1 Which type of investment are stocks?

A.
lending

B.
ownership

C.
cash equivalent

D.
interest

Answer:

i would say nationality

Explanation:

Freedom Riders are those persons who are Civil Rights activists working to fight for the various rights of their own and also the people belonging to the society.

To protest segregated bus terminals, groups of white but also African American civil rights activists took part in Freedom Riders, bus excursions through the American South in 1961.

To protest the lack of execution of US Supreme Court rulings that segregated public transportation was unconstitutional, civil rights activists known as "Freedom Riders" boarded intercity buses through into segregated Southern US in 1961 and succeeding years.

The Freedom Riders united civil rights advocates who traveled by interstate bus from Washington, DC, towards the segregated South around 1961 to enforce new U.S. Supreme Court rulings declaring segregated public transportation to be illegal.

Due to the frequent acts of violence directed at them, the Freedom Riders gained national prominence for their cause while traveling across the South on interstate buses. Discover the effects of something like the travels mostly on the Civil Rights Movement as well as the nation by traveling to the places where Freedom Riders made stops throughout their route.

Learn more about the Freedom Riders here:

https://brainly.com/question/27106432

#SPJ1

The statement that expresses the central idea is that a the Romans move towards a more democracy Society by spreading power among elected officials but they favored the wealthy more than the public.

After the fall of the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Republic was established where people could be elected in various offices to lead the city - state's government.

However, this process was not entirely fair as the wealthy people in Rome were more favored in the process and even had more say in government. Rome was therefore not truly democratic.

Find out more on Rome at https://brainly.com/question/26519729

#SPJ1

Answer:

Harold Godwinson was a mighty noble in England, a fine soldier, and a talented politician.

Explanation:

In 1066, having a lot of talents would make you a worthy candidate for the throne.  

I hope this helped:)

The way that Donatello used perspective in his sculptures was he C. Elongated upper bodies to figures that would be viewed from below

Donatello was a very famous and celebrated Italian artist and sculptor and he came up with artworks that would inspire Italian artists ( and other artists ) for generations.

He was known for using what was called the " one point perspective " which ensured that his figures were anatomically correct. And when a figure was to be viewed from below, he would make the upper bodies longer.

Find out more on Donatello at https://brainly.com/question/3701359

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

B. needed a stronger army and navy.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America.

D. South America

The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America

Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

The recently found regions beyond Eurasia were split between the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire by the Treaty of Tordesillas, which was signed on June 7, 1494, at Tordesillas, Spain, and validated in Portugal.

The Treaty of Tordesillas established a border that split the non-European world into two distinct regions, one ruled by Spain and the other by Portugal. In 1494, Spain and Portugal signed the Treaty of Tordesillas, dividing the non-European globe between them.

The Treaty of Tordesillas thus resulted in the division of South America.

To learn more about Tordesillas, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29406901

Answer: supreme court is the top of the court system and the people/persons that are on the top of their court system is chief justice

Explanation:

The raging women's mob that marched through the rain to Versailles in October 1789 was provoked by the expensive bread. The correct response is option (3).

The Women's March on Versailles, also known as the October March, the October Days, or simply the March on Versailles, was one of the first and most significant events of the French Revolution. When the march began on the morning of October 5, 1789, women in Paris' marketplaces were about to riot over the excessive price of bread. The unrest quickly combined with revolutionaries' efforts as they sought liberal political reforms and a constitutional monarchy for France. The market ladies and their supporters eventually became a mob of thousands. Under the encouragement of revolutionary agitators, they searched the city's arsenal for weapons before marching toward the Palace of Versailles. The crowd surrounded the palace and forced King Louis XVI to comply with their demands during a dramatic and violent confrontation. The majority of the French Assembly was forced to travel back to Paris with them the following day, along with the king and his family.

These occurrences put an end to the king's independence and signaled the beginning of a new power dynamic that would ultimately favor the Third Estate, the ordinary people, against the established, privileged orders of the French nobles. The march on Versailles turned out to be a pivotal occasion in the Revolution since it brought together the largest number of individuals yet from the origins of the Revolution.

To know more about French Revolution, visit:

brainly.com/question/2796465

#SPJ1

Answer:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.

Explanation:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.

The desperate Russians adopted a Scorched-Earth Tactic, burning the areas they left behind whenever they withdrew. The correct response is option (4).

A scorched-earth doctrine, a military strategy, aims to destroy anything the adversary might use to their advantage. Targets may be things like obvious weaponry, transport vehicles, communication hubs, industrial resources, and anything else the enemy could use against you.

