Answer: Nancy Pelosi (Democratic Party)
Explanation: No explanation needed!
HELP!!!! 30 POINTS!!!
How did Donatello use perspective in his sculptures?
A. Faded their colors to show distance
B. Incorporated diagonal lines in the figure
C. Elongated upper bodies to figures that would be viewed from below
D. Incorporated a vanishing point at the focal point of the work
The way that Donatello used perspective in his sculptures was he C. Elongated upper bodies to figures that would be viewed from below
What perspective did Donatello use?Donatello was a very famous and celebrated Italian artist and sculptor and he came up with artworks that would inspire Italian artists ( and other artists ) for generations.
He was known for using what was called the " one point perspective " which ensured that his figures were anatomically correct. And when a figure was to be viewed from below, he would make the upper bodies longer.
Find out more on Donatello at https://brainly.com/question/3701359
#SPJ1
What was a major cause of the Panic of 1819?
• A. Farmers and businesses being unable to pay back money
borrowed from banks
•
B. A need to provide a stronger army and navy for America's armed
forces
C. Too many women and
children working in new factories
• D. High demand for American products in European countries
Answer:
Explanation:
B. needed a stronger army and navy.
Tina and Grayson collect a shovel full of soil from the school garden and bring it back to the science lab. They put the soil in a glass container with some water and stir the mixture. They let the mixture settle overnight. What will the soil mixture most likely look like the next day?
a
The top layer of soil will be lighter, contain rocks, and have larger particles. The bottom layer will be darker and will have smaller particles.
b
The top layer of soil will be darker, contain rocks, and have larger particles. The bottom layer will be lighter and will have smaller particles.
c
The top layer of soil will be lighter and will have smaller particles.The bottom layer will be darker, contain rocks, and have larger particles.
d
The top layer of soil will be darker and will have smaller particles. The bottom layer will be lighter, contain rocks, and have larger particles.
The next day, the soil mixture will likely look like c The top layer of soil will be lighter and will have smaller particles. The bottom layer will be darker, contain rocks, and have larger particles.
What happens to soil in water?When soil enters water, then the different components of the soil will be divided based on their densities. The items with heavier densities will stay at the bottom while those with lighter densities will come to the top. In other words, the objects that are heavier in the water, will have a better chance of remaining at the bottom while the lighter particles come to the top.
We will see this in the soil sample collected by Tina and Grayson who stirred the mixture of water when they mixed it with water. Lighter particles will float to the top layer and so the top will be lighter in color. The heavier particles such as rocks will sink to the bottom. As there will be a high concentration of them, this part will be darker in color.
Find out more on soil at https://brainly.com/question/1182776
#SPJ1
The relationship between levels of military personnel and state revenues as shown in the table is best understood in the context of which of the following global developments in the period 1450–1750 ?
answer choices
As military forces expanded and became more professionalized, states were forced to develop new ways to generate revenue.
As agricultural technology became more advanced, less people were needed to farm and more people were able to be enrolled in state militaries.
As commercial profits and urbanization increased, states were able to obtain more revenue.
As states expanded their territories, they were able to acquire access to more natural resources.
The global developments in the period 1450–1750 the military forces expanded and became more professionalized, states were forced to develop new ways to generate revenue. The correct option is A.
Why did this split intensify during the 1450-1750 time period?The political rivalries between the Ottoman and Safavid empires, as well as their ties to Islam, exacerbated the schism. Explain the evolution of Sikhism in relation to the Mughal Empire.
The increased use of gunpowder, cannons and armed trade in Europe and Asia resulted in the establishment of large empires. By conquering other countries' lands and erecting palaces to demonstrate their power, and forcing their people to live with them so they could not work against them.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about The Ottoman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/19205737
#SPJ1
Should the states (and voters) have the ability to decide which rights we can enjoy and which rights can be voted out? Why or why not?
Answer:
no -why - because if they had the ability to decide which right we can enjoy it be bad because many could think for example : that slaves should be allowed again for every state . or for example: purge be allowed (which would be very bad it would decrease population). some people think good and some bad or dangerous they shouldn't because even if they did states and voters get a long and agree people would not agree for sure . please give me a star if it was helpful !
