People in Tampa asked President McKinley to send soldiers for protection. Do you think the city was really in danger?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
People in Tampa asked President McKinley to send soldiers for protection. Do you think the city was really in danger?
No, really no. The city was not really in imminent danger, although people who lived in Tampa Bay had their reasons to be afraid.
We are talking about the times of the Spanish-American War in 1898. The US military had decided to establish the port of Tampa Bay as the official port of embarkation for the navy troops that were sent to the Island of Cuba to fight in the war against the Spanish Navy. That is why Tampa residents felt they were in danger of a possible attack from the Spanish Navy.
True or False
Under the threat of torture, Galileo knelt before the Protestant pope and read aloud a signed confession. In it, he agreed that the ideas of Copernicus were false.
How did the Navajo code talkers help the Allied forces win the war in the Pacific
Answer:
In 1942, 29 Navajo men joined the U.S. Marines and developed an unbreakable code that would be used across the Pacific during World War II. They were the Navajo Code Talkers. The Code Talkers conveyed messages by telephone and radio in their native language, a code that was never broken by the Japanese.
Explanation:
What’s the answer to this questions
Which state only allowed women to vote for school bonds or Texas.
What improvements would you suggest to
the Roman model of government? Why?
Answer:
Regular salary for all government workers + senators.
Explanation:
This would lead to less corruption which destroyed Roman abillity to create defensive forces quickly.
Why did Jackson prefer state banks to a national bank? He believed state banks were more helpful to the common man. He believed state banks could do more to pay national expenses. He believed state banks took money away from the common people. He believed state banks would help his wealthy campaign contributors.
Answer:
He believed state banks were more helpful to the common man.
Explanation:
Jackson prefers state banks to a national bank because "He believed state banks were more helpful to the common man."
This is evident in the fact, Andrew Jackson, President of the United States between 1829 to 1837, felt that the national bank because is a risk to the conventional standards with which America was endowed. That is when the national bank takes the management of the money supply in a centralized entity, this will pose a threat to American society.
According to chief Joseph ,how did white settlers view american indians
Answer:
A - they saw American Indians as less than human.
Explanation:
The answer was correct on edge
Why do cheynne attack vagon trains? (Movie: into the west)
Answer:
The Cheyenne Indians attack Jacob's wagon train. They are trying to wipe out the cholera disease by killing all the whites. ... At the Cheyenne camp Naomi is purchased for the price of “Five Horses” and this becomes her new name.
Explanation:
PLZZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!
In what way(s) did the Framers (writers) claim to have already tried in addressing the complaints?
Answer:
In what ways did the framers claim to have already tried in addressing the complaints? They tried to tell the people that they were being ignored. What will change in the colonies as a result of the declaration? The colonists would face hardships, with protests, consequences, and war resulting from this.
Explanation:
I love the Declaration of independence. But hope this helped!
The people were being ignored, they sought to convey. The Founding Fathers assert that they handled the objections by reminding the British of their overstepping of their borders, the reasons the colonies came to America, and by appealing to Britain's sense of justice and goodness.
What did the framers disagree on?They clashed on congressional representation and trade policy both domestically and internationally. The Three-Fifths Compromise, the Connecticut Compromise, and the Compromise on Commerce and Slave Trade.
The American Constitution's creators were forward-thinking individuals. They made our Constitution durable. In addition to addressing the particular issues the country was facing at the moment, their goal was to lay the groundwork for the new country's future stability and direction.
Learn more about the Framers here:
https://brainly.com/question/10781730
#SPJ2
What caused the Red Scare and What was the impact the Red Scare on the United States
Answer:
According to a source:
Red Scare Impact The Red Scare was hysteria over the perceived threat posed by Communists in the U.S. during the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, which intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s. (Communists were often referred to as “Reds” for their allegiance to the red Soviet flag.)
Hope this helps!
One of the main reasons of the Red Scare was World War I, which prompted many people to adopt strong patriotic and anti-immigrant sentiments.
The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia sparked fears that foreigners, notably from Russia, Europe, were plotting to topple the US administration.
Even during Great War seen between Ussr And the united Countries, which increased in the 1940s and 1950s, the Red Scare was panic about the potential threat presented by Communism in the The Us.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/21462636?referrer=searchResults
Why did Jefferson want to buy the Louisiana Territory?
b
He understood the importance of gaining control of the port of New Orleans for shipping and trade.
He needed the land in order to go to war with Spain.
He wanted to strip the Federalists of their power.
He wanted control of the Rocky Mountains.
Od
Answer:
he understood the importance of new orleans
Explanation:
the French had coats.
Answer:
C- to gain control of New Orleans.
