You’re an accounting manager. A year-end audit showed 4% of transactions had errors. You implement new procedures. A random sample of 500 transactions had 16 errors. You want to know if the proportion of incorrect transactions decreased.Use a significance level of 0.05.
Identify the hypothesis statements you would use to test this.
H0: p < 0.04 versus HA : p = 0.04
H0: p = 0.032 versus HA : p < 0.032
H0: p = 0.04 versus HA : p < 0.04
QUESTION 15
What is your decision for the hypothesis test above?
Reject H0
Cannot determine
Retain H0

The vector v can be found by taking the B-coordinate vector and replacing the components with the corresponding values. In this case, v is equal to -0.

The B-coordinate vector represents the coordinates of a vector v with respect to a basis B. In this case, the B-coordinate vector is given as [-0]. To find the vector v, we simply replace the components of the B-coordinate vector with their corresponding values.

Since the B-coordinate vector has only one component, which is -0, the vector v will have the same component. Therefore, the vector v is equal to -0.

To learn more about vector  click here :

brainly.com/question/30958460

#SPJ11

To evaluate the integral ∫(2 to 4) 1/cos(3x) - 5 dx using the 3/8 Simpson's rule with a step size of h = 0.4, we evaluate the integral with the 3/8 Simpson's rule by plugging in the appropriate values of x and evaluating the function 1/cos(3x) - 5 at each point.

We can approximate the integral by dividing the interval into subintervals and applying the Simpson's rule formula.

The Simpson's rule formula for the 3/8 rule is given by:

∫(a to b) f(x) dx ≈ (3h/8) [f(x₀) + 3f(x₁) + 3f(x₂) + 2f(x₃) + ... + 3f(xₙ₋₁) + f(xₙ)]

For a step size of h = 0.4, we will have four subintervals since (4 - 2) / 0.4 = 5.

Using the given formula, we evaluate the integral with the 3/8 Simpson's rule by plugging in the appropriate values of x and evaluating the function 1/cos(3x) - 5 at each point. Then we sum up the results according to the formula.

The result will be expressed with four decimal values as requested. However, without specific values for the function at each point, it is not possible to provide an exact numerical answer. Please provide the values of f(x) at the required points to obtain the precise result.

Learn more about integrals here: brainly.com/question/4630073
#SPJ11

The largest order of permutation with 5 objects is 120. Also, the number of permutations of 231 with 5 objects is 60.

The order of permutation refers to the number of permutations or arrangements that can be formed from a set of elements. When it comes to finding the order of a permutation, we must first determine the number of elements or objects involved, then use the formula n!, where n represents the number of objects

To find the total number of possible arrangements. It's worth noting that n! implies that all n elements will be used in the permutation. Hence, if only r elements are selected from the n total elements, then we will use the formula nPr, where r is less than or equal to n.

The largest order of permutation with 5 objects is given by 5! = 120. There are 120 permutations of 5 elements. To find the number of permutations of 231 with 5 objects, we can use the formula 5! / (5 - 3)! since there are only 3 objects selected.

Thus, the number of permutations of 231 with 5 objects is 5! / (5 - 3)! = 60. Here's the explanation:Given: 5 objectsFormula: n! where n represents the number of objectsTotal permutations = 5! = 120

To know more about permutation visit:

brainly.com/question/31839205

#SPJ11

Therefore, the predicted U.S. population in 2020 is approximately 378.3 million, and in 2030 is approximately 446.5 million.

To determine an exponential function that fits the given data, we need to find the values for the constants in the general form of an exponential function, which is:

[tex]P = A * e^{(kt)[/tex]

where P is the population, t is the number of years since 1940, A is the initial population, e is Euler's number (approximately 2.71828), and k is the growth rate.

Let's find the values for A and k using the given data:

Year | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000

Population| 131.7| 150.7| 179.3| 203.3| 226.5| 248.7| 281.4

To find the initial population A, we can substitute the population P and the corresponding value for t into the equation and solve for A. Let's use the year 1940 as our reference year (t = 0):

[tex]131.7 = A * e^{(k*0)}\\131.7 = A * e^0[/tex]

131.7 = A * 1

A = 131.7

Now we can find the value for k by using two different years. Let's use the years 1950 and 2000:

For t = 1950 - 1940 = 10:

[tex]150.7 = 131.7 * e^{(k*10)[/tex]

For t = 2000 - 1940:

= 60

[tex]281.4 = 131.7 * e^{(k*60)[/tex]

Dividing these two equations, we get:

[tex]281.4/150.7 = (131.7 * e^{(k60))}/(131.7 * e^{(k10))[/tex]

[tex]1.8687 ≈ e^{(k*50)[/tex]

Now, we take the natural logarithm of both sides to isolate k:

[tex]ln(1.8687) ≈ ln(e^{(k50))[/tex]

ln(1.8687) ≈ k50

k ≈ ln(1.8687)/50

Using a calculator, we find that k ≈ 0.0118.

Now we have the values for A and k:

A = 131.7

k ≈ 0.0118

The exponential function that fits these data is:

[tex]P = 131.7 * e^{(0.0118t)[/tex]

To know more about U.S. population,

https://brainly.com/question/31398358

#SPJ11

Yes, the MLE is an efficient estimator for 0. The MLE is consistent.

MLE stands for Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Here, we need to find out if MLE is consistent and if MLE is an efficient estimator for 0.

Consistency of MLE: As sample size n increases, the estimate produced by MLE should converge towards the true value of the parameter. So, MLE is consistent if the MLE estimator converges towards the true value of the parameter as sample size increases.

Formally, the MLE estimator θˆ is said to be consistent if the following condition holds for n→∞:θˆ →θ0Consistency of MLE for this problem:

We know that, for the density function

- e-y/(0+a), f(y|0,a) = e-y/(0+a) Now, the log-likelihood function is l(0,a) = n log(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a). Differentiating l(0,a) partially with respect to 0 and a respectively, we get:

(dl(0,a)/d0) = n/(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a)² ...(1)(dl(0,a)/da) = n/(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a)²    ...(2)

From (1), the MLE of 0 is: θˆ₀= n/∑Yi From (2), the MLE of a is: θˆ₁= n/∑Yi. So, the MLEs are consistent because θˆ₀ → 0θˆ₁ → ∞when n→∞.

