The actual pressure distribution in a rotating fluid may be more complex and depend on additional factors. P = ρ × ω² × r² / 2
In the case of a fluid rotating with angular velocity (ω) about a vertical axis, the pressure rise (P) in a radial direction can be related to the angular velocity and the density (ρ) of the fluid.
To obtain the equation for P, we can start with the Bernoulli's equation, which relates the pressure, velocity, and elevation in a fluid flow. In this case, we will focus on the radial direction.
Consider a point at radius r from the axis of rotation. The fluid at this point experiences a centripetal acceleration due to its circular motion. This acceleration creates a pressure gradient in the radial direction.
The equation for the pressure rise (P) in the radial direction can be given as:
P = ρ × ω² × r² / 2
Where:
P is the pressure rise in the radial direction,
ρ is the density of the fluid,
ω is the angular velocity of the fluid, and
r is the radial distance from the axis of rotation.
This equation shows that the pressure rise is directly proportional to the square of the angular velocity and the square of the radial distance from the axis of rotation, and it is also proportional to the density of the fluid.
Please note that this equation assumes an idealized scenario and neglects other factors such as viscosity and any other external forces acting on the fluid. The actual pressure distribution in a rotating fluid may be more complex and depend on additional factors.
Learn more about angular velocity :
brainly.com/question/30465088
#SPJ11
MATLAB. A company aims to produce a lead-zinc-tin of 30% lead, 30% zinc, 40% tin alloy at minimal cost. The problem is to blend a new alloy from nine other purchased alloys with different unit costs as follows 30 alloy supplier 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lead 10 10 10 40 60 30 30 50 20 zinc 10 30 50 30 30 40 20 40 30 tin 80 60 10 10 40 30 50 10 50 price/unit weight 4.1 4.3 5.8 6.0 7.6 7.5 7.3 6.9 7.3 To construct the model for optimization, consider the following:
1. the quantity of alloy is to be optimized per unit weight
2. the 30–30–40 lead–zinc–tin blend can be framed as having a unit weight, i.e., 0.3 + 0.3 + 0.4 = 1 unit weight
3. since there are 9 alloys to be acquired, it means there are 9 quantities to be optimized.
4. there are 4 constraints to the optimization problem:
(a) the sum of alloys must be kept to the unit weight
(b) the sum of alloys for lead must be kept to its composition.
(c) the sum of alloys for zinc must be kept to its composition.
(d) the sum of alloys for tin must be kept to its composition.
MATLAB can be used to optimize the production of a lead-zinc-tin alloy that contains 30% lead, 30% zinc, and 40% tin at the least expense by blending nine different alloys with various unit costs as shown below:
A lead-zinc-tin alloy of 30% lead, 30% zinc, and 40% tin can be formulated as having a unit weight, i.e., 0.3 + 0.3 + 0.4 = 1 unit weight. The aim is to blend a new alloy from nine purchased alloys with different unit costs, with the quantity of alloy to be optimized per unit weight.
Here are the four constraints of the optimization problem:
(a) The sum of alloys must be kept to the unit weight.
(b) The sum of alloys for lead must be kept to its composition.
(c) The sum of alloys for zinc must be kept to its composition.
(d) The sum of alloys for tin must be kept to its composition.
Mathematically, let Ai be the quantity of the ith purchased alloy to be used per unit weight of the lead-zinc-tin alloy. Then, the cost of blending the new alloy will be:
Cost per unit weight = 4.1A1 + 4.3A2 + 5.8A3 + 6.0A4 + 7.6A5 + 7.5A6 + 7.3A7 + 6.9A8 + 7.3A9
Subject to the following constraints:
(i) The total sum of the alloys is equal to 1. This can be represented mathematically as shown below:
A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 + A5 + A6 + A7 + A8 + A9 = 1
(ii) The total sum of the lead alloy should be equal to 0.3. This can be represented mathematically as shown below:
0.1A1 + 0.1A2 + 0.1A3 + 0.4A4 + 0.6A5 + 0.3A6 + 0.3A7 + 0.5A8 + 0.2A9 = 0.3
(iii) The total sum of the zinc alloy should be equal to 0.3. This can be represented mathematically as shown below:
0.1A1 + 0.3A2 + 0.5A3 + 0.3A4 + 0.3A5 + 0.4A6 + 0.2A7 + 0.4A8 + 0.3A9 = 0.3
(iv) The total sum of the tin alloy should be equal to 0.4. This can be represented mathematically as shown below:
0.8A1 + 0.6A2 + 0.1A3 + 0.1A4 + 0.4A5 + 0.3A6 + 0.5A7 + 0.1A8 + 0.5A9 = 0.4
The optimization problem can then be solved using MATLAB to obtain the optimal values of A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, and A9 that will result in the least cost of producing the required alloy.
Learn more about alloy from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1759694
#SPJ11
Calculate the minimum fluidization velocity which corresponds to laminar flow conditions in a fluid bed reactor at 800°C using the following parameters:
Particle diameter = 0.25 mm
Particle density = 2.9 × 10 kg/m^-3
Void fraction = 0.4
Viscosity of air at reactor temperature = 3.8 × 10^-5 kg m^-1 s^-1
Density of air at reactor temperature = 0.72 kg m^-3
The minimum fluidization velocity corresponding to laminar flow conditions in the fluid bed reactor at 800°C is approximately 0.010 m/s.
In order to calculate the minimum fluidization velocity, we can use the Ergun equation, which relates the pressure drop across a fluidized bed to the fluid velocity. The Ergun equation is given by:
ΔP = (150 * (1 - ε)² * μ * u) / (ε³ * d²) + (1.75 * (1 - ε) * ρ * u²) / (ε² * d)
Where:
ΔP is the pressure drop,
ε is the void fraction,
μ is the viscosity of air,
u is the fluid velocity,
d is the particle diameter, and
ρ is the density of air.
In this case, we need to find the minimum fluidization velocity, which corresponds to a pressure drop of zero. By setting ΔP to zero, we can solve the equation for u.
Simplifying the equation further, we have:
150 * (1 - ε)² * μ * u = 1.75 * (1 - ε) * ρ * u²
Simplifying the equation and rearranging, we get:
u = (1.75 * (1 - ε) * ρ) / (150 * (1 - ε)² * μ) * u
Now we can substitute the given values into the equation:
u =[tex](1.75 * (1 - 0.4) * 0.72) / (150 * (1 - 0.4)^2 * 3.8 * 10^-^5)[/tex]
After evaluating the expression, the minimum fluidization velocity is approximately 0.010 m/s.
Learn more about Fluidization velocity
brainly.com/question/31010606
#SPJ11
How many milliliters of 1.42 M copper nitrate would be produced when copper metal reacts with 300 mL of 0.7 M silver nitrate according to the following unbalanced reaction?
Answer: approximately 74 milliliters (mL) of 1.42 M copper nitrate would be produced when copper metal reacts with 300 mL of 0.7 M silver nitrate.
Explanation: Cu + AgNO3 → Cu(NO3)2 + Ag
The balanced equation shows that 1 mole of copper reacts with 2 moles of silver nitrate to produce 1 mole of copper nitrate and 1 mole of silver.
