The author includes specific details in the sentences to support the main argument, provide a basis for comparison, deliver messages through opinions, reinforce a call for change, and use repetition for emphasis.
How the author uses sentencesBased on the options provided, it seems that the author includes these sentences to support the main argument by providing specific details.
These details help to illustrate the point being made and add depth to the author's reasoning. By including specific examples or details, the author can strengthen their argument and make it more compelling. Providing specific details allows for a clearer understanding of the topic at hand and helps the reader to visualize or connect with the ideas being presented.
Read more onsentences here https://brainly.com/question/552895
#SPJ4
Read or review the script Mona used for her presentation about the solar system.
Mars is one of the planets in the solar system. It is near Earth, and there are some robotic machines exploring Mars. There might be life on the Red Planet.
Other planets include Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Uranus, and Neptune. Earth is a planet too, and it is the third planet from the Sun.
The sun is in the middle of the solar system which is part of the Milky Way which is a galaxy in the universe. Planets go orbiting around the sun in circles, and orbit means go around. Is there life on other planets? We don’t know, but there probably is.
Which of the following is NOT a good way to start the review?
I like how you mentioned alien life.
The part about orbits makes no sense.
I enjoyed hearing about the planets.
It’s cool to hear about the Milky Way.
According to the information, the sentence that is not a good way to start the review is "The part about orbits makes no sense." (option B).
Which is NOT a good way to start the review?To identify which is not a good way to start the review we have to consider the statement that is not constructive feedback and does not provide any specific reasons for why the section on orbits did not make sense.
According to the above, some expressions like "I like", "I enjoyed" and "It's cool" are examples of a personal consideration that give us an opinion about the text. On the other hand, option B is a statement that does not give an opinion or deepen the reasons to argue its position.
Learn more about reviews in: https://brainly.com/question/30423155
#SPJ1
Read or review the script Mona used for her oral report about the solar system.
Mars is one of the planets in the solar system. It is near Earth, and there are some robotic machines exploring Mars. There might be life on the Red Planet.
Other planets include Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Uranus, and Neptune. Earth is a planet too, and it is the third planet from the Sun.
The sun is in the middle of the solar system which is part of the Milky Way which is a galaxy in the universe. Planets go orbiting around the sun in circles, and orbit means go around. Is there life on other planets? We don’t know, but there probably is.
In discussing Mona’s presentation, Stephen said “I didn’t understand your explanation of orbits.” Mona responded, “I was totally clear about orbits, they’re circular paths around the sun!” What rule did Mona break?
She should have left the room.
She should have been clearer.
She should have just listened.
She didn’t break a rule.
The rule that Mona broke is: She should have been clearer.
How to get the rule that has been brokenMona violated an important rule: she assumed her audience shared her level of understanding when discussing "orbits".
Just because Mona understood what "orbits" means doesn't guarantee everyone in her audience did, and therefore should have provided more specific explanation to make sure everyone understood.
Therefore, the correct option here would have been: She should have provided clearer answers.
Read more on solar orbits here:https://brainly.com/question/2564537
#SPJ1
Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether each argument is valid or invalid. First find the form of the argument by defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the conclusion using the predicates. If the argument is valid, then use the rules of inference to prove that the form is valid. If the argument is invalid, give values for the predicates you defined for a small domain that demonstrate the argument is invalid. QUESTION A AND B ALREADY SOLVED. PLEASE solve part C, D, E using same method, and give some explantion for your answer. THANKS! The domain for each problem is the set of students in a class. (a) Every student on the honor roll received an A. No student who got a detention received an A. No student who got a detention is on the honor roll. H(x): x is on the honor roll A(x): x received an A. D(x): x got a detention.
Hello! I'm happy to help you out in this matter. Following is the answer to your argument :
(c) Every student who received an A is on the honor roll.
H(x): x is on the honor roll
A(x): x received an A.
This argument is invalid. We can show this by giving a counterexample. For example, consider a scenario where there is a student named John who received an A, but he is not on the honor roll. This scenario contradicts the conclusion of the argument, which states that every student who received an A is on the honor roll. Therefore, the argument is invalid.
