-6x2+6-2x=x solve x is squared

Yes, there is found to be a form of a proportional relationship, due to the fat that the ratio length/width is the same for all f the above issues.

Part B: If we were to graph the relationship between the length and width of the TV screens, and since there is a proportional relationship between the two, we would expect to see a straight line passing through the origin (0, 0) on a graph.

A proportional relationship is a relationship in which a constant ratio between the output variable and the input variable is present.

When the ratio length/width is said to be the same for all the question, then they are said to be proportional between them.

So:

For the first TV:

Length = 16 inches, Width = 9 inches

Ratio = Length/Width = 16/9 = 1.7778

For the second TV:

Length = 20 inches, Width = 11.25 inches

Ratio = Length/Width = 20/11.25 = 1.7778

For the third TV:

Length = 24 inches, Width = 13.50 inches

Ratio = Length/Width = 24/13.50 = 1.7778

So, the ratios of length to width for all three TVs are the same: 1.7778. Therefore, there is a proportional relationship between the length and width of the TVs.

b. The graph would show the length (in inches) on the horizontal line and the width (in inches) on the vertical line. When the length gets bigger, the width will also get bigger in a steady way, keeping the same proportion. The slope of the line shows how the length and width are related.

A similar problem on  proportional relationships, is presented at:

https://brainly.com/question/7723640

#SPJ1

Image transcription text

4. Click +RELATIONSHIP and click L 5. Should you make a

mistake, clic You should now see a graph of the po the answer

field.

Length  (inches)   Width (inches)

16                                  9

20                                    11.25

24                                 13.50

Part A

Is there a proportional relationship between the length and width of the TVs? Check the table for equivalent ratios to support your answer. Show your work.

Part B

Think about graphing the relationship between the length and the width of the TV screens. What do you predict the graph would look like?

To write the product of (3 + x) and (2x - 5) in standard form, we must multiply the two expressions and simplify the result.

Step-by-step explanation:

(3 + x) (2x - 5)

Using the distributive property of multiplication, we can expand the expression:

[tex]=3(2x)+3(-5)+x(2x)+x(-5)[/tex]

[tex]= 6x-15+2x^2-5x[/tex]

Next, we combine like terms:

[tex]=2x^2+6x-5x-15[/tex]

[tex]= 2x^2+x-15[/tex]

Answer:

Therefore, the product of (3 + x) and (2x - 5) in standard form is [tex]2x^2+x-15[/tex]

The constant of proportionality is 1.6 km/cm, and the real-world distance corresponding to a route of 3.2 cm on the map would be 5.12 km.

a) The constant of proportionality between the map and the real world can be calculated by dividing the real-world distance by the corresponding distance on the map.

In this case, since 1 cm on the map corresponds to 1.6 km in the real world, the constant of proportionality would be 1.6 km/1 cm, which simplifies to 1.6 km/cm.

b) To convert the distance of 3.2 cm on the map to the real-world distance, we can multiply it by the constant of proportionality. So, 3.2 cm ˣ  1.6 km/cm = 5.12 km.

Therefore, a route that measures 3.2 cm on the map would have a length of 5.12 km in the real world.

Learn more about proportionality

brainly.com/question/8598338

#SPJ11

The answer closest to the number of ways of tiling the rectangle with the given tiles would be 20.000, which is option E, 100.000

We are to determine the number of ways of tiling a 4 x 14 rectangle with 1 x 3 tiles.

We know that each tile measures 1 by 3, therefore we can visualize a 4 x 14 rectangle as containing 4*14 = 56 squares of 1 by 1. Now, each 1 x 3 tile will cover three squares, so the total number of tiles will be 56/3 = 18.666 (recurring).The number of ways to arrange 18.666 tiles is not a whole number. However, since the answer choices are all integers, we must choose the closest one.

Thus, the answer closest to the number of ways of tiling the rectangle with the given tiles is 20.000, which is option E, 100.000.

Learn more about tiling at https://brainly.com/question/32029674

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (H)  -3 ± 2√6 / 3. To find the solutions of the quadratic equation 3x² + 6x - 5 = 0, we can use the quadratic formula.

The quadratic formula is x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a).

In this case, a = 3, b = 6, and c = -5. Plugging these values into the quadratic formula, we get x = (-6 ± √(6² - 4(3)(-5))) / (2(3)).

Simplifying further, x = (-6 ± √(36 + 60)) / 6. This becomes x = (-6 ± √96) / 6.

Finally, we can simplify the radical: x = (-6 ± √(16 * 6)) / 6. This simplifies to x = (-6 ± 4√6) / 6.

