Answer:
The Mexican–American War, also known in the United States as the Mexican War and in Mexico as the Intervención Estadounidense en México, was an armed conflict between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. It followed the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico still considered Mexican territory since the government did not recognize the Velasco treaty signed by Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna when he was a prisoner of the Texian Army during the 1836 Texas Revolution. The Republic of Texas was de facto an independent country, but most of its citizens wished to be annexed by the United States. Domestic sectional politics in the U.S. were preventing annexation since Texas would have been a slave state, upsetting the balance of power between northern free states and southern slave states. In the 1844 United States presidential election, Democrat James K. Polk was elected on a platform of expanding U.S. territory in Oregon and Texas. Polk advocated expansion by either peaceful means or by armed force, with the 1845 annexation of Texas furthering that goal by peaceful means. For Mexico, this was a provocation, but Polk went further, sending U.S. Army troops to the area; he also sent a diplomatic mission to Mexico to try to negotiate the sale of territory. U.S. troops' presence was provocative and designed to lure Mexico into starting the conflict, putting the onus on Mexico and allowing Polk to argue to Congress that a declaration of war should be issued. Mexican forces attacked U.S. forces, and the United States Congress declared war.
Explanation:
Here you go, btw you should give more than 8 points ;/
Mexican War (1846–48).After weeks of fruitless diplomacy, the United States and the republic of Mexico declared war on each other in the spring of 1846. By the 1840s, many Americans held the view that the United States should reach from the Atlantic all the way to the Pacific Ocean. In 1844, Democrat James K. Polk of Tennessee ran for the presidency and won on a platform of expansionism, embracing the popular concept of “manifest destiny”—that God approved U.S. expansion throughout the continent. Polk opened diplomacy designed to redeem his campaign pledges to purchase California and other Mexican lands as well as to obtain the Oregon country from Britain. Considered in grand strategic terms, Polk intended to make the United States the undisputed national power on the North American continent and to obtain West Coast ports. The British agreed to an equitable treaty dividing Oregon, but no self‐respecting patriotic Mexican leader would be satisfied with any amount of money for California.
U.S. annexation of Texas sparked the war. The Texas Revolution of 1836 had won independence for the republic of Texas, but Mexico never officially recognized the loss of the province. Polk's predecessor, John Tyler, arranged the annexation of Texas into the United States in 1845 by a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress before Polk was sworn in. According to Mexico, the United States had torn away one of its provinces. The Mexican government rejected Polk's final offer of $35 million for California and other lands and dispatched military forces to the Rio Grande. It also rejected Texas and U.S. claims that the border extended south to the Rio Grande instead of the Nueces River.
On 23 April 1846, President Mariano Paredes announced that a state of “defensive” war existed between Mexico and the United States, in response to the violation of the Texas border by U.S. soldiers under Gen. Zachary Taylor, who marched under Polk's orders from Louisiana through Texas up to the Nueces River. On 25 April, Mexican and U.S. forces fought a skirmish between the Nueces and the Rio Grande. Eleven U.S. dragons were killed, five wounded and forty‐seven captured. It took several days for word of the skirmish to reach President Polk, who had previously decided on war even before Paredes's announcement. On 11 May, he asked Congress to acknowledge the state of war that Mexico had already announced, but did so with a resounding and controversial call: “American blood has been shed on American soil.” On 13 May, Congress strongly endorsed Polk's request, 174–14 in the House of Representatives and 40–2 in the Senate. Critics, mostly northern Whigs, condemned the president's action, asserting that he sought war to acquire more slave territory and denying that the disputed border area belonged to the United States.
Northern Mexico included two commercial centers, Santa Fe, New Mexico, and San Francisco, California. Lightly populated and distant from Mexico City, both provinces were difficult to defend. Polk met with his cabinet and formulated a remarkably ambitious strategy. He ordered U.S. soldiers to invade New Mexico, capture Santa Fe, then proceed to conquer California, where a naval squadron would assist them in securing the province. Meanwhile, General Taylor with less than 3,000 regulars would drive Mexican forces south of the Rio Grande, which the United States claimed as the international boundary. Polk assumed that if U.S. forces occupied the Rio Grande as well as key spots in New Mexico and California, Mexico would have no choice but to concede the fait accompli, and the United States would have won the war.