Answer:
Voting is a very important part of any democracy. Citizens vote for leaders to represent them and their ideas, and the leaders support the citizens' interests.
What was Nixon's real motive in keeping his White House tapes private?
Answer: President Nixon initially refused to release the tapes, putting two reasons forward: first, that the Constitutional principle of executive privilege extends to the tapes and citing the separation of powers and checks and balances within the Constitution, and second, claiming they were vital to national security.
Explanation:
How does Bradford characterize Tubman? What language does Bradford use to tie religion into the fight for freedom?
Bradford refers to Tubman as a hero and contrasts her with notable female figures revered for their strength and bravery. According to Bradford, Tubman has been referred to as Moses for his leadership and for freeing hundreds of slaves.
How does Bradford characterize Tubman?Generally, Tubman is portrayed as a hero by Bradford, and she is compared to other influential women who are recognized for their bravery and strength. Bradford asserts that Tubman has been given the nickname "Moses" due to her status as a leader and her ability to free a large number of slaves.
Tubman is portrayed as a hero by Bradford, and she is compared to other influential women who are recognized for their bravery and strength.
Bradford asserts that Tubman has been given the nickname "Moses" due to her status as a leader and her ability to free a large number of slaves.
Read more about Bradford characterize Tubman
https://brainly.com/question/15319756
#SPJ1
The mob of women who marched in the rain to Versailles in October of 1789 were demanding:
lower taxes.
a pardon for their husbands, fathers, or sons.
bread.
equal rights.
The raging women's mob that marched through the rain to Versailles in October 1789 was provoked by the expensive bread. The correct response is option (3).
What is Women's March on Versailles?The Women's March on Versailles, also known as the October March, the October Days, or simply the March on Versailles, was one of the first and most significant events of the French Revolution. When the march began on the morning of October 5, 1789, women in Paris' marketplaces were about to riot over the excessive price of bread. The unrest quickly combined with revolutionaries' efforts as they sought liberal political reforms and a constitutional monarchy for France. The market ladies and their supporters eventually became a mob of thousands. Under the encouragement of revolutionary agitators, they searched the city's arsenal for weapons before marching toward the Palace of Versailles. The crowd surrounded the palace and forced King Louis XVI to comply with their demands during a dramatic and violent confrontation. The majority of the French Assembly was forced to travel back to Paris with them the following day, along with the king and his family.
These occurrences put an end to the king's independence and signaled the beginning of a new power dynamic that would ultimately favor the Third Estate, the ordinary people, against the established, privileged orders of the French nobles. The march on Versailles turned out to be a pivotal occasion in the Revolution since it brought together the largest number of individuals yet from the origins of the Revolution.
To know more about French Revolution, visit:
brainly.com/question/2796465
#SPJ1
ASAP!!
Round 1 – Which would have been a bigger change to a European community?
From bartering for everything to trading with money
OR
From living on a feudal estate to living in a city
Round 2 – Which would have been a bigger change to a European community?
From making all essential goods locally to regionally trading
OR
From there only being nobles and peasants to there being a middle class of merchants and artisans
For each of the rounds above, answer the question directly and explain your reasoning in one well-developed paragraph. Your explanation should show that you understand both changes (not just the one you chose as the bigger change). You should write in complete sentences, and while images are not required for full credit, they will make your presentation stronger. You also are not required to do outside research, but should if you need more information to do your comparison.
The biggest changes for a European community are: From bartering for everything to trading with money, From having only nobles and peasants to having a middle class of merchants and artisans.
What are the biggest changes for the European communities of the Middle Ages?During the Middle Ages there were very few changes. However, many of them meant fundamental changes in society and the functioning of human communities. In general, these changes gave way to the following stages of humanity such as modernity, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, among others.
Some of the most radical changes that occurred in Europe were the change from barter to trade with money and the appearance of new social classes such as the middle class, which included the merchants who would later become bourgeois.
In the case of the changes in commerce, they were one of the biggest changes because people had to adapt to this new way of commerce. Therefore, people made objects and later sold them to obtain money and thus be able to buy the objects they needed for their daily lives. This was a challenge because some items were more in demand than others and this defined their price.
