{y=1/2(one half)x-6
{2x+3y=45

Answer:

chat me up I will help you understand this

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of food available divided by ..

= 0 - Var(y) = 0  Thus, we have shown that x - y and xy are uncorrelated.

To show that x - y and xy are uncorrelated, we need to show that their covariance is zero.

Covariance is defined as Cov(x,y) = E[(x - E[x])(y - E[y])].

We can expand the covariance of x-y and xy as follows:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - y - E[x - y])(xy - E[xy])]

= E[((x - E[x]) - (y - E[y]))(xy - E[x]E[y])]

= E[(x - E[x])xy - (x - E[x])E[y] - (y - E[y])E[x] + (y - E[y])E[x]E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - E[(x - E[x])E[y]] - E[(y - E[y])E[x]] + E[(y - E[y])E[x]E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - E[x - E[x]]E[y - E[y]] - E[y - E[y]]E[x - E[x]] + E[x - E[x]]E[y - E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - (Var(x) - 0)

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(x)

Since x and y have the same variance, Var(x) = Var(y). Therefore:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(x) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(y)

To show that this is equal to zero, we can use the fact that E[xy] = E[x]E[y] since x and y are independent.

Therefore:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(y)

= E[(x - E[x])y]E[x] - E[(x - E[x])E[y]] - Var(y)

= E[(x - E[x])](E[xy] - E[x]E[y]) - Var(y)

= 0 - Var(y) = 0

Thus, we have shown that x - y and xy are uncorrelated.

To learn more about variance click here

brainly.com/question/30052284

#SPJ11

At the beginning of 2024, Wagner made significant changes in accounting for investment, corrected errors, and implemented new policies. These changes may have a significant impact on the financial statements of the company.

The changes made by Wagner could affect the financial statements of the company in several ways. For example, changes in accounting methods could affect the way revenue and expenses are recognized, which could affect the company's profitability.

Correcting errors in previous financial statements could also have an impact on the company's financial position, as well as its reputation with investors and other stakeholders.

Finally, the introduction of new accounting policies could result in changes to the way financial information is presented, which could affect the way investors and other stakeholders interpret the company's financial statements. It is therefore important for Wagner to communicate these changes to stakeholders and ensure that the financial statements accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance.

Learn more about investment here:

brainly.com/question/20080933

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

Change in accounting principle: Wagner changed its method of accounting for the investment in Wise, Inc. from the previous method to the equity method. The reporting approach used is the retrospective approach, which involves adjusting the financial statements for prior periods to reflect the new method of accounting.

The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of coaching among students who retake the SAT is 0.130 to 0.176. The margin of error is 0.023. This means we are 99% confident that the true proportion of students who paid for coaching falls within this range.

A 99% confidence level means that if we were to repeat this study multiple times, 99% of the intervals we construct would contain the true proportion of students who paid for coaching. This level of confidence is commonly used in academic research to ensure that the results are reliable.

To guarantee a maximum margin of error of 1% at a 99% confidence level, the sample size needed would be approximately 15,823. This calculation can be done using the formula: n = (z^2 * p * q) / E^2, where z is the z-score for the desired confidence level, p is the estimated proportion of students who paid for coaching (0.135 in this case), q is 1-p, and E is the maximum margin of error (0.01 in this case).

Learn more about proportion here: brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ11

The odds that a student who got an A on the exam got help from the professor during office hours is about 41.77%.

To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem, which is a way to calculate conditional probabilities. Let A be the event that a student got an A on the exam, and B be the event that a student got help from the professor during office hours.

We want to find P(B|A), the probability that a student got help from the professor during office hours given that they got an A on the exam.

Bayes' theorem states that:

P(B|A) = P(A|B) * P(B) / P(A)

We are given that students who get help from the professor during office hours are 18 times more likely to get an A on the exam than students who do not get help, so:

P(A|B) = 18 * P(A|B')

where B' is the complement of B (i.e., not getting help from the professor during office hours).

