Answer:
$2.25
Step-by-step explanation:
9/4=2.25
checking work:
2.25+2.25=4.50
4.50+4.50=9
5/680 long divison explanation
Please help...
Solve using the method of your choice:
[tex]2 {x}^{2} + 3x - 2 = 0[/tex]
Answer:
x=½, -2
x= 0.5, -2
possibly im not perfect
Researchers investigated whether the proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss was diff erent in 2005–2006 than in 1988–1994. They collected data on random samples of American teenagers in those two time periods. Let the symbol π05-06 denote the population proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss in 2005–2006 and similarly for π88-94. A 95% confidence interval for the parameter π05-06 − π88-94 turns out to be (0.0015, 0.0467).
Required:
What is an appropriate conclusion to draw?
Complete Question
Researchers investigated whether the proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss was different in 2005–2006 than in 1988–1994. They collected data on random samples of American teenagers in those two time periods. Let the symbol [tex]\pi __{05-06}}[/tex] denote the population proportion of American teenagers with some level of hearing loss in 2005–2006 and similarly for [tex]\pi__{{88-94}}[/tex]. A 95% confidence interval for the parameter [tex]\pi__{{05-06}} }- \pi__{{88-94}}[/tex] turns out to be (0.0015, 0.0467).
Required:
What is an appropriate conclusion to draw?
Answer:
The appropriate conclusion is
The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006
Step-by-step explanation:
Generally the appropriate conclusion is
The sample data provide little evidence to doubt that the proportion of American teenagers with hearing loss was the same in 1988-1994 as in 2005-2006.
This because the confidence intervals are very close to zero , i.e both the upper limit and the lower limit are close to zero and if we are take 0.05 as our level of significance we see that the both values of the confidence level are small to be significant
UM WHAT I NEED SOME ADMINS LOOK
Answer:
LOL UGH THAT KEEPS HAPPENING TO ME
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
try reloading the page or check your internet
Step-by-step explanation:
what is the slope of a line parallel to the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 18
Answer:
3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 2y = 18
y=(3/2)x-9
Slope of the given line=3/2
As parallel lines have same slope, slope of the line parallel to the line 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.
Hope it helps :)
Slope of a line parallel to the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.
What is Slope of Line?The slope of the line is the ratio of the rise to the run, or rise divided by the run. It describes the steepness of line in the coordinate plane.
The slope intercept form of a line is y=mx+b, where m is slope and b is the y intercept.
The slope of line passing through two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is
m=y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁
Two lines are said to be parallel when their slopes are same.
To find the slope of parallel line, we need to find slope of 3x - 2y = 18
3x-2y=18
-2y=18-3x
y=-18/2+3/2x
y=3/2x-18/2
Slope of line is 3/2
Hence, slope of a line parallel to the line whose equation is 3x - 2y = 18 is 3/2.
To learn more on slope of line click:
https://brainly.com/question/14511992
#SPJ2
Round 1.24236 to the nearest hundredth
Answer:
1.24
Step-by-step explanation:
pls help will give brainliest
Answer:3rd one
Step-by-step explanation:
please help explain if you can
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
58-90 bc its a right triangle
hope this helps
if 6 pounds of apples cost $9, how much would 21 apples cost?
the area of a square is 73.96 m^2 .calculate the length of its side.
---------------------------------------------------
give me the answer step by step I know its answer is 8.6 m but I need its formula
It a bc i said so hahahahaha
A researcher wants to compare the heights of males between generations to see if they differ. To do this, he samples random pairs of males who are at least 18 years old and their fathers. He then splits them into a sample of fathers and a sample of sons. Suppose that data were collected for a random sample of 11 pairs, where each difference is calculated by subtracting the height of the son from the height of the father. Assume that the heights are normally distributed. The test statistic is t≈1.971, α=0.05, the corresponding rejection regions are t<−2.228 and t>2.228, the null hypothesis is H0:μd=0, and the alternative hypothesis is Ha:μd≠0.
Select all that apply:
a. Reject the null hypothesis.
b. Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
c. The conclusion of the hypothesis test is that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the heights of males between generations are different.
d. The conclusion of the hypothesis test is that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the heights of males between generations are different.
Answer:
The correct option is
Option A and Option C
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size of paired men is [tex]n_p = 11[/tex]
The test statistics is t≈1.971
The significance level is α=0.05
The rejection region is t<−2.228 and t>2.228
The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o :\mu_ d=0[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a :\mu_ d \ne 0[/tex]
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as
[tex]df = n_1 + n_2 - 2[/tex]
Here [tex]n_1[/tex] is the sample size of father which is [tex]n_1 = 11[/tex]
[tex]n_2[/tex] is the sample size of males who are at least 18 years old which is [tex]n_2 = 11[/tex]
So
[tex]df = 11 + 11 - 2[/tex]
=> [tex]df = 20[/tex]
Generally the critical values of α=0.05 from the t- distribution table at a degree of freedom of [tex]df = 20[/tex] for a two -tailed test is
[tex]t_{0.05 , 20 } = \pm 2.08596345 [/tex]
From the value obtained we see that the critical value is within the region of rejection hence
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
The conclusion of the hypothesis test is that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the heights of males between generations are different.