Additionally, this allowed the kingdoms to grow and accommodate a greater number of people. Kingdoms became cities where people had other social dynamics and abandoned feudal ways of life that were mainly rural.
On the other hand, the appearance of the middle class in which there were merchants and artisans was an important change for feudal society because these merchants began to enrich themselves by reducing the gap between the nobility and the middle class. This is how the bourgeoisie arose in the following centuries.
Lastly, these merchants had the ability to increase the area of influence of trade by reaching other countries and massifying the import and export of products. This caused the cities to become even more crowded and the merchants had an economic status similar to that of the nobility.
Learn more about the Middle Ages in: https://brainly.com/question/26586178
#SPJ1
Answer: im literally doing the assignment rn but its bartering to money and from only nobles to middle class merchants
Explanation: i just called my teacher and shes cool so i got the answer
PLEASE HURRY 5 MINUETS Why is Pittsburgh nicknamed the "Gateway to the West"?(1 point)
Responses
because its abundance of natural resources drew people from the East to jobs in factories
because its abundance of natural resources drew people from the East to jobs in factories
because it was the main hub for railroads going from the East to West
because it was the main hub for railroads going from the East to West
because its canals allowed the easy transportation of materials from the East to West
because its canals allowed the easy transportation of materials from the East to West
because its location on three rivers allowed easy transportation of materials from the East to West
because its location on three rivers allowed easy transportation of materials from the East to West
"Pittsburgh" is nicknamed the "Gateway to the West" because its location on three rivers allowed easy transportation of materials from the East to West. The Option D is correct.
Why is Pittsburgh so famous?The name "Pittsburgh" is very famous for its dramatic topography (meeting of three rivers) and its history of the steel industry. It was also known for major league sports teams, research universities, infrastructure like incline cable railways, tunnels etc.
In early 1800s, the city was known as the “Gateway to the West” because of the huge advantage its had by having the intersection of three major waterways; the Allegheny River and Monongahela River join together at what is known as the “point” to form the Ohio River.
Read more about Pittsburgh
brainly.com/question/11585281
#SPJ1
Your President may easily become king.
—Patrick Henry, 1788
What is Patrick Henry's main point in the quote above?
Answer:
The president would have too much power within the new government.
brainliest plssWho is at the top of the court system and who is involved?
Answer: supreme court is the top of the court system and the people/persons that are on the top of their court system is chief justice
Explanation:
What group made up the largest part of Spanish America
The group that made up the largest part of spanish america is the peninsulares according to the casta system because the peninsulares were the ones born in spain they made up most of Spanish America.
Improvement task: Describe two features of Harold Godwinson's background that would have made a credible (worthy) candidate for the throne in 1066
Answer:
Harold Godwinson was a mighty noble in England, a fine soldier, and a talented politician.
Explanation:
In 1066, having a lot of talents would make you a worthy candidate for the throne.
I hope this helped:)
How do you think humans would behave in a "state of nature"?
In the state of nature, this equal ability to kill each other leads to mistrust. All of our belongings, and our life itself, might be taken at any moment, because there is no greater power to stop anyone from attacking us . Some people would attack us because they need our resources to survive.
What is a state of nature?In moral and political philosophy, religion, social contract theories, and international law, the state of nature is the hypothetical life of people before societies existed. State of nature philosophers deduce that there must have been a time before organised societies existed, and this assumption raises questions such as: "What was life like before civil society?"; "How did government first emerge from such a starting position?," and "What are the hypothetical reasons for entering a state of society by establishing a nation-state?"
In political theory, the state of nature is the actual or hypothetical condition of humans prior to or after political association. The concept of a natural state was central to the social-contract theories of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, as well as French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Social-contract theorists' visions of the state of nature differed sharply, though most associated it with the absence of state sovereignty.
Therefore ,the idea of a state of nature is an effort to try and understand what humans would be like without any government or society and considers why we let ourselves be governed.
