Answer:
D
Explanation:
All of the above they sue for breach
Which of the following jobs in the field of criminal justice pays the least?
A.
police officer
B.
correctional officer
C.
probation officer
D.
forensic scientist
Answer:
B. correctional officer
Explanation:
The jobs in the field of criminal justice pay the least is a correctional officer. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Job?A Job is referred to what an individual chooses as a profession to earn something. A career of an individual is based on his talents, skills, and abilities which help him to seek growth and development and achieve the goals of life.
Correctional officers are in charge of maintaining a close eye on people who have been jailed while they appear in court, as well as those who have been given prison or imprisonment punishment.
The job of a corrections officer in the field of criminal justice is paid the least because they do not have any active role in the investigation as compared to other options which play a significant role in any criminal case.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
learn more about Job, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17205577
#SPJ2
The previous Activities have provided you with an economic and
ethical basis for evaluating kidney-transplant policies. Now it is time for you
to be the policy maker. Read the following information and then decide which
policy you support. Be ready to justify your decision. Which policy saves the
most lives? Which conforms most closely to the ethical framework you find most
acceptable?
OPTION 1: THE CURRENT SYSTEM
A national law makes it illegal to sell human organs. Anyone who sells a kidney
faces jail, fines or both. People may donate kidneys, however, and doctors dis-
tribute donated kidneys on the basis of need. Some of the factors they consider
in allocating kidneys are the patient’s age and medical condition, how long the
patient has been on a waiting list and whether the donor is in the local area.
Under this system, there is a shortage of kidneys, and many people are on a
waiting list for years. During this time they receive costly dialysis treatment,
and many people die.
OPTION 2: AN OPEN MARKET
Create an open market in kidneys. People may sell their kidneys on the mar-
ket for the highest price they can get. They may sell and deliver a kidney while
they are still alive, or they may sell for delivery after they die. Brokerage firms
match buyers and sellers. People could even sell kidneys on eBay. Recipients
would pay for the kidney the same way they pay for other medical care: with
their own funds or through insurance, government programs and charity.
OPTION 3: A REGULATED MARKET
Create a market in which anyone may sell a kidney, but only authorized insti-
tutions such as hospitals may legally buy. This option reduces the possibility
of acquiring kidneys through involuntary means such as theft or murder. The
institutions would allocate the kidneys on a basis similar to the way kidneys
are allocated today using age, medical need or time spent on a waiting list.
Recipients would pay for the kidneys with private funds, insurance,
government assistance and charity.
OPTION 4: A COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
This approach uses nonmarket mechanisms to increase the supply in
several ways.
A marketing campaign would increase people’s awareness of the issue and alter
their preferences for organ donation through moral persuasion. The slogan for a
national television campaign might be “Friends don’t let friends waste the gift
of life.” This is not an appeal to altruism but to people’s sense of moral obliga-
tion and duty.
A more authoritarian policy would legally mandate that when people die, all
their organs will be donated unless they indicate otherwise. People who don’t
want to donate must take the extra step to note this in advance on their driv-
er’s license. Today people must agree in advance for their organs to be donated.
2 -3 paragraphs
Answer:
i don’t know
Explanation:
i don’t know
6. Dion is a police officer who gets called to a disturbance at a retail store. A
teenager has been begging for money, and the store owner wants the teenager
arrested for harassing customers. Dion knows the teenager lives with his
grandfather and the family has not been able to make ends meet financially. Dion
decides not to arrest the teenager. Instead Dion gives the teenager a warning and
provides him with some information on where to go to for help.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
7. Anka is a correctional officer. After getting to know an inmate well, the inmate asks
Anka to smuggle in some of the inmate’s favorite junk food. The inmate offers to
pay a large amount of money, if Anka does it. Anka does not need the extra
money, so she decides to bring in the food for the inmate without accepting the
bribe.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
8. Jenson is a private security officer who works at the door of a club which is
sanctioned to only allow individuals who are 21 and over to enter. The club
owners ask Jenson and the other security officers to allow females under the age
of 21 into the club. Jenson does not feel comfortable with allowing this. He
decides not to personally allow under-aged individuals in, but knows other security
officers are allowing them in.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
ethical
1.the teenager as known this is his first time doing this and he was let off with a warning witch is resonable and ok to do so.
2. the teenager was let off with information of where to get help with money
3. what this police officer has done was perfectly fine and legal however if the teenager had attempted this before the teenager would be arrested.
Explanation:
Jenson is a private security officer who works at the door of a club which is sanctioned to only allow individuals who are 21 and over to enter. The club owners ask Jenson and the other security officers to allow females under the age of into the club. Jenson does not feel comfortable with allowing this. He decides not to personally allow under-aged individuals in, but knows other security officers are allowing them in.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons :
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical
1. if they are allowing individuals under the age of 21 in they need to have a stamp or a badge that has to be visable or they will be kicked out.
2 the individuals that are the age or above 21 should have a different badge that indicates that they are the age of or above 21 and must be visible or they will get kicked out.
3 if they are allowing underage individuals in they must have people watching them so they don't sneak alcoholic beverages.
Explanation:
While creating a test for his trainees, Max, a correctional officer, lists the following question: To avoid injury and do their jobs effectively, correctional officers must be physically competent, self-disciplined, and _____. Which of the following is the BEST choice to fill in the blank?
A.
amiable
B.
agreeable
C.
ambitious
D.
alert
Answer:
d
Explanation:
While creating a test for his trainees, Max, a correctional officer, lists the following question: To avoid injury and do their jobs effectively, correctional officers must be physically competent, self-disciplined, and alert. Hence, option D is correct.
