Why are the Battles of Lexington and Concord significant? The colonial militia was defeated. Their ammunition was destroyed. The British admitted defeat and withdrew completely from Massachusetts. The battles marked the beginning of the American Revolution. The battles showed how unprepared the colonists were.

Answer:

guacamole nick gha penniessz

Explanation:

ez points

Answer:

both houses of Congress and individual state legislatures.

Explanation:

In American history, people those who supported the Ratification of the Constitution of 1787 to 1788 were known as the Federalists. They were a strong national republic.

On the other hand those who opposed the Constitution's ratification were known as anti-federalists. They were in support of small localized government. But the anti-federalists were not as organised as the federalists.

Both the groups, Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists were much concerned about preservation of liberty.

They worked out for the amendment of the Constitution which involved the House of Congress as well as the individual state legislatures.

Answer:

.

Explanation:

In the wake of the expansion of the US throughout the west, animosities flared between natives and settlers over land. ... It is a fact that the encroachment upon Nez Perce land by American settlers created the dispute in the first place, but the two sources differ in views about what role they played.

Answer:the construction of the great sphinx

Explanation:

Answer:

The formations of the Pyramids of Giza

Explanation:

Answer:

chart c i got it right on a test

hope i helped

Explanation:

Answer:

Its Chart C.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Civilization

2. Fertile Crescent

3. Husband He River

4. Indus River

5. Irrigation

6. Mesopotamia

7. Nile River

8. Silt

Pros: Power is centralized within a leadership team, rather than involving everyone in every decision.

People can participate in activities, relationships, and work while the group in power handles the larger issues of the society.

An oligarchy strives to keep the status quo, which breeds conservatism instead of taking on risky ventures.

It can foster creativity and innovation because people are free from worries about running society.

Cons: The ruling class controls policies and legislation, and ends up with much more wealth than the rest of society.

As the ruling class gains more expertise, it tends to exclude outsiders, making it tough for people to break in.

It prevents new perspectives and diversity.

It can limit available supplies to certain classes, fix prices, provide selective benefits, and restrict the economy by hindering basic supply and demand functions.

When people feel they can't join the ruling class, they may no longer feel compelled to follow the rules set by the ruling class, leading to rebellion, disruption, and war.

Answer:

New French colony

Explanation:

New France (French: Nouvelle-France), also sometimes known as the French North American Empire or Royal New France, was the area colonized by France in North America, beginning with the exploration of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence by Jacques Cartier in 1534 and ending with the cession of New France to Great Britain and Spain in 1763 under the Treaty of Paris (1763).

The territory of New France consisted of five colonies at its peak in 1712, each with its own administration: Canada, the most developed colony was divided into the districts of Québec, Trois-Rivières, and Montréal; Hudson's Bay; Acadie in the northeast; Plaisance on the island of Newfoundland; and Louisiane.[1][2] It extended from Newfoundland to the Canadian Prairies and from Hudson Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, including all the Great Lakes of North America.

In the 16th century, the lands were used primarily to draw from the wealth of natural resources such as furs through trade with the various indigenous peoples. In the seventeenth century, successful settlements began in Acadia and in Quebec. By 1765, the population of the new Province of Quebec reached approximately 70,000 settlers.[3][4] The 1713 Treaty of Utrecht resulted in France giving Great Britain its claims over mainland Acadia, the Hudson Bay, and Newfoundland. France established the colony of Île Royale, now called Cape Breton Island, where they built the Fortress of Louisbourg.[5][6]

The British expelled the Acadians in the Great Upheaval from 1755 to 1764, which has been remembered on July 28 each year since 2003. Their descendants are dispersed in the Maritime Provinces of Canada and in Maine and Louisiana, with small populations in Chéticamp, Nova Scotia and the Magdalen Islands. Some also went to France.

In 1763, France ceded the rest of New France to Great Britain and Spain, except the islands of Saint Pierre and Miquelon, at the Treaty of Paris which ended the Seven Years' War, part of which included the French and Indian War in America. Britain received Canada, Acadia, and the parts of French Louisiana which lay east of the Mississippi River, except for the Île d'Orléans, which was granted to Spain with the territory to the west. In 1800, Spain returned its portion of Louisiana to France under the secret Treaty of San Ildefonso, and Napoleon Bonaparte sold it to the United States in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, permanently ending French colonial efforts on the American mainland.

New France eventually became absorbed within the United States and Canada, with the only vestige of French rule being the tiny islands of Saint Pierre and Miquelon. In the United States, the legacy of New France includes numerous placenames as well as small pockets of French-speaking communities.