To learn more about state of nature, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13162622
#SPJ1
Ukraine and Yugoslavia: The Resurgence of
Nationalist
presentation on this topic should include the following:
• a brief overview or timeline of the key events that led to
independence for Ukraine and the breakup of Yugoslavia
• a description of how nation-building has proceeded in Ukraine since
independence
* a summary of the ethnic conflicts that erupted during the breakup of
Yugoslavia
* a comparison of the effects of nationalism on Ukraine and
Yugoslavia
a concluding statement on the significance of these historic changes
for the peoples of Ukraine, Yugoslavia, and the United States
What war had saddled the British government with debt?
Answer:
The French Indian War
Explanation:
This war also lead to excessive taxing in the colonies which then lead to the Revolutionary War
Give 3 examples of scenes from the movie Conspiracy, which show the aura of fear and/or intimidation that permeated Nazi Germany.
The unified German military forces were involved in systematic war crimes throughout World War II, including killings, plundering, the use of forced labor, the execution of three million Soviet war prisoners, and the annihilation of Jews. just out of necessity
What were the fears the Nazis created?The Nazis established a state of terror. By using violence and intimidation, this was accomplished. German citizens were too terrified to defy Nazi rules.
The intelligence and security agency of the Nazi Party was known as the SD (Sicherheitsdienst). The goal of the SD, which was run by Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heidrich, was to put everyone in Germany under close observation.
Nazi Germany's secret police were known as the Gestapo (German for "Secret State Police"). It was essential to the internal security of Germany.
For mass murder, the Nazis experimented with gas vans.
Learn more about Nazism, from:
brainly.com/question/13817923
#SPJ1
what is the annexation of hawaii
Do you think that the Act Respecting Alien Enemies is reasonable or unreasonable?
Answer:
I think it's unreasonable
Which statement expresses the central idea of the text a the Romans move towards a more democracy Society by spreading power among elected officials but they favored the wealthy more than the actors did be wrong wasn't a truly Democratic Society because the Roman citizens were severely limited when it came to which officials they could vote for see the actors had a very successful Democratic Society consisting of elected officials with limited terms 4D the Romans made it so that the individuals wealth could not affect their
ability to run for office or to vote for officials
The statement that expresses the central idea is that a the Romans move towards a more democracy Society by spreading power among elected officials but they favored the wealthy more than the public.
How was Roman society set up?After the fall of the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Republic was established where people could be elected in various offices to lead the city - state's government.
However, this process was not entirely fair as the wealthy people in Rome were more favored in the process and even had more say in government. Rome was therefore not truly democratic.
Find out more on Rome at https://brainly.com/question/26519729
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast European and Japanese feudalism
https://brainly.com/question/7847947?referrer=searchResults
plese give a brainlist
Which statement BEST explains how the overall
structure of Passage 2 influences the reader?
Instructions on how to use defensive pessimism to
handle negative experiences give the reader tools
that can be applied to daily life.
Comparisons help the reader understand how
defensive pessimism differs from positive thinking.
and why it could be a better coping strategy.
An explanation of cause and effect allows the
reader to recognize how defensive pessimism can
result in reducing stressful situations.
A history of defensive pessimism helps the reader
understand how it began, and why psychologists
believe it is suited to the modern age.
People, especially those who are highly worried, can benefit from defensive pessimism by thinking more positively and making better decisions. Conversely, defensive pessimists create strategies for handling issues in their heads.
What is defensive pessimism?In the middle of the 1980s, Nancy Cantor and her students identified the cognitive approach known as defensive pessimism. People employ defensive pessimism as a coping mechanism before anxiety-inducing situations or performances. No of how well they have performed in the past when someone uses defensive pessimism, they have low expectations for their performance.
Then, defensive pessimists consider particular unfavorable occurrences and failures that might have a detrimental impact on their efforts to achieve their goals. Defensive pessimists can prevent or prepare for potential negative consequences by imagining them in advance. By employing this technique, defensive pessimists might constructively channel anxiety that otherwise might have a negative impact on their performance.
Learn more about pessimism, from:
brainly.com/question/23812584
#SPJ1
Answer:
Comparisons help the reader understand how defensive pessimism differs from positive thinking, and why it could be a better coping strategy.
Which of the following was NOT a result of the Battle of Bunker Hill?
