who was the 16 the president of the United states​

Answer:

Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the

collateral to secure credit. This credit allows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure efficient use of resources. That’s because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to maximize profit.

Explanation:

Answer:

Indoor Plumbing

Explanation:

During the 1920s, American's society and culture changed in developing into new by introducing roaring twenty, with new gadgets which helped women getting to involve in modernity.  Automobiles, the radio, television, the refrigerator, and electric razor were some of the inventions that became popular in the 1920s. Many people used chamber pots to relieve themselves, which would be put under the bed or in a closet. In the 1920s, city people had indoor bathrooms and running water. Indoor plumbing arrives in rural areas during the 1930s. Farm families living in the country were accustomed to older methods of drawing water from wells and hand pumps as they did not have a water supply system.

Answer: Televisions

Explanation: I chose plumbing on the test and got it wrong. The correct answer is televisions.

Answer:

How did the religious beliefs of the Aztec and the conquistadores differ? A. The Aztec worshiped multiple deities, while the conquistadores worshiped a single deity. ... The Aztec didn't perform religious rituals, while the conquistadores sacrificed animals.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Middle East, Afghanistan and Taliban regime and World War I

Explanation:

During the World War I, promises were made to restore pleasant democratic practices and to ensure the rule of law take it course, apparently all these were short-lived when these promises were not effectively delivered. George W. Bush also held out promises during and after the war in Iraq which was to oust the sitting regime of Saddam Hussein so as to restore democracy and make it safe for the citizens. This later turned out to be the same disappointment and anti-democratic conclusions that were followed by Woodrow Wilson in the First World War and the Middle East was engaged in endless cycles of bloodshed after the war. A third example is that of the Taliban Regime in Afghanistan that ended in the same fate and it turned out that most times, promises that were made were likely not being prepared to be fulfilled by those who made them.

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Louverture focused on ending slavery, while Bolívar was more interested in achieving independence.

Explanation:

Toussaint Louverture was the main leader of the Haitian Revolution, started in 1791 as a slave revolt in the French colony of Saint Domingue and ended in 1804 with the independence of Haiti, the first Latin American country to obtain emancipation.

Specifically, Louverture participated in the third stage of this conflict, which was from 1799 to 1801. There, he managed to form an army of almost 50,000 men who confronted and defeated the French forces, forming a self-government in the colony that in 1804 was He would become independent under the name of Haiti, although with Louverture already deceased, having died in captivity after being kidnapped by the French as a prisoner of war.

In turn,  Simón Bolivar was the most influential and famous of the leaders of the war of independence of the Spanish colonies in Latin America. He was awarded the honorary title of Libertador because of his decisive contribution to the independence of Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. Its intention was to create a single Latin American nation, encompassing all the former Spanish colonies on the continent, under the name of Gran Colombia. Finally, his proposal did not prosper.

Answer:

The white line politically dividing Korea represents  the 38th parallel.After WWII Korea was divided at the 38th parallel for purposes of military occupation. This line then solidified into a political frontier between American-supported Republic of Korea and the Soviet backed Democratic People's Republic of Korea. North Korean troops swept across the 38th parallel to attack South Korea.

Explanation:

i hope this will help you :)

Answer:

D

Explanation:

This is still the line today, and notice how in some areas they are more into the north or some more into the south? The few days and even the few hours before the war ended. The commanders of both sides ordered their forces to make a massive push to claim as much land as they could for their country. How did that work out? It was nearly pointless. Still, the fact that a South Korea exists. And KPOP (For some people...) Exists.

Addendum: Plus, the 38th Parallel division was once a straight line until wars end.

Answer: what are the options

Explanation:

B. Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government.

Explanation:

Before the United States Constitution, there was the Articles of Confederation. These Articles ended up getting completely thrown out and replaced because many people thought it was too weak and brought the country down.

The Articles of Confederation was known to be very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not properly create or enforce laws, regulate trade, or tax citizens. This made it very difficult to get anything done and many people thought that it weakened the country.