For their part, however, the Mexicans stood ready to fight, both for the defense of their territory and the future of their fledgling nation, which only twenty‐four years earlier had won its independence from Spain. Mexico possessed a tiny naval coast guard and on paper had a national army of more than 30,000 soldiers, over three times the U.S. Army's size at 8,500 officers and men. Numbers masked contrasts between the two armies, however. The Mexican Army was indifferently trained and unevenly equipped. Some units had enthusiastic officers, good weapons, and adequate supplies; others were deficient in all respects. Many Mexican officers held honorific commissions but knew little about military matters. The army had been involved with intrigues in the national capital, where commanders went in and out of favor with the political winds. Thus, the Mexican Army had more weaknesses than strengths.
Which of the following statements about the Cloture Rule is FALSE?
A. The Cloture Rule is rarely used in the Senate.
B. The Cloture Rule is used to prevent or stop a filibuster.
C. The Cloture Rule can only be invoked twice during a senatorial debate.
D. The Cloture Rule was adopted in 1917 when a filibuster lasted for three weeks.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
HELP ASAP LIMITED TIME!!
A preliminary election to select, by popular vote, the party's candidate is
a) a run-off election.
b) a caucus.
c) a convention.
d) a direct primary.
Answer:
b) A caucus
Explanation:
is “a meeting of party leaders or party members to select candidates, elect convention delegates, and establish the party’s policy position on specific issues.” The word can also be a verb for meeting in this way (e.g., the Republicans caucused ).
What 3 major periods divide ancient
Rome's[ history?
Early, Middle, and Late?
Regal, Republican, and ?Imperial
Farming, Warring, and Urban?
Answer:
the second one -- regal republican and imperial
Explanation:
What should a student do independently to prepare for a formal discussion? Check all that apply.
do research
establish goals
develop opinions
pick a moderator
create guidelines
take careful notes
Answer:
A B E F
Explanation:
Just took the test
In the 1800s, European nations competed with each other to conquer and colonize countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Explain the economic and political motivations for these conquests, and the benefits and negative effects of imperialism.
Were 17th Century and 18th Century Russia essentially the same? I need to write a paragraph on it. Thanks.
Explanation:
Centuries are conveniently employed as units of periodization, at any rate in modern European historiography. Such a division of time implies that each century possesses a physiognomy of its own, distinguishing it from those preced ing and those following it, and imparting some sort of coherence to all events that occurred within its limits. That the strict chronological boundaries of a century may not always be observed in such periodization (for example, 1715 to 1789 passes as the eighteenth century in French history) need not unduly disturb us. The minor chronological discrepancies do point, however, to a significant aspect of this standard as a unit of periodization. The fact that the unit varies depending on which element of past life (political, economic, religious, cultural, or any other) is chosen as the determining criterion means that the "century" differs from country to country. Traditionally, reigns have served to define a historical period, although specific political events, for instance revolutions, may have been more significant. In some instances, a century has been defined in terms of events in different realms of public life; thus, in the case of France, the eighteenth century denotes both the age of Enlightenment" and the prodrome of "1789 and all that." I restate here the obvious in order to call attention to an aspect of historical reflection that is not always acknowledged: one may, for example, speak of eighteenth-century France or of Germany in the eighteenth century, but it is quite possible that, depending on the criteria used, features associated with one century in one country may appear in a different chronologi cal unit in another country.
Periodization of modern European history has traditionally been based on the experience of France: politically, the seventeenth century in that country stretches from the assassination of Henry IV in 1610 to the death of Louis XIV in 1715, while the eighteenth century ends abruptly and symbolically on July 14, 1789 (or, according to some historians, on the night of August 4 of the same year). In cultural terms the seventeenth century in France is the period of classical literature, just as the eighteenth is the age of the philosophes. This periodization is inadequate, however, when we talk about the social and eco nomic history of the country. We see, for example, that economically and socially the Ancien Régime prevailed well into the nineteenth century. Similar chronological discrepancies can be found in the socioeconomic history of other
This essay is based on a talk given at the first meeting of Harvard University's study group for the eighteenth century and on a lecture delivered at the Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences in July 1981.
How did Native Americans react when the English settlers invaded their homeland?
The Native Americans resisted.
The Native Americans ran away
The Native Americans did nothing
The Native Americans adopted all the English beleifs and customs.
