Can advise on the solution?​

Step-by-step explanation:

2) 63

3) 7000

4) 10

These are some answers

Answer:

a) Real range of employees hired by each organization surveyed = 56

b) The cumulative percent of "new" employees with the lowest tenure =        30%

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Note: To get the real range of employees hired by each organization, you would do a head count from 34 to 89 employees. This means that this can be done mathematically by finding the difference between 34 and 89 and add the 1 to ensure that "34" is included.

Real range of employees hired by each organization surveyed = (89 - 34) + 1

Real range of employees hired by each organization surveyed = 56

b) It is clearly stated in the question that  the "new" employee status was mostly reserved for the 30% of employees in the organization with the lowest tenure.

Therefore, the cumulative percent of "new" employees with the lowest tenure = 30%

Answer:

2x/3 + 2= 16

=21

Step-by-step explanation:

Standard form:

2

3

x − 14 = 0  

Factorization:

2

3 (x − 21) = 0  

Solutions:

x = 42

2

= 21

Answer:

yesseinafhinks

Step-by-step explanation:

Dividing by 10² is also the same thing as multiplying by 10^-2. In that case, we simply move the decimal places only 2 places back. That would give us 7.516, not 0.7516 (which is 3 times, not 2).

Answer:

no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

6-3x=4-x-3-2x

Combine like terms

6-3x =1 -3x

Add 3x to each side

6 -3x+3x = 1-3x+3x

6 =1

This is not true so there are no solutions

Answer:

No solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 - 3x = 4 - x - 3 - 2x

Add or subtract like terms if possible.

6 - 3x = -3x + 1

Add -1 and 3x on both sides.

6 - 1 = -3x + 3x

5 = 0

There are no solutions.

Answer:

B, C and D

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Statement: "Every integer has an additive inverse"

To find: statement that is equivalent to the given statement

Solution:

For any integer x, if [tex]x+y=0[/tex] then y is the additive inverse of x.

Here, 0 is the additive identity.

Statements ''All integers have additive inverses '', '' If x is an integer, then x has an additive inverse'' and  ''Given an integer x, there exists a y such that y is the additive inverse of x'' are equivalent to the given statement "Every integer has an additive inverse".

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

When the time is 3:40pm

(a)The angle between the two hands in standard position is drawn and attached below.

(b)Now, each hour = 30 degrees

Therefore, the angle between 3 and 8 in an anticlockwise movement

= 7 X 30 =210 degrees

Stating the angle as a negative angle, we have:

[tex]210^\circ-360^\circ=-150^\circ\\$The angle as a negative angle is -150^\circ[/tex]

Answer:

225º or 3.926991 radians

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of the complete circle would be π×radius²: 3.14×8²=200.96

The fraction of the circle that is still left will be a direct ratio of the angle of the sector of the circle.

[tex]\frac{125.6}{200.96}[/tex]=.625. This is the ratio of the circe that is in the sector. In order to find the measure we must multiply it by either the number of degrees in the circle or by the number of radians in the circle (depending on the form in which you want your answer).

There are 360º in a circle, so .625×360=225 meaning that the measure of the angle of the sector is 225º.

We can do the same thing for radians, if necessary. There are 2π radians in a circle, so .625×2π=3.926991 radians.

Answer:

225º

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C (the third graph)

Step-by-step explanation:

This graph's function has a domain and range that both exclude one value, which is 0. The x and y values are never 0 in the function, as it approaches 0 but never meets it.

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

This graph has an asymptote at y = 0 and x=0

This excludes these values

The domain excludes x =0

The range excludes y=0

Answer:

To solve for x we can write:

x² - y² = 55

x² = y² + 55

x = ±√(y² + 55)

To solve for y:

x² - y² = 55

y² = x² - 55

y = ±√(x² - 55)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the rate at which the volume V (in dollars) of sales is changing is approximated by the equation

V ' ( t ) = − 26400 e^− 0.49 t .

t = time (in days)

.v'(6) can be derived by simply substituting t = 6 into the modelled equation as shown:

V'(6) = − 26400 e− 0.49 (6)

V'(6) = -26400e-2.94

V'(6) = -26400×-0.2217

V'(6) = $5852.88

V'(6) = $5,853 to nearest dollars

V'(6) = 585300cents to nearest cent

To get v(6), we need to get v(t) first by integrating the given function as shown:

V(t) = ∫−26400 e− 0.49 t dt

V(t) = -26,400e-0.49t/-0.49

V(t) = 53,877.55e-0.49t + C.