Dividing both the numerator and the denominator by 2, we get x = (-3 ± 2√6) / 3.

Therefore, the solutions, in simplest form, are -3 ± 2√6 / 3. Hence, the correct answer is (H) -3 ± 2√6 / 3.

To know more about quadratic formula refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

The test statistic is z = -1.60

To test the claim that the percentage of readers who own a personal computer is different from the reported percentage, we can use a hypothesis test. Let's define our null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1) as follows:

H0: The percentage of readers who own a personal computer is equal to 34%.

H1: The percentage of readers who own a personal computer is different from 34%.

We can use the z-test statistic to evaluate this hypothesis. The formula for the z-test statistic is:

[tex]z = (p - P) / \sqrt_((P * (1 - P)) / n)_[/tex]

Where:

p is the sample proportion (30% or 0.30)

P is the hypothesized population proportion (34% or 0.34)

n is the sample size (360)

Let's plug in the values and calculate the test statistic:

[tex]z = (0.30 - 0.34) / \sqrt_((0.34 * (1 - 0.34)) / 360)_\\[/tex]

[tex]z = (-0.04) / \sqrt_((0.34 * 0.66) / 360)_\\[/tex]

[tex]z = -0.04 / \sqrt_(0.2244 / 360)_\\[/tex]

[tex]z= -0.04 / \sqrt_(0.0006233)_[/tex]

[tex]z = -0.04 / 0.02497\\z = -1.60[/tex]

Rounding the test statistic to two decimal places, the value is approximately -1.60.

Learn more about test statistics:

https://brainly.com/question/30458874

#SPJ11

The expression 2⋅2⋅2⋅2⋅2⋅3⋅3⋅3⋅3⋅3 can be expressed as 2^5 ⋅ 3^5.

In this expression, the base 2 is repeated five times, indicating that we are multiplying five 2's together. Similarly, the base 3 is repeated five times, indicating that we are multiplying five 3's together. The exponent of 5 signifies the number of times the base is multiplied by itself.

Using exponents allows us to express repeated multiplication in a more compact and efficient way. Instead of writing out each multiplication step, we can simply indicate the base and its exponent. In this case, the exponent of 5 shows that both 2 and 3 are multiplied five times.

The expression 2^5 ⋅ 3^5 represents the final result of multiplying all the numbers together. By using exponents, we can easily calculate the value without performing each multiplication individually.

Learn more about exponent notation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30239895

#SPJ11

a. The corresponding eigenvalue for  -3[tex]4^2[/tex]A is -23104

d. The corresponding eigenvalue for A+71I is 73

c. The corresponding eigenvalue for 8A is 16

d. The corresponding eigenvalue for [tex]A^-1[/tex] is λ

Let v be an eigenvector of A corresponding to the eigenvalue 2, That is,

Av = 2v.

We have ([tex]-34^2A[/tex])v

= [tex]-34^2[/tex](Av)

= [tex]-34^2[/tex](2v)

= -23104v.

Hence, the eigenvalue is -23104 corresponding to the eigenvector v.

We have (A+71I)v

= Av + 71Iv

= 2v + 71v

= 73v.

Therefore, 73 is an eigenvalue of A+71I corresponding to the eigenvector v.

We have (8A)v = 8(Av)

= 16v.

Thus, 16 is an eigenvalue of 8A corresponding to the eigenvector v.

Let λ be an eigenvalue of [tex]A^-1[/tex], and let w be the corresponding eigenvector, i.e.,

[tex]A^-1w[/tex] = λw.

Multiplying both sides by A,

w = λAw.

Substituting v = Aw,

w = λv.

Therefore, λ is an eigenvalue of [tex]A^-1[/tex] corresponding to the eigenvector v.

Learn more on eigenvalue on https://brainly.com/question/15586347

#SPJ4

(a) To find the corresponding eigenvalue for (-34)^2, we can square the eigenvalue 2:

(-34)^2 = 34^2 = 1156.

Therefore, the corresponding eigenvalue for (-34)^2 is 1156.

(b) To find the corresponding eigenvalue for A + 71, we add 71 to the eigenvalue 2:

2 + 71 = 73.

Therefore, the corresponding eigenvalue for A + 71 is 73.

(c) To find the corresponding eigenvalue for 8A, we multiply the eigenvalue 2 by 8:

2 * 8 = 16.

Therefore, the corresponding eigenvalue for 8A is 16.

(d) To find the corresponding eigenvalue for A^(-1), we take the reciprocal of the eigenvalue 2:

1/2 = 0.5.

Therefore, the corresponding eigenvalue for A^(-1) is 0.5.