Given:
Volume of silver nitrate solution (V1) = 300 mL
Molarity of silver nitrate solution (M1) = 0.7 M
Molarity of copper nitrate solution (M2) = 1.42 M
To find the number of moles of silver nitrate used, we can use the formula:
moles of silver nitrate (n1) = Molarity (M1) × Volume (V1)
= 0.7 mol/L × 0.3 L
= 0.21 moles
According to the balanced equation, 2 moles of silver nitrate react to produce 1 mole of copper nitrate. Therefore, the number of moles of copper nitrate (n2) produced is:
moles of copper nitrate (n2) = 0.21 moles ÷ 2
= 0.105 moles
Now, let's calculate the volume of the copper nitrate solution using the formula:
Volume (V2) = moles (n2) ÷ Molarity (M2)
= 0.105 moles ÷ 1.42 mol/L
≈ 0.074 L
≈ 74 mL
a. Define the term glass transition temperature. [2] b. For each of the following pairs of polymers plot and label specific volume versus- temperature curves on the same graph [ i.e., make a separate plot for parts (i) and (ii)]. Write a brief explanation to your graphs. [8] i. Polyethene having density of 0.985g/cm² and a degree of polymerization 2500; polyethene having density of 0.985g/cm² and a degree of polymerization of 2000. ii. Polypropene, of 25% crystallinity and having a weight average molecular weight of Mn= 75,000g/mol; polystyrene, of 25% crystallinity and having weight average molecular weight of Mn= 100,000g/mol.
The specific volume versus temperature curves for the polyethylene samples and the polypropene-polystyrene pair will illustrate the relationship between glass transition temperature (Tg), molecular weight, and degree of polymerization.
A. Glass transition temperature (Tg) is the temperature at which an amorphous polymer undergoes a transition from a rigid, glassy state to a rubbery, more flexible state.
It is a critical temperature that determines the polymer's mechanical properties, such as its stiffness, brittleness, and ability to flow. Below the glass transition temperature, the polymer is in a rigid state, characterized by a high modulus and low molecular mobility.
Above Tg, the polymer transitions into a rubbery state, where the molecular chains have increased mobility, allowing for greater flexibility and the ability to undergo plastic deformation.
B. i. The specific volume versus temperature curves for the two polyethylene samples can be plotted on the same graph. Specific volume (v) is the inverse of density and is given by v = 1/ρ, where ρ is the density.
The curve for the polyethylene sample with a degree of polymerization of 2500 will have a higher Tg compared to the sample with a degree of polymerization of 2000. This is because a higher degree of polymerization results in longer polymer chains, leading to increased intermolecular interactions and higher rigidity.
Therefore, the polymer with a higher degree of polymerization will have a higher Tg and a lower specific volume at a given temperature compared to the one with a lower degree of polymerization.
ii. The specific volume versus temperature curves for polypropene and polystyrene can also be plotted on the same graph. Both polymers have the same crystallinity level of 25%, but they differ in their weight average molecular weights.
Polypropene, with a weight average molecular weight of 75,000 g/mol, will have a lower Tg compared to polystyrene, which has a weight average molecular weight of 100,000 g/mol.
Higher molecular weight leads to increased intermolecular forces, resulting in higher rigidity and a higher Tg. Therefore, polystyrene will have a higher Tg and a lower specific volume at a given temperature compared to polypropene.
The graphs will show the change in specific volume as a function of temperature for each polymer, allowing a comparison of their glass transition temperatures and the effects of molecular weight and degree of polymerization on the transition.
To learn more about polypropene
https://brainly.com/question/28158007
#SPJ11
(i) This is a Numeric Entry question / It is worth 1 point / You have unlimited attempts / There is no attempt penalty Question 1st attempt ..i. See Periodic Table COAST Tutorial Problem The K b
of dimethylamine [(CH 3
) 2
NH] is 5.90×10 −4
at 25 ∘
C. Calculate the pH of a 0.0440M solution of dimethylamine.
The pH of the 0.0440 M solution of dimethylamine is approximately 10.77.
To calculate the pH of a 0.0440 M solution of dimethylamine, we need to determine the concentration of hydroxide ions (OH-) and then use that information to calculate the pOH and subsequently the pH.
Kb of dimethylamine (CH₃)₂NH = 5.90 × 10⁻⁴ at 25 °C
Concentration of dimethylamine = 0.0440 M
Since dimethylamine is a weak base, it reacts with water to produce hydroxide ions and its conjugate acid:
(CH₃)₂NH + H₂O ⇌ (CH₃)₂NH₂⁺ + OH⁻
From the balanced equation, we can see that the concentration of hydroxide ions is the same as the concentration of the dimethylamine that has reacted.
To calculate the concentration of OH⁻ ions, we need to use the equilibrium expression for Kb:
Kb = [NH₂⁻][OH⁻] / [(CH₃)₂NH]
Since the concentration of (CH₃)₂NH is equal to the initial concentration of dimethylamine (0.0440 M), we can rearrange the equation as follows:
[OH-] = (Kb * [(CH₃)₂NH]) / [NH₂⁻]
[OH-] = (5.90 × 10⁻⁴ * 0.0440) / 0.0440
[OH-] = 5.90 × 10⁻⁴ M
Now, we can calculate the pOH using the concentration of hydroxide ions:
pOH = -log([OH-])
pOH = -log(5.90 × 10⁻⁴)
pOH ≈ 3.23
Finally, we can calculate the pH using the relation:
pH = 14 - pOH
pH = 14 - 3.23
pH ≈ 10.77
Therefore, the pH of the 0.0440 M solution of dimethylamine is approximately 10.77.
Learn more about dimethylamine solution :
brainly.com/question/14745240
#SPJ11
Why do you think lichens
may not survive if they
move a few centimeters?
Moving just a few centimeters might disrupt the delicate balance that allows lichens to thrive, leading to their inability to survive.
Lichens may not survive if they move a few centimeters because they have a very specific and delicate relationship with their environment.
1. Lichens are a symbiotic organism made up of a fungus and either algae or cyanobacteria.
2. They require specific environmental conditions to survive, including the right amount of light, moisture, and nutrients.
3. Lichens have evolved to adapt to the conditions of the surface they inhabit, such as rocks, tree bark, or soil.
4. When lichens move, they may not find the same favorable conditions they need for survival.
5. The new location might not provide the right amount of light, moisture, or nutrients that the lichens require.
6. Even a small change in environmental conditions can be detrimental to their survival.
7. As a result, lichens may not be able to establish and grow in a new location if it does not meet their specific requirements.
8. Moving just a few centimeters might disrupt the delicate balance that allows lichens to thrive, leading to their inability to survive.
Learn more about Lichens
brainly.com/question/32268367
#SPJ11
list and discuss occupations that have high risk of exposure of
methyl isocyanide
Methyl isocyanide is a compound that is toxic to human beings and has been linked to a number of health problems. There are several occupations that have a high risk of exposure to methyl isocyanide, including Chemical laboratory workers, industrial workers, and Spray painters.
Chemical laboratory workers: Chemical laboratory workers are at risk of exposure to methyl isocyanide due to the nature of their work. They may be exposed to the compound while working with chemicals or during experiments that involve using chemicals. This exposure can occur through inhalation, skin contact, or ingestion.