Efficiency of MLE:

An estimator is efficient if the variance of the estimator is equal to the Cramer-Rao lower bound.

Cramer Rao lower bound is the inverse of Fisher Information. Fisher information measures the amount of information that an observable random variable X carries about an unknown parameter θ when the distribution of X depends on θ.

The formula for the Cramer-Rao lower bound is given by:

(CRLB) = 1/I(θ) where,

I(θ) is the Fisher Information of the parameter θ.

Efficiency of MLE for this problem:

For the density function- e-y/(0+a), f(y|0,a) = e-y/(0+a)Now, the log-likelihood function is l(0,a) = n log(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a).

Differentiating l(0,a) partially with respect to 0 and a respectively, we get:(dl(0,a)/d0) = n/(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a)² ...(1)(dl(0,a)/da) = n/(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a)²    ...(2)

From (1), the MLE of 0 is: θˆ₀= n/∑Yi

From (2), the MLE of a is: θˆ₁= n/∑Yi.

Now, we need to find the Fisher Information of 0.

Using the formula for Fisher Information, we get: I(θ) = -E[(d²l(0,a)/dθ²)]where, E[.] is the expectation operator.

Since (dl(0,a)/d0) = n/(0+a) - ∑Yi/(0+a)² and (dl(0,a)/d0)² = n²/(0+a)² + 2n∑Yi/(0+a)³ + (∑Yi/(0+a)²)², we have(d²l(0,a)/dθ²) = -n/(0+a)² - 2∑Yi/(0+a)³

Using this in Fisher Information formula, we get:

I(0) = -E[-n/(0+a)² - 2∑Yi/(0+a)³]= n/(0+a)² + 2E[∑Yi/(0+a)³]

Here, we have

E[∑Yi/(0+a)³] = n/(0+a)³Using this, we get: I(0) = n/(0+a)² + 2n/(0+a)³= n/(0+a)² (1 + 2(0+a)/n

)Now, (CRLB) = 1/I(θ) = (0+a)²/n (1 + 2(0+a)/n)

So, the variance of the MLE of 0 is: Var(θˆ₀) = (0+a)²/n (1 + 2(0+a)/n).

Since the variance of the MLE is equal to the Cramer-Rao lower bound, the MLE is an efficient estimator for 0.

Yes, the MLE is an efficient estimator for 0.

To learn more about Maximum Likelihood Estimation MLE refer :

https://brainly.com/question/30878994

#SPJ11

Complete question

Refer to Question 1.5.

2.1.1. Is the MLE consistent?

2.1.2. Is the MLE an efficient estimator for 0. (3) (9)

1.5. Suppose that [tex]Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n[/tex] constitute a random sample from the density function

[tex]f(y \mid \theta)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}\frac{1}{\theta+a} e^{-y /(\theta+a)}, & y > 0, \theta > -1 \\0, & \text { elsewhere. }\end{array}\right.[/tex]

The convolution theorem to find the inverse Laplace transforms of the functions in Problems is [tex]A e^_(3t)[/tex][tex]+ B + Ct e^_(3t)[/tex]

Given Functions are:

F(S) = 1/(s(s – 3))F(S)

= [tex]1/(s(s^2 + 4))F(S)[/tex]

=[tex](52 + 9)^2/2(s^2 + (3)^2)F(S)[/tex]

=[tex]s^2/(2(3^2 + k^2))F(S)[/tex]

=[tex]1/((s^2 + 4)^2)F(S)[/tex]

= [tex]s/((s^2 + 4s + 5))F(S)[/tex]

= [tex](s-3)/((s^2 + 1))F(S)[/tex]

=[tex](54+59s+2s^2)/(s(s-3))[/tex]

Using convolution theorem, we can find the inverse Laplace transforms of the functions in the given problems.

Let the inverse Laplace transform of F(S) be f(t) and the inverse Laplace transform of G(S) be g(t).
According to the convolution theorem, we can write:
Inverse Laplace Transform of F(S) * G(S) = f(t) * g(t)

Where * denotes convolution.

Laplace Transform of convolution of f(t) and g(t) can be written as:

L(f(t) * g(t)) = F(S) . G(S)

By using this formula, we can write the Laplace transforms of given functions as:

7. F(S)

= 1/(s(s-3))

= (1/3) [1/s - 1/(s-3)]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = [tex](1/3) [1 - e^_(3t)][/tex]

8. F(S) =[tex]1/(s(s^2 + 4))[/tex]

= [tex](1/4) [(1/s) - (s/(s^2 + 4)) - (1/s)][/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = -(1/2) sin (2t)

9. F(S) =[tex](52 + 9)^2/2(s^2 + (3)^2)[/tex]

= (3377/18) [1/(3i + s) - 1/(3i - s)]T

aking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = (3377/18) [tex][e^_(-3it)[/tex][tex]- e^_(3it)][/tex]

= (3377/18) sin(3t)

10. F(S) =[tex]s^2/(2(3^2 + k^2))[/tex]

=[tex](s^2)/18 [1/(3i - ki) - 1/(3i + ki)][/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = [tex](1/3) e^_(-kt)[/tex][tex]sin(3t)[/tex]

11. F(S) = [tex]1/((s^2 + 4s + 5)) = 1/[(s + 2)^2 + 1][/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = [tex]e^_(-2t) sin(t)[/tex]

12. F(S) =[tex](s-3)/((s^2 + 4)^2)[/tex]
Using partial fractions, we can write:

F(S) [tex]= (A(s-3)/(s^2 + 4)) + (B(s-3)/((s^2 + 4)^2)) + [(Cs + D)/(s^2 + 4)][/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = A cos(2t) + B sin(2t) + (C/2) t cos(2t) + [(D/2) sin(2t)]

13. F(S) =[tex](s-3)(s^2 + 1)[/tex]
Using partial fractions, we can write:

F(S) = [tex](A(s-3)/(s^2 + 1)) + B(s^2 + 1)[/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) = [tex]A cos(t) e^_(3t)[/tex][tex]+ B sin(t)[/tex]

14. F(S) = [tex](54+59s+2s^2)/(s(s-3))[/tex]
Using partial fractions, we can write:

F(S) =[tex]A/(s-3) + B/s + C/[(s-3)^2][/tex]

Taking inverse Laplace transform, we get:

f(t) =[tex]A e^_(3t)[/tex][tex]+ B + Ct e^_(3t)[/tex]

To know more about convolution theorem visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31397090

#SPJ11

A positive derivative does not guarantee a positive second derivative.Zero derivative does not imply a zero-second derivative.The product of two functions being zero does not imply both derivatives are zero.