When t = 0, V(t) = $170,000

170,000 = 53,877.55e-0 +C

170000 = 53,877.55(2.7183)+C

170,000 = 146,454.37+C

C = 170,000-146,454.37

C = 23545.64

V(6) = 53,877.55e-0.49(6)+ 23545.64

V(6) = -11,945.63+23545.64

V(6) = $11,600 (to the nearest dollars)

Since $1 = 100cents

$11,600 = 1,160,000cents

Answer:

Yes, triangle GYK is similar to triangle BAK.

Step-by-step explanation:

The sides of each triangle are proportional to each other.

Take the longest side of each triangle. You are comparing line AK with line KY.

The proportion is 15/25.

Now, take the shortest side of each triangle. You are comparing line KB with GK.

The proportion is 6/10.

To determine if the triangles are proportional, we can see if the two proportions are equal to each other:

15/20=6/10

3/5=6/10

Correct! 3/5 equals to 6/10. Therefore, the two triangles are similar because their sides are proportional.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

O  Yes!

Step-by-step explanation:

We would check whether the proportionality of their sides is equal

Taking proportionality

= [tex]\frac{6}{10} = \frac{15}{25}[/tex]

Cross Multiplying

6 × 25 = 15 × 10

150 = 150

So, ΔABK is similar to ΔGKY

Answer:

[tex]-15.11[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-12.48-(-2.99)-5.62=\\-12.48+2.99-5.62=\\-9.49-5.62=\\-15.11[/tex]

Answer:

-15.11

Step-by-step explanation:

-12.48+2.99-5.62=

-9.49 - 5.62= - (9.49+5.62)=-15.11

Answer:

Minimum population of fish in lake = 2400 - 155 = 2245

Maximum population of fish in lake = 2400 + 155 = 2555

Step-by-step explanation:

population of fish in lake = 2400

Variation of fish = 155

it means that while current population of fish is 2400, the number can increase or decrease by maximum upto 155.

For example

for increase

population of fish can 2400 + 2, 2400 + 70, 2400 + 130 etc

but it cannot be beyond 2400 + 155.

It cannot be 2400 + 156

similarly for decrease

population of fish can 2400 - 3, 2400 - 95, 2400 - 144 etc

but it cannot be less that 2400 - 155.

It cannot be 2400 - 156

Hence population can fish in lake can be between 2400 - 155 and 2400 + 155

minimum population of fish in lake = 2400 - 155 = 2245

maximum population of fish in lake = 2400 + 155 = 2555

Answer:

The like terms are: [tex]a^{2}b,\ ab,\ \teaxt{and}\ a[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression is:

[tex]-a^{2}b+6ab-8+5a^{2}b-6a-b-a^{2}b-6a-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+6ab+5a^{2}b+6ab-6a[/tex]

Collect the like terms as follows:

[tex]-a^{2}b+6ab-8+5a^{2}b-6a-b-a^{2}b-6a-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+6ab+5a^{2}b+6ab-6a[/tex]

[tex]=(-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b-a^{2}b-a^{2}b+5a^{2}b+5a^{2}b)+(6ab+6ab+6ab)-(6a-6a-6a)-b-8[/tex]

[tex]=12a^{2}b+18ab+18a-b-8[/tex]

Thus, the final expression is [tex]12a^{2}b+18ab+18a-b-8[/tex]

The like terms are: [tex]a^{2}b,\ ab,\ \teaxt{and}\ a[/tex].

Answer:

The CORRECT answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2.87 = AC

Step-by-step explanation:

Since this is a right triangle we can use trig functions

sin theta = opp / hyp

sin 35 = AC /5

5 sin 35 = AC

2.867882182= AC

To the nearest hundredth

2.87 = AC

Answer:

101-120=4

Step-by-step explanation:

All that you need to do is count how many data points fall into this category. In this case, there are four data points that fall into the category of 101-120 pushups

Therefore, the answer to the blank is 4. If possible, please mark brainliest.

Answer:

There are 4 numbers between 101 and 120.