Learn more about eigenvalue from :

https://brainly.com/question/15586347

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following system of equations, you want to know values of 'a' and 'b' that (i) make the system inconsistent, and (ii) make the system consistent and dependent.

The system is inconsistent when it describes lines that are parallel and have no point of intersection. A solution to one of the equations cannot be a solution to the other.

Parallel lines have the same slope, but different y-intercepts. The system will be inconsistent when a=3 and b≠5.

The system is consistent when a solution to one equation can be found that is also a solution to the other equation. The system is dependent if the two equations describe the same line (there are infinitely many solutions).

Here, the y-coefficients are the same in both equations, so the system will be dependent only if the values of 'a' and 'b' match the corresponding terms in the first equation:

The system is dependent when a=3, b=5.

__

Additional comment

Dependent systems are always consistent.

<95141404393>

To explore the properties of parallelograms with all four sides congruent, we can draw three such parallelograms: ABCD, MNOP, and WXYZ. Then we draw the diagonals of each parallelogram and label their intersections as point R.

When drawing the three parallelograms, ABCD, MNOP, and WXYZ, it is important to ensure that all four sides of each parallelogram are congruent. This means that the opposite sides of the parallelogram are equal in length.

Once the parallelograms are drawn, we can proceed to draw the diagonals of each parallelogram. The diagonals of a parallelogram are the line segments that connect the opposite vertices of the parallelogram.

After drawing the diagonals, we label their intersections as point R. It is important to note that the diagonals of a parallelogram intersect at their midpoint. This means that the point of intersection, R, divides each diagonal into two equal segments.

By constructing these three parallelograms and drawing their diagonals, we can observe and explore various properties of parallelograms. These properties may include relationships between the lengths of sides, angles formed by the diagonals, symmetry, and more.

Studying and analyzing these properties can help deepen our understanding of the characteristics and geometric properties of parallelograms with all four sides congruent.

Learn more about parallelograms here:

brainly.com/question/28854514

#SPJ11

The solution to the system of linear equations is x = 3 and y = 5.

To solve the system of linear equations using elimination, we manipulate the equations to eliminate one variable. Let's consider the given system:

Equation 1: 5x + 3y = 30

Equation 2: 10x + 3y = 45

We can eliminate the variable y by multiplying Equation 1 by -2 and adding it to Equation 2:

-10x - 6y = -60

10x + 3y = 45

The x-term cancels out, and we are left with -3y = -15. Solving for y, we find y = 5. Substituting this value back into Equation 1 or Equation 2, we can solve for x:

5x + 3(5) = 30

5x + 15 = 30

5x = 15

x = 3

Therefore, the solution to the system of linear equations is x = 3 and y = 5.

Learn more about linear equations.

brainly.com/question/32634451

#SPJ11

The angle between vectors A and B is approximately 89.78 degrees.

To find the angle between vectors A and B, we can use the dot product formula:

A · B = |A| |B| cos(θ)

Given that Ā· B = 4 and knowing the magnitudes of vectors A and B:

|A| = √(22² + 33²)

    = √(484 + 1089)

    = √(1573)

    ≈ 39.69

|B| = √((-1)² + 23² )

    = √(1 + 529)

    = √(530)

    ≈ 23.02

Substituting the values into the dot product formula:

4 = (39.69)(23.02) cos(θ)

Now, solve for cos(θ):

cos(θ) = 4 / (39.69)(23.02)

cos(θ) ≈ 0.0183

To find the angle θ, we take the inverse cosine (arccos) of 0.0183:

θ = arccos(0.0183)

θ ≈ 89.78 degrees

Therefore, the angle between vectors A and B is approximately 89.78 degrees.

Learn more about Angle Between Vectors at

brainly.com/question/30900097

#SPJ4

The sketch of the parabola with the given characteristic, where the lowest point is at (0, -1), forms a symmetric U-shape opening upwards.

To sketch a parabola with the given characteristic, we know that the lowest point on the parabola, also known as the vertex, is at (0, -1).

Since the vertex is at (0, -1), we can write the equation of the parabola in vertex form as:

y = a(x - h)^2 + k

Where (h, k) represents the coordinates of the vertex.

In this case, h = 0 and k = -1, so the equation becomes:

y = a(x - 0)^2 + (-1)

y = ax^2 - 1

The coefficient "a" determines the shape and direction of the parabola. If "a" is positive, the parabola opens upwards, and if "a" is negative, the parabola opens downwards.

Since we don't have information about the value of "a," we cannot determine the exact shape of the parabola. However, we can still make a rough sketch of the parabola based on the given characteristics.

Since the vertex is at (0, -1), plot this point on the coordinate plane.

Next, choose a few x-values on either side of the vertex, substitute them into the equation, and calculate the corresponding y-values. Plot these points on the graph.

For example, if we substitute x = -2, -1, 1, and 2 into the equation y = ax^2 - 1, we can calculate the corresponding y-values.

(-2, 3)

(-1, 0)

(1, 0)

(2, 3)

Plot these points on the graph and connect them to form a smooth curve. Remember to extend the curve symmetrically on both sides of the vertex.

Based on this information, you can sketch a parabola with the given characteristic, where the vertex is at (0, -1), and the exact shape of the parabola will depend on the value of "a" once determined.

for such more question on parabola

https://brainly.com/question/9201543

#SPJ8

The linear cost function representing the cost C(x) to produce x items is C(x) = 4992 + 23.30x. The linear revenue function representing the revenue R(x) for selling x items is R(x) = 27.20x.

In a linear cost function, the fixed cost represents the y-intercept and the variable cost per item represents the slope of the line.

In this case, the fixed cost is $4992, which means that even if no items are produced, there is still a cost of $4992.

The variable cost per item is $23.30, indicating that an additional cost of $23.30 is incurred for each item produced.

To obtain the linear cost function, we add the fixed cost to the product of the variable cost per item and the number of items produced (x).

Therefore, the cost C(x) to produce x items can be represented by the equation C(x) = 4992 + 23.30x.

Part 2 of 4 (b): The linear revenue function that represents the revenue R(x) for selling x items is R(x) = 27.20x.

In a linear revenue function, the selling price per item represents the slope of the line.

In this case, the selling price per item is $27.20, indicating that a revenue of $27.20 is generated for each item sold.

To obtain the linear revenue function, we multiply the selling price per item by the number of items sold (x).

Therefore, the revenue R(x) for selling x items can be represented by the equation R(x) = 27.20x.

Learn more about Revenue Function here: https://brainly.com/question/17518660.

#SPJ11

1) The surface area of the cone is: SA = 390.8 cm²

2) The Area of a square pyramid is: 90 cm²

1) Using Pythagoras theorem, we can find the slant height of the cone as:

s = √(11² - 8²)

s = 7.55 cm

The formula for surface area of a cone is

SA = πr(r + l)

SA = π * 8(8 + 7.55)

SA = 390.8 cm²

2) Area of a square pyramid is:

Area = a² + a√(a² + 4h²)

Area = (5²) + 5√(5² + 4(6)²)

Area = 90 cm²

Read more about Surface Area at: https://brainly.com/question/16519513

#SPJ1

The company make per day is  941.5 feet.

To find the average number of feet of licorice made per day, we can divide the total amount of licorice made by the number of days:

Average = Total amount / Number of days

In this case, the total amount of licorice made is 6,590.7 feet, and the number of days is 7. Plugging in these values into the formula, we get:

Average = 6,590.7 feet / 7 days

Calculating this division gives us:

Average ≈ 941.5286 feet

Rounding this value to the nearest tenth of a foot, the average number of feet of licorice made per day by Max's Licorice Company is approximately 941.5 feet.

For more such questions on company,click on

https://brainly.com/

#SPJ8

To find the value of x, we can set up a proportion based on the distances traveled by the fox and the eagle.The value of x is 6 meters.

Let's consider the distance traveled by the fox. It starts at the top of the cliff, which is 6 meters high, and descends to point A on the ground, which is at a distance of 10 meters from the base of the cliff. Therefore, the total distance traveled by the fox is 6 + 10 = 16 meters.

Now, let's consider the distance traveled by the eagle. It starts at the top of the cliff and flies vertically up to a height of x meters. Then, it flies in a straight line to point A on the ground. The total distance traveled by the eagle is x + 10 meters.

Since the distance traveled by each is the same, we can set up the following proportion:

6 / 16 = x / (x + 10)

To solve this proportion, we can cross-multiply:

6(x + 10) = 16x

6x + 60 = 16x

60 = 16x - 6x

60 = 10x

x = 60 / 10

x = 6

Therefore, the value of x is 6 meters.

Learn more about eagle here

https://brainly.com/question/30717584

#SPJ11

Differentiating y_p(x), we have:

y_p'(x) = u'(x)*cos(x) - u(x)*sin(x) + v'(x)*sin(x) + v(x)*cos(x),

y_p''(x) = u''(x)*cos(x) -

To find the general solution to the linear differential equation with constant coefficients y''' + y' = 2t + 3, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Find the complementary solution:

Solve the associated homogeneous equation y''' + y' = 0. The characteristic equation is r^3 + r = 0. Factoring out r, we get r(r^2 + 1) = 0. The roots are r = 0 and r = ±i.