We are also given that about 11.7% of students get help from the professor during office hours, so:

P(B) = 0.117

We can calculate P(A) by using the law of total probability:

P(A) = P(A|B) * P(B) + P(A|B') * P(B')

Since P(B') = 1 - P(B), we have:

P(A) = 18 * P(A|B') * 0.883 + P(A|B) * 0.117

Now we can plug in the values we have and solve for P(B|A):

P(B|A) = (18 * P(A|B') * P(B)) / (18 * P(A|B') * 0.883 + P(A|B) * 0.117)

Using a calculator, we can find that P(B|A) is approximately 41.77%.

In other words, if we randomly select a student who got an A on the exam, there is a 41.77% chance that they got help from the professor during office hours.

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31682849

#SPJ4

The angle that the ramp makes with the ground is approximately 19 degrees.

the   angle    that the ramp makes with the ground can be found using trigonometry. the tangent of the angle is equal to the height of the ramp divided by the horizontal distance it covers:

tan(θ) = height / distance

where θ is the angle, height is 3.5 ft, and distance is 10 ft.

tan(θ) = 3.5 / 10θ = arctan(3.5 / 10)

θ = 19.1 degrees (rounded to the nearest degree)

Learn more about angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

Answer: YOU have to put the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Sally's conclusion that high school GPA is an excellent and useful predictor of performance ratings at work is not entirely supported by the correlation coefficient of 0.09 with a significance level of p<.01.

Although a significant correlation suggests a positive association between high school GPA and performance ratings, the strength of the relationship is weak. The practical significance of such a weak correlation may be limited in real-world scenarios where multiple factors can influence job performance.

It is also important to note that correlation does not imply causation.

Therefore, even if high school GPA is significantly correlated with performance ratings at work, it does not necessarily mean that high school GPA is a causative factor in better job performance. Other variables such as work experience, motivation, and personality may also contribute to predicting job performance, and their effects should also be taken into account when assessing the usefulness of high school GPA as a predictor.

Learn more about correlation coefficient here:

brainly.com/question/31978443

#SPJ11

Therefore, The grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence since two numerical ranges, [70, 73) and [67, 70), have the same grade assigned to them.

Explanation:
A one-to-one correspondence means that each input has a unique output and vice versa. In this case, the grading function assigns a grade to a numerical range.
To determine if it is a one-to-one correspondence, we need to check if any two numerical ranges have the same grade assigned to them.
Looking at the given ranges, we can see that there is an overlap between [70, 73) and [67, 70) since they share the grade. Therefore, this grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence.

Therefore, The grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence since two numerical ranges, [70, 73) and [67, 70), have the same grade assigned to them.

To learn more about the linear function visit:

brainly.com/question/29612131

#SPJ11

A 15 ¾ in. board is cut in a single cut from a 38 ¼ in board. The saw cut takes 3/8 in.  21 ¾ inches of the 38 ¼ inch board is left.

To find out how much of the 38 ¼ inch board is left after cutting, follow these steps:
1. Determine the total length of the cut: The cut takes 3/8 inch and removes a 15 ¾ inch board, so the total length of the cut is 15 ¾ inches + 3/8 inch.
2. Convert mixed numbers to improper fractions: 15 ¾ = (15 × 4 + 3)/4 = 63/4; 38 ¼ = (38 × 4 + 1)/4 = 153/4
3. Add the improper fractions: (63/4) + (3/8) = (63/4) + (3/8 × 2/2) = (63/4) + (6/8) = (126/8) + (6/8) = 132/8 = 16 ½ inches
4. Subtract the cut length from the original board length: (153/4) - (132/8) = (153/4) - (16 ½ × 4/4) = (153/4) - (66/4) = 87/4 = 21 ¾ inches
After cutting, 21 ¾ inches of the 38 ¼ inch board is left.

To learn more about total length, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/23952968

#SPJ11

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

1/5*12x/1=

12x/5

1/5*-10=

-2

D=12x/5-2

Answer:

r = 3, h = 6

r = 6, h = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you need to use the first equation to solve for one variable in terms of the other.