Explanation:
Are my answers right or wrong or do I need to add an answer
Answer:
ur fine
Explanation:
Please help!!! If you get this right I'll mark you a branliest! Which document from 1836 defined the government organization of the newly independent nation of Texas? A) The Texas Pledge B) The U.S. Constitution C) The Texas Constitution D) The Texas Declaration of Independence
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The Texas Declaration of Independence
The Texas Declaration of Independence was the formal declaration of independence of the Republic of Texas from Mexico in the Texas Revolution. It was adopted at the Convention of 1836 at Washington-on-the-Brazos on March 2, 1836, and was formally signed the next day after mistakes were noted in the text.
One important belief in Judaism is that A. idols should never be disrespected B. violence is never acceptable. c. there is only one all-powerful god. D. Jews must all share one language I will give brainlest
Answer:
c. there is only one all-powerful god.
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Why did President Jackson support the removal of Native Americans?
1.He hoped to distract attention from the rising economic crisis.
2.He hoped it would weaken the power of the U. S. military.
3.He hoped to gain support from Native American leaders.
4.He hoped to make more land available for white settlement.
Answer
4, He hoped to make more land available for white settlement.
Explanation:
Jackson wanted to spread west to establish American city's and sieze native land.
explain the controversy that arose involving the importation of slaves
Answer:
Salvery
Explanation:
Its Slavery
7. Name some other examples from history where individuals have voluntarily given up great
power. Are they easy to find?
There were the other examples from history where individuals have voluntarily given up great power were the dictatorships. There was the common name on the related to the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.
What is history?
History is the study of previous events, as defined by the term. Everything pertaining to human behavior is covered in history. History encompasses a variety of facets, including political, cultural, scientific, religious, person, location, and economic.
According to the history was the famous examples of the voluntarily and the great power into the dictatorships. There was the related on the history are the common names was the situated on the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet. This is the important role play.
As a result, the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.
Learn more about on history, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3583505
#SPJ5
9. For an amendment to be ratified, it must be approved by what fraction of the states? C. three-fourths A. one-half B. one-third D. nine-tenths
Answer:
9/13 so technically the answer is C). three-fourths
Explanation:
Mark me Brainliest Please.Answer:
three-fourths
Explanation:
Got it right on Edmentum/ Plato
do you know what I can put here
A nation needs capital to become industrialized. true or false
Answer: true
Explanation:
What similarites do you notice between the burial practices of the Shang and Egyptians? What is different?
Answer:
Similarities:
The Shang Dynasty and the Egyptian Dynasty believed that man in one way or another survived the death of the physical body and was usually translated into one form or another after death.Both civilizations believed that death was just a continuation of life, an extension of it. Hence, during burial rites, adequate preparation was made for the journey to the great beyond. In the Shang Dynasty, for instance, slaves were interend alive with their masters, whilst in Ancient Egypt, in what is now called Retainership Sacrifices servants were usually killed after their master's death in order for them to continue serving their masters in the afterlife. The Shang tombs could be so large that it could take as much as 150 bodies. Eventually, actual slaves became replaced with artworks depicting slaves and the object the dead needed in the other realm rather than the actual slaves and objects.Another similarity was that in both practices, valuable objects were buried alongside the dead as it was thought that they would need these things in the afterlife. It was therefore not uncommon to find treasures, in gold, valuable utensils, and other items/objects in the gravesites of noble people who had died.Dissimilarities:
In Egypt, the body was extensively Mummified. In Shang Dynasty this was not the case.
Mummification refers to the methods of embalming, by the use of special processes which include the removal of all moisture from the body, leaving only a dried form that would not easily decay. Chemicals and or natural preservatives, such as resin, were used to remove moisture, hence terminating the process of decay. Proper mummification sometimes took up to 70 days.
Explanation:
Here is some background about the Shang Dynasty and Ancient Egypt.
Shang Dynasty
The Shang Dynasty which is one of the foremost dynasties that ruled China was a great and established one. Its governance spanned 1600 to 1046 B.C.
The Shang Dynasty was known for many laudable achievements in astronomy, artworks, military know-how, and Mathematics. The Shang were known for igniting the Bronze Age.
Ancient Egypt
Ancient Egypt was a civilization that existed between 3050–2686 BC in Ancient North Africa. It became notorious for advances in Quarrying, surveying, and superior construction techniques that enable the creation of historical marvels such as the monumental pyramids, obelisks, and temples.
They also had a unique system of maths, effective medical system, irrigation, and agricultural technologies that were uncommon in that period.
Cheers
Sumuari were kept very wealthy so that they would remain loyal to there nobels true or false?
Answer:
False, they had some sort of code of honor, I don't remember the name, it's been some time
Why did Europeans benefit the most from the trade? Why did the trade not happen in Europe? What obstacles made trade difficult or dangerous in Europe ?