Evaluate 64 to the power of 1/2 x 10 to the power of -2
Find the value of x
PLEAASEEE HELP!!!
Answer:
x = 37
Step-by-step explanation:
4x + 3 + x - 8 = 180
4x + x - 8 + 3 = 180
5x - 5 = 180
5x = 185
x = 37
Hope this helps!
The rule (x, y)→(x−1, y-3) represents a translation 1 unit ____ and 3 units ____
Answer: left, down
Hope this helps.
I NEED HELP HERE ASAP, I’m giving brainliest to the right one. I forgot how to solve this:/
Answer:
28 weeks
Step-by-step explanation:
It says that $42 was 1/3 of her total. So you multiply $42 by 3 and you get $126. You now divide $126 by her weekly allowance, $4.5, and the answer is 28.
1. $42 x 3 = $126
2. $126/$4.5 = 28
3. The answer is Sharon has been saving her allowance for 28 weeks.
Hope this helps!
-Jerc
Answer:
She has been saving her money up for 28 weeks.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. If 42 is 1/3 of her money, then you would multiply 42 by 3 to get the full 3/3 so: 42•3=126
2. Next, you would divide $126 by $4.50 because that is the total amount of money divided by how much she saved up each week, so: 126/4.5=28 and that gives us the answer which is 28.
Determine the density in g/cm3 of a mineral that has a volume of 3.8 cm3 and a mass of 22.4 g.
Answer:
5.89 g/cm³
Step-by-step explanation:
givens,
Mass = 22.4 g
volume = 3.8 cm³
Density = mass / volume
= 22.4 / 3.8
= 5.89 g/cm³
The density with a volume of 3.8 cm³ and a mass of 22.4 g is 5.89 g / cm³.
Given,
The volume of a mineral = 3.8 cm3
And the mass of the mineral = 22.4 g
We need to find the density.
What is density?It is the ratio of mass and volume.
Density = mass / volume
Find the density.
Volume = 3.8 cm³
Mass = 22.4 g
Density
= Mass / Volume
= 22.4 / 3.8
= 5.89 g / cm³
Thus the density with a volume of 3.8 cm³ and a mass of 22.4 g is
5.89 g / cm³.
Learn more about how to find density in the cgs system here:
https://brainly.com/question/9989733
#SPJ6
I need help with this question
Answer:
The answer is going to be option 1.
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer you get from multiply an number by itself is a perfect square.
Answer:
8×8 =8^2=64 (perfect square)
Step-by-step explanation:
64 is a perfect square because 8^2 =8×8 =64
Cualquiera de las dos rectas puede ser la de pendiente 1 o pendiente 2, sólo hay que
conservarla hasta el final de la operación.
BLO
Fórmula que vamos a aplicar:
m-m
1+m-m
tan 0=
Pendiente de la recta 3x - 4y + 8 = 0
Pendiente de la recta 2x + 3y - 23 = 0
Sustitución de datos
tan 0 =
Al realizar la operación de la fórmula se obtiene la tangente del ángulo, por lo que hay
que buscar el inverso de la tangente, que es el valor del ángulo de intersección entre
las rectas dadas.
tan 8 =
El valor del ángulo e es
What Is It HomeWork*.
Answer:
sumthing that we hate doing
Step-by-step explanation:ughhhhhhhhhh
If p = 5, q = 4, and r = 1, what is the value of p - r ?
a. 3
b. 4
c. 6
d. 1
the function is graphed below. On which interval of X is the average rate of change of the function the greatest?
Answer:
Between x = 48 and x = 45.
Step-by-step explanation:
Average rate of change of a function in the given interval is represented by,
Average rate of change = [tex]\frac{\triangle y}{\triangle x}[/tex]
From the table attached,
Average rate of change of the function between x = 3 and x = 9
= [tex]\frac{16-7}{9-3}[/tex]
= 3
Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22
= [tex]\frac{32-16}{22-9}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{16}{13}[/tex]
= 1.23
Average rate of change in the interval x = 9 and x = 22,
= [tex]\frac{45-32}{45-22}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{13}{23}[/tex]
= 0.57
Average rate of change in the interval x = 45 and x = 48,
= [tex]\frac{63-45}{48-45}[/tex]
= 6
Therefore, average rate of change is maximum between x = 45 and 48.
Option given in bottom right will be the answer.
The product of the number g and the opposite of 7 is equal to k.
Change to an algebraic expression
a horizontal line , such as y=4, has a slope of what
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
A horizontal line has a slope of zero and a vertical line has an undefined slope
Please Assist!
What is the answer to this question???
Answer:
[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Midpoint Formula: [tex](\frac{x_1+x_2}{2},\frac{y_1+y_2}{2} )[/tex]
Simply plug in your coordinates into the midpoint formula to find midpoint:
R(-2, 3)
S(-8, -2)
[tex](\frac{-2+-8}{2},\frac{3+-2}{2} )[/tex]
[tex](\frac{-10}{2},\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]
[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]
Simplify the algebraic expression by combining like (or similar) terms.