R + h = 9

R = 9 - h

Then, you can substitute this expression for R into the second equation:

2 × r × h = 54

2 × (9 - h) × h = 54

Simplifying:

18h - 2h^2 = 54

2h^2 - 18h + 54 = 0

This is a quadratic equation, which you can solve using the quadratic formula:

h = (-b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a

Plugging in a = 2, b = -18, and c = 54, you get:

h = (18 ± sqrt(18^2 - 4(2)(54))) / (2(2))

h = (18 ± 6) / 4

h = 6 or h = 3

Now that you have values for h, you can use the first equation to solve for R:

R + h = 9

If h = 6, then R = 9 - h = 3

If h = 3, then R = 9 - h = 6

Therefore, the possible values for r and h are:

r = 3, h = 6

r = 6, h = 3

Answer: Weather Forecasting

Step-by-step explanation:

The partial fraction decomposition of the rational expression[tex]36x^2[/tex] - 10x can be written as: ([tex]36x^2[/tex] - 10x)/(ax + b) = A/(ax + b) +Bx/(ax + b) where A and B are constants to be determined.

This form of the partial fraction decomposition separates the rational expression into two simpler fractions, where the denominator is a linear factor of the form ax + b. The first fraction has a constant numerator (A), and the second fraction has a linear numerator (Bx).
To solve for the constants A and B, the expression can be rewritten as:
[tex]36x^2[/tex] - 10x = A(ax + b) + Bx(ax + b)
Expanding the right side and equating coefficients of [tex]x^{2}[/tex] and x, we get the following system of equations:
36 = aA
-10 = bA + aB
These equations can be solved for A and B once the values of a and b are known. However, since the problem instructs us not to solve for the constants, we can leave the expression in the form of the partial fraction decomposition without determining the values of A and B.

To learn more about partial fraction, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/30894807

3SPJ11

The correct option is b, the statement is false because the leading coefficient is -2, which is negative.

Here we have the quadratic function:

f(x) = -2x² - 4x + 7

Remember that if the leading coefficient is positive, then the parabola opens up, while if the leading coefficient is negative, the parabola opens down.

Here the leading coefficient is -2, is negative, then the parabola opens down.

Then the correct option is the second one, the statement is false because the leading coefficient is negative.

Learn more about quadratic functions at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Alessandra will pay $24, which is the second highest price. By making the winner pay the second highest price, the auction ensures that the winning bid is close to the true value of the item.

In an auction, the winner pays the second highest price, not their own bid. Since Alessandra's bid was $25 and the second highest bid was $24, she will pay $24. This is because the auction is designed to incentivize bidders to bid their true value for the item, as bidding too high could result in paying more than the item is worth, while bidding too low could result in losing the auction altogether. By making the winner pay the second highest price, the auction ensures that the winning bid is close to the true value of the item.

Learn more about auction here: brainly.com/question/17288557

#SPJ11

Shop A offers 3 rulers for £1.50, which is equivalent to £0.50 per ruler.

Shop B offers 5 rulers for £2, which is equivalent to £0.40 per ruler.

Therefore, Shop B offers the cheapest price.

To purchase 45 rulers, we can buy 9 sets of 5 rulers from Shop B, which would cost:

9 × £2 = £18

Alternatively, we could buy 15 sets of 3 rulers from Shop A, which would cost:

15 × £1.50 = £22.50

Therefore, the cheapest price for 45 rulers is £18 from Shop B.

The cheapest price for 45 rulers would be to buy them from Shop B, which would cost £18.

The division in mathematics is one kind of operation. In this process, we split the expressions or numbers into the same number of parts.

First, find the cost per ruler at each shop:

At Shop A, you can buy 3 rulers for £1.50, so the cost per ruler is £1.50 ÷ 3 = £0.50.

At Shop B, you can buy 5 rulers for £2, so the cost per ruler is £2 ÷ 5 = £0.40.

So, Shop B has a cheaper price per ruler.

Next, you need to find the total cost of buying 45 rulers from Shop B.

Since the cost per ruler is £0.40, you can multiply this by the number of rulers to get the total cost:

Total cost = £0.40 × 45 = £18.

Therefore, the cheapest price for 45 rulers is £18 at Shop B.

To learn more about the division;

https://brainly.com/question/13263114

#SPJ2

Gradients are an important concept in many fields of science and engineering, providing a quantitative measure of how a particular variable changes over space or time.