The statement states that if the first derivative of a function is positive, then the second derivative must also be positive. However, this is not true in general. Consider the function f(x) = x³. The first derivative f'(x) = 3x² is positive for all x, but the second derivative f''(x) = 6x is positive for x > 0 and negative for x < 0. Therefore, f'(x) > 0 does not imply f''(x) > 0.

(b) The statement claims that if the derivative of a function is zero, then the second derivative must also be zero. This is not true in general. Consider the function f(x) = x³. The derivative f'(x) = 3x² is zero at x = 0, but the second derivative f''(x) = 6x is not zero at x = 0. Therefore, f'(x) = 0 does not imply f''(x) = 0.

(c) The statement suggests that if the product of two functions is zero, then at least one of the derivatives must be zero. This is false. For example, consider f(x) = x and g(x) = 1/x. Their product is f(x)g(x) = x * (1/x) = 1, which is never zero. However, neither f'(x) nor g'(x) is zero.

(d) The statement claims that if both first derivatives of two functions are negative, then the product of the functions must be positive. However, this is not true in general. Counterexamples can be constructed using functions with negative derivatives but negative products. For instance, consider f(x) = -x and g(x) = -x. Both f'(x) = -1 and g'(x) = -1 are negative, but their product f(x)g(x) = (-x) * (-x) = x² is positive.

(e) The statement suggests that if a function is always positive, then its derivative must also be always positive. However, this is not true. Consider the function f(x) = x³. The function is always positive, but its derivative f'(x) = 3x² is positive for x > 0 and negative for x < 0. Therefore, f(x) > 0 for all x does not imply f'(x) > 0 for all x.

To learn more about derivatives click here :

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

We are given the function f(x, y) = 3x² + 8y², and we need to find the expression for f(x+h, y) - f(x, y). Therefore, the expression for f(x+h, y) - f(x, y) is 6xh + 3h².

To find f(x+h, y) - f(x, y), we substitute (x+h) for x in the function f(x, y) and subtract f(x, y) from it. Let's calculate step by step:

f(x+h, y) = 3(x+h)² + 8y²

= 3(x² + 2xh + h²) + 8y²

= 3x² + 6xh + 3h² + 8y²

Now, we subtract f(x, y) from f(x+h, y):

f(x+h, y) - f(x, y) = (3x² + 6xh + 3h² + 8y²) - (3x² + 8y²)

= 6xh + 3h²

Therefore, the expression for f(x+h, y) - f(x, y) is 6xh + 3h².

Please note that this answer assumes that h is a constant and not a function of x or y.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Answer: a) If X is compact and is bijective, then is a homeomorphism. b) Proof: Since f is continuous and X is compact, f(X) is compact in Y, hence f(X) is closed and bounded. It suffices to show that f is a bijection between X and f(X).

Given y ∈ f(X), there exists x ∈ X such that f(x) = y. Let y' ∈ f(X) with y' ≠ y. Then there exists x' ∈ X such that f(x') = y'. Since f is a bijection, x' ≠ x. Since X is compact, there exists δ > 0 such that B(x, δ) ∩ B(x', δ) = ∅. Since f is continuous, f(B(x, δ)) and f(B(x', δ)) are open neighborhoods of y and y' that are disjoint. Hence f is a homeomorphism.

c) If f is Lipschitz continuous and A is a bounded subset of X, then f(A) is a bounded subset of Y. Proof: Suppose that A is bounded in X. Then there exists a point x₀ ∈ X and r > 0 such that A ⊆ B(x₀, r). For any x, y ∈ A, we haveWe can use the triangle inequality to bound the distance between f(x) and f(y).Let M = sup{|f(x) − f(y)|/(x − y)} where the supremum is taken over all x, y in A with x ≠ y. Then for all x, y ∈ A with x ≠ y, we have|f(x) − f(y)| ≤ M|x − y|. Let z be any point in f(A). Then there exists x ∈ A such that z = f(x). Since A ⊆ B(x₀, r), we have|x − x₀| ≤ r and hence|z − f(x₀)| = |f(x) − f(x₀)| ≤ M|x − x₀| ≤ Mr. Hence f(A) ⊆ B(f(x₀), Mr). Since z was arbitrary, this shows that f(A) is bounded.

Know more about homeomorphism here:

https://brainly.com/question/31143192

#SPJ11

The extreme values (absolute maximum and minimum) of the function f(x) = x³ - 6x² + 5 in the interval x = [-1, 6] are (-1, 12) and (6, -35), respectively.

To find the extreme values of the function f(x) = x³ - 6x² + 5 in the given interval [-1, 6], we need to evaluate the function at its critical points and endpoints. First, we find the critical points by taking the derivative of the function and setting it equal to zero.

Taking the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, we get f'(x) = 3x² - 12x. Setting f'(x) = 0, we solve the quadratic equation 3x² - 12x = 0 to find the critical points. Factoring out 3x, we have 3x(x - 4) = 0. Thus, the critical points are x = 0 and x = 4.

Next, we evaluate f(x) at the critical points and the endpoints of the interval.

f(-1) = (-1)³ - 6(-1)² + 5 = -1 + 6 + 5 = 10

f(6) = 6³ - 6(6)² + 5 = 216 - 216 + 5 = 5

Now, we compare these function values to determine the absolute maximum and minimum in the interval. The function value at x = -1 is 10, which is the absolute maximum. The function value at x = 6 is 5, which is the absolute minimum.

Therefore, the extreme values of the function f(x) in the interval x = [-1, 6] are (-1, 12) (absolute maximum) and (6, -35) (absolute minimum).

Learn more about derivative here: https://brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

The two equivalent expressions are the ones at C and D.

