudes, and historical context. It is important to consider individual experiences within specific communities and regions, rather than making broad generalizations.
Research studies and firsthand accounts from affected individuals can provide more insight into the unique experiences of Mexican Americans, Hutterites, and other ethnic minorities in a given state.
For more such question on prejudice
https://brainly.com/question/25189630
#SPJ8
Social Studies 7 question, open screenshot
Pls help me on my history homework
What kind of profit could be made by European fur traders and why do you think the Native peoples were happy with the arrangement?
Catt opened her piece by stating that ""prejudice and tradition are breaking down"". To which of the following groups did that statement apply? O Immigrant women O White women O All women O African American women
Answer: a O immigrant women
Explanation: i did the quiz and got i right
Catt opened her piece by stating that "prejudice and tradition are breaking down". The statement applies to all women.
A woman is an adult female human. A woman may be referred to as a girl, maiden, or woman, and she may be referred to as an individual or a group. Prejudice refers to the preconceived notions, beliefs, attitudes, and feelings that a person or a group has toward another individual or group. It can be positive or negative and is frequently the product of socialization, cultural conditioning, and individual experiences.Tradition is a system of beliefs, values, customs, and practices that is passed down through generations and shapes a group's way of life. These traditions might be based on religious, moral, or social norms that have been handed down through the generations. They provide individuals with a sense of belonging and continuity.Catt's statement that prejudice and tradition are breaking down applies to all women. Women have faced prejudice and oppression throughout history. Women have been barred from obtaining an education, working, and participating in government. They have also been the target of violence, discrimination, and inequality. Catt's comment is an assertion that things are changing, and women are making strides toward equality.
To know more about tradition visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27992543
#SPJ11