Answer:
The options are
A. They believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America.
B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
C. They feared that Latin America countries would invade the United States.
D. They worked to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America.
The answer is B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
President Roosevelt and Wilson both ruled the US and were similar and different in their approach to various conditions.
Roosevelt believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America while Wilson didn’t.They also had differences in fearing that Latin America countries would invade the United States and working to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America. They had a similar policy in the aspect of resorting frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.
Describe three examples of anti-democratic actions by the U.S. during and after the war.
Answer:
The Middle East, Afghanistan and Taliban regime and World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, promises were made to restore pleasant democratic practices and to ensure the rule of law take it course, apparently all these were short-lived when these promises were not effectively delivered. George W. Bush also held out promises during and after the war in Iraq which was to oust the sitting regime of Saddam Hussein so as to restore democracy and make it safe for the citizens. This later turned out to be the same disappointment and anti-democratic conclusions that were followed by Woodrow Wilson in the First World War and the Middle East was engaged in endless cycles of bloodshed after the war. A third example is that of the Taliban Regime in Afghanistan that ended in the same fate and it turned out that most times, promises that were made were likely not being prepared to be fulfilled by those who made them.
How did the 20th-century independence movement in Vietnam differ from the
one in India?
A. The Vietnamese movement was a popular nationalist revolution,
while the Indian movement was part of a proxy war.
B. The Vietnamese movement produced a new democratic state,
while the Indian movement produced a communist state.
C. The Vietnamese movement removed a European colonial power,
while the Indian movement reformed a colonial government
D. The Vietnamese movement escalated into a full-scale
revolutionary war, while the Indian movement was largely
nonviolent
Answer: B the vietnamese movement was a popular nationalist revoulution, while indian movement was part of a proxy war.
Explanation:
1. What "American truism' was re-confirmed by the 2008 elections? Why does the author take that position?
Answer and Explanation:
Undecideds always vote for the challenger, so they voted for Barak Obama. His campaign was staged in the limelight of change. He raised the slogan, “Washington must change.” The change against prolonged US war policy in Iraq. While John McCain emphasized his experience and supported the war in continuation of George W. Bush’s war policies. Moreover, Obama`s firm standing with his ideology during the times of significant financial crisis in 2008 established trust in his name. Meanwhile, McCain suspended the election campaign. The emerged challenger`s role of Barak Obama staged him with a tremendous decisive victory.
First time in American history that more than half of the voters’ population went online to get connected to the election process in 2008 elections, according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project. This represents fifty-five percent of the American adult population. The internet`s role in the 2008 elections painted true colors of the technology revolution in the millennials era.
Compare Mussolini's rise to power and totalitarian state in Italy that of Hitler's rise to power and totalitarian state in Germany.
Answer:
Explanation: Both, like most of the world then and now, was developing an economic depression from hordes of excess labor undercutting wages and depleting resources. Overpopulation was not under control anywhere then and the world had overwhelmed the current technology's ability to access sufficient resources for the expanding hordes of people. So it was once again time for the most desperate to attack neighbors and take their land and resources. WW I had slaughtered some excess people but its stagnant trench warfare did almost nothing to acquire more useful land for anyone.
The people of Italy, Spain, and Germany became interested in Marxist international socialist and fascist national socialist policies in their growing desperation. Because the national socialists promised to protect national industries and its jobs against foreign competition undercutting them, they won the competition between the two radical socialist philosophies.
Italy's Mussolini developed the fascist "corporatist" national socialist structure. It was a more efficient shallow bureaucratic system that "incorporated" each industry under a single government bureau that controlled it.
Spain and Germany copied Italy's model. Italy's economy started improving and it began more conquests south into Africa and east into the Balkans to feed it. Spain became mired with a war against its Marxists who were raging jealous against the national socialist's popularity "stealing" their proletariat from them. Communists from other countries, including the US, entered Spain to help their communists. The German national socialists sided with Franco, Spain's fascist leader, and helped defeat the communists in a fierce civil war made famous by writers like Hemingway.
