Why does the federal government have more power than state government?

Answer: Humans have been using brands to identify livestock animals for thousands of years. In ancient times it was more of a ritualistic act. During the Middle Ages in Europe, hot branding was used to identify the owner of livestock. This has continued throughout history. In the American West branding is often associated with trail drives and cattle rustlers.

In more modern times, we have other styles of identification including ear tags, and tattoos, but branding is still used to identify ownership of animals. This is especially important in Western states, where grazing of public lands is vital to raising cattle. Out on the vast ranges cattle can easily wonder or get mixed with other herds. Believe it or not, there are still modern-day cattle rustlers to keep an eye out for. Being able to identify an animal’s owner by a brand is critically important. In many situations, brands are used to identify specific animals by branding a number on their side or hip. A brand is frequently used in the purebred cattle business to identify an animal’s original  ownership after change in owners takes place. Most brands are placed either on the shoulder, side, or behind the hip. Excessive branding is discouraged because it decreases the leather value of the hide.

Branding was once mostly hot iron, heated in a fire pit or barrel. Hot brands tan the hide and leaves a scar where the brand was placed. This technique is still commonly used in large cattle herds like on this ranch near Colorado Springs. Other techniques in branding have also been introduced in more modern times. Electricity is commonly used to heat the branding iron or a freeze brand can also be used. This ranch in Wyoming also brands their cattle.

Freeze branding works by killing the pigment producing cells, resulting in white hair regrowth. Both of these can be easily read from a distance when done properly. The cow may budge and bawl for a moment, but no long-term harm or pain is done to the animal.

Answer:

lower demand

Explanation:

Answer:

1

Explanation:

1

Answer:

The North people wanted to block south seaports to gain control of the Mississippi River to control transportaion and cut the South in two, and to capture Richmond. The South's plan was simpler southerners planned to defend their territory until the northerners tired of fighting.

Explanation:

Answer:

i don't know the answer ask you best friend

Answer:

C. They allied with European powers.

Explanation:

Question being asked:How did some American Indians react to the growing conflicts between European powers in North America? 

They worked together to resist all Europeans. Nope

They gave their land to European colonists. Yes

They allied with European powers. Nope

Hope this helps :)

A. Congress

Hope this helps, mate! Good luck.

Answer:

OMG!! that game was my childhood, and yes Ik how to fix it! (hopefully)

So what you have to do is:

Hopefully rebooting your device works! :]

Answer:

dude we need the video to answer ur question

Answer:

This sura is called al-Anfal, because the word "anfal" is used twice in its first verse.The sura is also called Badr, because it was revealed on the occasion of the battle of Badr when, according to some commentators, some disagreement appeared among the Muslims over the distribution of the spoils of the battle.It is also called Sura al-Jihad, because after its revelation, the Prophet (s) would order the soldiers to recite it in battles.

Answer:

In the 19th century, the South was as dependent on outsiders as it had been during the colonial period.

Hope This Helps

Explanation:

Answer:

The 3 organs of Central Government are as follows:

Legislative who makes the Law

Executive who implements the Law, and

Judiciary who interprets the Law

Answer:

D

Explanation:

gain new resources

Answer:

D. Gain new resources

Explanation:

Took the test and it makes the most sense

Answer:

D. Lockout

Explanation:

took the quiz and got it right!

hope this helps

^^

Answer:

lockout

Explanation:

Answer:

World Health Organization

Explanation:

World Health Organization is concerned with the statistic.

Answer: World Health Organization

Explanation:Because in 1998 polio's cases went over 99% so that means that the internal organization that corners with his was world health organization

Answer: The meaning of the word Mohenjo-Daro is 'Mound of the dead'. It is a well planned and organized town. It has two very important buildings; The great Bath and the Great Granary. The Great Bath was perhaps used for ritualistic purposes. Located at the center of the citadel, it is remarkable for beautiful brickwork. The Great Granary, which was perhaps the largest building of the Indus Valley Civilization suggests extreme centralization as the ruling authorities must have first brought the agricultural produce here and then redistributed it

pls mark me as brainliest

Answer:

O boy, that’s a long, long, answer.

Well lets start.

First of all, why did the United States enter WWI?

There were a few reasons, but one sticks out the most... that is of course, money. The British and a few other countries the United States had funded were in fact, buying weapons and other supplies from the U.S. If the United States had just let these countries lose the war, they would have lost an insane amount of profits from these supplies that they had sent over. Therefore, the U.S. had a reason there. There are a few other arguements as to why, but for the general portion, that is widely considered the main reason the U.S. gto involved.

Moving on to your question: How did it effect the outcome of the war?

For starters, the war of WW1 was faught in the trenches, so the europeans were generally fighting for basically inches of land — that is until the Germans invented tanks and the infamous Blitzkrieg. The British and French forces were essentially being dominated by this overpowering force.

When the united States joined the war in 1917, it was a significant turn of events. The British and french now had access to additional resources, food, ammunition, the neccessities! The Americans also brought their people which added additional manpower to the fight.

So yes, the United States entering the war in 1917, definitely had an impact on WW1.

The plague brought an eventual end to Serfdom in Western Europe. The manorial system was already in trouble, but the Black Death assured its demise throughout much of western and central Europe by 1500. Severe depopulation and migration of the village to cities caused an acute shortage of agricultural laborers.

Answer:

A military leader take some control over a country's government and launches a series of wars

Answer:

A military leader take some control over a country's government and launches a series of wars

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

We can help you to answer this question based on our knowledge of the topic.

The relationship between Conservation Movement and progressive politicians during the Progressive Era was the conservationists supported the progressives to demand a series of changes that could benefit the United States.

In the particular case of the Conservation Movement, conservationists demanded the federal government its intervention to keep the natural resources of the country. US President Theodore Roosevelt backed the proposition and was known as the greatest conservationist.

The problem had been that during the 1800s, industries overexploited the raw materials and naturals resources of the United States. That is why the Conservationists Movement demanded to put a stop to major industries and a most responsible way to use natural resources

Let's remember that the Progressive movement was "an attempt to address the problems associated with the Gilded Age.

Answer:

It's principles strongly appeal to members of the lower class

Explanation:

Answer:

court, senate, and state of representative.

Explanation:

Answer:

"ca", in this context means "circa", or "roughly". so, around the year 1200.

thus, the estimated population of London around 1200AD was 25,000

Answer:

dfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Explanation:

i rlly dont know sorry

Any individual would not live in the British or French colony, as they exploit the human as well as other resources for their personal gain.

The term "colony" refers to a portion of foreign land acquired by the other major nation. Massachusetts, for example, was the first colony to acknowledge slavery, which began in 1641 and was legalized within a few years.

The army and many settlers saw Native Americans as little more than vermin to be eradicated. Certain rites were prohibited, children were pushed into the European school system, and entire communities were tethered to land that was worthless and could not sustain them.

Therefore, it can be concluded that Any person would not live in a British or French colony, since they abuse people and other resources for personal benefit.

Learn more about Colonies here:

brainly.com/question/20147075

#SPJ2

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Where the answer