Write an expression for "two multiplied by t".
Please help!!
10 POINTS

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes, you can make a triangle with it

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Lengths: 9in, 4in, 6in[/tex]

Required

Do the lengths form a valid triangle

To do this, we make use of triangle inequality theorem which states that;

For sides a, b and c;

[tex]a + b > c[/tex]

[tex]b + c >a[/tex]

[tex]a + c > b[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]9 + 4 > 6[/tex] -- true

[tex]4 + 6 > 9[/tex] -- true

[tex]6 + 9 > 4[/tex] -- true

Since all the inequalities are true, then the sides form a valid triangle

Answers

D 36

Step-by-step explanation:

77 is the area for the squared trapezoid and 36 is the closest to 77

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B.  r = 6.30÷5

Step-by-step explanation:

The cost per pencil is found by dividing the cost by the number of pencils.

Here, the cost is $6.30 and the number of pencils is 5. Then the cost per pencil (r) is ...

  r = 6.30 ÷ 5

Answer:

Hi! The answer to your question is B. {[tex]{-3, -13}[/tex]}

Step-by-step explanation:

☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆

☆Brainliest is greatly appreciated!☆

Hope this helps!!

- Brooklynn Deka

Answer:

-2x+10

Step-by-step explanation:

-2(x-5)

Distribute

-2*x -2*-5

-2x+10

Answer:

18.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

So happy you are with brainly

Step-by-step explanation:

34

if c is a irrational number that means a or b is also an irrational number or both of them are irrational numbers but they are different then each other

i hope that will help

There are two possible answers:

You can only pick one of those two cases. In short, exactly one of the 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational. Both 'a' and b cannot be rational together, and they both cannot be irrational together.

================================================

Explanation:

For a moment, let's say that 'a' and b are both rational numbers. This means they would be ratios of integers. So,

a = p/q

b = r/s

where p,q,r,s are integers. The denominators q & s cannot be zero.

Multiplying those rational numbers 'a' and b leads to

a*b = (p/q)*(r/s) = (p*r)/(q*s)

We get a result in the form of integer/integer. Recall that multiplying any two integers leads to some other integer. Since (p*r)/(q*s) is a ratio of integers, it is rational and that makes a*b = c to be rational. However, your teacher said that c is irrational which is the opposite of rational.

In short, if both 'a' and b are rational, then a*b = c is rational. This means we know for certain that both 'a' and b cannot be both rational for c to be irrational.

------------------------

Next, we'll consider 'a' and b to both be irrational. Is it possible to have a*b = c to be irrational as well? It depends.

If we have the following

a = sqrt(3)

b = sqrt(12)

then,

a*b = sqrt(3)*sqrt(12) = sqrt(3*12) = sqrt(36) = 6

Showing that a*b is rational because 6 = 6/1 is a ratio of integers. This is a bit strange considering how 'a' and b themselves were irrational, but they led to a rational product.

This doesn't always happen since something like

sqrt(3)*sqrt(5) = sqrt(3*5) = sqrt(15)

is irrational. So if both 'a' and b are irrational together, then a*b could be rational or it could be irrational. We would need more information about the values of 'a' and b.

Therefore, we know that we can rule out the case that 'a' and b are irrational together.

------------------------

Lastly, we'll consider the case when one of 'a' or b is rational while the other is irrational. The order doesn't matter. So we'll make 'a' to be irrational and b to be rational.

Since b is rational, this means b = p/q for some integers p,q where q is nonzero. The value of 'a' cannot be written as a ratio like this because it is irrational.

Multiplying any nonzero rational number with an irrational one always leads to an irrational result. If a*b was rational, then we could say

a*b = r/s

a*(p/q) = r/s

a = (r/s)*(q/p)

a = (r*q)/(s*p)

Showing that 'a' is rational, but this contradicts the fact we made 'a' to be irrational at the top of this section. Therefore, a*b is always irrational if exactly one of 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational.

In other words, if,

then a*b = c is irrational

Answer:

[tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] is bigger.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {9}^{27} = ( {3}^{2} )^{27} = {3}^{2 \times 27} = {3}^{54} \\ [/tex]

If we compare the exponents of [tex] {3}^{54}[/tex] and [tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] it can be concluded that:

[tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] > [tex] {3}^{54}[/tex]

Answer:

I love Math anyways  

the ans is in the picture with the steps  

(hope it helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answers:

Open the pdf below and youll find what you need. also do the largest bills you can.

Answer:

336 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for a triangle is 1/2 * height *base

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7.7 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution is given by the quadratic formula.

For ax² +bx +c = 0, the roots are ...

  x = (-b±√(b²-4ac))/(2a)

We want the positive root, so ...

  x = (-113 -√(113² -4(-16)(74)))/(2(-16)) = (113 +√17505)/32 ≈ 7.6658

The rocket will hit the ground about 7.7 seconds after it is launched.