A gradient is a term used in mathematics and physics to describe the change in a variable over a certain distance. It refers to the rate at which a variable changes as you move from one point to another. In the context of temperature, for example, a temperature gradient would describe how the temperature changes as you move from one location to another. This can help in understanding the spatial distribution of temperature and other variables in various contexts, such as weather forecasting, climate studies, or even engineering applications.

A gradient is a measure of change in a variable, like temperature or pressure, over a specified distance, providing valuable information about the spatial distribution and variations in these variables.

A gradient can be positive, indicating an increase in the variable as you move in a particular direction, or negative, indicating a decrease. In the case of temperature, a positive gradient would mean that the temperature is increasing as you move in a particular direction, while a negative gradient would mean that the temperature is decreasing.

One important application of gradients is in the study of heat transfer. The rate at which heat flows from one location to another is proportional to the temperature gradient between the two locations. In other words, the greater the difference in temperature between two points, the faster heat will flow between them.

Overall, gradients are an important concept in many fields of science and engineering, providing a quantitative measure of how a particular variable changes over space or time.

Learn more about gradient here:

brainly.com/question/30249498

#SPJ11

The  two linearly independent solutions to the homogeneous portion of the differential equation are:

y_1 = 1

y_2 = t

The homogeneous portion of the differential equation is obtained by setting the right-hand side equal to zero:

de'' = 0

The characteristic equation is:

r^2 = 0

which has a repeated root r = 0. Therefore, the general solution to the homogeneous equation is:

y_h = c_1 + c_2 t

where c_1 and c_2 are arbitrary constants.

To find two linearly independent solutions, we can choose two different values for c_1 and c_2. For example, we can choose c_1 = 1 and c_2 = 0, which gives:

y_1 = 1

and we can choose c_1 = 0 and c_2 = 1, which gives:

y_2 = t

Both of these solutions are linearly independent because they are not multiples of each other. Therefore, the two linearly independent solutions to the homogeneous portion of the differential equation are:

y_1 = 1

y_2 = t

Visit to know more about Linearly independent:-

brainly.com/question/31328368

#SPJ11

Main Answer: The second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

Supporting Question and Answer:

How can we compare different bank offers to determine which one provides a better deal?

To compare different bank offers, we can consider the interest rates and compounding frequencies offered by each bank. By calculating the future value of an investment using the provided interest rate and compounding frequency, we can determine which bank will yield a higher return over a given time period. Additionally, considering other factors such as fees, terms and conditions, and the reputation of the banks can help in making an informed decision about which offer is a better deal.

Body of the Solution:To determine if Jim will have enough money to buy a car that costs $12,160 after 2 years with an interest rate of 9.8% compounded annually, we can calculate the future value of his initial investment of $10,000.

The formula to calculate the future value (FV) of an investment with compound interest is:

FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt);Where, P = Principal amount (initial investment) ,r = Annual interest rate (as a decimal) ,n = Number of times interest is

compounded per year and  t = Number of years

Using the given information, we have:

P = $10,000

r = 9.8% = 0.098 (as a decimal)

n = 1 (compounded annually)

t = 2 years

Plugging in these values into the formula:

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.098/1)^(1×2)

FV = 10,000(1.098)^2

FV = 10,000(1.206)

FV = 12,060

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years would be approximately $12,060. Therefore, he would not have enough money to buy the car that costs $12,160.

Now, let's consider the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually. To determine if this is a better deal, we need to calculate the future value using the same formula, but with the new interest rate.

r = 10% = 0.10 (as a decimal)

n = 2 (compounded semiannually, meaning twice a year)

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.10/2)^(2×2)

FV = 10,000(1.05)^4

FV = 10,000(1.2155)

FV = 12,155

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years with the second bank would be approximately $12,155. Therefore, the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually would be a slightly better deal as Jim would have more money by the end of the 2-year period compared to the first bank's offer.

Final Answer:Therefore, the second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

Question:Jim places ​$10,000 in a bank account that pays 9.8​% compounded. After 2 ​years, will he have enough money to buy a car that costs ​$12,160​? If another bank will pay Jim 10​% compounded semiannually​, is this a better​ deal?