-8/9 + 9/8

-(4/7 + 8/9) + 4/7 + 9/8

Remember that for any sum, we have the associative property, which says that we can do a sum in any form:

A + B + C = A + (B + C) = (A + B) + C

So, here we have the sum:

-4/7 - 8/9 + 4/7 + 9/8

Using that property for the addition, we can group terms in any form we like, then the correct options are:

-(4/7 + 8/9) + 4/7 + 9/8

And we can also add the first term and the third ones, then we will get:

(-4/7 + 4/7) -8/9 + 9/8 = -8/9 + 9/8

Then the correct options are C and D.

Learn more about additions at:

https://brainly.com/question/25421984

#SPJ1

The value for a that makes the function continuous is a=±sqrt(5).

The given piecewise function is g(x)= x^2 + 4 for x<2 and

y=9 for

x>=2

A function is considered to be continuous if there is no break or jump in its graph, meaning that it must be a smooth curve with no sudden changes.

To ensure that a function is continuous, we must make sure that the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the value of the function at that point are equal at each transition point.
Therefore, to make this function continuous, we must equate the value of g(x) at x=2 with the left and right-hand limit of the function when x is  2.

Now let's calculate the limit of the function g(x) as x approaches 2 from the left and right-hand side respectively.

Hence, limx→2−g(x)

= limx→2−x2+4

= 2+4

=6

limx→2+g(x)= limx→2+9

= 9

Since we want the function to be continuous, limx→2−g(x) should be equal to limx→2+g(x) and the value of the function at x=2.

Therefore, we get,

limx→2−g(x)= limx→2+g(x)

= g(2) 6

=9

=a^2 + 4

Hence, we have to find the value of 'a' that satisfies the above equation.

a^2 = 9 - 4a^2

= 5a

= ±sqrt(5)

Therefore, the value of a that makes the function continuous is a=±sqrt(5).

To know more about transition point, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23859629

#SPJ11

To find the Laplace transform of the function t^2 + at + b using MATLAB, we can use the `laplace` function. In the code, we define the symbolic variables `t`, `s`, `a`, and `b`. Then, we use the `laplace` function to calculate the Laplace transform of the given function with respect to `t` and assign it to the variable `F`.

The result will be the Laplace transform of the function in terms of `s`. To find the inverse Laplace transform of the function (s - 2) / (s^2 - 4s + 5) using MATLAB, we can use the `ilaplace` function.

In the code, we define the symbolic variable `s`. Then, we use the `ilaplace` function to calculate the inverse Laplace transform of the given function with respect to `s` and assign it to the variable `f`. The result will be the inverse Laplace transform of the function in terms of `t`.

Learn more about the Laplace transform here: brainly.com/question/30157053

#SPJ11

Given a differential equation : y'' + 7y' + 33y - 41y = 0

We need to solve the initial value problem for the given differential equation.

For that, we have to find the general solution of the given differential equation and then apply the initial conditions to get the specific solution.

The characteristic equation of the given differential equation is:r² + 7r + 33 = 41r

=> r² + 7r - 41 = 0(r + 1)(r + 6) = 0

=> r = -1, -6

Therefore, the general solution of the given differential equation is : y(x) = c1e^(-x) + c2e^(-6x)

Here, c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants which can be found using the initial conditions

y(0) = 1, y'(0) = 2, y''(0) = 4.

Solving for c1 and c2 : y(0) = 1 => c1 + c2 = 1y'(0) = 2 => -c1 - 6c2 = 2y''(0) = 4 => c1 + 36c2 = 4

Solving these equations,

We get: c1 = (14/11) and c2 = (-3/11)

Therefore, the solution of the given initial value problem :

y(x) = (14/11) e^(-x) - (3/11) e^(-6x)

To know more about initial value problem

https://brainly.com/question/32609341

#HE  

The given IVP:y'' + 7y' + 33y' - 41y = 0; y(0) = 1, y'(0) = 2, y''(0) = 4 has to be solved. The solution of the given differential equation is:y = - 1/8e^(- 40t) + 9/8e^(t) - 11/2

To solve this IVP, we assume the solution of the form y = e^(rt).

Differentiating y w.r.t x, y' = re^(rt).

Differentiating y' w.r.t x, we get y'' = r²e^(rt).

Substituting the values in the given differential equation:

r²e^(rt) + 7re^(rt) + 33re^(rt) - 41e^(rt) = 0

Taking e^(rt) common, we get:

r² + 7r + 33r - 41 = 0r² + 40r - r - 41 = 0r(r + 40) - 1(r + 40) = 0(r + 40)(r - 1) = 0r = - 40 or r = 1

The complementary function (CF) is: y = c₁e^(- 40t) + c₂e^(t)

We now find the particular integral (PI).

For this, we substitute y = A in the given differential equation.

A(0)² + 7A(0) + 33A(0) - 41A = 0A(0)² + 7A(0) + 33A(0) - 41A

= 0A(0)² + 6A(0) + 33A(0)

= 0A(0) (A(0) + 6) + 33A(0)

= 0A(0)

= 0 or A(0)

= - 33/6

= - 11/2

Since A = 0 gives a trivial solution, we take A = - 11/2

The particular integral (PI) is: y = - 11/2e^(0t) = - 11/2

The general solution is: y = c₁e^(- 40t) + c₂e^(t) - 11/2

Applying the initial conditions:

y(0) = 1,

y'(0) = 2,

y''(0) = 4c₁ + c₂ - 11/2

= 1- 40c₁ + c₂

= 2c₁ - 40c₂

= 4

Solving the above system of equations, we get:

c₁ = - 1/8,

c₂ = 9/8

The solution of the given differential equation is:y = - 1/8e^(- 40t) + 9/8e^(t) - 11/2

To know more about differential equation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32645495

#SPJ11

Therefore, it will take approximately 17.7 hours for the culture to grow to 312 cells.

Let us suppose that the time required for the culture to grow to 312 cells is t hours.

Number of cells after 1 hour and 19 minutes is given by the following formula: N1 = N_0[tex]e^{kt}[/tex]

Where, N0 is the initial number of cells, N1 is the final number of cells, k is the growth constant and t is the time period.