Answer:
Europeans wanted to gain riches from the New World. They also wanted to claim land for their countries. ... The Northwest Passage is a water route that goes through North America. Vespucci helped people notice that the New World was unknown land.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP!
dentify and explain a significant decision made by George Washington in his personal life that had immediate consequences for the United States of America.
answer:
1. General Washington decided not to impose a battlefield strategy on his field commanders.
Explanation:
The general consensus among historians is that Washington was a mediocre military strategist at best. However, a recent study in the Academy of Management Journal cast some doubt on that consensus.
2. What does Washington argue is the problem with the national government under the
Articles of Confederation? What must be done to solve the problem in his view
Answer:
Washington feared the current government was so powerless that it would soon dissolve either from deteriorating support of the people or from the fact that states would no longer bother to send representatives to the Confederation Congress.
Explanation:
The reason which Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the Articles of Confederation is:
The government did not have enough power to governThe thing which must be done to solve the problem in his view is:
To make the government have more power to tax the peopleAccording to the given question, we are asked to show the reason which Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the Articles of Confederation
As a result of this, can see that George Washington and some other Americans believed that the Articles of Confederation was weak and did not give the states enough power and would soon crumble.
However, he believed that giving the central government more power such as taxing the people would help solve the problem
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/18377156
What significance does the Holocaust have to current world events?
Answer:
One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.
Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.
The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”
One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.
The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.
Explanation:
im a nerd with this stuff.
How did US leaders respond to the threat of Soviet Expansion in
Europe?
Answer:
Explanation:
World War II convinced U.S. leaders that the policies of isolationism and appeasement had been mistakes. To counter the growing Soviet threat, they sought new ways to keep the U.S. safe and protect its interests abroad.
McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all out battle.” How did he characterize
the two sides in the “battle”? Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all-out battle.” How did he characterize the two sides in the “battle”?
What Republican Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy did was to confront the American People by accusing that several members of the federal government and the US military had ties with Communists or were Communists.
Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?
I think he was a cruel person with peculiar political ambitions because he did accuse people but never present a valid or serious argument or piece of evidence to support his claims. He only accused people, affecting their public image and reputation. And that was so wrong. However, he scared and alienated many citizens and made the federal government investigate the alleged cases.
How did Jim Beckwourth show the capacity to act over one's own life?
Answer:
Among the many men who have distinguished themselves as mountaineers, traders, chiefs of great Indian nations, and as early pioneers in the settlement of our Pacific coast, is James P. Beckwourth, whose varied and startling personal adventures would have found no record but for the accident of meeting with a wanderer in the mountains of California, interested in the man, and, patiently listening to his story, proceeded, as it fell from his lips, to put it upon paper. This autobiography was thus produced, and was the result of some months' labor in the winter of 1854-55. In prosecuting the task, the author has in no instance departed from the story of the narrator, but it was taken down literally as it was from day to day related. Beckwourth kept no journal, and, of course, relied upon his memory alone; consequently dates are often wanting, which it was impossible to give with accuracy when recurring to events transpiring in the course of very many years. Beckwourth is personally known to thousands of people "living on both sides of the mountains," and also, from his service under the United States government, has enjoyed the acquaintance of many officers of the United States Army, who have been stationed in Florida, Mexico, and California. In his long residence with the Indians he adopted their habits, and was in every respect conformed to their ways: the consequence was, from his great courage and superior mental endowments, he rose rapidly in their estimation, and finally became their chief. As an Indian, therefore, he speaks of their customs, and describes their characteristics; and probably, from his autobiography, we have more interesting particulars than were ever before given of the aborigines. Beckwourth, after ten thousand adventures, finally became involved in the stream that set toward the Pacific, and, almost unconsciously, he established a home in one of the pleasant valleys that border on Feather River. Discovering a pass in the mountains that greatly facilitated emigrants in reaching California, his house became a stopping-place for the weary and dispirited among them, and no doubt the associations thus presented have done much to efface his natural disposition to wander and seek excitement among the Indian tribes. In person he is of medium height, of strong muscular power, quick of apprehension, and, for a man of his years, very active. From his neck is suspended a perforated bullet, with a large oblong bead each side of it, secured by a thread of sinew: this amulet is just as he wore it while chief among the Crows. With the exception of this, he has now assumed the usual costume of civilized life, and, in his occasional visits to San Francisco, vies with many prominent residents in the dress and manners of the refined gentleman. It is unnecessary to speak of the natural superiority of his mind: his autobiography everywhere displays it. His sagacity in determining what would please the Indians has never been surpassed; for on the most trying occasions, where hundreds of others would have fallen victims to circumstances, he escaped. His courage is of the highest order, and probably no man ever lived who has met with more personal adventure involving danger to life, though in this respect he is not an exception to all mountaineers and hunters who early engaged in the fur trade and faced the perils of an unknown wilderness.