Step-by-step explanation:

101-120: 105, 111, 111, 113 (4 numbers)

Answer:

r = -10*cos(t)

Step-by-step explanation:

To write the rectangular equation in polar form we need to replace x and y by:

[tex]x=r*cos(t)\\y=r*sin(t)[/tex]

Replacing on the original equation, we get:

[tex](x+5)^2+y^2=25\\x^2+10x+25+y^2=25\\(r*cos(t))^2+10*(r*cos(t))+25+(r*sin(t))^2=25[/tex]

Using the identity [tex]sin^2(t)+cos^2(t)=1[/tex] and solving for r, we get that the polar form of the equation is:

[tex](r*cos(t))^2+10*(r*cos(t))+25+(r*sin(t))^2=25\\r^2cos^2(t)+10rcos(t)+r^2sin^2(t)=0\\r^2cos^2(t)+r^2sin^2(t)=-10rcos(t)\\r^2(cos^2(t)+sin^2(t))=-10rcos(t)\\r^2=-10rcos(t)\\\\r=-10cos(t)[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]z=1.64<\frac{a-14.4}{1.1}[/tex]

And if we solve for a we got

[tex]a=14.4 +1.64*1.1=16.204[/tex]

The 95th percentile of the hip breadth of adult men is 16.2 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X the random variable that represent the hips breadths of a population, and for this case we know the distribution for X is given by:

[tex]X \sim N(14.4,1.1)[/tex]  

Where [tex]\mu=14.4[/tex] and [tex]\sigma=1.1[/tex]

For this part we want to find a value a, such that we satisfy this condition:

[tex]P(X>a)=0.05[/tex]   (a)

[tex]P(X<a)=0.95[/tex]   (b)

We can find a quantile in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.95 of the area on the left and 0.05 of the area on the right it's z=1.64

Using this value we can set up the following equation:

[tex]P(X<a)=P(\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}<\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma})=0.95[/tex]  

[tex]P(z<\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma})=0.95[/tex]

And we have:

[tex]z=1.64<\frac{a-14.4}{1.1}[/tex]

And if we solve for a we got

[tex]a=14.4 +1.64*1.1=16.204[/tex]

The 95th percentile of the hip breadth of adult men is 16.2 inches.

Answer:

a. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that correctly identifies the chip is significantly smaller than 50%.

b. Test statistic z=-1.001

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the proportion that correctly identifies the chip is significantly smaller than 50%.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.5\\\\H_a:\pi<0.5[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=199.

The sample proportion is p=0.462.

[tex]p=X/n=92/199=0.462[/tex]

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.5*0.5}{199}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.001256}=0.035[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi+0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.462-0.5+0.5/199}{0.035}=\dfrac{-0.035}{0.035}=-1.001[/tex]

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z<-1.001)=0.16[/tex]

As the P-value (0.16) is greater than the significance level (0.01), the effect is  not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that correctly identifies the chip is significantly smaller than 50%.

Answer:

D. 32 sq. unit s

Step-by-step explanation:

4×18/2=32

Answer:

See below in bold.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can write the equation as

y = a(x - 28)(x + 28)   as -28 and 28  ( +/- 1/2 * 56) are the zeros of the equation

y has coordinates (0, 32) at the top of the parabola so

32 = a(0 - 28)(0 + 28)

32 = a * (-28*28)

32 = -784 a

a = 32 / -784

a = -0.04082

So the equation is y = -0.04082(x - 28)(x + 28)

y = -0.04082x^2 + 32

The second part  is found by first finding the value of x corresponding to  y = 22

22 = -0.04082x^2 + 32

-0.04082x^2 = -10

x^2 = 245

x = 15.7 inches.

This is the distance from the centre of the door:

The distance from the edge = 28 - 15.7

= 12,3 inches.

Answer:The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Cos A = [tex]\frac{Adjacent}{Hypotenuse}[/tex]

Where Adjacent = 28, Hypotenuse = 197

Cos A = [tex]\frac{28}{197}[/tex]

Complete Question:

A restaurant borrows $16,100 from a local bank for 4 months. The local bank charges simple interest at an annual rate of 2.45% for this loan. Assume each month is 1/12 of a year.

Answer each part below.Do not round any intermediate computations, and round your final answers to the nearest cent. If necessary, refer to the list of financial formulas.

(a) Find the interest that will be owed after 4 months

(b) Assuming the restaurant doesn't make any payments, find the amount owed after 4 months

Answer:

a) Interest that will be owed after 4 months , I = $131.48

b) Amount owed by the restaurant after 4 months = $16231.48

Step-by-step explanation:

Note that the question instructs not to round any intermediate computations except the final answer.