Answer:
Explanation:
the natives adopted the english customs and ways
Which element of the Constitution reflects the influence of the French philosopher Baron de Montesquieu?
cross out
the amendment process
cross out
the Electoral College
cross out
the “necessary and proper” clause
cross out
the separation of powers
Answer:
The Separation of Powers
Explanation:
Montesquieu called the idea of dividing government power into three branches the "separation of powers." He thought it most important to create separate branches of government with equal but different powers. That way, the government would avoid placing too much power with one individual or group of individuals.
“Although the principle of equality has always been self-evident, it has never been self-executing. It has taken acts of courage from generations of fearless and hopeful Americans to make our country more just.”
Explain what this quote means and how it relates to Rosa Parks.
This quote is saying that equality hasnt always been around for everyone in this case it would be referring to Blacks. The self executing part is referring to how inequality has never just appearwd its taken multiple people such as rosa parks and martin luther king and others to help bring it about. And it relates to Rosa Parks because she was one of the people to take a stand for equality and help try to gather others to do similar acts in the name of equality.
What group of people had the right to vote in colonial America?
A.
Only male colonists of British descent.
B.
Only men serving in the governor’s office.
C.
Only males who were religious leaders.
D.
Only men who owned property.
E.
Only men who were slave owners.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Anwser:
be I would think the only one that would make sence would be D. Only men who owned property.
Explanation:
Why is reading this first-person account of a slave auction
important?
This was a policy that the US would lend goods to Britain and return Britain would replace them after the war
A. Share Lease Policy
B. Lend Lease Policy
C. neither
Answer:
Correct answer is B. Lend Lease Policy .
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as this was not a name of any policy related to the mentioned question.
B is correct as this policy was introduced in 1941. Although United States officially didn't enter the war, but signed an act according to which they will lend goods to Britain during the war. It later spread on other countries that were on the side of Allies.
ill give points if you help me! please and thank you! :)
Answer:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau if I remember correctly. Sorry if I am wrong. Have a fantastic day!
All of the following are types of jurisdiction except:
O concurrent
O appellate
O exclusive
O criminal
Answer:
Criminal
Explanation:
tama na po yan
This area of the United States was acquired from the British in an 1846 treaty
Answer:
The British gained the land north of the 49th parallel, along with the Vancouver Island.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
The area of the United States that was acquired from the British is Pacific Northwest and in an 1846 treaty called the Treaty of Oregon.
The acquisition of the Pacific Northwest via the Oregon Treaty had far-reaching consequences for the United States. It cemented American dominance over a broad territory, created prospects for westward expansion, and influenced the formation of the Western United States.
The Oregon Treaty was signed by the United States and the United Kingdom to settle disagreements about control of the Oregon Country. Both countries occupied this region, which included modern-day Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and sections of Montana and Wyoming.
Thus, the area of the United States that was acquired from the British is Pacific Northwest, and in an 1846 treaty called the Treaty of Oregon.
Learn more about treaty, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29570726
#SPJ4
SOMEONE HELP ILL GIVE BRAINLY
How did the Reconstruction plans of President Johnson and Radical Republicans in Congress differ in dealing with the defeated rebellious states?
The radical republicans differ from Lincoln's plan because they thought the war was easy towards the south.
Explanation:
Radical republicans believed that the Lincoln plan for reconstruction was not harsh enough because from their point of view the south was guilty of starting the war and the deserved to be punished as such. The south needed to be rebuilt the civil war.
President Andrew Johnson, the successor to President Abraham Lincoln, after his assassination had a very difficult idea about it than with radical republicans.
What is a nation-state?
OA. An independent group of people who live in a state with no
government
OB. An independent group of people living in a defined territory with an
OC. A group of people with a shared culture and language who live in a
OD. A group of people living under the rule of a government in which
organized governrnent
number of countries
they have no say
Answer:
OC. A group of people with a shared culture and language who live in a
Explanation:
Answer:
OB. An independent group of people living in a defined territory with an
Local government decisions are usually based on what 2 factors?
taxes and revenues
social and environmental issues
education and crime
priorities and resources
Explanation:
we have exactly same question. can someone give us an answer plssss
How did trade along the Silk Road contribute to economic interdependence?
Check all that apply.
Answer:
Silk Roads across Eurasia,
of trade routes enabled merchants to travel from China to the Mediterranean Sea, carrying with them high-value commercial goods, the exchange of which encouraged urban growth and prosperity.