Answer:

The story of North American exploration spans an entire millennium and involves a wide array of European powers and uniquely American characters. It began with the Vikings’ brief stint in Newfoundland circa 1000 A.D. and continued through England’s colonization of the Atlantic coast in the 17th century, which laid the foundation for the United States of America. The centuries following the European arrivals would see the culmination of this effort, as Americans pushed westward across the continent, enticed by the lure of riches, open land and a desire to fulfill the nation’s manifest destiny.

Answer: C Cyrus the great

Explanation:

Cyrus was a person king who conquered Babylon and ended it.

Answer: A and B

Explanation:

Because News media and Interest groups are private organizations.

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The framers of the Constitution worried that powerful leaders and institutions must be held accountable by other powerful leaders and institutions, which led them to adopt an elaborate system of checks and balances, as well as a division and sharing of powers among the three branches of government.

Explanation:

The doctrine of the separation of powers is a state theory according to which the executive, legislative and judicial powers must belong to different bodies, controlling each other and serving as a limit for the exercise of the functions of each body.

The doctrine of the separation of powers is presented in Montesquieu's main work, The Spirit of Laws. Nowadays, it is a fundamental part of the governance of Western democracies. Thus, for example, the Constitution of the United States grants the President the exercise of the executive power, the Congress that of the legislative power, and the Supreme Court that of the judicial power. In turn, all these bodies control, limit and supervise each other through the checks and balances system, which establishes certain authorization or approval requirements for some tasks of each body.

Answer:

Explanation:

Seeking greater glory and riches, de Soto embarked on a major expedition in 1538 to conquer Florida for the Spanish crown. He and his men traveled nearly 4,000 miles throughout the region that would become the southeastern United States in search of riches, fighting off Native American attacks along the way.

Answer:

With ideal climate and available land, property owners in the southern colonies began establishing plantation farms for cash crops like rice, tobacco and sugar cane—enterprises that required increasing amounts of labor

Explanation:

I hope this helps you :)

Southern Colonies were less developed because Large plantation owners feared the growth of cities would decrease their wealth and used political power to prevent it. Option (A) is correct.

The term resource refers to all of the materials in our environment that are technologically accessible, economically feasible, and culturally sustainable, allowing us to meet our needs and desires.

Agriculture was the foundation of the southern colonies' economy (farming). Many of the colonists who came to the southern colonies were wealthy aristocrats or businessmen from England who wanted to increase their wealth by owning land.

The cash crops grown in each colony were determined by which crop grew best in that colony's soil type. The southern colonies had fewer towns and cities because farming required a lot of lands that were spread out.

Therefore, Option (A) is correct.

Learn more about Resources, here;

https://brainly.com/question/29408476

#SPJ2

B.) About 1 in 4 American Indians died during the journey.

( just took the quiz on edge )

About 1 in 4 American Indians died during the journey.

The answer is option B.

In 1838 and 1839, as a part of Andrew Jackson's Indian elimination coverage, the Cherokee state became compelled to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in gift-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee human beings are known as this journey the "path of Tears," due to their devastating consequences

It ended around March of 1839. the rule of cotton declared a white simplest unfastened population. Upon accomplishing Oklahoma,  Cherokee nations, the Japanese and western, had been reunited. as a way to stay peacefully and harmoniously collectively, a meeting happened in Takattokah.

Learn more about Trail of Tears here; brainly.com/question/674671

#SPJ2

Answer:

A. Aqueducts

Explanation:

Learned it in 7th grade social study class

The romans built huge aqueducts that carried water from mountains.

Answer:

c. midwestern united states

Explanation:

Answer:

cccccccccccccccc

Explanation:

Answer:

A

hope this helps

An increasing number of Americans today as an Identify with neither political party. The correct option is (D).

Political office elections are held by collective organizations known as political parties. A political party's members run in elections under the same banner.

The Green Party, Libertarians, Constitution Party, and Natural Law Party are a few additional political organizations that are referred to be "third parties" in the United States.

A two-party system is how elections are conducted in the US. This indicates that two political parties control all three levels of government. These two parties are the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in the United States.

Therefore, an increasing number of Americans today as an Identify with neither political party.

To know more about the Political parties, visit

https://brainly.com/question/12401053

#SPJ6

Answer:

New France, French Nouvelle-France, (1534–1763), the French colonies of continental North America, initially embracing the shores of the St. Lawrence River, Newfoundland, and Acadia (Nova Scotia) but gradually expanding to include much of the Great Lakes region and parts of the trans-Appalachian West.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :P

Answer:

Terrorism

Explanation:

I know it right and pls give Brainliest.