Anti-Federalists opposed creating a new constitution, as they felt like having a strong government was a threat. Federalists felt the opposite and they wanted to have a strong government and they thought that having a strong government meant having a strong country.

With the Articles of Confederation, Congress couldn't really enforce or interpret any laws that were passed, which the Federalists did not agree with. When the Articles were replaced by the United States Constitution, branches were created in order to equally distribute power and make sure that no power would be used in an unfair or unethical manner.

Answer:

English philosopher

Explanation:

Both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are very well-known english philosphers for their massive contribution to the field of english philosophy and related fields such as political philosophy as well. Both are also fairly known for their contribution in English Enlightment or widely known as just Enlightment.

Both shared common world views and some extreme views unfit for current times but were substantially great for their times.

Hobbes believed that being selfish and bad is people's nature so need for absolute monarch or authority is a must as it will keep people's behavior in check and establish societal peace and prosperity.

Locke had similar perspectives on nature of people and is well known for his ideas about rebellion and government's role. He viewed government as this entity which is in place to protect people's rights so if government doesn't do that people have right to overthrow it and make a new one.

English philospher is the descriptions apply to both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Hence, option B is correct.

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are both well-known English philosophers due to their substantial contributions to English philosophy and related fields like political philosophy. Both enjoy a respectable reputation for their contributions to the English Enlightenment, more commonly referred to as the Enlightenment.

Hobbes believed that in order to preserve societal harmony and prosperity, there must be an absolute ruler or power because selfishness and bad behavior are inherently a part of human nature.

Locke, who is renowned for his thoughts about insurrection and the function of the state, held similar beliefs about human nature. He believes that the government is a body established to protect citizens' rights.

Thus, option B is correct.

For more information about concept of the passage, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1476553

#SPJ5

Answer:

Explanation:nnjjnjnjn

Answer: serving on a jury when called to do so

Explanation:

If asked to serve on a jury, it is a responsibility. An responsibility is an act or responsibility that someone is ethically or legally obligated to perform.

An responsibility is a legal need to contribute, do, or not do something. A responsibility or obligation is an act or way to proceed to which a person is ethically or legally obligated. Obligations that give a creditors or obligee the legal right to demand their fulfilment in a court of law.

So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/17071279?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

have fallen by more than one-half.

Explanation:

Thick, noticeable smog in many of the cities and manufacturing centers of the United States helped bring the 1970 e Clean Air Act to spur passage at the height of the national environmental movement. The ensuing modifications were intended to enhance its effectiveness and address newly recognized problems of air pollution such as acid rain and stratospheric ozone layer damage. The Clean Air Act allows EPA to set national environmental air quality levels for certain specific and prevalent contaminants, based on the latest research, to protect public health and welfare nationally. Certain main regulations are intended to reduce the rise in emissions from increasing motor vehicle numbers and new manufacturing plants.

Answer:

The complexion

The language

The long hair

Explanation:

From this excerpt, the narrator describes his experience as he first arrived the coast and how his astonishment at seeing the sea was quickly converted to terror when he realized he was no longer a spectator but now a part of the slave ship.

He described the captors and spoke about their differences with other slaves which included their complexion, hair and language.

"Their complexions too differing so much from ours, their long hair, and the language they spoke, (which was very different from any I had ever heard).  . ."

Answer:

Boris Yeltsin

Explanation:

the events that led to the September 11 attacks in the correct sequence are.