(d) No student who is on the honor roll received a detention.
H(x): x is on the honor roll
D(x): x got a detention.
This argument is valid. We can prove its validity using the rules of inference. The argument can be written symbolically as ¬∃x(H(x) ∧ D(x)), which can be rewritten using De Morgan's law as ∀x(¬H(x) ∨ ¬D(x)). This is a valid argument form known as the rule of inference called universal instantiation.
(e) Every student who did not receive an A got a detention.
A(x): x received an A.
D(x): x got a detention.
This argument is invalid. We can show this by giving a counterexample. For example, consider a scenario where there is a student named Sarah who did not receive an A, but she did not get a detention either. This scenario contradicts the conclusion of the argument, which states that every student who did not receive an A got a detention. Therefore, the argument is invalid.
Learn more about validity at https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ11
vid
2 Do you think that people feel safer if they know
about the possible dangers at home? Why?/
nd Why not?
Yes, I do believe that people generally feel safer if they are aware of the possible dangers at home. There are a lot of reasons why this might be true.
What are the dangers?Being aware of possible hazards in one's own home can give individuals the ability to actively prevent mishaps and harm. One may exercise extra caution in checking the ventilation and gas connections of their stove if they recognize its tendency to experience gas leaks.
In the event that an individual is aware of a malfunctioning smoke detector, they can promptly rectify the issue or obtain a replacement, which will ensure that they receive necessary fire alerts.
Learn more about dangers from
https://brainly.com/question/29477357
#SPJ1
Scrie un text de 30 40 cuvinte in care sa prezinti doua trasaturi si 2 abilitati ale omului moder fata de omul preistoric folosind 4 adverbe si 4 adjective.evidentiaza le prin sublinierea cu 2 cul ori
Omul modern se diferențiază de omul preistoric prin multe aspecte. Două trăsături care îl caracterizează pe omul modern sunt inteligența și creativitatea. Abilitățile sale de a gândi critic și de a inova sunt și ele remarcabile.
Omul modern este capabil să rezolve probleme complexe și să găsească soluții neașteptate, iar aceste abilități îl ajută să progreseze și să evolueze.
Pe de altă parte, omul preistoric era cunoscut pentru forța sa fizică și abilitățile sale de vânător, dar nu avea același nivel de inteligență sau creativitate.În prezent, omul modern este capabil să comunice cu ușurință și eficiență, deoarece are o abilitate crescută de a vorbi și de a scrie.
De asemenea, omul modern este foarte adaptabil și poate face față cu succes situațiilor noi și dificile. Inteligența și creativitatea sa îi permit să inoveze și să progreseze în domeniile științei, tehnologiei și artei.
În concluzie, omul modern are abilități superioare și trăsături deosebite care îl diferențiază în mod clar de omul preistoric. Aceste trăsături și abilități îl ajută să fie adaptabil și să progreseze într-un mod eficient și productiv.
Learn more about omul preistoric at:
https://brainly.com/question/10726765
#SPJ11
أعرب الكلمات مشلول :
Answer: عاجز.عاجز.مخدر.عاجز.مخدر.غير نشط.خامل. مشلول.
Explanation: أنا أعرفهم بالذاكرة
Read the excerpt from the passage. ". . . You could almost see that thought turn in him as he turned, and pace in him as he paced; so completely possessing him, indeed, that it all but seemed the inward mold of every outer movement. "
Which idea does the author convey through the use of figurative language?
The author uses figurative language to convey the idea that the character's thought is deeply ingrained and influential in his actions.
The idea that is conveyedThe phrase "you could almost see that thought turn in him as he turned" suggests a strong correlation between the character's mental process and his physical movements.
The use of the word "pace" further emphasizes the connection, as it implies a rhythmic and repetitive motion that mirrors the character's thought process.
By describing the thought as "the inward mold of every outer movement," the author suggests that it shapes and molds the character's behavior in a profound and pervasive manner. Overall, the figurative language portrays the character's thoughts as a powerful force that drives and directs his actions.
Read more on ideas that are conveyed here https://brainly.com/question/1914190
#SPJ4