Answer:

It is b

Explanation:

Answer:

option B :

to make money from government-owned businesses

Explanation:

Politics was never a buisness. It is not a purpose of a government officials to gain profit from the people in a territory.

Answer:

In the early 1900s, more than half of Americans were either farmers or lived in rural communities.1 Most U.S. farms were diversified, meaning they produced a variety of crops and animal species together on the same farm, in complementary ways.2 Farmers were skilled in a wide range of trades and had autonomy over how to manage their crops and animals. Animals were typically raised with access to the outdoors. Most of the work on the farm was done by human or animal labor.

Although conditions like these still exist, the industrialization of agriculture radically transformed how the vast majority of food is produced in the U.S. and many other parts of the world. Over the brief span of the 20th century, agriculture underwent greater change than it had since it was first adopted some 13,000 years ago. Modern U.S. agriculture has been described as “the most efficient in the world, at least in terms of the dollar and cent costs of production.”1 The public health and ecological costs of industrialization, however, are not reflected in the prices of food.

SPECIALIZATION

wheat harvest

cigar workers

Specialization aims to increase efficiency by narrowing the range of tasks and roles involved in production. A diversified farmer, for example, might need to manage and care for many different vegetable crops, a composting operation, a flock of egg-laying hens, a sow, and her litter of piglets. Specialized farmers, by contrast, can focus all their knowledge, skills, and equipment on one or two enterprises, such as growing corn and soy, or fattening beef cattle. Over the course of industrialization, specialization was applied to nearly all facets of food production.

Diversified farms gave way to genetically uniform monocultures—fields planted with just one crop species at a time, such as corn, wheat, or soy, over a very large area. Meat, milk, and egg production became largely separated from crop production and involved facilities that housed a single breed of animal, during a particular period of its lifespan, for a single purpose (e.g., breeding, feeding, or slaughter). Farmers, once skilled in a breadth of trades, fell into more specialized roles.

Specialization was also applied to animal genetics, as selective breeding produced animals designed for a single outcome—large breast meat, for example, or increased milk production. Compared to chickens of the 1930s, today’s chickens bred for meat (“broilers”) grow to almost twice the weight, in less than half the time, using less than half as much feed.5 Genetic selection for these exaggerated traits has often come at the expense of the animals’ health, including increased risks for heart failure in broilers and udder infections in dairy cows bred for higher milk production.6

MECHANIZATION

wheat harvest

Threshing

Like work on an assembly line, specialized labor often involves repetitive tasks that can be performed by machines. This meant routine jobs like sowing seeds, harvesting crops, milking cows, and feeding and slaughtering animals could be mechanized, reducing (and in some cases eliminating) the need for human and animal labor. Between 1900 and 2000, the share of the U.S. workforce involved in agriculture declined from 41 percent to 2 percent.7

In some cases, mechanization brought tremendous gains in efficiency. Grain and bean crops, such as corn, wheat, rice, and soy, must be cut from the fields (reaped) and removed from the inedible parts of the plant (threshed). Doing this by hand involves an enormous amount of time and effort. By hand, a person can thresh roughly 15 to 40 kg of grain per hour, usually by beating the harvested crop against a hard surface to shake the grain loose from the inedible chaff that surrounds it. In the same amount of time, a mechanized thresher can process 450 to 600 kg of rice, sorghum, or beans, or 1,500 to 2,000 kg of corn.8

CHEMICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL INPUTS

graph

pesticide

The early 1900s saw the introduction of synthetic fertilizers and chemical pesticides, innovations that have become a hallmark of industrial crop production. In just 12 years, between 1964 and 1976, synthetic and mineral fertilizer applications on U.S. crops nearly doubled, while pesticide use on major U.S. crops increased by 143 percent.10 The shift to specialized monocultures increased farmers’ reliance on these chemicals, in part because crop diversity can help suppress weeds and other pests.11,12

Chemical and pharmaceutical use also became commonplace in newly industrialized models of meat, milk, and egg production. Antibiotics, for example, were introduced to swine, poultry, and cattle feed after a series of experiments in the 1940s and 1950s found that feeding the drugs to animals caused them to gain weight faster and on less feed.13 By 2009, 80 percent of the antibiotic drugs sold in the U.S. were used not for human medicine but for

Explanation: