Answer:
strained is the right answer
Explanation:
Reasons why Television kills creativity
Answer:
Children who spend just 15 minutes or more a day watching their favourite cartoons on television may be at an increased risk of losing their creative minds as compared to those who read books or solve jigsaw puzzles, a study says.
There was clear evidence that children came up with less original ideas immediately after watching television,"said Sarah Rose, Lecturer at Staffordshire University in Britain," although adding "these effects disappeared after a short time."
However, "if children are less creative in their play, this could, over time, negatively impact their development," Rose said.
There is a belief that slow-paced programmes are more educational but our findings do not support this, Sarah said.
In the study, the team looked at the immediate impact of television on three-year-old's creativity. They compared children who watched -- Postman Pat, with those who read books or played jigsaw puzzles.
The children were tested for throwing up maximum original creative ideas.
The study is potentially useful to those who produce children's television shows, early year educators, as well as parents.
The findings were presented at the British Psychological Developmental Conference in Belfast, recently.
What was John Marshall’s final decision? What led him to this conclusion?
Hello. Your question is incomplete and this makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, in the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to John Marshall's decision regarding the Marbury v. Madison. If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer and Explanation:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall decided that the national congress does not have absolute power over government decisions, as, like the entire political body in the country, it was subject to the laws covered by the federal constitution. Thus, any act, adopted by Congress, or any other branch of government, that was unconstitutional, that is, that was not approved by any law within the federal constitution, could be revised or completely annulled by the Supreme Court.
What prompted Marshall to decide this was the positioning of the federal constitution as the country's supreme law, which cannot be violated in any way.
The Marbury case v. Madison, occurred when William Marbury, who was appointed as country judge by President John Adams, did not receive the diploma that allowed him to hold office, when James Madison became Secretary of State after President Thomas Jefferson came to power. However, as an appointed judge, Marbury had the right to receive the diploma and Marshall saw the denial of the diploma as an unconstitutional act.