1.) beginning of the Cold war

2.) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan

3.) US support of the mujahideen with weapons and training

4.) rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan

5.) Osama bin Laden’s organization of mujahideen fighters

6.) attacks on US Embassies in North Africa

7.) September 11 attacks

Answer:  Plato test takers I just took the test and this is the correct orde

1.) beginning of the Cold war

2.) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan

3.) US support of the mujahideen with weapons and training

4.) rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan

5.) Osama bin Laden’s organization of mujahideen fighters

6.) attacks on US Embassies in North Africa

7.) September 11 attacks

Explanation:  Hope you click on enough of the brainly answers to get to this is the correct sequence

Answer:

Hope this helpd :)

Explanation:

She is imprisoned in Ashoka Vatika in Lanka until she is rescued by Rama, who slays her captor. One day a man questioned the purity of Sita and in order to prove her purity and maintain the unquestionable dignity of Ayodhya kingdom and King Rama, she decides to leave the kingdom and sacrifice her place.

Answer: Reduces the risk of serious side effects.

Explanation:

Answer:

reduces the risk of serious side effects

hope this helps.

D) Indian Boarding Schools

Answer:

its d

Explanation:

Answer:

Deter and defeat aggression.

Explanation:

The United States Armed Forces is the agency formed by the US that consists of military forces, that is, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and so on.

Deter and Defeat aggression is one of the primary mission of the US Armed Forces. Under this mission the US is able to deter and defeat aggression of the enemy. A true deterrence is considered to be the one in whic army is able to deny an aggressor from achieving his purposes and to impose necessary penalties on the aggressor. Under this purpose, the US Armed Force is able to ensure the safety and security of territory and population.

The given definition is concerned with the primary purpose of 'Deter and Defeat Aggression' of the US Armed Forces.

Racism in the judicial and law systems is something that matters to me. This issue can be addressed through legal measures by changing laws, changing police training, and demanding change from governments, companies, and people in higher power who are able to make the change. This issue should matter to everyone. It should matter to every person even if it doesn't affect them because it is just wrong and disgusting. People of color lose their lives at the hands of police because of an unjust system and people should consider why this is happening. I would want my law to distinctly change the behavior from people and cops towards people of color. Anything that needs to happen and be addressed for it to be changed should be taken in to account. Having laws and different  training against racial discrimination in our system would most likely decrease hate crimes commit by police towards any person of color. If people were trained against it and it was illegal to do so, maybe people would realize that they need to stop. This law would decrease unnecessary deaths, attacks, and criminalization of POC. People should support this because it is wrong. There are wrongful deaths, arrests,  and hate crimes happening towards innocent people because of race. This system is corrupted and needs to be changed to be just and fair. It would be funded by donations and lowering the funds towards the government, police, etc.

Answer:

I think its B, i wasnt around then but hope i helped (:^])

I believe it was spices.

Answer: A. Guns

Explanation:

Answer and Explanation:

Undecideds always vote for the challenger, so they voted for Barak Obama. His campaign was staged in the limelight of change. He raised the slogan, “Washington must change.” The change against prolonged US war policy in Iraq. While John McCain emphasized his experience and supported the war in continuation of George W.  Bush’s war policies. Moreover, Obama`s firm standing with his ideology during the times of significant financial crisis in 2008 established trust in his name. Meanwhile, McCain suspended the election campaign. The emerged challenger`s role of Barak Obama staged him with a tremendous decisive victory.

First time in American history that more than half of the voters’ population went online to get connected to the election process in 2008 elections, according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project. This represents fifty-five percent of the American adult population. The internet`s role in the 2008 elections painted true colors of the technology revolution in the millennials era.

Answer:

San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence  of Argentina was expelling Spaniards from neighboring countries.

Explanation:

Jose de San Martin was the main liberator of Argentina and the southern part of South America during the 1810s and 1820s. It was a military man born in Argentina, at that time the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata colony, who had been educated in Spain and had fought for this country in the Napoleonic wars. Therefore, he was an experienced warrior who, once noted of the independence movement, decided to return to his homeland to lead the troops. His first battle was in San Lorenzo, in February 1813, followed by other iconic contests until on July 9, 1816, Argentina declared its independence from Spain.

But San Martin knew that, if they did not cooperate with neighboring countries, the Spanish would win and return to Argentine territory. For this reason, he organized the Army of the Andes to liberate Chile, which he achieved in 1818 after the Battle of Maipu.

Later, he continued with his army to the north, liberating Peru in 1821 and leaving the command of the South American independence effort to Simon Bolivar in 1822.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, the question is incomplete because it does not provide what kind of debate it is referring to, or who were their protagonists.

However, we can comment on the following.

As we do not know what debate the question is referring to, lets put an example when a candidate did not provide hard data or back it up

with strong reasons and evidence.

In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone. He told that they were a threat to America. It was a simple accusation just to enrage their followers. He did not prove it with serious data. Indeed, the Media published that there had been many more crimes committed by American citizens that immigrants. But what the candidate wanted to create was a sentiment of hate to support its platform against immigration.

Answer:

In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone

Explanation:

Answer:

I'll save you the points because my answer may not appease your guidelines. Here is it in basic form. America want's Canada or what is at the time just a territory of Great Britan with a little autonomy. Essentially a territory and if given leniency for the sake of governance it could be considered a puppet/dominion. Basically America was sick of the Britis. They took their sailors who at the time were getting taken by the numerically superior British Navy and well enslaved them for lack of better terms well the technical term is impressment but yeah its work against their will by that of a foreign power. It angered American Politicians and they felt that at this time they did not get the respect nor recognition they deserved. If Canada was indeed taken maybe the British would leave America alone and pursue the Monroe doctrine. Although unlike most modern Wars it was a war declared by Congress and approved by the president. Problem was we didn't really have a great Army or even one to begin with. You could argue some divisions of the Federal government did exist like Merchant marines, American legion, etc. but lets just say we didn't have a grandstanding army. We win, we loose, our navy ain't so hot. Our generals not so smart we burn Ontario. Go into Quebec it's cold so we get out. Canada burns us too and our White house. Madison somehow leads the people of D.C. to believe in him and surprisingly keeps moral up after their literal Capital is burnt. Also didn't really end until 1814. Also in D.C the invading British forces somehow by a miracle a tornado I kid you not pushed the British out of D.C. and stopped their invasion. Sometimes luck really was on America's side so if you believe in providence I mean that's a great example. Basically 1814 fort mchenry happens. Star Spangled banner. It's the entiphasis of America. Also flag is 15 stars 15 bars extremely unique but fitting for the time. General Andrew Jackson leads his men to victory. The entire city of Baltimore was into the effort. All races, creeds, and people united by one nation indivisible. That day proved to show how we could all one day be simply Americans. We won although being outnumbered and through each day of bombs bursting in air we came back with a bigger flag. This battle created our national anthem. There was a treaty signed between both nations. Basically agreeing to stop mess with one another and recognize each other. It even allowed for some trade so that was a positive. Some speculate on who actually won the War. Is it the British or Americans. Brits don't care since the Napolean wars and such and although I believe the Canadians do well they weren't exactly autonomous and didn't gain much quite either. America did not get to annex Canada but they did gain as some call it their second Independence and solidification into the world stage. They held off so we should give credit where its due. I usually say its a wish wash. A tie if you will. All gains were negated and all losses for very little political points. I say it matters and yet matters not. Lots of lives to be lost for little gain in land. I guess you can say it was just a war of pride although it did not start that way. It ended up just showing capabilities and even both sides really couldn't win at least without changing a large portion of each individual nations history. The brits lists a building America Lost a building and none lost land so yeah lots of people lost over political recognition and withdraw from aggressive tactics but such is war.

Explanation:

Answer:

i believe its D

Explanation:

Answer:

D. Portuguese

Explanation:

The Portuguese formed alliances with Kongo leaders in the 1400s and 1500s.

The Kongo had been unstable with factional and regional conflicts and accepted an alliance with the Portuguese so they could restore order.

The Kongo leaders gave the Portuguese some colonies, allowing them to trade and have access to the Kongo slave labor.

Answer:

D. Portuguese

Explanation:

is right, I don't know why it has 3 stars???