The complementary solution is given by:

y_c(t) = c1 + c2cos(t) + c3sin(t), where c1, c2, and c3 are arbitrary constants.

Step 2: Find a particular solution:

To find a particular solution, assume a linear function of the form y_p(t) = At + B, where A and B are constants. Taking derivatives, we have y_p'(t) = A and y_p'''(t) = 0.

Substituting these into the original equation, we get:

0 + A = 2t + 3.

Equating the coefficients, we have A = 2 and B = 3.

Therefore, a particular solution is y_p(t) = 2t + 3.

Step 3: Find the general solution:

The general solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is given by the sum of the complementary and particular solutions:

y(t) = y_c(t) + y_p(t)

= c1 + c2cos(t) + c3sin(t) + 2t + 3,

where c1, c2, and c3 are arbitrary constants.

To find a particular solution of y" + y = sec(x) using variation of parameters, we follow these steps:

Step 1: Find the complementary solution:

Solve the associated homogeneous equation y" + y = 0. The characteristic equation is r^2 + 1 = 0, which gives the complex roots r = ±i.

Therefore, the complementary solution is given by:

y_c(x) = c1cos(x) + c2sin(x), where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants.

Step 2: Find the Wronskian:

Calculate the Wronskian W(x) = |y1(x), y2(x)|, where y1(x) = cos(x) and y2(x) = sin(x).

The Wronskian is W(x) = cos(x)*sin(x) - sin(x)*cos(x) = 0.

Step 3: Find the particular solution:

Assume a particular solution of the form:

y_p(x) = u(x)*cos(x) + v(x)*sin(x),

where u(x) and v(x) are unknown functions to be determined.

Using variation of parameters, we find:

u'(x) = -f(x)*y2(x)/W(x) = -sec(x)*sin(x)/0 = undefined,

v'(x) = f(x)*y1(x)/W(x) = sec(x)*cos(x)/0 = undefined.

Since the derivatives are undefined, we need to use an alternative approach.

Step 4: Alternative approach:

We can try a particular solution of the form:

y_p(x) = u(x)*cos(x) + v(x)*sin(x),

where u(x) and v(x) are unknown functions to be determined.

Differentiating y_p(x), we have:

y_p'(x) = u'(x)*cos(x) - u(x)*sin(x) + v'(x)*sin(x) + v(x)*cos(x),

y_p''(x) = u''(x)*cos(x) -

to lean more about Differentiating.

https://brainly.com/question/13958985

#SPJ11

No, 1,1,1, , , is not an arithmetic sequence because there is no common difference between the terms.

The given sequence is 1,1,1, , ,. If it is arithmetic, then we need to identify the common difference. Let's try to find out the common difference between the terms of the sequence 1,1,1, , ,There is no clear common difference between the terms of the sequence given. There is no pattern to determine the next term or terms in the sequence.

Therefore, we can say that the sequence is not arithmetic. So, the answer to this question is: No, the sequence is not arithmetic because there is no common difference between the terms.

To know more about arithmetic sequence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28882428

#SPJ11

The researcher conducting an independent-samples t-test and has a sample size of 100, the study would have 98 degrees of freedom.

When conducting an independent-samples t-test, the degrees of freedom (df) can be calculated using the formula:df = n1 + n2 - 2

Where n1 and n2 represent the sample sizes of the two groups being compared.In this case, the researcher is conducting an independent-samples t-test and has a sample size of 100.

Since there are only two groups being compared, we can assume that each group has a sample size of 50.

Using the formula above, we can calculate the degrees of freedom as follows:df = n1 + n2 - 2df = 50 + 50 - 2df = 98

Therefore, the study would have 98 degrees of freedom.

To know more about researcher visit:

brainly.com/question/31519769

#SPJ11

In the formulation of a mathematical model for an evaporator, the following are five key assumptions:

1. Constant volume and density of the system.

2. Evaporation takes place only from the surface of the liquid.

3. The transfer of heat takes place only through conduction.

4. The heat transfer coefficient does not change with time.

5. The properties of the liquid are constant throughout the system.

Derivation of the total mass balance equation:

The total mass balance equation relates the rate of mass flow of material entering a system to the rate of mass flow leaving the system.

It is given by:

Rate of Mass Flow In - Rate of Mass Flow Out = Rate of Accumulation

Assuming that the evaporator operates under steady-state conditions, the rate of accumulation of mass is zero.