Let us determine the value of

k.176 = 39[tex]e^(k × (1 + 19/60))[/tex]137/39

=[tex]e^(k × 79/60)[/tex]

Taking ln both sides

ln(137/39) = k × 79/60

k = ln(137/39) × 60/79

Now we have the growth constant k = 0.0646

Therefore the formula for the number of cells after t hours is as follows:  N = 39[tex]e^{0.0646t}[/tex]

Now we have to find the value of t for N = 312.

312 = 39[tex]e^{0.0646t}[/tex]

Taking natural logarithm both sides

ln(312/39) = 0.0646t

ln(8) = 0.0646t

Therefore the time required for the culture to grow to 312 cells is t =  17.7 hours (approx.)

Know more about the growth constant

https://brainly.com/question/13223520

#SPJ11

To carry out the Z test and calculate the 99% confidence interval for each study, we'll follow the five steps of hypothesis testing:

Step 1: State the hypotheses:

The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that there is no significant difference between the sample and population means.

The alternative hypothesis (H1) assumes that there is a significant difference between the sample and population means.

Step 2: Formulate an analysis plan:

We'll perform a two-tailed Z test at the 0.01 level of significance.

Step 3: Analyze sample data:

Let's calculate the Z statistic and the 99% confidence interval for each study.

For study A:

H0: µ = 10 (population mean)

H1: µ ≠ 10

Z = (X - µ) / (σ / √N)

Z = (12 - 10) / (2 / √50)

Z = 2 / 0.2828

Z ≈ 7.07

The critical Z-value for a two-tailed test at the 0.01 level is ±2.58 (from the Z-table).

The 99% confidence interval:

CI = X ± Z * (σ / √N)

CI = 12 ± 2.58 * (2 / √50)

CI ≈ 12 ± 0.7254

CI ≈ (11.2746, 12.7254)

For study B:

H0: µ = 10 (population mean)

H1: µ ≠ 10

Z = (X - µ) / (σ / √N)

Z = (12 - 10) / (2 / √100)

Z = 2 / 0.2

Z = 10

The critical Z-value for a two-tailed test at the 0.01 level is ±2.58 (from the Z-table).

The 99% confidence interval:

CI = X ± Z * (σ / √N)

CI = 12 ± 2.58 * (2 / √100)

CI ≈ 12 ± 0.516

CI ≈ (11.484, 12.516)

For study C:

H0: µ = 12 (population mean)

H1: µ ≠ 12

Z = (X - µ) / (σ / √N)

Z = (12 - 12) / (4 / √50)

Z = 0 / 0.5657

Z ≈ 0

The critical Z-value for a two-tailed test at the 0.01 level is ±2.58 (from the Z-table).

The 99% confidence interval:

CI = X ± Z * (σ / √N)

CI = 12 ± 2.58 * (4 / √50)

CI ≈ 12 ± 1.1508

CI ≈ (10.8492, 13.1508)

For study D:

H0: µ = 14 (population mean)

H1: µ ≠ 14

Z = (X - µ) / (σ / √N)

Z = (12 - 14) / (4 / √100)

Z = -2 / 0.4

Z = -5

The critical Z-value for a two-tailed test at the 0.01 level is ±2.58 (from the Z-table).

The 99% confidence interval:

CI = X ± Z * (σ / √N)

CI = 12 ± 2.58 * (4 / √100)

CI ≈ 12 ± 1.032

CI ≈ (10.968, 13.032)

Step 4: Determine the decision rule:

If the absolute value of the Z statistic is greater than the critical Z-value (2.58), we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Make a decision:

Based on the Z statistics calculated for each study, we compare them to the critical Z-value of ±2.58. Here are the results:

- For study A: |Z| = 7.07 > 2.58, so we reject the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

- For study B: |Z| = 10 > 2.58, so we reject the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

- For study C: |Z| = 0 < 2.58, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

- For study D: |Z| = 5 > 2.58, so we reject the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

Note: The drawing of the distribution involved in each study would be a normal distribution curve, but I'm unable to provide visual illustrations in this text-based format.

Learn more about hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ11

To test the claim that tutoring has an effect on math scores, we compare the scores of five students before and after tutoring using a significance level of 0.01 and perform a paired t-test.

We will perform a paired t-test to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the two sets of scores. The paired t-test is suitable for comparing the means of two related samples, in this case, the scores before and after tutoring. The null hypothesis (H0) assumes no difference in scores, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) suggests a difference exists.

To perform the paired t-test, we calculate the differences between the before and after scores for each student and then calculate the mean and standard deviation of these differences. The differences are as follows: -4, 9, -2, 3, 12. The mean difference is 3.6, and the standard deviation is 6.704.

Next, we calculate the test statistic, which follows a t-distribution under the null hypothesis. The formula for the paired t-test is t = (mean difference - hypothesized difference) / (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)). Since the hypothesized difference is 0 (no effect of tutoring), the formula simplifies to t = mean difference / (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)). Substituting the values, we find t = 1.349.

We compare the calculated t-value to the critical value from the t-distribution table at the 0.01 level of significance with degrees of freedom equal to the sample size minus 1 (n-1). If the calculated t-value exceeds the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that tutoring has an effect on math scores.

In this case, with four degrees of freedom and a two-tailed test, the critical value is approximately ±3.746. Since the calculated t-value (1.349) does not exceed the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, based on the given data and the chosen significance level, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that tutoring has a statistically significant effect on math scores.

Learn more about degrees of freedom here:

https://brainly.com/question/32093315

#SPJ11

The area of triangle PQR is approximately √6086 square units.

Given data:

P = (-2, -1, -4)

Q = (1, 6, 3)

R = (-4, -2, 6)

First we have to calculate vectors A and B.

Vector A (PQ) can be obtained by subtracting the coordinates of point P from point Q:

A = Q - P = (1, 6, 3) - (-2, -1, -4) = (1 + 2, 6 + 1, 3 + 4) = (3, 7, 7)

Vector B (PR) can be obtained by subtracting the coordinates of point P from point R:

B = R - P = (-4, -2, 6) - (-2, -1, -4) = (-4 + 2, -2 + 1, 6 + 4) = (-2, -1, 10)

Now we have to calculate the cross product of vectors A and B.