Napoleon entered Russia with his troops in June 1812. He anticipated a brief conflict to get revenge on Czar Alexander I for his misdeed in abandoning the Continental System. Napoleon entered Russia with about 600,000 soldiers. He intended to engage the Russian troops in a fierce fight, the kind of conflict he typically prevailed in. Alexander was aware of this and devised a cunning plan: every time Napoleon's men attempted to attack, the Russians just continued retiring. Napoleon was furious and marched his army deeper into Russia by repeatedly following the escaping Russians. As a result, the campaign took far longer than Napoleon had anticipated. The fact that he expected his army to be able to subsist off the land they were in, as was his custom, meant that he had brought very little supplies, even by the standards of the brief campaign he had planned. However, the desperate Russians adopted a "scorched-earth" tactic, burning the areas they left behind whenever they withdrew. Napoleon's army had problems getting supplies, and the more it marched, the weaker it got.

To know more about scorched-earth tactic, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28222596

#SPJ1

Answer:

The French Indian War

Explanation:

This war also lead to excessive taxing in the colonies which then lead to the Revolutionary War

Answer:

no -why - because if they had the ability to decide which right we can enjoy it be bad because many could think for example : that slaves should be allowed again for every state . or for example: purge be allowed (which would be very bad it would decrease population). some people think good and some bad or dangerous they shouldn't because even if they did states and voters get a long and agree people would not agree for sure . please give me a star if it was helpful !

Answer:

Voting is a very important part of any democracy. Citizens vote for leaders to represent them and their ideas, and the leaders support the citizens' interests.

The group that made up the largest part of spanish america is the peninsulares according to the casta system because the peninsulares were the ones born in spain they made up most of Spanish America.

"Pittsburgh" is nicknamed the "Gateway to the West" because its location on three rivers allowed easy transportation of materials from the East to West. The Option D is correct.

The name "Pittsburgh" is very famous for its dramatic topography (meeting of three rivers) and its history of the steel industry. It was also known for major league sports teams, research universities, infrastructure like incline cable railways, tunnels etc.

In early 1800s, the city was known as the “Gateway to the West” because of the huge advantage its had by having the intersection of three major waterways; the Allegheny River and Monongahela River join together at what is known as the “point” to form the Ohio River.

Read more about Pittsburgh

brainly.com/question/11585281

#SPJ1

The unified German military forces were involved in systematic war crimes throughout World War II, including killings, plundering, the use of forced labor, the execution of three million Soviet war prisoners, and the annihilation of Jews. just out of necessity

The Nazis established a state of terror. By using violence and intimidation, this was accomplished. German citizens were too terrified to defy Nazi rules.

The intelligence and security agency of the Nazi Party was known as the SD (Sicherheitsdienst). The goal of the SD, which was run by Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heidrich, was to put everyone in Germany under close observation.

Nazi Germany's secret police were known as the Gestapo (German for "Secret State Police"). It was essential to the internal security of Germany.

For mass murder, the Nazis experimented with gas vans.

Learn more about Nazism, from:

brainly.com/question/13817923

#SPJ1

The global developments in the period 1450–1750 the military forces expanded and became more professionalized, states were forced to develop new ways to generate revenue. The correct option is A.

The political rivalries between the Ottoman and Safavid empires, as well as their ties to Islam, exacerbated the schism. Explain the evolution of Sikhism in relation to the Mughal Empire.

The increased use of gunpowder, cannons and armed trade in Europe and Asia resulted in the establishment of large empires. By conquering other countries' lands and erecting palaces to demonstrate their power, and forcing their people to live with them so they could not work against them.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about The Ottoman Empire here:

https://brainly.com/question/19205737

#SPJ1

https://brainly.com/question/7847947?referrer=searchResults

plese give a brainlist

People, especially those who are highly worried, can benefit from defensive pessimism by thinking more positively and making better decisions. Conversely, defensive pessimists create strategies for handling issues in their heads.

In the middle of the 1980s, Nancy Cantor and her students identified the cognitive approach known as defensive pessimism. People employ defensive pessimism as a coping mechanism before anxiety-inducing situations or performances. No of how well they have performed in the past when someone uses defensive pessimism, they have low expectations for their performance.

Then, defensive pessimists consider particular unfavorable occurrences and failures that might have a detrimental impact on their efforts to achieve their goals. Defensive pessimists can prevent or prepare for potential negative consequences by imagining them in advance. By employing this technique, defensive pessimists might constructively channel anxiety that otherwise might have a negative impact on their performance.