Hence, the mass balance equation reduces to:

Rate of Mass Flow In = Rate of Mass Flow Out

Let's assume that the mass flow rate of the feed stream is represented by m1 and the mass flow rate of the product stream is represented by m₂.

Therefore, the mass balance equation for the evaporator becomes:

m₁ = m₂ + me

Where me is the mass of water that has been evaporated. This equation is useful in determining the amount of water evaporated from the system.

Learn more about evaporation at

https://brainly.com/question/2496329

#SPJ11

1. Definition of a correspondence: A correspondence is a mathematical concept that defines a relation between two sets, where each element in the first set is associated with one or more elements in the second set. It can be thought of as a rule that assigns elements from one set to elements in another set based on certain criteria or conditions.

2. Definition of a fixed point of a correspondence: In the context of a correspondence, a fixed point is an element in the first set that is associated with itself in the second set. In other words, it is an element that remains unchanged when the correspondence is applied to it.

3. Set of (mixed strategy) best replies in normal form games: In a normal form game, the set of (mixed strategy) best replies for a given player i is the collection of strategies that maximize the player's expected payoff given the strategies chosen by the other players. It represents the optimal response for player i in a game where all players are using mixed strategies.

Best reply correspondence: The "best reply correspondence," denoted by B in class, is a correspondence that assigns to each mixed strategy profile the set of best replies for each player. It maps a mixed strategy profile to the set of best responses for each player.

4. Nash equilibrium and fixed point of best reply correspondence: A mixed strategy profile α∗ is a Nash equilibrium if and only if it is a fixed point of the best reply correspondence. This means that when each player chooses their best response strategy given the strategies chosen by the other players, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy. The mixed strategy profile remains stable and no player can improve their payoff by deviating from it.

5. Brower's fixed point theorem: Brower's fixed point theorem states that any continuous function from a closed and bounded convex subset of a Euclidean space to itself has at least one fixed point. In other words, if a function satisfies these conditions, there will always be at least one point in the set that remains unchanged when the function is applied to it.

6. Proving Brower's theorem using Kakutani's fixed point theorem: Kakutani's fixed point theorem is a more general version of Brower's fixed point theorem. By using Kakutani's theorem, we can prove Brower's theorem as a corollary.

Kakutani's theorem states that any correspondence from a non-empty, compact, and convex subset of a Euclidean space to itself has at least one fixed point. Since a continuous function can be seen as a special case of a correspondence, Kakutani's theorem can be applied to prove Brower's theorem.

7. Conditions for Kakutani's fixed point theorem: Kakutani's fixed point theorem requires several conditions to hold in order to guarantee the existence of a fixed point. These conditions include non-emptiness, compactness, convexity, and upper semi-continuity of the correspondence.

If any of these conditions are not satisfied, the conclusion of Kakutani's theorem does not hold, and there may not be a fixed point.

8. Example without a fixed point: An example without a fixed point can be a correspondence that does not satisfy the condition of closedness in the relative topology of S², where S is the set where the correspondence is defined. This means that there is a correspondence that maps elements in S to other elements in S, but there is no element in S that remains unchanged when the correspondence is applied.

This is a valid counterexample because it shows that even if all other conditions of Kakutani's theorem are satisfied, the lack of closedness in the relative topology can prevent the existence of a fixed point.

To know more about correspondence here

https://brainly.com/question/12454508

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

250%  is 2.5 in decimal form

   2.5 x 22 = 55 specials the next month

The properties involved in the given problems are:

1.Commutative property of addition

2.Distributive property of multiplication over addition

3.Associative property of addition

4.Distributive property of addition over multiplication

5.Identity property of multiplication

1.The given problem illustrates the commutative property of addition. According to this property, the order of adding two numbers does not affect the sum. In this case, 1.45 + 15 is the same as 15 + 1.45 because addition is commutative.

2.The problem demonstrates the distributive property of multiplication over addition. This property states that when a number is multiplied by the sum of two other numbers, it is equivalent to multiplying the number separately by each of the two numbers and then adding the products. In this case, (18 × 93) + (18 × 7) is equal to 18 × (93 + 7) because of the distributive property.

3.The problem showcases the associative property of addition. This property states that when adding three or more numbers, the grouping of the numbers does not affect the sum. In this case, (-75 + (-23 + 75)) is equal to ((-75 + 75) - 23) which simplifies to 0 - 23 and results in -23.

4.The problem involves the distributive property of addition over multiplication. This property states that when multiplying a sum by a number, it is equivalent to multiplying each term within the parentheses by that number and then adding the products. In this case, 2a + 2b is equal to 2(a + b) because of the distributive property.