To learn more about different bank offers to determine which one provides a better deal from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/13791574

#SPJ4

The second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

To compare different bank offers, we can consider the interest rates and compounding frequencies offered by each bank. By calculating the future value of an investment using the provided interest rate and compounding frequency, we can determine which bank will yield a higher return over a given time period. Additionally, considering other factors such as fees, terms and conditions, and the reputation of the banks can help in making an informed decision about which offer is a better deal.

To determine if Jim will have enough money to buy a car that costs $12,160 after 2 years with an interest rate of 9.8% compounded annually, we can calculate the future value of his initial investment of $10,000.

The formula to calculate the future value (FV) of an investment with compound interest is:

FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt);Where, P = Principal amount (initial investment) ,r = Annual interest rate (as a decimal) ,n = Number of times interest is

compounded per year and  t = Number of years

Using the given information, we have:

P = $10,000

r = 9.8% = 0.098 (as a decimal)

n = 1 (compounded annually)

t = 2 years

Plugging in these values into the formula:

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.098/1)[tex]^(1×2)[/tex]

FV = 10,000(1.098[tex])^2[/tex]

FV = 10,000(1.206)

FV = 12,060

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years would be approximately $12,060. Therefore, he would not have enough money to buy the car that costs $12,160.

Now, let's consider the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually. To determine if this is a better deal, we need to calculate the future value using the same formula, but with the new interest rate.

r = 10% = 0.10 (as a decimal)

n = 2 (compounded semiannually, meaning twice a year)

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.10/2)^(2×2)

FV = 10,000(1.05)^4

FV = 10,000(1.2155)

FV = 12,155

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years with the second bank would be approximately $12,155. Therefore, the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually would be a slightly better deal as Jim would have more money by the end of the 2-year period compared to the first bank's offer.

Therefore, the second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

To learn more about investment

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ4

Answer: The answer is D. 1/4

We cannot determine the probability of the number of 0's being different from the number of 1's without additional information. The probability depends on the length of the bit string.

However, we can state that if the length of the bit string is odd, then the probability of having an equal number of 0's and 1's is zero, and therefore the probability of having a different number of 0's and 1's is 1. On the other hand, if the length of the bit string is even, then the probability of having an equal number of 0's and 1's is positive, and therefore the probability of having a different number of 0's and 1's is less than 1.

In general, if we let n be the length of the bit string, then the probability of having an equal number of 0's and 1's is given by the binomial coefficient C(n, n/2) divided by 2^n, and the probability of having a different number of 0's and 1's is 1 minus this value.

To learn more about binomial coefficient click here: brainly.com/question/14216809

#SPJ11

Among the following pairs of triangles, the triangle in option D can be proven through SSS similarity.

Similar triangles are the pair of triangles with corresponding angles of the same magnitude and the corresponding sides are proportional. The following are the criteria for proving similarities:

In the given question,

In option A,

Given:

DF / JK = FG / KL

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by SAS criterion

In option B,

Given:

∠G = ∠L

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by AA criterion

In option C,

Given:

∠G = ∠L

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by AA criterion

In option A,

Given:

DF / JK = FG / KL = GD / LJ

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by SSS criterion

Learn more about similar triangles:

https://brainly.com/question/29782809

#SPJ1

The value of the PQ is 5.452  when the PR value is 7 and the ∠PRQ value is 50°. Option B is the correct answer.

We need to find the value of the PQ. To determine the value of PQ we need to use the trigonometry functions which are,

Sinθ = opposite side / hypotenuse

Cosθ = Adjacent side / hypotenuse

Tanθ =  opposite side / Adjacent side

Given data:

PR = 7

∠PRQ = 50°

We can determine the PQ by using the formula,

Sin θ = opposite side / hypotenuse

Sin θ = P Q / PR

0.766044 = P Q / 7

P Q =  0.766044 × 7

P Q = 5.452

Therefore, The value of the PQ is 5.45.

To learn more about trigonometry functions:

https://brainly.com/question/29615325

#SPJ1

The question is,

use one of the triangles to approximate PQ in the following triangle Answers

By using Pythagoras' theorem, the length of XY is equal to 14.4 centimeters.

In Mathematics and Geometry, Pythagorean's theorem is modeled or represented by the following mathematical equation (formula):

x² + y² = z²

Where:

x, y, and z represents the length of sides or side lengths of any right-angled triangle.