A :American morale was boosted because they stood up to the British
B : Americans kept control of Bunker and Breed's Hill.
C :The British took control of Bunker and Breed's Hill.
D :More Americns paned the colonists to fight the British.
Which is the common ground for determining value in modern societies?
A subject, viewpoint, or interest on which two or more individuals can agree is referred to as common ground.
What is common ground in modern society?You don't have to agree on everyone when you and someone else find something in agreement. You and the other person share similar interests or viewpoints on certain subjects. However, there are still certain issues or points of disagreement. The point of agreement among the two of you is this viewpoint. Finding a point of agreement between two people might help them communicate even when they disagree.
After talking about this point of agreement for a while, you might both be more receptive to hearing the other's perspective on the points of disagreement. During a conflict, the common ground strategy can bring people together. You can agree to disagree when you concentrate on your shared interests.
To know more about common ground, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26660433
#SPJ1
When Napoleon attacked Russia, the Russian strategy was to:
use brilliant generals and daring battle tactics.
put Napoleon on the defensive by attacking France.
defend Moscow at all costs.
pursue a scorched-earth policy.
The desperate Russians adopted a Scorched-Earth Tactic, burning the areas they left behind whenever they withdrew. The correct response is option (4).
What is a scorched-earth policy?A scorched-earth doctrine, a military strategy, aims to destroy anything the adversary might use to their advantage. Targets may be things like obvious weaponry, transport vehicles, communication hubs, industrial resources, and anything else the enemy could use against you.
Napoleon entered Russia with his troops in June 1812. He anticipated a brief conflict to get revenge on Czar Alexander I for his misdeed in abandoning the Continental System. Napoleon entered Russia with about 600,000 soldiers. He intended to engage the Russian troops in a fierce fight, the kind of conflict he typically prevailed in. Alexander was aware of this and devised a cunning plan: every time Napoleon's men attempted to attack, the Russians just continued retiring. Napoleon was furious and marched his army deeper into Russia by repeatedly following the escaping Russians. As a result, the campaign took far longer than Napoleon had anticipated. The fact that he expected his army to be able to subsist off the land they were in, as was his custom, meant that he had brought very little supplies, even by the standards of the brief campaign he had planned. However, the desperate Russians adopted a "scorched-earth" tactic, burning the areas they left behind whenever they withdrew. Napoleon's army had problems getting supplies, and the more it marched, the weaker it got.
To know more about scorched-earth tactic, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28222596
#SPJ1
What impact did the battle of bunker hill among the colonists?
Answer:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.
Explanation:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.
Is this statement true or false?
Parallels are numbered from 0° to 90° east and from 0° to 90° west.
Otrue
false
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of __________.
A.
Africa
B.
Asia
C.
North America
D.
South America
Answer:
Explanation:
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America.
D. South America
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America
Therefore, the correct answer is option D.
The recently found regions beyond Eurasia were split between the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire by the Treaty of Tordesillas, which was signed on June 7, 1494, at Tordesillas, Spain, and validated in Portugal.
The Treaty of Tordesillas established a border that split the non-European world into two distinct regions, one ruled by Spain and the other by Portugal. In 1494, Spain and Portugal signed the Treaty of Tordesillas, dividing the non-European globe between them.
The Treaty of Tordesillas thus resulted in the division of South America.
To learn more about Tordesillas, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29406901
Briefly explain Metacom’s grievances against the English.
First Indian War, the Great Narragansett War, or Metacom's Rebellion. It was the Native Americans' desperate attempt to elude acknowledging English rule and prevent English settlement on their ancestral territories.
From 1675 to 1676, southern New England was the scene of King Philip's War, also known as the A fellow Christian Indian reported to English authorities that Sassamon, who had earlier accused Metacom of plotting an uprising against the English, had been slain by three warriors working for the local sachem Metacom, known to the English as King Philip.
The Indians attacked adjacent villages because they were worried about encroachments and the rifts that missionaries were causing in native culture. Twelve of the ninety Puritan towns were completely destroyed by Metacom's campaign, which also attacked forty other Puritan towns.
Learn more about the Metacom here: https://brainly.com/question/2251429