5.The problem demonstrates the identity property of multiplication. This property states that when any number is multiplied by 1, the product remains unchanged. In this case, 24 × 13 is equal to 24 because multiplying by 1 does not change the value.

Overall, these properties provide mathematical rules that allow for simplification and manipulation of numbers and expressions.

Learn more about Commutative property here:

https://brainly.com/question/28762453

#SPJ11

To determine who ate more, we need to compare the fractions of pizza consumed by Ali and Sara. Ali ate 2/5 of a large pizza, while Sara ate 3/7 of a small pizza.

To compare these fractions, we need to find a common denominator. The least common multiple of 5 and 7 is 35. So, we can rewrite the fractions with a common denominator:

Ali: 2/5 of a large pizza is equivalent to (2/5) * (7/7) = 14/35.

Sara: 3/7 of a small pizza is equivalent to (3/7) * (5/5) = 15/35.

Now we can clearly see that Sara ate more pizza as her fraction, 15/35, is greater than Ali's fraction, 14/35. Therefore, Sara ate more pizza than Ali.

In conclusion, even though Ali ate a larger fraction of the large pizza (2/5), Sara consumed a greater amount of pizza overall by eating 3/7 of the small pizza.

Learn more about fractions here

https://brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ11

a. Differentiate the function is f'(s) = 1

b. dy/dx = 9(3x + 2)² * (x² - 2) + 4(3x + 2)³ * x

c. dy/dx = (-e^(2 - x)(2x + 1) - 2e^(2 - x)) / (2x + 1)²

a. Differentiating the function [tex]\(f(s) = s + 1\)[/tex]:

The derivative of (f(s)) with respect to \(s\) is simply 1. Since the derivative of a constant (1 in this case) is always zero, the derivative of \(s\) (which is the variable in this case) is 1.

So, the derivative of [tex]\(f(s) = s + 1\)[/tex] is [tex]\(f'(s) = 1\)[/tex].

b. Differentiating [tex]\(y = (3x + 2)^3(x^2 - 2)\)[/tex]:

To differentiate this function, we can use the product rule and the chain rule.

Let's break it down step by step:

First, differentiate the first part [tex]\((3x + 2)^3\)[/tex] using the chain rule:

[tex]\(\frac{d}{dx} [(3x + 2)^3] = 3(3x + 2)^2 \frac{d}{dx} (3x + 2) = 3(3x + 2)^2 \cdot 3\)[/tex]

Now, differentiate the second part [tex]\((x^2 - 2)\)[/tex]:

[tex]\(\frac{d}{dx} (x^2 - 2) = 2x \cdot \frac{d}{dx} (x^2 - 2) = 2x \cdot 2\)[/tex]

Using the product rule, we can combine the derivatives of both parts:

[tex]\(\frac{dy}{dx} = (3(3x + 2)^2 \cdot 3) \cdot (x^2 - 2) + (3x + 2)^3 \cdot (2x \cdot 2)\)[/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]\(\frac{dy}{dx} = 9(3x + 2)^2 \cdot (x^2 - 2) + 4(3x + 2)^3 \cdot 2x\)[/tex]

So, the derivative of [tex]\(y = (3x + 2)^3(x^2 - 2)\)[/tex] is [tex]\(\frac{dy}{dx} = 9(3x + 2)^2 \cdot (x^2 - 2) + 4(3x + 2)^3 \cdot 2x\)[/tex].

c. Differentiating [tex]\(y = \frac{e^{2 - x}}{(2x + 1)}\)[/tex]:

To differentiate this function, we can use the quotient rule.

Let's break it down step by step:

First, differentiate the numerator, [tex]\(e^{2 - x}\)[/tex], using the chain rule:

[tex]\(\frac{d}{dx} (e^{2 - x}) = e^{2 - x} \cdot \frac{d}{dx} (2 - x) = -e^{2 - x}\)[/tex]

Now, differentiate the denominator, [tex]\((2x + 1)\)[/tex]:

[tex]\(\frac{d}{dx} (2x + 1) = 2\)[/tex]

Using the quotient rule, we can combine the derivatives of the numerator and denominator:

[tex]\(\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{(e^{2 - x} \cdot (2x + 1)) - (-e^{2 - x} \cdot 2)}{(2x + 1)^2}\)[/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]\(\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{(-e^{2 - x}(2x + 1) + 2e^{2 - x})}{(2x + 1)^2} = \frac{(-e^{2 - x}(2x + 1) - 2e^{2 - x})}{(2x + 1)^2}\)[/tex]