Explanation:
The trade on the Silk Road was such that the following is true:
Civilizations across the network relied on trade.Silk Road trade led to exchange of technology and innovations. Religions and philosophies spread via the Silk RoadWhen the Mongols were in power, they protected the Silk RoadThe Silk Road was hugely important to the development of Eurasia as nations connected to the networks created carried out extensive trade such that nations advanced when they came in contact with technology from other nations.
Religions and philosophies such as Christianity, spread along to Silk Road which allowed for this to happen. Even the Mongols protected the Silk Road with intensity because the empire grew quite wealthy from the trade on it.
In conclusion, the Silk Road was heavily important to Eurasia.
Find out more on the Silk Road at https://brainly.com/question/827753.
Under Pericles, how did Athens take a leading role in the Delian League?
Pericles moved the Delian League treasury to Athens.
Members elected Athens as the leader of the league.
Pericles offered money to build a fleet of trade ships.
Members sent soldiers to live and train in Athens.
Answer:
I hope this helps
Explanation:
The Delian League was a defensive league made up of city-states and controlled by Athens that defended each other against Persia. During the next several decades, the league drove persia out of Anatolia and Greece grew richer through increased overseas trade.
Answer:
Pericles moved the Delian League treasury to Athens.
Explanation:
That's what he did.
Which of the following statements is most likely to have been said by a Federalist?
I'd vote for this new constitution, if it had a bill of rights.
The country is falling apart; we must find a way to hold it together.
I know something must change, but I am afraid of this new system.
I don't want to give up any more liberties; a strong national government is dangerous!
Answer:
I know for sure its not "I'd vote for this new constitution, if it had a bill of rights." because remember the anti-federalists fought for the bill of rights. the federalists said the constitution should be ratified imidietely to prevent chaos.(lol excuse my spelling). same goes with " I don't want to give up any more liberties; a strong national government is dangerous!". im pretty sure its not "I know something must change, but I am afraid of this new system" because that seems to go with the others. i think its " The country is falling apart; we must find a way to hold it together."
Explanation:
PLEAASE ILL MARK AS BRAINIEST
WHAT CIVILZTION WAS MORE ADVANCED INDUS VALLEY OR MESOPATAMIA
Answer:
The Indus Valley Civilization
Explanation:
The Indus Valley Civilization only flourished in its most developed form between 2500 and 1800 BCE until it became extinct, but at the time of these exchanges, it was a much larger entity than the Mesopotamian civilization, covering an area of 1.2 million square kilometers with thousands of settlements,
now give me the brainliest
what event increased great britain’s national debt
Answer:
The costs of fighting a protracted war on several continents meant Britain's national debt almost doubled from 1756 to 1763, and this financial pressure which Britain tried to alleviate through new taxation in the Thirteen Colonies helped cause the American Revolution.
Explanation:
i hope this helps
Answer:
French and Indian War
Explanation:
Many things increased Britain's debt including the French and Indian war. The British forced colonists to pay taxes to help repay their debt.
What is the second question answer ??
Answer:
option 2
Explanation:
please Mark me brainliest
What was the fundamental difference between the two political parties?
Answer:
their ideologies, party symbols and schemes and programmes they offer
PLEASE SHELP ASAP (im timed)
Why did Japan open its ports to U.S. trade?
a.
to make a profit
c.
they feared a military attack
b.
to establish friendly relations
d.
to obtain opium
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
They feared a military attack, as their military was not strong enough compared to the Western countries.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. they feared a military attack
Explanation:
i got it right on edg
When were some women nicknamed the flappers?
A. 1930-1940
B. 1920-1930
C. neither
Answer:
c. neither it was 1920s
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:i hope that helps
How did rani jaivanta dies
Answer:
Rani Bhatiyani was the youngest wife of Rana Uday Singh and the most loved mother of Maharana Pratap. She would plan scheme after scheme and no one would ever suspect her except the Maharani of Mewar, Jaivanta Bai. After Pratap grew up, Uday Singh developed a suspect on Bhatiyani. When he was totally sure about his suspect, he sentenced Dheer Bai a death punishment.It is also believed that she was forced to lead a widow's life and died when the time came.
Explanation:
Simelarites between fredrick douglus and john brown
Answer:
John Brown and Frederick Douglass are both abolitionists
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass and John Brown were both abolitionist leaders trying to abolish slavery in the United States. Also, the states they were born in had slavery really bad Frederick Douglass grew up in Maryland and John Brown grew up in Connecticut.
The mystery document was an example of what
Answer:
black codes
Explanation:
I'm think that's the answer you're looking for