Which of these triangles are definitely not congruent to any of the others?
Check all that apply.

Answer:

w = 7.7 units; x = 44°

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Sine

Step-by-step explanation:

sin 32=x/15

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a square is four times a side. We are told a side equals 3x+5 so

P=4S

P=4(3x+5)

P=12x+20

equation of the line formula : y = mx + c

════════ ∘◦❁◦∘ ════════

════════════════════

-15 - x = -5y

-15 -1x = -5y

(-15 : -5) - (1:-5x) = y

3 - (-⅕x) = y

3 + ⅕x = y

3 + ⅕x = y

y = ⅕x + 3

#So m (slope) is ⅕

════════════════════

Step-by-step explanation:

Given.

- 15-x = - 5y

5y = x + 15

y = ( x + 15) 5

y = x / 5 + 3

comparing the given equation with y = mx + c Then

Slope (m) = 1/5

Hope it will help :)

I'm going to solve this step by step:

Given: w=x(v_2 - v_1)

          w/x=v_2-v_1

          v_2=w/x+v_1

[tex] \tt \dashrightarrow w = x(v_2 - v_1) [/tex]

[tex] \tt \dashrightarrow \dfrac{w}{x} = v_2 - v_1[/tex]

[tex] \tt \dashrightarrow \dfrac{w}{x} + v_1= v_2[/tex]

[tex] \tt \dashrightarrow v_2 = \dfrac{w}{x} + v_1[/tex]

[tex] \large \underline{\boxed{\bf{v_2 = \dfrac{w}{x} + v_1}}}[/tex]

Hence, value of [tex] \tt v_2 = \dfrac{w}{x} + v_1[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

No. If two sides are 5cm the third side must be less than 2(5)=10cm

Answer: No, a triangle cannot be formed with these side lengths.

=========================================================

Explanation:

Recall that the triangle inequality theorem says that for a triangle to be possible, the sum of any two sides must be larger than the third side.

With these given side lengths, we can see that 5+5 = 10 is not larger than 20, so a triangle is not possible here. I recommend you try it out with 3 slips of paper of these lengths. You should find that the two 5 cm sides are too short to be able to connect to the 20 cm side properly.

Answer:

40% of 20 = 8

75% of 80 = 60

I hope you have a good day :)

Answer:

40% of 20 is 8

75% of 80 is 60

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

First solve for y,

7-y<2x

7-2x<y

y>-2x+7

your y intercept would be (0,7)

and your slope would be -2/1 so, you go down 2 and 1 to the right.

Since this is a greater than symbol, we have to shade above the line and the line would also be a dotted line.

Answer:

Top left: a is negative and p is positive

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula y = ax + p is referring to the formula y = mx + b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Since the line is going down, the slope is negative-- a is negative.

Since the line crosses the y-axis above the origin, the y-intercept is positive-- p is positive.

Answer:

a is negative and p is positive

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation y = ax + p is written in slope-intercept form, where a is the slope and p is the y-intercept.

When a slope is negative, the line goes down the further right it goes.

The line on the graph lowers as it moves right, which means that the slope(a) is negative.

The line intercepts the y-axis above the origin, which means that it must be positive.

Answer:

m=3/4 j or m = .75j

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The wing of the dragonfly was 9.65 cm longer than that of the fly, 102% larger in percentage terms.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the length of the wing of the old dragonfly was 19.5 cm, while the length of the wing of a common fly is 9.85 cm, to determine how long the dragonfly's wing was compared to that of the fly, the following must be done calculations:

19.5 - 9.85 = X

9.65 = X

Thus, the wing of the dragonfly was 9.65 cm longer than that of the fly. In turn, in terms of percentages, the result is the following:

9.65 = 100

19.5 = X

19.5 x 100 / 9.65 = X

1950 / 9.65 = X

202 = X

Thus, in percentage terms, the dragonfly's wing was 102% larger than that of the current fly.