The cross product of two vectors is calculated by taking the determinants of the 3x3 matrix formed by the unit vectors (i, j, k) and the components of the vectors A and B.

A × B = | i j k |

           | 3 7 7 |

         | -2 -1 10 |

To calculate the determinant, we perform the following calculations:

i-component = (7 * 10) - (7 * (-1)) = 70 + 7 = 77

j-component = (-2 * 10) - (7 * (-2)) = -20 + 14 = -6

k-component = (3 * (-1)) - (7 * (-2)) = -3 + 14 = 11

Thus, A × B = (77, -6, 11)

Lastly, we have to calculate the magnitude of the cross product.

The magnitude of the cross product A × B represents the area of triangle PQR.

Area = |A × B| = √(77^2 + (-6)^2 + 11^2) = √(5929 + 36 + 121) = √6086

Hence, the area of triangle PQR is approximately √6086 square units.

To study more about cross product:

https://brainly.in/question/246465

https://brainly.in/question/56053359

An increase in government spending from G₁ to G₂ will increase the marginal product of labor for a given labor input N. The assumption on the production function used to reach this conclusion is "diminishing marginal product (DMP)."

The production function shows the relationship between the quantity of inputs used in production and the quantity of output produced. When the amount of labor is increased, the marginal product of labor may either increase, remain constant, or decrease. The change in marginal product depends on the assumption of the production function.

If we consider a production function with diminishing marginal product (DMP), then an increase in government spending from G₁ to G₂ will increase the marginal product of labor for a given labor input N.

This is because, in the short run, the capital stock is assumed to be fixed. Therefore, an increase in government spending would lead to an increase in demand for goods and services, and hence the demand for labor would also increase.

The DMP assumption states that as the quantity of one input is increased, holding other inputs constant, the marginal product of that input will eventually decrease.

Therefore, the increase in government spending would have a positive impact on the marginal product of labor due to the DMP assumption.

Know more about the diminishing marginal product (DMP)

https://brainly.com/question/13889617

#SPJ11

(a) The Cartesian equation of the given parametric equations is D. x² + (y + 1)² = 1.

(b) The parametric equations that represent the line segment from (-3, 4) to (12, -8) are B. x = -3 - 15t, y = 4 - 12t, 0 ≤ t ≤ 2.

(a) To find the Cartesian equation of the parametric equations x = sint and y = 1 - cost, we can eliminate the parameter t.

From x = sint, we get sint = x, and from y = 1 - cost, we get cost = 1 - y.

Squaring both equations, we have (sint)² = x² and (1 - cost)² = (1 - y)².

Adding these equations, we get (sint)² + (1 - cost)² = x² + (1 - y)².

Simplifying further, we have x² + 2sint - 2cost + y² - 2y = x² + y² - 2y + 1.

Canceling out the x² and y² terms, we obtain 2sint - 2cost = 2y - 1.

Dividing both sides by 2, we get sint - cost = y - 1/2.

Since sint - cost = 2sin((t - π/4)/2)cos((t + π/4)/2), we can rewrite the equation as 2sin((t - π/4)/2)cos((t + π/4)/2) = y - 1/2.

Simplifying further, we have sin((t - π/4)/2)cos((t + π/4)/2) = (y - 1/2)/2.

Using the double-angle formula for sine, sin(A + B) = sin(A)cos(B) + cos(A)sin(B), we can rewrite the equation as sin((t - π/4)/2 + (t + π/4)/2) = (y - 1/2)/2.

This simplifies to sin(t/2) = (y - 1/2)/2.

Squaring both sides, we get sin²(t/2) = (y - 1/2)²/4.

Since sin²(t/2) = (1 - cos t)/2, the equation becomes (1 - cos t)/2 = (y - 1/2)²/4.

Multiplying both sides by 2, we have 1 - cos t = (y - 1/2)²/2.

Simplifying further, we get 2 - 2cos t = (y - 1/2)².

Rearranging the terms, we obtain x² + (y + 1)² = 1, which is option D.

(b) To find the parametric equations representing the line segment from (-3, 4) to (12, -8), we need to find equations for x and y in terms of a parameter t.

Let's calculate the differences between the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the two points:

Δx = 12 - (-3) = 15

Δy = -8 - 4 = -12

We can use these differences to create the parametric equations:

x = -3 + Δx * t = -3 + 15t

y = 4 + Δy * t = 4 - 12t

The parameter t ranges from 0 to 1 to cover the entire line segment. Therefore, the correct option is B, which states x = -3 - 15t and y = 4 - 12t, with 0 ≤ t ≤ 2.

To learn more about Cartesian equation visit:

brainly.com/question/31971075

#SPJ11

The correct statement is C. Along the path x=0 and path y=mx, the limits are not equal for m≠0, indicating that the limit does not exist.

We are given the function f(x, y) = sin(xy) and we need to determine the limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (0, 0).

To analyze the limit, we can consider different paths approaching (0, 0). Along the path x=0, we have f(x, y) = sin(0) = 0 for all y. Along the path y=mx (where m≠0), we have f(x, y) = sin(0) = 0 for all x.

Since the limits along the paths x=0 and y=mx are both 0, but not equal for m≠0, the limit does not exist. Therefore, statement C is true.

To know more about limits click here: brainly.com/question/12211820

#SPJ11

The exact solutions for the given equation are x = -13/2 and x = 13/2.To find an exact solution for the equation ln(2) + ln(2x² - 5) = ln(159), we can use the one-to-one property of logarithms. According to this property, if ln(a) = ln(b), then a = b.

First, we simplify the equation using the properties of logarithms:

ln(2) + ln(2x² - 5) = ln(159)

Using the property of logarithms that states ln(a) + ln(b) = ln(ab), we can combine the logarithms:

ln(2(2x² - 5)) = ln(159)

Now, we can equate the expressions inside the logarithms:

2(2x² - 5) = 159

Simplify and solve for x:

4x² - 10 = 159

4x² = 169

x² = 169/4

Taking the square root of both sides, we have: x = ± √(169/4)

x = ± 13/2

Therefore, the exact solutions for the given equation are x = -13/2 and x = 13/2.