What is physically competent?Physical competence is the ability to perform a variety of movements for various lengths of time and intensities, as well as the capability to develop movement techniques and patterns.
Physical literacy is the ability to move competently and confidently in a variety of physical activities in situations that support a person's overall development.
A person's physical literacy is demonstrated when they can catch, jump, run, swim, or throw. These kinds of skills work as the pillars on which children can build a strong foundation from which they can comfortably engage in a growing range of activities as they grow.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about physically competent, click here
https://brainly.com/question/14642339
#SPJ2
An attorney has a case in Iowa that has a legal issue to be decided. The attorney brings in a case from the neighboring state of Nebraska that was decided by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The judge in the state of Iowa is not REQUIRED to follow that Nebraska case, but can consider it. The case law is referred to as ___________________________________ authority since the Iowa judge may, but does not have to decide the same way as Nebraska.
Answer: Persuasive authority
Explanation:
Persuasive authority is a decision that a court may follow but does not have to. The decision may be from courts with lower, equal, or higher standing with the court it is brought to but from another jurisdiction.
The case in question here will be dealt with according to Iowa state law so bringing a decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court is from another jurisdiction. The Iowa judge can either choose to follow the precedent set by Nebraska or not at their own discretion.
what is “ judical restraint” and which supreme court justices practiced it?
Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.
Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (served 1902–1932)Louis Brandeis (served 1916–1939)Felix Frankfurter (served 1939–1962)Dion is a police officer who gets called to a disturbance at a retail store. A teenager has been begging for money, and the store owner wants the teenager arrested for harassing customers. Dion knows the teenager lives with his grandfather and the family has not been able to make ends meet financially. Dion decides not to arrest the teenager. Instead Dion gives the teenager a warning and provides him with some information on where to go to for help.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C.illegal
Your reasons :
1.
2.
3.
What is katarungang Pambarangay
Answer: History
There has long been a traditional, local system of resolving disputes. Presidential Decree 1508 talks an unofficial "time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes among family and barangay members at the barangay level without judicial resources".[7]
Alfredo Flores Tadiar was the principal author of Presidential Decree 1508, The Katarungang Pambarangay Law,[8] and he also wrote its implementing rules, requiring prior conciliation as a condition for judicial recourse.[citation needed] For 12 years (1980–1992), he was a member of the Committee of Consultants, Bureau of Local Government Supervision, which oversaw the nationwide operations of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law.[citation needed] Under the decree, the body was known as Lupong Tagapayapa .[7]
This decree was replaced by the Local Government Code of 1991.
Explanation: Katarungang Pambarangay
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.[1] The barangay captain sits on the Lupon Tagapamayapa along with other barangay residents, which is the committee that decides disputes and other matters. They do not constitute a court as they do not have judicial powers.[2]
The system exists to help decongest the regular courts and works mostly as "alternative, community-based mechanism for dispute resolution of conflicts,"[1] also described as a "compulsory mediation process at the village level."[3]
Throughout the Philippines the Barangay Justice Systems handles thousands of cases a year.[4] Since officials have more flexibility in decision-making, including from complex evidence rules, and receive some resources from government, the courts are more numerous and accessible than other courts and therefore the courts are able to hear more cases and to respond more immediately.[4]
The Katarungang Pambarangay share characteristics with similar traditional, hybrid courts in other countries such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Nigeria and South Africa, among others.[5] Such courts emerged during colonial periods as Western imperial powers introduced western legal systems.[5] The Western legal systems were usually applied to westerners while the local dispute resolution systems were integrated into the Western system in a variety of ways including incorporation of local decision makers into the government in some way.[5] After independence, many states faced the same problems as their former rulers, especially "limited geographical reach of state institutions, Western-modeled institutions often divorced from community structures and expectations, and resource constraints in the justice sector."[5] Hybrid courts became a "middle ground for supporting community decision-making while simultaneously expanding the authority and reach of the state."[5]
Besides "hybrid courts", other authors have described the system as a "Non-State Justice System".[6]
Answer:
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.
Explanation:
Hope i helped! <3
Briefly explain how class evidence can help in a criminal investigation
Answer:
Evidence is important to show the point and get the answer
Explanation:
While the President of the United States has the power to veto federal laws passed by the U.S. House and Senate, the Governor of the State of Florida can veto which of the following?
Answer:
The Florida governor can veto state laws.
James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case
presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial conversation in the hallway,
James talks to Judge Danner about the woman's restraining order stating she moved into her parents home out of fear, but her parents' home is not on the list of addresses banned on the restraining order. Judge Danner decides to write the parents' address on a photocopy of the restraining order and authenticated the document without adding the new document to the court records.
A. Ethical
B. Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical as it would be considered "ex parte"
Explanation:
ex parte- with respect to or in the interests of one side only or of an interested outside party.
he had an unnoficial conversation
Anna quit a criminal life as a thief after she got married and had children. Now she leads a busy life, looking after her children and taking care of the house. Which aspect of life course theory does this situation support?
A.
A routine, structured life leaves less time to interact with delinquent peers.
B.
After marriage, delinquent peers do not entertain other individuals.
C.
A person quits criminal life on his or her own.
D.
An unsteady life leads to persistent offending.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
She doesn't have time to be a thief anymore now that her kids need her. Her busy routine is stopping her.
Answer: a routine, structured life leaves less time to interact with delinquent peers
Explanation: got it right on the test
The three interdependent branches of the U.S. CJS are the courts, the corrections system, and the
O legal branch
O law enforcement branch
O legislative branch
O executive branch