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

step 1. h(t) = -16t^2 + 48t + 288. Set this equal to 320.

step 2. -16t^2 +48t + 288 = 320

step 3. -16t^2 + 48t - 32 = 0

step 4. -16(t^2 - 3t + 2)

step 5. -16(t - 2)(t - 1)

step 6. The ball reaches 320 feet "both!!!" at t = 1, 2 seconds once going up and once coming down.

Answer:

y - 9 = -5(x + 4)

General Formulas and Concepts:

Algebra I

Point-Slope Form: y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Slope m = -5

Coordinate (-4, 9) → x₁ = -4, y₁ = 9

Step 2: Write Function

Substitute into general form.

y - 9 = -5(x - -4)

y - 9 = -5(x + 4)

Answer: 5,000,000 - 4,000 - 300 or  5,004,300

Step-by-step explanation:

5,004,300 = 5,004,300.0

Left shift 6 times to largest digit = 5.004300

5.004300 (show the shift multiplier: 10^6)

5.004300*10^6

Answer:

5004300

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. m = -6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-14

Step-by-step explanation:

its negative 14 because 2-(-14)= -12

Answer:

y = 5/2x - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

y-int = -5

slope = 5/2

rise/run

alright my friend i've gotta go but i think you can solve these on your own.

just use the number that's on the Y vertical line to find y-int

and then use 2 points and count up to find the rise and then count across to fine thet run.

use the formula y=mx+b

good luck my friend <3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(0,-5) (4,5)

(5+5)/(4-0)= 10/4 = 5/2

y + 5 = 5/2(x - 0)

y + 5 = 5/2x - 0

y = 5/2x - 5

Answer:58 approximately c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2x+9y=18

Step-by-step explanation:

Distribute the denominator

y=-2/9x+2

9y=-2x+2

9y+2x=2

im sorry if this is wrong

Answer:

80°

Step-by-step explanation:

140+140+x=360

280+x=360

x=80

Answer:

a triangle with side measurements of 5, 5, and 5 inches​

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test.

Construction of triangle with side measurement 2 inch, 3 inch, 5 inch is not possible.

This theorem simply states that the sum of two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. If this is true for all three combinations, then you will have a valid triangle.

If triangle has the sides, a ,  b and c then

a + b > c

b + c > a

a + c > b

Given length of the sides,

a)  Triangle made with sides having length 3 inch, 4 inch, 6 inch.

3 + 4 > 6 ; 4 + 6 > 3 ; 3 + 6 > 4

= 7 > 6 ; 10 > 3 ; 9 > 4

Triangle inequality theorem is satisfied, hence triangle construction is possible

b)  Triangle made with sides having length 2 inch, 3 inch, 5 inch.

2 + 3 > 5 ; 3 + 5 > 2 ; 2 + 5 > 3

= 5 = 5 ; 8 > 3 ; 7 > 3

Triangle inequality theorem is not satisfied, hence triangle construction is not possible

a)  Triangle made with sides having length 3 inch, 3 inch, 4 inch.

3 + 3 > 4 ; 3 + 4 > 3 ; 3 + 4 > 3

= 6 > 4 ; 7 > 3 ; 7 > 3

Triangle inequality theorem is satisfied, hence triangle construction is possible

a)  Triangle made with sides having length 5 inch, 5 inch, 5 inch.

5 + 5 > 5 ; 5 + 5 > 5  ; 5 + 5 > 5

= 10 > 5 ; 10 > 5 ; 10 > 5

Triangle inequality theorem is satisfied, hence triangle construction is possible.

Hence, Triangle with side measurements of 2 inch , 3 inch , and 5 inch is not possible to construct.

Learn more about triangle inequality theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ6

Answer:

Definitely not!

Step-by-step explanation:

It was reflected across the x axis, resized and moved in x and y directions, but since the shape ABCD is symmetrical across the y axis, a reflection across y axis won’t change anything!

Answer:

The slope is -1/3

Answer:

=18

Step-by-step explanation:

5-4=1

1x4=4

4+14=18

hope it helped

Answer:

<3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

R.I.P

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

68.18%

Step-by-step explanation:

325+50=375

375-220=155

155÷220×100%

≈68.18%