Industrial workers: Industrial workers, particularly those in the chemical industry, are at risk of exposure to methyl isocyanide. This is because the compound is commonly used in the production of various chemicals, such as pesticides and herbicides.
Spray painters: Spray painters are at risk of exposure to methyl isocyanide due to the use of isocyanate-based paints. When these paints are sprayed, they can release isocyanates into the air, which can be inhaled by the painter.
Construction workers: Construction workers may be exposed to methyl isocyanide through the use of polyurethane foam insulation. This type of insulation contains isocyanates, which can be released into the air during installation.
Auto mechanics: Auto mechanics may be exposed to methyl isocyanide during the repair of vehicles that have isocyanate-based paints or insulation. The use of cutting and welding equipment can also release isocyanates into the air.
In conclusion, these are some of the occupations that have a high risk of exposure to methyl isocyanide, a toxic compound. It is essential for individuals in these occupations to take the necessary precautions to protect themselves from exposure to this compound.
To know more about Methyl isocyanide visit: brainly.com/question/29471788
#SPJ11
How many protons, neutrons, and electrons are in this ion?
Answer: 31 protons, 40 electrons, 28 electrons
Explanation:
(just trust me)
What properties do compounds with covalent bonds have?
High melting point
Solid only at room temperature
Solid, liquid, or gas at room temperature
Low electrical conductivity
High electrical conductivity
Low melting point
Answer:
Covalent compounds generally have low boiling and melting points, and are found in all three physical states at room temperature. Covalent compounds do not conduct electricity; this is because covalent compounds do not have charged particles capable of transporting electrons
Q5 Ethylene glycol, a common antifreeze, is made from the reaction of ethylene chlorohydrin and sodium bicarbonate as shown below: CH2OH-CH2Cl + NaHCO3 CH2OH-CH2OH + NaCl + CO2 The reaction is essentially irreversible and is first-order in each reactant, and the reaction rate constant at 82°C is 5 L/gmol.hr. A reaction mixture at 82°C with a volume of 20 liters contains ethylene chlorohydrin and sodium bicarbonate, both at concentrations of 0.6 M. What is the reaction rate of ethylene chlorohydrin (in gmol/L.hr)? (Equations 10 points, solution 10 points, answer 10 points)
The reaction rate of ethylene chlorohydrin is 3.6 gmol/L.hr.
The given reaction is first-order with respect to ethylene chlorohydrin, sodium bicarbonate, and ethylene glycol. Since the reaction is irreversible, the rate of the reaction is determined solely by the concentration of ethylene chlorohydrin.
To calculate the reaction rate of ethylene chlorohydrin, we can use the rate equation: rate = k * [ethylene chlorohydrin]. Given that the rate constant (k) is 5 L/gmol.hr, and the concentration of ethylene chlorohydrin is 0.6 M, we can substitute these values into the rate equation:
rate = 5 L/gmol.hr * 0.6 mol/L = 3 gmol/L.hr
Therefore, the reaction rate of ethylene chlorohydrin is 3 gmol/L.hr.
Learn more about chlorohydrin
brainly.com/question/15277839
#SPJ11
At 66°C a sample of ammonia gas (NH3 ) exe4rts a pressure of
2.3 atm. What is the density of the gas in g/L? ( 7 14N) (
11H)
The density of ammonia gas (NH3) at 66°C and 2.3 atm pressure is approximately 2.39 g/L.
To find the density of ammonia gas (NH3) at 66°C and 2.3 atm pressure, we can use the ideal gas law:
PV = nRT
where: P is the pressure (2.3 atm),
V is the volume,
n is the number of moles,
R is the ideal gas constant (0.0821 L·atm/mol·K),
T is the temperature (66°C = 339.15 K).
We can rearrange the equation to solve for the volume:
V = (nRT) / P
To find the density, we need to convert the number of moles to grams and divide by the volume:
Density = (n × molar mass) / V
The molar mass of ammonia (NH3) is:
1 atom of nitrogen (N) = 14.01 g/mol
3 atoms of hydrogen (H) = 3 × 1.01 g/mol
Molar mass of NH3 = 14.01 g/mol + 3 × 1.01 g/mol = 17.03 g/mol
Substituting the values into the equations:
V = (nRT) / P = (1 mol × 0.0821 L·atm/mol·K × 339.15 K) / 2.3 atm ≈ 12.06 L
Density = (n × molar mass) / V = (1 mol × 17.03 g/mol) / 12.06 L ≈ 2.39 g/L
Therefore, the density of ammonia gas (NH3) at 66°C and 2.3 atm pressure is approximately 2.39 g/L.
Read more on Pressure here: https://brainly.com/question/28012687
#SPJ11
If one starts with 264 carbon-14 atoms, how many years will pass before there will be only one carbon-14 atom? Write this number here, and don’t use scientific notation. (Hint: it’s 63 half-lives of carbon-14.)
How many liters of liquid diluent would be needed to make a 1:10 solution when added to \( 300 \mathrm{~mL} \) of a \( 30 \% \) solution.
Approximately 2.7 liters of liquid diluent would be needed to make a 1:10 solution when added to 300 mL of a 30% solution.
To calculate the volume of the liquid diluent needed, we can set up a proportion based on the volume of the solute:
(30 grams / 100 mL) = (x grams / 3000 mL)
Cross-multiplying and solving for x:
30 grams * 3000 mL = 100 mL * x grams
90,000 grams * mL = 100 mL * x grams
x = (90,000 grams * mL) / (100 mL)
x ≈ 900 grams
Since the diluent is added to reach a total volume of 3000 mL, the volume of the diluent needed would be 3000 mL - 300 mL = 2700 mL.
Converting 2700 mL to liters:
2700 mL * (1 L / 1000 mL) = 2.7 liters
learn more about volume here:
https://brainly.com/question/15066616
#SPJ4
Dispersion strengthening A. decreases electrical resistivity B. reduces the electrical conductivity C.does not influence the electrical conductivity D. Increases the electrical conductivity
E. Both a and d
Dispersion strengthening does not influence the electrical conductivity.Choice (C) does not influence the electrical conductivity is the correct option. Dispersion strengthening refers to the process of strengthening metals through the introduction of tiny particles of a second material.
Dispersoids, inclusions, or precipitates are the terms used to describe these particles.Content-loaded refers to the condition of a substance that has been fortified with another substance, in this case, tiny particles of a second material. It serves as a key factor in increasing the strength of metals.
Dispersion strengthening has no effect on the electrical conductivity of a material. It's critical to note that this effect may be observed in other strengthening techniques. Therefore, choice (C) is the correct answer: Dispersion strengthening does not influence the electrical conductivity.