Learn more about pessimism, from:

brainly.com/question/23812584

#SPJ1

Answer:

Comparisons help the reader understand how defensive pessimism differs from positive thinking, and why it could be a better coping strategy.

A subject, viewpoint, or interest on which two or more individuals can agree is referred to as common ground.

You don't have to agree on everyone when you and someone else find something in agreement. You and the other person share similar interests or viewpoints on certain subjects. However, there are still certain issues or points of disagreement. The point of agreement among the two of you is this viewpoint. Finding a point of agreement between two people might help them communicate even when they disagree.

After talking about this point of agreement for a while, you might both be more receptive to hearing the other's perspective on the points of disagreement. During a conflict, the common ground strategy can bring people together. You can agree to disagree when you concentrate on your shared interests.

To know more about common ground, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26660433

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think it's unreasonable

The biggest changes for a European community are: From bartering for everything to trading with money, From having only nobles and peasants to having a middle class of merchants and artisans.

During the Middle Ages there were very few changes. However, many of them meant fundamental changes in society and the functioning of human communities. In general, these changes gave way to the following stages of humanity such as modernity, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, among others.

Some of the most radical changes that occurred in Europe were the change from barter to trade with money and the appearance of new social classes such as the middle class, which included the merchants who would later become bourgeois.

In the case of the changes in commerce, they were one of the biggest changes because people had to adapt to this new way of commerce. Therefore, people made objects and later sold them to obtain money and thus be able to buy the objects they needed for their daily lives. This was a challenge because some items were more in demand than others and this defined their price.

Additionally, this allowed the kingdoms to grow and accommodate a greater number of people. Kingdoms became cities where people had other social dynamics and abandoned feudal ways of life that were mainly rural.

On the other hand, the appearance of the middle class in which there were merchants and artisans was an important change for feudal society because these merchants began to enrich themselves by reducing the gap between the nobility and the middle class. This is how the bourgeoisie arose in the following centuries.

Lastly, these merchants had the ability to increase the area of influence of trade by reaching other countries and massifying the import and export of products. This caused the cities to become even more crowded and the merchants had an economic status similar to that of the nobility.

Learn more about the Middle Ages in: https://brainly.com/question/26586178

#SPJ1

Answer: im literally doing the assignment rn but its bartering to money and from only nobles to middle class merchants

Explanation: i just called my teacher and shes cool so i got the answer

First Indian War, the Great Narragansett War, or Metacom's Rebellion. It was the Native Americans' desperate attempt to elude acknowledging English rule and prevent English settlement on their ancestral territories.

From 1675 to 1676, southern New England was the scene of King Philip's War, also known as the A fellow Christian Indian reported to English authorities that Sassamon, who had earlier accused Metacom of plotting an uprising against the English, had been slain by three warriors working for the local sachem Metacom, known to the English as King Philip.

The Indians attacked adjacent villages because they were worried about encroachments and the rifts that missionaries were causing in native culture. Twelve of the ninety Puritan towns were completely destroyed by Metacom's campaign, which also attacked forty other Puritan towns.

Learn more about the Metacom here: https://brainly.com/question/2251429

In the state of nature, this equal ability to kill each other leads to mistrust. All of our belongings, and our life itself, might be taken at any moment, because there is no greater power to stop anyone from attacking us . Some people would attack us because they need our resources to survive.

In moral and political philosophy, religion, social contract theories, and international law, the state of nature is the hypothetical life of people before societies existed. State of nature philosophers deduce that there must have been a time before organised societies existed, and this assumption raises questions such as: "What was life like before civil society?"; "How did government first emerge from such a starting position?," and "What are the hypothetical reasons for entering a state of society by establishing a nation-state?"

In political theory, the state of nature is the actual or hypothetical condition of humans prior to or after political association. The concept of a natural state was central to the social-contract theories of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, as well as French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Social-contract theorists' visions of the state of nature differed sharply, though most associated it with the absence of state sovereignty.

Therefore ,the idea of a state of nature is an effort to try and understand what humans would be like without any government or society and considers why we let ourselves be governed.

To learn  more about state of nature, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13162622

#SPJ1

Answer: President Nixon initially refused to release the tapes, putting two reasons forward: first, that the Constitutional principle of executive privilege extends to the tapes and citing the separation of powers and checks and balances within the Constitution, and second, claiming they were vital to national security.

Explanation:

Answer:

The president would have too much power within the new government.