Answer:

At 10 percent significance level, there is not enough statistical evidence to suggest that there is a difference between mean

a. The decision rule for 5% level of confidence is;

For test statistic is less than 2.306 we fail to reject the null hypothesis

For a test statistic larger than 2.306 we reject the null hypothesis

b. The test statistic is approximately -1.2008

Step-by-step explanation:

The given data are;

No; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

East Side Shop; 548, 493, 609, 567, 432

West Side Shop; 523, 721, 695, 510, 532

Therefore, we have;

The mean for the East Side Shop, [tex]\overline x_1[/tex] = 529.8

The standard deviation for the East Side Shop, s₁ = 68.751

The mean for the West Side Shop, [tex]\overline x_2[/tex] = 596.2

The standard deviation for the West Side Shop, s₂ = 102.7701

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2})}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^{2} }{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

Therefore, we have;

The null hypothesis is H₀; μ₂ - μ₁ = 0

The alternative hypothesis is Hₐ; μ₂ - μ₁ ≠ 0

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(529.8-596.2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{68.751^{2} }{5}+\dfrac{102.7701^{2}}{5}}} \approx -1.2008[/tex]

At degrees of freedom, df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 8, we have the critical-t = 1.895

Given that the critical-t is more than test statistic, we do not reject the null hypothesis, therefore, there is not enough statistical evidence to suggest that there is a difference between mean

Required;

a. At 5% level, we have critical-t = 2.306

Therefore, the decision rule for 5% level of confidence is that we fail to reject the null hypothesis when the magnitude of the test statistic is less than 2.306 and we reject the null hypothesis for a test statistic larger than 2.306

b. The test statistic is given as follows;

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2})}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^{2} }{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(529.8-596.2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{68.751^{2} }{5}+\dfrac{102.7701^{2}}{5}}} \approx -1.2008[/tex]

Solution:

The difference of cubes identity is

if a and b are any two real numbers, then difference of their cubes, when taken individually:

a³-b³= (a-b)(a² + ab + b²)→→→Option (D) is

true option.

I will show you, how this identity is valid.

Taking RHS

(a-b)(a² +b²+ab)

= a (a² +b²+ab)-b(a² +b²+ab)

= a³ + a b² +a²b -b a² -b³-ab² Cancelling like terms, we get

= a³-b³

= LHS

Answer:

231

Step-by-step explanation:

TB equals 90 bc it's a 90 degree angle. To get BD you need to subtract 180 and 90 bc half of a circle equals 180. Do the same to find DC but it's 180-129. Then to find TBC you add all of those together.

Answer:

I think Cube

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

210 is answer when bases are same. powers should be added

Step-by-step explanation:

it's basically indicesis basically in this is so it was multiplication addition rule that you use

Answer:

Impossible

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6.11 or 6.12

Step-by-step explanation:

You will have to divide 116.25 by 19

to find the length Mr.Rice will need to purchase

which is 6.11842105

Answer:

3.259259259259 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3 7/27

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok so first you do

2×1 = 2, then

2×2/9 = 4/9, then

1×2/3 = 2/3, then

2/3×2/9 = 4/27, then add all of those...

2+4/9+2/3+4/27= 3 7/27    

Hope this helps!! :D

Answer:

1_2/3

=1/3 or 0.33

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability is not more than 1..

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

3x/6=36

3x=36(6)

3x=216

x=216/3

x=72

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

11 1/4 divided by 3= 3.75 (3 3/4)

Answer:

d) [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex] pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

What we know:

- Sarah has [tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex] pounds of dog food

- Sarah is dividing this into 3 containers

1) Convert [tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex] into an improper fraction

[tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Multiply the whole number by the denominator

11 × 4 = 44

Add 44 to the numerator

44 + 1 = 45

[tex]\frac{45}{4}[/tex]

2) Divide [tex]\frac{45}{4}[/tex] by 3

[tex]\frac{45}{4} / 3[/tex]

Dividing by a number is the same as multiplying its reciprocal

[tex]= \frac{45}{4} *\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Multiply the numerators and the denominators

[tex]45*1 = 45\\4*3 = 12[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{45}{12}[/tex]

3) Convert [tex]\frac{45}{12}[/tex] into a mixed number fraction

[tex]\frac{45}{12}[/tex] ⇒ [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Therefore, there will be [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex] pounds of food in each container.

I hope this helps!

Answer: 1.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Expected value is the weighted average of the various possibilities and their probability of occurring.

The probabilities represented are:

0.35, 0.35, 0.15 and 0.15.

They add up to:

= 0.35 +0.35 + 0.15 + 0.15

= 1

The possibilities are; 0, 1, 2 and 3.

Expected value = (0.35 * 0) + (0.35 * 1) + (0.15 *2) + ( 0.15 * 3)

= 1.1

The Answer is (6x^2+7x+2)

Use the FOIL method

Answer:

height = 26.96 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

sin 64° = height/30

0.8988 = height/30

height = 26.96 feet

Answer:

H0 : u ≤ 0.353  

Ha: u > 0.353

Step-by-step explanation:

The null and alternate hypotheses are formulated by the given claim. The claim is mostly set as the alternate hypothesis and the opposite of the alternate hypothesis is the null hypothesis.

In this question the given statement is the average on this final test to gauge preservation interest was 35.3 (out of 100). This can be used as the null hypothesis.

H0 : u ≤ 0.353  

The claim is also given which is To test whether the  new curriculum Improves impressions about witte preservation.

against the claim Ha: u > 0.353

Therefore it will be a one tailed test.