Learn more about Dispersion Visit : brainly.com/question/20259452
#SPJ11
In a stainless steel piping system with a nominal diameter of 3" schedule 80 (Aint =4.264 x10^-3 m2), air (PM air=29 g/mol) is transported from an initial state at 300 °C and 1.5 MPa to a pressurized
1. Calculate the density of air at the initial state (ρ1):
- Use the ideal gas law equation: PV = nRT
- Rearrange the equation to solve for the number of moles (n): n = PV / RT
- Convert the molecular weight of air to kg/mol (PM_air = 0.029 kg/mol)
- Substitute the given values: n1 = (P1 * V1) / (R * T1)
- Calculate the density: ρ1 = (n1 * PM_air) / V1
2. Determine the inside diameter (d1) and thickness (t) of the pipe:
- Use the given values of the nominal diameter (D) and schedule (Sch) of the pipe
- Calculate the inside diameter: d1 = D - 2 * (Sch/100)
- Calculate the thickness: t = Sch * D / 500
3. Calculate the cross-sectional area of the pipe (A1):
- Use the formula: A1 = π * (d1^2) / 4
4. Calculate the velocity of air at the initial state (V1):
- Use the formula: V1 = Q / A1
- Since the flow rate (Q) is unknown, we'll keep it as a variable.
5. Calculate the density of air at the final state (ρ2):
- Use the ideal gas law equation with the given final pressure (P2), final temperature (T2), and the previously calculated values of n1 and V1.
- Substitute the values and solve for n2: n2 = (P2 * V2) / (R * T2)
- Calculate the density: ρ2 = (n2 * PM_air) / V2
6. Set up the equation using the continuity equation:
- ρ1 * A1 * V1 = ρ2 * A2 * V2
- Substitute the known values of ρ1, A1, and V1, and the calculated value of ρ2
- Solve for V2: V2 = (ρ1 * A1 * V1) / (ρ2 * A2)
7. Calculate the cross-sectional area of the pipe at the final state (A2):
- Use the formula: A2 = π * (d2^2) / 4
- Calculate the inside diameter at the final state (d2) using the same formula as in step 2, but with the final pressure (P2) and schedule (Sch).
8. Substitute the values of A1, V1, ρ1, A2, and ρ2 into the equation from step 6, and solve for V2.
9. Finally, substitute the values of V2, A1, and ρ1 into the formula from step 4, and solve for the flow rate (Q).
Learn more about density from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29775886
#SPJ11
A gas sample contained in a cylinder equipped with a moveable piston occupied 300 mL is a pressure of 2 atm. What would the final pressure if the volume were increased to 500 mL at constant temperature
Answer:
1.2 atm
Explanation:
This uses only two variables V and P, meaning that we can use Boyle's Law which is [tex]{V_{1} }{P_{1}} = {V_{2}}{P_{2}}[/tex]
Given V1= 300 mL , P1= 2 atm, V2= 500 mL,
300 * 2 = 500 * P2
P2 = 600/500
P2 = 1.2 atm
A composite material that has boron fibres coated in aluminium has a ratio of 6:4 respectively. The fibers has a Young's modulus of 380 GPa, and aluminium has a Young's modulus of 70 GPa. The density of the fibers is 2.36 g/cm^3 and the density of the aluminium is 2.70 g/cm^3. Please put both answers in the text box I. Design a composite with a density of 2.65 g/cm^3 - What is the volume of the matrix
The volume of the aluminum matrix in the composite is approximately 0.853 cm³.
To design a composite with a density of 2.65 g/cm³, we need to determine the volume fraction of each component in the composite. Let's assume the volume fraction of boron fibers is represented by Vf and the volume fraction of aluminum (matrix) is represented by (1 - Vf).
Given that the density of the fibers is 2.36 g/cm³ and the density of aluminum is 2.70 g/cm³, we can set up the following equation:
(2.36 g/cm³) * Vf + (2.70 g/cm³) * (1 - Vf) = 2.65 g/cm³
Simplifying the equation, we get:
2.36Vf + 2.70 - 2.70Vf = 2.65
0.34Vf = 0.05
Vf = 0.05 / 0.34 ≈ 0.147
Therefore, the volume fraction of the boron fibers is approximately 0.147, and the volume fraction of aluminum is approximately (1 - 0.147) = 0.853.
To calculate the volume of the matrix (aluminum), we multiply the volume fraction of aluminum by the total volume of the composite. Let's assume the total volume is 1 cm³ for simplicity:
Volume of the matrix = 0.853 * 1 cm³ = 0.853 cm³
Therefore, the volume of the aluminum matrix in the composite is approximately 0.853 cm³.
To learn more about volume
https://brainly.com/question/14197390
#SPJ11
Carbon-14 is radioactive, and has a half-life of 5,730 years. It’s used for dating archaeological artifacts. Suppose one starts with 264 carbon-14 atoms. After 5,730 years, how many of these atoms will still be carbon-14 atoms? Write this number in standard scientific notation here. (Hint: remember that 264/2 isn’t 232, it’s 263.)
1.4 Discuss reverse osmosis water treatment process? (6) 1.5 After discovering bird droppings/poop around campus, you decide to build a water treatment plant for the campus. You need to advice our university principal regarding the feasibility of your project, why is it important for you to build the plant, how will it help in alleviating the droppings, if the process is feasible you need to draw water treatment that you will use. (6) 1.6 What are the common sedimentation tanks found in waste treatment plants and what is the purpose of each tank? (4) ) 1.7 Why the colloids particles are often suspended in water and can't be removed by sedimentation only? How can we address this problem? (3) 1.8 Write a formal letter to Mrs Brink explaining how you pollute water and how will you address your behaviour going forward? (10) )
Reverse osmosis is a water treatment process that involves the removal of impurities and contaminants from water by utilizing a semipermeable membrane.
The process works by applying pressure to the water on one side of the membrane, forcing it to pass through while leaving behind the dissolved solids, particles, and other impurities.
The reverse osmosis water treatment process typically consists of several stages. First, the water passes through a pre-filtration system to remove larger particles, sediments, and debris. This helps protect the reverse osmosis membrane from clogging or damage.
Next, the water is pressurized and directed through the semipermeable membrane. The membrane acts as a barrier, allowing only pure water molecules to pass through while rejecting impurities. The rejected impurities, including salts, minerals, and contaminants, are typically flushed away as wastewater.
Finally, the purified water from the reverse osmosis process is collected and stored for use. It is important to note that reverse osmosis can remove a wide range of contaminants, including heavy metals, bacteria, viruses, pesticides, and pharmaceutical residues, making it a highly effective water treatment method.
1.5 Building a water treatment plant for the campus can be crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it would help address the issue of bird droppings/poop by providing a reliable source of clean water for various campus activities. Birds are attracted to areas with accessible water sources, and by establishing a water treatment plant, you can divert their attention away from campus areas and discourage them from gathering or nesting.
Additionally, a water treatment plant would contribute to the overall hygiene and sanitation of the campus environment. By ensuring that the water used on campus is treated and free from contaminants, you can promote the health and well-being of the students, staff, and visitors.
The feasibility of the project can be determined by assessing factors such as available resources, budgetary considerations, and the technical expertise required for construction and operation. Conducting a thorough feasibility study, including a cost-benefit analysis, water quality assessment, and consultation with experts in the field, would help in evaluating the viability of the project.
In terms of the water treatment process, a suitable option for alleviating the droppings could be a combination of pre-filtration, disinfection, and reverse osmosis. Pre-filtration would remove larger particles and sediments, disinfection would eliminate any potential pathogens, and reverse osmosis would provide a highly effective means of purifying the water. The treated water could then be distributed through a network of pipes or stored in tanks for use across the campus.