Based on the information provided about the side lengths of this right-angled triangle, we have the following equation:

XZ² = ZY² + XY²

16² = 7² + XY²

256 = 49 + XY²

XY² = 256 - 49

XY² = 207

XY = √207

XY = 14.4 centimeters.

Read more on Pythagorean theorem here: brainly.com/question/15430861

#SPJ1

To perform the indicated operations for the expression y^2-9/4 * 8/y+3, we can follow the order of operations, which is PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction).

First, we need to simplify the expression inside the parentheses:

y^2 - 9/4 * (8/(y+3))

Next, we need to simplify the expression inside the parentheses since it is enclosed in parentheses:

y^2 - 9/4 * (8/(y+3)) = y^2 - 18/(y+3)

Finally, we can simplify the expression further by multiplying (multiplication takes precedence over addition and subtraction):

y^2 - 18/(y+3) = (y^3(y+3) - 18)/4(y+3)

Thus, y^2-9/4 * 8/y+3 simplifies to (y^3(y+3) - 18)/4(y+3).

The probability of getting between 1 and 9 heads in 10 tosses is approximately 0.998 or 99.8%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the binomial distribution formula:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

where:

X is the number of heads

n is the number of tosses

p is the probability of getting a head in a single toss

(n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k heads from n tosses

In this case, we want to find the probability of getting between 1 and 9 heads in 10 tosses, inclusive. So we need to calculate:

P(1 ≤ X ≤ 9) = P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + ... + P(X = 9)

To simplify the calculation, we can use the complement rule:

P(1 ≤ X ≤ 9) = 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 10)

where P(X = 0) and P(X = 10) represent the probabilities of getting 0 and 10 heads, respectively.

Using the binomial distribution formula, we can calculate:

P(X = 0) = (10 choose 0) * 0.5^0 * 0.5^10 = 0.0009765625

P(X = 10) = (10 choose 10) * 0.5^10 * 0.5^0 = 0.0009765625

So:

P(1 ≤ X ≤ 9) = 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 10) = 1 - 2 * 0.0009765625 = 0.998046875

Therefore, the probability of getting between 1 and 9 heads in 10 tosses is approximately 0.998 or 99.8%.

Learn more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The p-value (0.025) is less than the level of significance (0.05). Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

This means that there is a low probability of obtaining the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. As a result, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the correct decision regarding the null hypothesis test is to reject the null hypothesis.

In a hypothesis test, the p-value was calculated as 0.025, and the level of significance is α = 0.05. To make a decision regarding the null hypothesis test, compare the p-value to the level of significance. If the p-value is less than or equal to α, reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than α, do not reject the null hypothesis.

In this case, the p-value (0.025) is less than the level of significance (0.05). Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis (option d).

To know more about hypothesis visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13286354

#SPJ11

Answer:

1740 people

Step-by-step explanation:

A 16% increase is 0.16 as a decimal.

1500 * 0.16 = 240 more people expected next year

Add that 240 to the 1500 for the total number expected next year:

1500+240 = 1740 people

Answer: Approximately 1,740 people are expected to attend the homecoming football game this year, which is a 16% increase from last year's attendance of 1,500 people. This value is already rounded to the nearest person.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sure, let's calculate the expected attendance for this year's homecoming football game.

Step 1: Understand the problem

The problem states that there was an attendance of 1,500 people last year and this year there is expected to be a 16% increase in attendance. We need to find out the expected attendance for this year.

Step 2: Set up the equation

We can calculate the increase in attendance by multiplying last year's attendance by the percentage increase. The equation for this is:

New Attendance = Old Attendance + (Old Attendance * Percentage Increase)

Step 3: Substitute the given values into the equation

In this case, the Old Attendance is 1,500 and the Percentage Increase is 16% or 0.16 in decimal form. Substituting these values into the equation gives:

New Attendance = 1,500 + (1,500 * 0.16)

Step 4: Solve the equation

Let's calculate the result.

The calculation gives us:

New Attendance = 1,740

So, approximately 1,740 people are expected to attend the homecoming football game this year, which is a 16% increase from last year's attendance of 1,500 people. This value is already rounded to the nearest person.