Annual rate = 2.45%

Monthly rate, [tex]R = \frac{2.45\%}{12}[/tex]

R = 0.20416666666%

Time, T = 4 months

Interest, [tex]I = \frac{PRT}{100}[/tex]

[tex]I = \frac{16100 * 0.20416666666 * 4}{100} \\I = 161 * 0.20416666666 * 4\\I = \$131.483333333\\I = \$131.48[/tex]

b) If the restaurant doesn't make any payments, that means after four months, they will be owing both the capital and the interest ( i.e the amount)

Amount owed by the restaurant after 4 months = (Amount borrowed + Interest)

Amount owed by the restaurant after 4 months = 16100 + 131.48

Amount owed by the restaurant after 4 months = $16231.48

Answer:

(a)f(4) square cm.

(b)f(10.91)-f(10.9) Square centimeter.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(r)=the area of a circle (in square cm) that has a radius of r cm.

(a)Area (in square cm) of a circle whose radius is 4 cm.

Since r=4cm

Area of the circle = f(4) square cm.

(b) When the radius of the increases from 10.9 to 10.91 cm.

Change in the Area = f(10.91)-f(10.9) Square centimeter.

Answer:

AT least 14 classrooms to hold the total number of students

Step-by-step explanation:

Since  we don't know the numer of girls in the school, let's call it "x".

What we know is that the number of girls plus the number of boys gives the total number of students. This is:

x + 129 = Total number of students

Now, since 5/8 of the total number of students are girls, and understanding that 5/8 = 0.625 in decimal form, then we write the equation that states:

"5/8 of the school's population are girls" as:

0.625 (x + 129) = x

then we solve for "x":

0.625 x + 0.625 * 129 = x

0.625 * 129 = x - 0.625 x

80.625 = x (1 - 0.625)

80.625 = 0.375 x

x = 80.625/0.375

x = 215

So now we know that the total number of students is: 215 + 129 = 344

and if each classroom can hold 25 students, the number of classroom needed for 344 students is:

344/25 = 13.76

so at least 14 classrooms to hold all those students

Answer:

1.90.93

2.90.27

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

one above correct

Step-by-step explanation:

1st - 90.93

2nd-90.27

Complete question is;

In a certain community, 8% of all people above 50 years of age have diabetes. A health service in this community correctly diagnoses 95% of all person with diabetes as having the disease, and incorrectly diagnoses 10% of all person without diabetes as having the disease. Find the probability that a person randomly selected from among all people of age above 50 and diagnosed by the health service as having diabetes actually has the disease.

Answer:

P(has diabetes | positive) = 0.442

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability of having diabetes and being positive is;

P(positive & has diabetes) = P(has diabetes) × P(positive | has diabetes)

We are told 8% or 0.08 have diabetes and there's a correct diagnosis of 95% of all the persons with diabetes having the disease.

Thus;

P(positive & has diabetes) = 0.08 × 0.95 = 0.076

P(negative & has diabetes) = P(has diabetes) × (1 –P(positive | has diabetes)) = 0.08 × (1 - 0.95)

P(negative & has diabetes) = 0.004

P(positive & no diabetes) = P(no diabetes) × P(positive | no diabetes)

We are told that there is an incorrect diagnoses of 10% of all persons without diabetes as having the disease

Thus;

P(positive & no diabetes) = 0.92 × 0.1 = 0.092

P(negative &no diabetes) =P(no diabetes) × (1 –P(positive | no diabetes)) = 0.92 × (1 - 0.1)

P(negative &no diabetes) = 0.828

Probability that a person selected having diabetes actually has the disease is;

P(has diabetes | positive) =P(positive & has diabetes) / P(positive)

P(positive) = 0.08 + P(positive & no diabetes)

P(positive) = 0.08 + 0.092 = 0.172

P(has diabetes | positive) = 0.076/0.172 = 0.442

Using formula:

[tex]P(\text{diabetes diagnosis})\\[/tex]:

[tex]=\text{P(having diabetes and have been diagnosed with it)}\\ + \text{P(not have diabetes and yet be diagnosed with diabetes)}[/tex]

[tex]=0.08 \times 0.95+(1-0.08) \times 0.10 \\\\=0.08 \times 0.95+0.92 \times 0.10 \\\\=0.076+0.092\\\\=0.168[/tex]

[tex]\text{P(have been diagnosed with diabetes)}[/tex]:

[tex]=\frac{\text{P(have diabetic and been diagnosed as having insulin)}}{\text{P(diabetes diagnosis)}}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{0.08\times 0.95}{0.168} \\\\=\frac{0.076}{0.168} \\\\=0.452\\[/tex]

Learn more about the probability:

brainly.com/question/18849788