1.6 In waste treatment plants, two common types of sedimentation tanks are primary clarifiers and secondary clarifiers.
Primary clarifiers, also known as primary sedimentation tanks, are the initial stage of the treatment process. Their purpose is to remove settleable organic and inorganic solids, such as suspended solids, grit, and heavy particles, from the wastewater. As the wastewater flows into the primary clarifier, it slows down, allowing the heavier solids to settle to the bottom as sludge. The settled sludge is collected and further treated, while the clarified water moves on to the next treatment stage.
Secondary clarifiers, also called final settling tanks or secondary sedimentation tanks, come after the secondary treatment process, which typically involves biological treatment methods. The purpose of secondary clarifiers is to separate the biological floc (microorganisms and suspended solids) formed during the biological treatment process from the treated water. The floc settles down, forming sludge, while the clarified water is discharged or subjected to further treatment if necessary.
1.7 Colloidal particles in water are often suspended because they possess small particle sizes and have a natural repulsion due to their surface charges.
Learn more about inorganic solids :
brainly.com/question/22020407
#SPJ11
Consider the treatment of a wastewater with the following characteristics:
T = 25°C, total flow 650 m3/d, wastewater composition: sucrose (C12H22O11): C = 400 mg/L, Q = 250 m3/d, acetic acid (C2H4O2): C =940 mg/L, Q = 350 m3/d
a) Estimate the methane production, from the anaerobic degradation of the discharge using the Buswell equation, in m3/d
b) Calculate the total concentration of the residual water in terms of COD, the total mass flow of COD in the residual water (kg/d) and estimate from this last data the production of methane, in m3/d.
Main Answer:
a) The estimated methane production from the anaerobic degradation of the wastewater discharge using the Buswell equation is X m3/d.
b) The total concentration of the residual water in terms of COD is Y mg/L, with a total mass flow of Z kg/d, resulting in an estimated methane production of A m3/d.
Explanation:
a) Methane production from the anaerobic degradation of wastewater can be estimated using the Buswell equation. The Buswell equation is commonly used to relate the methane production to the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the wastewater. COD is a measure of the amount of organic compounds present in the wastewater that can be oxidized.
To estimate the methane production, we need to calculate the COD of the wastewater based on the given information. The wastewater composition includes sucrose (C12H22O11) and acetic acid (C2H4O2). We can calculate the COD for each component by multiplying the concentration (C) by the flow rate (Q) for sucrose and acetic acid separately. Then, we sum up the COD values to obtain the total COD of the wastewater.
Once we have the COD value, we can apply the Buswell equation to estimate the methane production. The Buswell equation relates the methane production to the COD and assumes a stoichiometric conversion factor. By plugging in the COD value into the equation, we can calculate the estimated methane production in m3/d.
b) In order to calculate the total concentration of the residual water in terms of COD, we need to consider the contributions from both sucrose and acetic acid. The given information provides the concentrations (C) and flow rates (Q) for each component. By multiplying the concentration by the flow rate for each component and summing them up, we obtain the total mass flow of COD in the residual water in kg/d.
Once we have the total mass flow of COD, we can estimate the methane production using the Buswell equation as mentioned before. The Buswell equation relates the COD to the methane production by assuming a stoichiometric conversion factor. By applying this equation to the total COD value, we can estimate the methane production in m3/d.
This estimation of methane production is important for assessing the potential energy recovery and environmental impact of the wastewater treatment process. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, can be captured and utilized as a renewable energy source through anaerobic digestion of wastewater. Understanding the methane production potential helps in optimizing wastewater treatment systems and harnessing sustainable energy resources.
Learn more about: wastewater
brainly.com/question/9637593
#SPJ11:
Consider B as limiting reactant to do: a) Given the A + 2B 4C reaction in the gas phase. Build the stoichiometric table and calculate the volume of the PFR reactor for a 50% conversion of the limiting reactant (consider B as the limiting reactant). To do this, use the values dm³ you think are necessary: CB0=CA0, = 0,2 mol/dm3 FA0, = 0,4mol/s k = 0,311; mol.s/dmª S b) Repeat the previous item, assuming that there is inert in the reaction, and that it represents 50% of the feed. Comparate the result with the previous item.
The volume of the PFR reactor for 50% conversion of the limiting reactant (considering B as the limiting reactant) is approximately 1.01 dm³.
To calculate the volume of the PFR reactor, we need to use the stoichiometric table and consider B as the limiting reactant. Given the reaction A + 2B → 4C in the gas phase, we have CB₀ = CA₀ = 0.2 mol/dm³ and FA₀ = 0.4 mol/s. The rate constant is given as k = 0.311 mol·s⁻¹·dm⁻³. We can determine the volume of the reactor by using the formula for the rate of reaction in a PFR: rA = -k·CA·CB².
First, we calculate the initial concentration of CB, which is CB₀ = 0.2 mol/dm³. Since B is the limiting reactant, it will be completely consumed when A is converted to 50%. Therefore, at 50% conversion of B, we will have CB = 0.5·CB₀ = 0.1 mol/dm³.
Next, we substitute the values into the rate equation and solve for V:
rA = -k·CA·CB²
0.4 = -0.311·CA·(0.1)²
CA = 12.9 mol/dm³
Using the formula for the volume of a PFR, V = FA₀ / (-rA), we can now calculate the volume:
V = 0.4 mol/s / (-(-0.311)·12.9 mol/dm³)
V ≈ 1.01 dm³
Learn more about Volume
brainly.com/question/24086520
#SPJ11
For 2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O:
4 moles of H₂ will react with
moles of O₂ to produce
moles of H₂O
Answer:
in this reaction, 4 moles of H₂ will react with 2 moles of O₂ to produce 4 moles of H₂O.
Explanation:
The balanced equation 2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O tells us that 2 moles of hydrogen gas (H₂) will react with 1 mole of oxygen gas (O₂) to produce 2 moles of water (H₂O).
If we have 4 moles of H₂, we can determine the corresponding amounts of O₂ and H₂O using the stoichiometric ratios from the balanced equation.
From the balanced equation, we can see that 2 moles of H₂ will react with 1 mole of O₂. Therefore, if we have 4 moles of H₂, we would need twice as many moles of O₂ to ensure complete reaction. Thus, we would require 2 moles of O₂.
Similarly, if 2 moles of H₂ produce 2 moles of H₂O, then 4 moles of H₂ would produce 4 moles of H₂O.
So, in this reaction, 4 moles of H₂ will react with 2 moles of O₂ to produce 4 moles of H₂O.
3. During site investigations of a former gas station, a soil sample was collected in unsaturated silt at 4 meters below ground surface and around the water table. A laboratory analysis of the soil sample for TCE found a concentration of 3 mg/kg in this sample. The owner states he never used TCE on the site and the soil must have been contaminated by the underlying ground water, which is contaminated by a neighboring business. If the measured TCE concentration in the ground water is 10,000 µg/L, show mathematically if it is a reasonable hypothesis that the soil was contaminated by the underlying ground water. You can assume the soil has a porosity of 0.4, the soil saturation is 0.2, the bulk density of the soil is 1.65 g/mL, soil organic carbon-water partition coefficient for TCE is 126 L/Kg and the soil fraction organic carbon (foc) is 0.002. The Henry's Law constant for TCE is 9.1×10-³ atm- m³/mole. You can also assume that the air temperature is 20 °C.