Germany was the most successful with the system. It was well suited to the traditional German culture's stricter discipline and socialist origins (according to Marx). Their economy improved most rapidly and the world was fascinated at it's initial success until it began its conquest for the land needed by it's expanding population. LIke Greece, Rome, and France before it, it decided to take so much as it could, not just what it needed for the immediate future. The rest is history you should already know.
I hope this helps :D
Describe the course of the war 1812 in 400 words
Answer:
I'll save you the points because my answer may not appease your guidelines. Here is it in basic form. America want's Canada or what is at the time just a territory of Great Britan with a little autonomy. Essentially a territory and if given leniency for the sake of governance it could be considered a puppet/dominion. Basically America was sick of the Britis. They took their sailors who at the time were getting taken by the numerically superior British Navy and well enslaved them for lack of better terms well the technical term is impressment but yeah its work against their will by that of a foreign power. It angered American Politicians and they felt that at this time they did not get the respect nor recognition they deserved. If Canada was indeed taken maybe the British would leave America alone and pursue the Monroe doctrine. Although unlike most modern Wars it was a war declared by Congress and approved by the president. Problem was we didn't really have a great Army or even one to begin with. You could argue some divisions of the Federal government did exist like Merchant marines, American legion, etc. but lets just say we didn't have a grandstanding army. We win, we loose, our navy ain't so hot. Our generals not so smart we burn Ontario. Go into Quebec it's cold so we get out. Canada burns us too and our White house. Madison somehow leads the people of D.C. to believe in him and surprisingly keeps moral up after their literal Capital is burnt. Also didn't really end until 1814. Also in D.C the invading British forces somehow by a miracle a tornado I kid you not pushed the British out of D.C. and stopped their invasion. Sometimes luck really was on America's side so if you believe in providence I mean that's a great example. Basically 1814 fort mchenry happens. Star Spangled banner. It's the entiphasis of America. Also flag is 15 stars 15 bars extremely unique but fitting for the time. General Andrew Jackson leads his men to victory. The entire city of Baltimore was into the effort. All races, creeds, and people united by one nation indivisible. That day proved to show how we could all one day be simply Americans. We won although being outnumbered and through each day of bombs bursting in air we came back with a bigger flag. This battle created our national anthem. There was a treaty signed between both nations. Basically agreeing to stop mess with one another and recognize each other. It even allowed for some trade so that was a positive. Some speculate on who actually won the War. Is it the British or Americans. Brits don't care since the Napolean wars and such and although I believe the Canadians do well they weren't exactly autonomous and didn't gain much quite either. America did not get to annex Canada but they did gain as some call it their second Independence and solidification into the world stage. They held off so we should give credit where its due. I usually say its a wish wash. A tie if you will. All gains were negated and all losses for very little political points. I say it matters and yet matters not. Lots of lives to be lost for little gain in land. I guess you can say it was just a war of pride although it did not start that way. It ended up just showing capabilities and even both sides really couldn't win at least without changing a large portion of each individual nations history. The brits lists a building America Lost a building and none lost land so yeah lots of people lost over political recognition and withdraw from aggressive tactics but such is war.
Explanation:
Which program denied American Indians the use of their languages, forced them to cut their hair, denied the practice of traditional ceremonies, and forced adoption of American names?
A.
the Dawes Severalty Act
B.
the Curtis Act
C.
the Trail of Tears
D.
Indian Boarding Schools
E.
the reservation lifestyle
D) Indian Boarding Schools
Answer:
its d
Explanation:
Write all you know about Nagla dance by the kasina people of Ghana
Answer:
Nagla is a form of dance famous in Ghana specially among Kassena and the Frafra.
Explanation:
Nagla is a famous dance form in Northern Ghana specially among Kassena and the Frafra tribe. This dance form was initially perfomed at funerals but now it has taken modern shape and is performed at social gatherings or occasions or festivals as well, marriage being an exception.
This form of dance is performed by thumping feet on the ground in rhythmic manner on thhe drum beats. The dance posture of this dance is that the dancer bends his upper body forward, tucking his or her hands either behind the back or in front of him/her, the knees are bent a bit with the heels off the ground. In a way it forms a zig-zag shape by the human body.
Hitler's hatred of the Jews began with what assumption
Who wrote the new Japanese constitution?