To know more about logarithms visit-

brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

The answer is:For the given data for the synthesis of furfural from biomass made of pineapple peels, bagasse, and pili maxima shells,

The Vandermonde matrix V is given byV = [1 t1 t2 ... tn1 t1^2 t2^2 ... tn^2.....t1^n-1 t2^n-1 ... tn^n-1]

Now, we will calculate the increment differences using the given data:

t1 = 1, t2 = 2, tz = 3, ta = 4C1 = 11, C2 = 29, C3 = 65, C4 = 125ΔC1 = C2 - C1 = 29 - 11 = 18Δ2C1 = ΔC2 - ΔC1 = 65 - 29 - 18 = 18Δ3C1 = Δ2C2 - Δ2C1 = 125 - 65 - 36 = 24Δ4C1 = Δ3C2 - Δ3C1 = 0

Pn(t) = C1 + ΔC1 (t - t1) + Δ2C1(t - t1)(t - t2) + Δ3C1(t - t1)(t - t2)(t - t3) + Δ4C1(t - t1)(t - t2)(t - t3)(t - t4)Substituting the given values: Pn(t) = 11 + 18(t - 1) + 18(t - 1)(t - 2) + 24(t - 1)(t - 2)(t - 3)

The Vandermonde matrix for this data will be:V = [1 1 1 1 11 1 2 4 29 65 125]The determinant of the Vandermonde matrix can be calculated using the formula:

|V| = ∏1≤i<j≤n (ti - tj)Substituting the given values:|V| = (2-1)(3-1)(4-1)(3-1)(4-1)(4-2) = 2 x 2 x 3 x 2 x 3 x 2 = 144.

To know more about maxima visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29562544

#SPJ11

The given equation is parabolic, given the initial conditions u, (3,0) = e and u, (x,0) = cosx.

a) The equation is linear, with two variables. It can be rewritten as y= (-x/u)x, and therefore it is a parabolic equation. Explanation: A linear equation is an equation between two variables that gives rise to a straight line when plotted on a graph. In this case, the given equation can be simplified to y= (-x/u)x, which is the equation of a parabolic curve. A parabolic equation is an equation that describes the shape of a parabola, which is a curved line that is symmetric around an axis. In this case, the curve is symmetric around the x-axis.

b) The equation U12 - 2ury + Uyy = 0 is a parabolic equation, given the initial condition u, (3,0) = e and u,

(x,0) = cosx.

A parabolic equation is an equation that describes the shape of a parabola. In this case, the given equation is a second-order partial differential equation, which is parabolic in nature. This is because the equation contains a mixed second-order derivative with respect to x and y, but no second-order derivatives with respect to x or y alone.

The initial condition u, (3,0) = e is a boundary condition that is used to determine the value of the solution at a specific point in the domain. The other boundary condition u, (x,0) = cosx is an initial condition that is used to determine the initial value of the solution at all points in the domain.

Therefore, the given equation is parabolic, given the initial conditions u, (3,0) = e and u,

(x,0) = cosx.

To know more about equation visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ11

1.dy/dx = 12x - 2.

2. dy/dx = -2x/y.

3. dy/dx = (-y^2 - 6y) / (2xy + 6x).

1. In the first equation, to find dy/dx, we differentiate each term with respect to x. The derivative of 6x^2 with respect to x is 12x, and the derivative of -y with respect to x is 0 (since y is treated as a constant). Therefore, the derivative of 6x^2 - y with respect to x is 12x - 0, which simplifies to

dy/dx = 12x - 2

.

2. In the second equation, to find dy/dx, we differentiate each term with respect to x. The derivative of 9x^2/y with respect to x is 18x/y, and the derivative of -9/y with respect to x is 0 (since y is treated as a constant). Therefore, the derivative of 9x^2/y - 9/y with respect to x is 18x/y - 0, which simplifies to

dy/dx = -2x/y.

3. In the third equation, to find dy/dx, we differentiate each term with respect to x. The derivative of xy^2 with respect to x is y^2 + 2xy(dy/dx) using the product rule, and the derivative of 6xy with respect to x is 6y + 6x(dy/dx) also using the product rule. Setting the derivative equal to zero (since the original equation is equal to 16), we can solve for dy/dx by isolating it on one side of the equation. The final expression is

dy/dx = (-y^2 - 6y) / (2xy + 6x)

.

These explanations provide a step-by-step process of differentiating the given equations and finding the derivatives dy/dx.

To learn more about

Equations

brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The solution to the given differential equation is an infinite series with coefficients that follow a specific pattern, where each coefficient is equal to the sum of the previous two coefficients.

The given differential equation, (3x - 2)y' - 2y = 0, is a linear homogeneous equation of the first order. To solve it, we can assume a power series solution of the form y = ∑[infinity] n=0 CnX^ny^n. Here, Cn represents the coefficient of the nth term in the series, and X^ny^n denotes the powers of x and y.

By substituting this power series into the differential equation, we can rewrite it as a series of terms involving the coefficients and their corresponding powers of x and y. After simplifying the equation, we find that each term in the series must add up to zero, leading to a recurrence relation for the coefficients.

The recurrence relation for the coefficients is given by Cn+2 = Cn+1 = Cn. This means that each coefficient Cn is equal to both the previous coefficient, Cn-1, and the coefficient before that, Cn-2. Essentially, the value of each coefficient is determined by the two preceding coefficients. Once the initial values, C0 and C1, are known, we can calculate all the other coefficients in the series using this relation.

Therefore, the solution to the given differential equation is an infinite series with coefficients that follow a specific pattern, where each coefficient is equal to the sum of the previous two coefficients. This recurrence relation allows us to determine the coefficients for any desired term in the series, providing a systematic method for solving the differential equation.

To learn more about differential equation click here, brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

First, we find two vectors in the plane using the given points. Then, we calculate the cross product of these vectors to find the normal vector of the plane.

Let's denote the three given points as P1(0, 0, 0), P2(6, 0, 5), and P3(-3, -1, 4). We need to find the equation of the plane passing through these points.First, we find two vectors in the plane by subtracting the coordinates of P1 from the coordinates of P2 and P3:

Vector V1 = P2 - P1 = (6, 0, 5) - (0, 0, 0) = (6, 0, 5)

Vector V2 = P3 - P1 = (-3, -1, 4) - (0, 0, 0) = (-3, -1, 4)

Next, we calculate the cross product of V1 and V2 to find the normal vector N of the plane:

N = V1 × V2 = (6, 0, 5) × (-3, -1, 4)

Performing the cross product calculation, we find N = (-5, -6, -6).