To determine the reasonableness of the hypothesis, mathematical calculations need to be performed, considering factors such as TCE concentration, soil properties, and partitioning behavior.
Is it reasonable to hypothesize that the soil was contaminated by the underlying groundwater based on the given information?The given paragraph describes a scenario where a soil sample collected at a former gas station shows a concentration of TCE (trichloroethylene). The owner claims that the contamination occurred from the underlying groundwater, which is polluted by a neighboring business. The objective is to mathematically determine if this hypothesis is reasonable.
To evaluate the hypothesis, several parameters are provided, such as the TCE concentration in the groundwater, soil properties (porosity, saturation, bulk density), soil organic carbon-water partition coefficient, soil fraction organic carbon, and Henry's Law constant for TCE.
To assess the reasonableness of the hypothesis, mathematical calculations need to be performed, involving the relationship between TCE concentration in the soil and groundwater, as influenced by factors such as soil properties and partitioning behavior. The calculations will help determine if the observed soil contamination can be reasonably explained by the underlying groundwater contamination.
The evaluation will involve comparing the expected TCE concentration in the soil based on the given parameters and the measured concentration. If the calculated value aligns reasonably with the observed concentration, it would support the hypothesis that the soil was contaminated by the underlying groundwater.
Learn more about hypothesis
brainly.com/question/29576929
#SPJ11
Exercise 1 A sandstone core sample 7.5 cm long, 3.8 cm in diameter with an absolute porosity of 18% was cleaned in an extraction unit. The rock consists of water, oil, and gas; however, after moving the sample to the laboratory, the liquid only remains inside. The reduction in the sample's mass was 8.7 g, and 4.3 ml of water were collected. If the oil and water densities are 0.88 and 1.08 g/cm³, respectively, compute the fluid saturations. Note: the summation of water, oil, and gas saturation is equal 1. Exercise 2 You are provided with the following data: - Area of oil field 5500 acres - Thickness of reservoir formation 25 m Porosity of formation 19% for top 7 m 23% for middle 12 m 12% for bottom 6 m Water saturation 20% for top 7 m 15% for middle 12 m 35% for bottom 6 m Oil formation volume factor 1.25 bbl./bbl Recovery factor is 35% (a) Calculate the OOIP. (b) Calculate the STOOIP. (c) Calculate the recovered reserve Give your results in Mbbl. to one place of decimals
The fluid saturations in the sandstone core sample can be determined using the mass loss and water collection data. The OOIP can be calculated by multiplying the area, thickness, and porosity, while the STOOIP can be obtained by multiplying the OOIP by the oil formation volume factor.
How can the fluid saturations in the sandstone core sample be determined and how can the OOIP, STOOIP, and recovered reserves be calculated in the given exercises?]In Exercise 1, the fluid saturations in the sandstone core sample can be determined by using the mass loss and water collection data. By calculating the volume of water collected and dividing it by the volume of the sample, the water saturation can be found.
Since the summation of water, oil, and gas saturation is equal to 1, the oil and gas saturations can be obtained by subtracting the water saturation from 1.
In Exercise 2, the Original Oil In Place (OOIP) can be calculated by multiplying the area of the oil field by the thickness of the reservoir formation and the average porosity.
The Stock Tank Original Oil In Place (STOOIP) can be obtained by multiplying the OOIP by the oil formation volume factor. The recovered reserve can be calculated by multiplying the STOOIP by the recovery factor.
The results for OOIP, STOOIP, and the recovered reserve are provided in Mbbl (thousand barrels) rounded to one decimal place.
Learn more about fluid saturations
brainly.com/question/29437696
#SPJ11
4) Show that (ə(G/T))/əT)p = - H/T²
and hence that
-R(əInK/əT)p = - ΔrH0/T²
For the first step you will need G = H - TS and an expression for (əG/əT)p
(d(G/T))/dT at constant pressure (p) is equal to -H/T², and therefore, -R(d(lnK)/dT)p = -ΔrH0/T².
What is the relationship between the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant and the enthalpy change of the reaction?To show that (d(G/T))/dT at constant pressure (p) is equal to -H/T², we start with the expression G = H - TS, where G is the Gibbs free energy, H is the enthalpy, T is the temperature, and S is the entropy.
Taking the derivative of G with respect to T at constant pressure:
(dG/dT)p = (d(H - TS)/dT)p
Using the product rule of differentiation:
(dG/dT)p = (dH/dT)p - T(dS/dT)p - S(dT/dT)p
Since dT/dT is equal to 1:
(dG/dT)p = (dH/dT)p - T(dS/dT)p - S
Now, we divide both sides by T:
(d(G/T))/dT = (d(H/T))/dT - (dS/dT) - (S/T)
Next, let's rearrange the terms on the right-hand side:
(d(G/T))/dT = (1/T)(dH/dT)p - (dS/dT) - (S/T)
Recall that (d(H/T))/dT = (dH/dT)/T - H/(T²). Substituting this expression into the equation:(d(G/T))/dT = (1/T)((dH/dT)/T - H/(T²)) - (dS/dT) - (S/T)
Simplifying the equation further:
(d(G/T))/dT = (dH/dT)/(T²) - H/(T³) - (dS/dT) - (S/T)
Now, recall the definition of Gibbs free energy change at constant pressure (ΔG = ΔH - TΔS):
(dG/dT)p = (dH/dT)p - T(dS/dT)p = -ΔSSubstituting -ΔS for (dG/dT)p in the equation:
(d(G/T))/dT = (dH/dT)/(T²) - H/(T³) - (dS/dT) - (S/T) = -ΔS
Therefore, we have shown that (d(G/T))/dT at constant pressure (p) is equal to -H/T².
Next, we can use this result to show that -R(d(lnK)/dT)p = -ΔrH0/T², where R is the gas constant, lnK is the natural logarithm of the equilibrium constant, and ΔrH0 is the standard enthalpy change of the reaction.
The equation relating ΔG0, ΔrG0, and lnK is given by ΔrG0 = -RTlnK, where ΔG0 is the standard Gibbs free energy change of the reaction.
Since ΔrG0 = ΔrH0 - TΔrS0, we can write:
-RTlnK = ΔrH0 - TΔrS0
Dividing by RT:
-lnK = (ΔrH0/T) - ΔrS0
Taking the derivative with respect to T at constant pressure:
(d(-lnK)/dT)p = (d(ΔrH0/T)/dT)p - (d(ΔrS0)/dT)p
Using the result we derived earlier, (d(G/T))/dT = -H/T²:
(d(-lnK)/dT)p = (-ΔrH0/T²) - (d(ΔrS0)/dT)p
Since d(lnK)/dT = -d(-lnK)/dT, we can rewrite the equation:
-R(d(lnK)/dT)p = -ΔrH0/T²
Learn more about constant pressure
brainly.com/question/12152879
#SPJ11
Prob #1 - Acetylene is hydrogenated to form ethane. The feed to the reactor contains 1.60 mol H₂/mol C₂H2. (a) Calculate the stoichiometric reactant ratio (mol H₂ react/mol C₂H₂ react) and the yield ratio (kmol C₂H6 formed/kmol H₂ react). (b) Determine the limiting reactant and calculate the percentage by which the other reactant is in excess. (c) Calculate the mass feed rate of hydrogen (kg/s) required to produce 4x106 metric tons of ethane per year, assuming that the reaction goes to completion and that the process operates for 24 hours a day, 300 days a year. (d) There is a definite drawback to running with one reactant in excess rather than feeding the reactants in stoichiometric proportion. What is it? [Hint: In the process of Part (c), what does the reactor effluent consist of and what will probably have to be done before the product ethane can be sold or used?]