British officials
members of thy Diet
the Allied governments
US Army officers
Answer:
i believe its D
Explanation:
Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970. Since this act was passed, emissions of the six main air pollutants Group of answer choices cannot be measured since Congress failed to appropriate money to monitor the level of emissions. have fallen by more than one-half. have remained essentially constant, even though significant economic growth has occurred in the United States since 1970. have increased significantly due to the growth of the U.S. economy.
Answer:
have fallen by more than one-half.
Explanation:
Thick, noticeable smog in many of the cities and manufacturing centers of the United States helped bring the 1970 e Clean Air Act to spur passage at the height of the national environmental movement. The ensuing modifications were intended to enhance its effectiveness and address newly recognized problems of air pollution such as acid rain and stratospheric ozone layer damage. The Clean Air Act allows EPA to set national environmental air quality levels for certain specific and prevalent contaminants, based on the latest research, to protect public health and welfare nationally. Certain main regulations are intended to reduce the rise in emissions from increasing motor vehicle numbers and new manufacturing plants.
Which segment of the West African population accounted for more than half of those taken as slaves to the New World
Answer:
Adult men
Explanation:
Most of the slaves taken to the New World were adult men since they were viewed as more capable to perform the required labor. On top of that, a considerable number of adult male slaves died due to the rough conditions or during slave raids, which led to a greater need to capture adult men. This scenario caused a major imbalance in the male to female ratio in West Africa.
San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence
Answer:
San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence of Argentina was expelling Spaniards from neighboring countries.
Explanation:
Jose de San Martin was the main liberator of Argentina and the southern part of South America during the 1810s and 1820s. It was a military man born in Argentina, at that time the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata colony, who had been educated in Spain and had fought for this country in the Napoleonic wars. Therefore, he was an experienced warrior who, once noted of the independence movement, decided to return to his homeland to lead the troops. His first battle was in San Lorenzo, in February 1813, followed by other iconic contests until on July 9, 1816, Argentina declared its independence from Spain.
But San Martin knew that, if they did not cooperate with neighboring countries, the Spanish would win and return to Argentine territory. For this reason, he organized the Army of the Andes to liberate Chile, which he achieved in 1818 after the Battle of Maipu.
Later, he continued with his army to the north, liberating Peru in 1821 and leaving the command of the South American independence effort to Simon Bolivar in 1822.
heeelp please! History class
yo what extent did Yellow Journalism lead to war with spain? What benefit did the newspaper owners gain from the war? How has journalism evolved since the Spanish American War? is the told or prominence of media today likely to have a greater or lesser affect in the American public now? Fully explain your answer and give specific examples when needed at least 150 word (i will really appreciate it)
Answer:
Yellow Journalism pitted American Public opinion against Spain, which pushed public support to carry on a war with Spain.
Explanation:
Yellow Journalism, is essentially a bully pulpit tactic within journalism which allows public opinion to be swindled easily through tactful journalism. Essentially the United States government claimed that Spain shot down one of the American ships next to Cuba, which gave Roosevelt his glory conquest to obtain territory for the United States such as: The Philipines a good example. Journalism, since the american war has changed with style, but hasn't exactly changed from the original purpose; which is swaying the American to adopt certain thought-process or behave in a way to act socially acceptable to the mindsets of the time.
Why must the misuse of prescription and illegal drugs be avoided? reduces the risk of serious side effects decreases blood pressure reduces respiratory diseases decreases the risk of cancer
Answer: Reduces the risk of serious side effects.
Explanation:
Answer:
reduces the risk of serious side effects
hope this helps.
Which group of Europeans formed alliances with leaders in Kongo during the 1400s and 1500s?
A. Spanish
B. French
C. English
D. Portuguese
Answer:
D. Portuguese
Explanation:
The Portuguese formed alliances with Kongo leaders in the 1400s and 1500s.
The Kongo had been unstable with factional and regional conflicts and accepted an alliance with the Portuguese so they could restore order.
The Kongo leaders gave the Portuguese some colonies, allowing them to trade and have access to the Kongo slave labor.
Answer:
D. Portuguese
Explanation:
is right, I don't know why it has 3 stars???