So, the derivative of [tex]\(y = \frac{e^{2 - x}}{(2x + 1)}\) is \(\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{(-e^{2 - x}(2x + 1) - 2e^{2 - x})}{(2x + 1)^2}\).[/tex]

Learn more about function

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

The expression for the displacement wave u(r, t) that satisfies the given boundary conditions and initial conditions is:

u(r, t) = Σ Cn J0 (zn r) cos(zn t)

To find the expression for the displacement wave u(r, t) that satisfies the given boundary conditions and initial conditions, we can use an eigenfunction series expansion. The stress equation o(r, t) can be expressed as:

o(r, t) = Σ Cn cos(zn t) J1 (zn r)

Here, Cn represents the coefficients, zn are the zeros of the Bessel function of order zero, and J1 (zn) is the Bessel function of the first kind of order one.

Using this stress equation, we can express the displacement wave equation as:

0²u / du² - 10du / dt² - 200u = 0

To solve this equation, we assume a separation of variables u(r, t) = R(r)T(t). Substituting this into the wave equation and dividing by RT gives:

(1 / R) d²R / dr² + (r / R) dR / dr - 200r² / R = (1 / T) d²T / dt² + 10 / T dT / dt = λ

Here, λ is a separation constant.

Now, let's solve the equation for R(r):

(1 / R) d²R / dr² + (r / R) dR / dr - 200r² / R - λ = 0

This is a second-order ordinary differential equation. By assuming a solution of the form R(r) = J0 (zr), where J0 (z) is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero, we can find the values of z that satisfy the equation.

The solutions for z are the zeros of the Bessel function of order zero, zn. Therefore, the general solution for R(r) is given by:

R(r) = Σ Cn J0 (zn r)

To satisfy the boundary condition u(1, t) = 0, we need R(1) = Σ Cn J0 (zn) = 0. This implies that Cn = 0 for zn = 0.

Now, let's solve the equation for T(t):

(1 / T) d²T / dt² + 10 / T dT / dt + λ = 0

This is also a second-order ordinary differential equation. By assuming a solution of the form T(t) = cos(ωt), we can find the values of ω that satisfy the equation.

The solutions for ω are ωn = zn. Therefore, the general solution for T(t) is given by:

T(t) = Σ Dn cos(zn t)

Now, combining the solutions for R(r) and T(t), we can express the displacement wave u(r, t) as:

u(r, t) = Σ Cn J0 (zn r) cos(zn t)

To determine the coefficients Cn, we can substitute the initial condition u(r, 0) = Asin(4πr) into the expression for u(r, t) and use the orthogonality of the Bessel functions to find the values of Cn.

In conclusion, the expression for the displacement wave u(r, t) that satisfies the given boundary conditions and initial conditions is:

u(r, t) = Σ Cn J0 (zn r) cos(zn t)

To know more about Bessel functions and their properties, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31412426#

#SPJ11

Given the complex number:c = a + ib = 2i30 + 3ei45+4ei45First of all, let's convert the polar form to rectangular form:z = r(cosθ + isinθ), where r is the modulus and θ is the argument of the complex number.

So, putting the given values:z = 2(cos30 + isin30) + 3(cos45 + isin45) + 4(cos45 + isin45)Now, using the trigonometric identities given above,cos30 = √3/2sin30 = 1/2cos45 = sin45 = √2/2On substituting these values in the equation, we getz = 2√3/2 + i + 3(√2/2 + √2/2i) + 4(√2/2 + √2/2i)

On further simplificationz = √3 + 2i + 7√2/2 + 7√2/2i = (√3 + 7√2/2) + (2 + 7√2/2)iThus, the real part (a) is √3 + 7√2/2 and the imaginary part (b) is 2 + 7√2/2.So, the real part aa = √3 + 7√2/2 and the imaginary part bb = 2 + 7√2/2.

Learn more about complex number at https://brainly.com/question/32611844

#SPJ11

The resolving power of a 4x objective with a numerical aperture of 0.275 is approximately 0.57 micrometers.

The resolving power (RP) of an objective lens can be calculated using the formula: RP = λ / (2 * NA), where λ is the wavelength of light and NA is the numerical aperture.

Assuming a typical wavelength of visible light (λ) is 550 nanometers (0.55 micrometers), we substitute the values into the formula: RP = 0.55 / (2 * 0.275).

Performing the calculations, we find: RP ≈ 0.55 / 0.55 = 1.

Therefore, the resolving power of a 4x objective with a numerical aperture of 0.275 is approximately 0.57 micrometers.

Learn more about Resolving power

brainly.com/question/913003

brainly.com/question/31991352

#SPJ11