5+9x+2
Answer:
7 + 9x
Step-by-step explanation:
add 5 and 2 and 9x doesn't have a like term so it stays the same
Answer:
9x + 7
Step-by-step explanation:
Like terms are terms that have the same variables and powers. Here, for 9x, there is no other term that is multiplied by x. So, the only terms we can combine is 2 and 5 which leaves us with 9x+7.
Explain how sample size affects statistical significance.
Answer:
More formally, statistical power is the probability of finding a statistically significant result, given that there really is a difference (or effect) in the population. ... So, larger sample sizes give more reliable results with greater precision and power, but they also cost more time and money.
In 2008 the Better Business Bureau settled 75% of complaints they received (USA Today, March 2, 2009). Suppose you have been hired by the Better Business Bureau to investigate the complaints they received this year involving new car dealers. You plan to select a sample of new car dealer complaints to estimate the proportion of complaints the Better Business Bureau is able to settle. Assume the population proportion of complaints settled for new car dealers is .75, the same as the overall proportion of complaints settled in 2008
a. Suppose you select a sample of 450 complaints involving new car dealers. Show the sampling distribution of .
b. Based upon a sample of 450 complaints, what is the probability that the sample proportion will be within .04 of the population proportion?
c. Suppose you select a sample of 200 complaints involving new car dealers. Show the sampling distribution of .
d. Based upon the smaller sample of only 200 complaints, what is the probability that the sample proportion will be within .04 of the population proportion?
e. As measured by the increase in probability, how much do you gain in precision by taking the larger sample in part (b)?
Answer:
Explained below.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the Central limit theorem, if from an unknown population large samples of sizes n > 30, are selected and the sample proportion for each sample is computed then the sampling distribution of sample proportion follows a Normal distribution.
The mean of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:
[tex]\mu_{\hat p}= p[/tex]
The standard deviation of this sampling distribution of sample proportion is:
[tex]\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]
(a)
The sample selected is of size n = 450 > 30.
Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.
The mean and standard deviation are:
[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{450}}=0.0204[/tex]
So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0204^{2})[/tex].
(b)
Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:
[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0204}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0204})[/tex]
[tex]=P(-1.96<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.96)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.975-0.025\\=0.95[/tex]
Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.95.
(c)
The sample selected is of size n = 200 > 30.
Then according to the central limit theorem the sampling distribution of sample proportion is normally distributed.
The mean and standard deviation are:
[tex]\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.75\\\\\sigma_{\hat p}=\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.75(1-0.75)}{200}}=0.0306[/tex]
So, the sampling distribution of sample proportion is [tex]\hat p\sim N(0.75,0.0306^{2})[/tex].
(d)
Compute the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion as follows:
[tex]P(p-0.04<\hat p<p+0.04)=P(\frac{-0.04}{0.0306}<\frac{\hat p-p}{\sigma_{\hat p}}<\frac{0.04}{0.0306})[/tex]
[tex]=P(-1.31<Z<196)\\=P(Z<1.31)-P(Z<-1.96)\\=0.9049-0.0951\\=0.8098\\\approx 0.81[/tex]
Thus, the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion is 0.81.
(e)
The probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 450 is 0.95.
And the probability that the sample proportion will be within 0.04 of the population proportion if the sample size is 200 is 0.81.
So, there is a gain in precision on increasing the sample size.
Simplify the following expression, 3/8 divided by 1/4
The required simplified product is 3/2.
Given that fractions 3/8 ÷ 1/4.
To divide two fractions by multiplying the first fraction with the reciprocal of the second fraction.
Let a, b, c and d be any real numbers. Consider a/b ÷ c/d that gives
[tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex] × [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex].
That implies, [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{8}[/tex] × [tex]\frac{4}{1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex].
Hence, the required simplified product is 3/2.
Learn more about simplification of fraction, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16510095
#SPJ6
The Fashion Store has $6000 available each month for advertising. Newspaper ads cost $200 apiece and no more than 20 can be run per month. Radio ads cost $100 each and no more than 30 can run per month. TV ads cost $800 a piece, with a maximum of 7 available each month. Approximately 1000 women will see each newspaper ad, 800 will hear each radio ad, and 14,000 will see each TV ad. How much of each type of advertising should be used if the store wants to maximize exposure?
9514 1404 393
Answer:
7 TV ads4 radio adsStep-by-step explanation:
The audience per dollar is ...
Newspaper: 1000/$200 = 5/$
Radio: 800/$100 = 8/$
TV: 14000/$800 = 17.5/$
So, TV gives the greatest exposure. As much of the budget as possible should be spent on TV ads. That amount is the lesser of $6000 and ...
(7 ads)($800/ad) = $5600
With $5600 spent on TV ads, the remaining advertising budget is ...
$6000 -5600 = $400
The next most cost-effective medium is radio. The remaining $400 budget allows for ...
$400/($100/ad) = 4 ads
__
To maximize exposure, the advertising budget should be spent this way:
TV: 7 ads for $5600, exposure of 98000Radio: 4 ads for $400, exposure of 3200y = x²+1 at x=1 what’s the solution?