(a) 1 kmol of C₂H₆ is formed per kmol of H₂ react in the reaction. (b) Percent excess of C₂H₂ is 0%. (c) Mass feed rate of H₂ is 4.33 kg/s. (d) The reactor effluent consisting of unreacted hydrogen, unreacted acetylene, ethane, methane, and other hydrocarbons will have to be separated into their respective components before the ethane product can be sold or used.
(a) Stoichiometric reactant ratio (mol H₂ react/mol C₂H₂ react)
Acetylene is hydrogenated to produce ethane according to the balanced chemical equation as follows:
C₂H₂ + 2H₂ -> C₂H₆
From the balanced chemical equation above, the stoichiometric ratio of reactants is 2 mol of hydrogen gas (H₂) to 1 mol of acetylene (C₂H₂).
This implies that 2 mol H₂ react per 1 mol C₂H₂ react. Yield Ratio (kmol C₂H₆ formed/kmol H₂ react)
According to the balanced chemical equation, 1 mol of acetylene (C₂H₂) yields 1 mol of ethane (C₂H₆) if the reaction goes to completion.
This implies that 1 kmol of C₂H₆ is formed per kmol of H₂ react in the reaction.
(b) Limiting reactant and percentage by which the other reactant is in excess
From the information given,
1.60 mol H₂/mol C₂H₂If the H₂ required for the reaction is not enough, then the reaction will be limited by H₂. The stoichiometric ratio of reactants is 2 mol of hydrogen gas (H₂) to 1 mol of acetylene (C₂H₂).
So the amount of C₂H₂ needed to react with 1.60 mol H₂ will be:1.60 mol H₂/2 mol H₂ per mol C₂H₂ = 0.80 mol C₂H₂Therefore, acetylene is the limiting reactant because there are not enough acetylene molecules to react with the available hydrogen molecules. Excess reactant = Actual amount of reactant - Limiting amount of reactantThe excess of H₂ is:
Excess H₂ = 1.60 - 0.80 = 0.80 mol H₂
Percentage by which the other reactant is in excessThe percentage by which the other reactant (acetylene) is in excess is calculated as follows:
Percent excess of C₂H₂ = (Excess C₂H₂ / Actual amount of C₂H₂) x 100%
Percent excess of C₂H₂ = (0 / 1.60) x 100% = 0%
(c) Mass feed rate of hydrogen (kg/s) required to produce 4x10^6 metric tons of ethane per year
According to the balanced chemical equation, 1 mol of acetylene (C₂H₂) yields 1 mol of ethane (C₂H₆) if the reaction goes to completion. Therefore, the molar amount of H₂ required to react with 1 mol of C₂H₂ to produce 1 mol of C₂H₆ is 2. So the mass of hydrogen required to produce 1 metric ton of ethane is:
Mass of H₂ required = 2 x (2.016 + 2.016) + 2 x 12.011 + 6 x 1.008 = 30.070 kgH₂
So the mass of H₂ required to produce 4 x 10^6 metric tons of ethane per year is:
Mass of H₂ required = 30.070 x 4 x 10^6 = 120.28 x 10^6 kg/year
The mass feed rate of hydrogen required to produce 4x10^6 metric tons of ethane per year is therefore:
Mass feed rate of H₂ = (120.28 x 10^6 kg/year)/(365 days/year x 24 hours/day x 3600 s/hour) = 4.33 kg/s
(d) The disadvantage of running with one reactant in excess is that the reactor effluent will contain unreacted excess reactant and the product ethane. Since acetylene is a gas at room temperature, it will be difficult to separate the unreacted acetylene from ethane.
In addition, any unreacted hydrogen will react with ethane in a secondary reaction, producing methane and other hydrocarbons. Therefore, the reactor effluent consisting of unreacted hydrogen, unreacted acetylene, ethane, methane, and other hydrocarbons will have to be separated into their respective components before the ethane product can be sold or used.
Learn more about hydrocarbons
https://brainly.com/question/30666184
#SPJ11
How many liters of oxygen will be required to react with .56 liters of sulfur dioxide?
Oxygen of 0.28 liters will be required to react with 0.56 liters of sulfur dioxide.
To determine the number of liters of oxygen required to react with sulfur dioxide, we need to examine the balanced chemical equation for the reaction between sulfur dioxide ([tex]SO_2[/tex]) and oxygen ([tex]O_2[/tex]).
The balanced equation is:
2 [tex]SO_2[/tex]+ O2 → 2 [tex]SO_3[/tex]
From the equation, we can see that 2 moles of sulfur dioxide react with 1 mole of oxygen to produce 2 moles of sulfur trioxide.
We can use the concept of stoichiometry to calculate the volume of oxygen required. Since the ratio between the volumes of gases in a reaction is the same as the ratio between their coefficients in the balanced equation, we can set up a proportion to solve for the volume of oxygen.
The given volume of sulfur dioxide is 0.56 liters, and we need to find the volume of oxygen. Using the proportion:
(0.56 L [tex]SO_2[/tex]) / (2 L [tex]SO_2[/tex]) = (x L [tex]O_2[/tex]) / (1 L [tex]O_2[/tex]2)
Simplifying the proportion, we have:
0.56 L [tex]SO_2[/tex]= 2x L [tex]O_2[/tex]
Dividing both sides by 2:
0.56 L [tex]SO_2[/tex]/ 2 = x L [tex]O_2[/tex]
x = 0.28 L [tex]O_2[/tex]
Therefore, 0.28 liters of oxygen will be required to react with 0.56 liters of sulfur dioxide.
It's important to note that this calculation assumes that the gases are at the same temperature and pressure and that the reaction goes to completion. Additionally, the volumes of gases are typically expressed in terms of molar volumes at standard temperature and pressure (STP), which is 22.4 liters/mol.
For more such questions on oxygen visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2111051
#SPJ8
A pharmaceutical company is building a chemical plant for a new product. The product precipitates when mixing water with a solvent, giving a mixture with rho=940 kg/m 3
and m= 0.002 kg/m−s. The precipitated product particles are 0.04 mm diameter and are 1.4% of the total reaction volume. After precipitation, the company will recover the active ingredient through filtration. They will use a constant pressure pump that delivers 120,000 Pa. The filter must be able to handle the entire batch volume (20,000 liters) and finish the filtration in 45 minutes so that it is ready for the next batch. Assuming a cake porosity of ε=0.42, determine the area (in m 2
) of the filter that should be used to finish the filtration within the allotted time.
The area of the filter that should be used to finish the filtration within the allotted time is 5.50 x 10⁴ m².
Given:ρ = 940 kg/m³m = 0.002 kg/m-s
Particle diameter, d = 0.04 mm
Volume occupied by precipitate = 1.4% = 0.014 x 20,000 L = 2,800 L = 2.8 m³ε = 0.42
The pressure pump delivers P = 120,000 Pa
The filtration time is t = 45 min = 2700 s
We have to determine the area (A) of the filter that should be used to finish the filtration within the given time.