Now, we have the normal vector N = (-5, -6, -6) and a point on the plane P1(0, 0, 0). We can use the point-normal form of the equation of a plane:

A(x - x1) + B(y - y1) + C(z - z1) = 0

Substituting the values, we have -5x - 6y - 6z = 0 as the equation of the plane passing through the given points.Note: The coefficients -5, -6, and -6 in the equation represent the components of the normal vector N, and (x1, y1, z1) represents the coordinates of one of the points on the plane (in this case, P1).Finally, we substitute the coordinates of one of the points and the normal vector into the point-normal form equation to obtain the equation of the plane.

To learn more about cross product click here : brainly.com/question/29097076

#SPJ11

The time value of the annuity can be found by calculating the present value of each payment and summing them up based on the discount rate.

The given problem describes an annuity where payments are made at the end of each year for a total of 15 years. The payment amounts increase by $100 each year, starting from $100 in year 1 and ending with $1500 in year 15.

To find the time value of this annuity on the date of the last payment, we need to calculate the present value of each payment and then sum them up. The present value of each payment is determined by discounting it back to the present time using the appropriate discount rate.

Since the problem does not provide the specific discount rate (annual effective interest rate), we cannot calculate the exact time value. The time value of the annuity would vary depending on the discount rate used.

However, if we assume a pecific discount rates, we can calculate the present value of each payment and sum them up to find the time value of the annuity. The present value calculations involve dividing each payment by the appropriate power of (1 + i), where i is the annual effective interest rate.

Overall, the time value of the annuity can be determined by discounting each payment to its present value and summing them up based on the given discount rate.

Learn more about time value

brainly.com/question/29340992

#SPJ11

a) u is harmonic function :▽²u = uₓₓ + u_y_y = 0.

b) f(z) = (8xy³ - 8x'y) + i(2xy³ - (4/3)x³ + K)

c) Sc (y + x – 4ix³)dz = (1 - 4i3√2)/2 + (1/2)i.

a) Prove that the given function u(x, y) = -8x’y + 8xy3 is harmonic

The function u(x, y) = -8x’y + 8xy³ is of class C² on its domain of definition. In fact, u is defined and continuous for all x and y in R², as well as its first and second order partial derivatives.

Therefore, u satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations:

uₓ = -8y³

= -v_yu_y

= -8x' + 24xy²

= v_x.

Moreover,

[tex]u_xₓ = u_y_y[/tex]

= 0, and since u is of class C², it follows that u is harmonic:

▽²u = uₓₓ + [tex]u_y_y[/tex]

= 0.

b) Find v, the conjugate harmonic function and write f(z).

The conjugate harmonic function v can be obtained by integrating the first equation of the Cauchy-Riemann system:

∂v/∂y = -uₓ

= 8y³∫∂v/∂y dy

= ∫8y³ dxv

= 2xy³ + f(x)

From the second equation of the Cauchy-Riemann system, we know that:

∂v/∂x = u_y

= -8x' + 24xy²v

= -4x² + 2xy³ + C

The function f(x) satisfies ∂f/∂x = -4x², and hence f(x) = (-4/3)x³ + K, where K is a constant of integration.

Thus, v = 2xy³ - (4/3)x³ + K.

The analytic function f(z) is given by:

f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y)

f(z) = -8x'y + 8xy³ + i(2xy³ - (4/3)x³ + K)

f(z) = (8xy³ - 8x'y) + i(2xy³ - (4/3)x³ + K)

c) Evaluate Sc (y + x – 4ix³)dz where c is represented by:

c:The straight line from Z = 0 to Z = 1 + i C2: Along the imaginary axis from Z = 0 to Z = i.

The line integral is evaluated along the straight line from z = 0 to z = 1 + i.

Using the parameterization z = t(1 + i), with t between 0 and 1, the line integral becomes:

Sc (y + x – 4ix³)dz = ∫₀¹(1 + i)t(1 - 4i(t√2)³) dt

= ∫₀¹(1 + i)t(1 - 4i3√2t³) dt

= (1 - 4i3√2) ∫₀¹t(1 + i) dt

= (1 - 4i3√2)[(1 + i)t²/2]₀¹

= (1 - 4i3√2)(1 + i)/2

= (1 - 4i3√2)/2 + (1/2)i

Know more about the harmonic function

https://brainly.com/question/12120822

#SPJ11

The surface areas and volumes are listed below:

Case 1: A = 896 in²

Case 2: V = 1782√3 cm³

Case 3: A' = 15π m²

Case 4: h = 86 mm

Case 5: V = 7128 yd³

In this problem we find five cases of solids, whose surface areas and volumes must be found. The following formulas are used:

Areas

Rectangle

A = w · l

Triangle

A = 0.5 · w · l

Where:

Circle

A = π · r²

Where r is the radius.

Lateral area of a cone

A' = π · r · √(r² + h²)

Where:

Regular polygon

A = (1 / 4) · [n · a² / tan (180 / n)]

Where:

Volume

Pyramid

V = (1 / 3) · B · h

Prism

V = B · h

Where:

Now we proceed to determine all surface areas and volumes:

Case 1

A = [2√(25² - 24²)]² + 4 · 0.5 · 25 · [2√(25² - 24²)]

A = 896 in²

Case 2

V = (1 / 3) · (1 / 4) · [6 · 18² / tan (180 / 6)] · 11

V = (1 / 12) · 21384 / (√3 / 3)

V = (√3 / 12) · 21384

V = 1782√3 cm³

Case 3

A' = π · 3 · √(4² + 3²)

A' = 15π m²

Case 4

h = 3 · V / l²

h = 3 · (258 mm³) / (3 mm)²

h = 86 mm

Case 5

V = 18³ + (1 / 3) · 18² · √(15² - 9²)

V = 7128 yd³

To learn more on volumes of solids: https://brainly.com/question/17956344

#SPJ1