Answer:
a. both the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and the warranty of merchantability
Explanation:
since the seller assured the buyer that it would work, he breached both warranties.
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath-testing.
A. True
B. False
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath testing is a false statement. Thus option B is correct.
What is breath testing?The breath alcohol test analyzes breath air to determine the level of alcohol consumed. The test involves spitting into a breathalyzer 15 minutes after consuming alcohol. The test is used to determine how much booze is required to reach a hazardous level in the blood.
Three roadside checks for intoxication. Before stopping a car, the police may do so without having reason to believe the driver is intoxicated. In fact, it is permissible for the police to stop vehicles at random & check them for intoxicated drivers.
Operator error is significantly decreased by the device and printer display which guides the user through a testing cycle.Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about breath testing, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/15232346
#SPJ2
1. How would a teacher who chooses to tutor students after school be fulfilling her responsibilities as a good citizen?
Answer:
The Teacher is a good citizen
Explanation:
The teacher would be a good citizen since he is dedicating his free time to help another students who would not be able to pass a course without his help.
Are there ever "limit cases" where civil disobedience might be an ineffective or otherwise insufficient response to an unjust law? Why or why not? (philosophy)
Yes there are limit cases to situations where civil disobedience may be an ineffective response to unjust laws.
What is civil disobedience?This is a term that is used to refer to political protests. It is the type of disobedience that citizens may decide to carry out when they refuse to obey the laws that they have seen to be unjust and also unfair in the country that they live in.
This type of protest is usually non violent. Yes it could be ineffective if the citizens are in an authoritarian setting. Civil disobedience in such cases may lead to some ugly consequences for the protesters.
This only gets to be effective in a real democratic setting where the government is ready to listen to the people and make changes where necessary.
Read more on civil disobedience here:
https://brainly.com/question/22982846
#SPJ1
Simplify the expression.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i did this before and i got that right
Refer to the attachment!
The correct option according to the my simplification is B...
Crum Brothers Corp., a steel drum manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant in Pittsburg, Penn.. Coel Stone, the plant superintendent, hired Pitt Security Patrol, Inc. (PSP), a security company, to guard CBC property and deter thieves and vandals. Some PSP security guards, as Stone knew, carried firearms. Craig Sharp, a PSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun, in a briefcase, to work. While working at the CBC plant Craig fired his gun at Don Stew, a CBC employee, in the belief that Stew was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Stew. Stew's mother filed a suit in court against CBC and others, alleging in part that her son's death was the result of PSP's negligence, for which CBC was responsible.
PLEASE USE ISSUE, RULE, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION. I NEED THIS ANSWER FAST, THANK YOU!
Using the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion, see the analysis of the legal case indicated above.
What is the Issue?As already given, Additional security officers were engaged to defend the steel mill from thieves and vandals, as previously stated. CBC management was also aware that the security guards possessed weapons, which they were meant to employ for CBC protection.
The primary goal of recruiting more guards was to defend CBC from external threats.
What was the rule?The responsibility for confirming that the hired guards were:
trained for the circumstance and were legally permitted to carry and use weapons in a crisis situation like this;was that of CBC
Both PSP and CBC were entirely negligent in failing to check and regulate the scenario in which a security guard who was not qualified as an armed guard nonetheless carried the pistol.
What is the Analysis?Unauthorized employees carrying firearms are automatically breaking the law and endangering their own and others' safety.
Also, once CBC discovered that guards were armed with weapons, it was their job to ensure that sufficient training is provided to their personnel and that they are familiar with the entire procedure so that they may prevent any confusion and are not perceived as a thief or a risk to others.
What is the conclusion?Working in an atmosphere prone to theft and vandalism necessitated more security and armed guards, which was an inherently risky circumstance, especially when uncertified guards were deployed with guns.
However, both parties (PSP and CBC) were negligent.
Learn more about Legal case analysis at:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
what drug has an increased risk of over dose when taken with alcohol
Answer: opioids
Explanation:
opioid painkillers, Heroin, Vicodin, Fentanyl, Percocet, depressants
Which of these groups did not come to the unified states voluntary?
Historically, what sort of governing systems were supported by religious organizations?
Majority of religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
What is a democracy system?It is a government system where the laws, policies, leadership of the state are directly or indirectly decided by the people,
Hence, the religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
Read more about democracy system
brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
The monarchy was the type of religious system that was supported by organizations.
What was the Monarchy?This was the belief that the King or the queen had been appointed as the ruler of a place by God.
The religious organizations supported this type of leadership. The people were ruled by this system based on religious principles as well.
Read more on monarchy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710014
#SPJ1