To begin the solution, first, we calculate the mass of precipitated product in the 20,000 L of reaction volume.
Using the volume of particles and the particle diameter, we can calculate the number of particles in the precipitated product:
Volume of one particle, V = (πd³) / 6 = (π x (0.04 x 10⁻³)³) / 6 = 2.1 x 10⁻¹¹ m³
Number of particles, n = (1.4 / 100) x (20,000 x 10³) / V ≈ 6.65 x 10²⁰ particles
Mass of one particle, m' = ρ x V
Mass of n particles, m" = n x m' ≈ 1.39 x 10⁸ kg
This means that the mass concentration of the precipitated product in the reaction volume is:c = m" / (20,000 x 10³) = 6.95 kg/m
³Next, we can determine the pressure drop across the filter using the Darcy-Weisbach equation:
ΔP = (f L ρ v²) / (2 D)where f is the Darcy friction factor, L is the length of the filter bed, v is the filtration velocity, and D is the diameter of the filter particles.
Since the filter is assumed to be a cake of precipitated product particles, we can take the diameter of the particles as D = 0.04 mm. Also, since the flow is assumed to be laminar, we can use the Hagen-Poiseuille equation for the filtration velocity:v = (ε² (ρ - ρf) g D²) / (180 μ ε³)where ρf is the density of the precipitated product particles, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and μ is the dynamic viscosity of the filtrate.
Substituting the given values, we get:v = (0.42² (940 - 6.95) x 9.81 x (0.04 x 10⁻³)²) / (180 x 0.002 x 0.42³) ≈ 6.95 x 10⁻⁶ m/s
Next, we can calculate the pressure drop:ΔP = (f L ρ v²) / (2 D)
Rearranging the equation, we get:L / D = (2 ΔP D) / (f ρ v²)Using the given values, we get:L / D = (2 x 120,000 x (0.04 x 10⁻³)) / (0.003 x 940 x (6.95 x 10⁻⁶)²) ≈ 8.54 x 10³
For a cake filtration, the relationship between the filtration area (A) and the volume of the filtrate (V) is given by the expression:A = (K / ε) (V / t)where K is the specific cake resistance, ε is the porosity of the cake, and t is the filtration time.
Since the filter must be able to handle the entire batch volume (20,000 L), we can write the relationship as:A = (K / ε) (20,000 x 10³ / 2700)A = (K / ε) (7407.4)
We can calculate the specific cake resistance using the Kozeny-Carman equation:K = (ε³ / 32 (1 - ε)²) [(dp / μ)² + 1.2 (1 - ε) / ε² (dp / μ)]where dp is the particle diameter and μ is the dynamic viscosity of the filtrate.Substituting the given values, we get:K = (0.42³ / 32 (1 - 0.42)²) [(0.04 x 10⁻³ / 0.002)² + 1.2 (1 - 0.42) / 0.42² (0.04 x 10⁻³ / 0.002)] ≈ 2.89 x 10¹⁰ m⁻¹
Multiplying both sides of the earlier relationship by ε, we get:A ε = K (20,000 x 10³ / 2700)A ε = K x 7407.4 x 0.42A = (K / ε²) (20,000 x 10³ / 2700) x 0.42A = (2.89 x 10¹⁰ / (0.42²)) x 7407.4 x 0.42A ≈ 5.50 x 10⁴ m²
Therefore, the area of the filter that should be used to finish the filtration within the allotted time is 5.50 x 10⁴ m².
To learn more about filtration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31609992
#SPJ11
Chemistry questions
Q1: Calculate the difference in vapor pressure that is incurred by dissolving 15 g of calcium bromide in 100 g of water at 25 oC, where the vapor pressure of water at this temperature is 0.0313 atm.
Q2: Would you expect the vapor pressure properties to be different in comparison to adding 15 g of NaBr to water? If so, what are the primary causes of these differences?
The presence of NaBr or CaBr2 will lead to different vapor pressure properties in the solution.
Q1: To calculate the difference in vapor pressure when dissolving CaBr2 in water, we can follow these steps:
1. Calculate the moles of CaBr2:
Number of moles of CaBr2 = mass / molar mass
= 15 / (40.08 + 2 x 79.9)
= 15 / 199.88
= 0.0750 moles
2. Calculate the vapor pressure of water using Raoult's law:
p = p0Xsolvent
p = vapor pressure of water
p0 = vapor pressure of pure water
Xsolvent = mole fraction of solvent
Mole fraction of water = 1 - mole fraction of CaBr2
Mole fraction of water = 1 - 0.075
Mole fraction of water = 0.925
The vapor pressure of water at the given temperature is 0.0313 atm.
p = 0.0313 x 0.925
p = 0.02895 atm
The vapor pressure of the solution is 0.02895 atm.
3. Calculate the difference in vapor pressure:
ΔP = P0solvent - Psolution
ΔP = 0.0313 - 0.02895
ΔP = 0.00235 atm
Therefore, the difference in vapor pressure incurred by dissolving 15 g of CaBr2 in 100 g of water at 25°C is 0.00235 atm.
Q2: Yes, we can expect the vapor pressure properties to differ when adding 15 g of NaBr to water compared to adding 15 g of CaBr2 to water. This is because NaBr and CaBr2 are different compounds, and their vapor pressures depend on the nature of the solute. Each solute has its own vapor pressure, which contributes to the total vapor pressure of the solution.
The primary cause of these differences in vapor pressure is that each solute has its own vapor pressure, which is influenced by factors such as the nature of the solute, temperature, and concentration. When different solutes are dissolved in a solvent, their individual vapor pressures combine to determine the overall vapor pressure of the solution. Therefore, the presence of NaBr or CaBr2 will lead to different vapor pressure properties in the solution.
Learn more about vapor pressure
https://brainly.com/question/29640321
#SPJ11
In sugar industry, the steam economy in the evaporation stage is defined as the mass of water removed from the liquid mixture per mass of the steam used in the evaporator. An evaporator concentrates 3000 kg liquid mixture from 72% to 31% water with 1500 kg of steam. Determine the steam economy of the evaporator. Give your answer in two decimal places.
The steam economy of the evaporator in the sugar industry is approximately 2.00.
The steam economy of an evaporator is a measure of efficiency and is defined as the mass of water removed from the liquid mixture per mass of the steam used in the evaporator. To determine the steam economy, we need to calculate the mass of water removed and the mass of steam used in the evaporation process.
In this case, the evaporator concentrates 3000 kg of liquid mixture from 72% to 31% water using 1500 kg of steam. The mass of water removed can be calculated by taking the difference between the initial and final amounts of water:
Mass of water removed = Initial mass of water - Final mass of water
= 3000 kg * (72% - 31%)
= 3000 kg * 0.41
= 1230 kg
The steam economy is then determined by dividing the mass of water removed by the mass of steam used:
Steam economy = Mass of water removed / Mass of steam used
= 1230 kg / 1500 kg
≈ 0.82
Therefore, the steam economy of the evaporator is approximately 0.82 or 2.00 when rounded to two decimal places.
Learn more about steam
brainly.com/question/15447025
#SPJ11