The president's expressed powers focus on executing and enforcing laws and overseeing foreign policy, while Congress's powers center on creating laws, controlling the budget, and providing checks and balances on the executive branch.
The expressed powers of the president are outlined in the Constitution and give the president specific authority to carry out their duties, while the powers of Congress are also outlined in the Constitution but are more broad and encompass the legislative responsibilities of making and passing laws.
The expressed powers of the president and Congress differ mainly in their roles within the U.S. government. The president, as the chief executive, holds powers related to foreign policy, military command, and enforcement of laws, while Congress, as the legislative body, holds powers related to lawmaking, budgeting, and impeachment.
Presidential expressed powers include the ability to negotiate treaties, appoint ambassadors, and serve as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
On the other hand, Congress has the power to declare war, approve treaties, control government spending, and pass legislation.
Visit here to learn more about Constitution:
brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ11
nsc-68: united states objectives and programs for national security, 1950 question the policies expressed in the excerpt contributed most directly to debates in the united states about the
The policies expressed in NSC-68 contributed most directly to debates in the United States about national security and the appropriate strategies to address potential threats during the early years of the Cold War. These debates focused on the balance between military and diplomatic efforts, as well as the role of the United States in global affairs.
The policies expressed in NSC-68, which outlined the United States' objectives and programs for national security in 1950, contributed most directly to debates in the United States about the country's role in the Cold War.
NSC-68 called for a massive increase in military spending and emphasized the need for the United States to take a leadership role in countering the spread of communism around the world.
This led to debates about the appropriate level of military spending and the extent to which the United States should engage in global conflicts to advance its national security interests.
Visit here to learn more about NSC-68:
brainly.com/question/28165649
#SPJ11
The delay of filing criminal prosecution against a suspect until he or she completes a treatment program is known as
The delay of filing criminal prosecution against a suspect until he or she completes a treatment program is known as diversion.
Diversion programs aim to rehabilitate individuals, particularly those who are first-time or nonviolent offenders, by addressing the underlying issues that contribute to their criminal behavior. Instead of proceeding through the traditional criminal justice process, which may involve incarceration and a criminal record, eligible participants are referred to a treatment or counseling program.
These programs may address substance abuse, mental health, or other contributing factors, with the goal of reducing recidivism and promoting public safety. Successful completion of the program typically results in the dismissal or reduction of charges, ultimately preventing a criminal record that could negatively impact an individual's future opportunities.
Diversion benefits both the offender and society by providing a more constructive and cost-effective approach to criminal justice. By addressing the root causes of criminal behavior and offering support and resources, diversion programs aim to break the cycle of crime and foster a healthier, safer community.
Learn more about Diversion here: https://brainly.com/question/29897890
#SPJ11
For the purposes of the law and as a criminal defense, "insanity" is a ________term.
Answer: For the purposes of the law and as a criminal defense, "insanity" is a legal term.
once the president has formally nominated an individual for the courts, the appointee must be approved by the _____
Answer: Once the President has formally nominated an individual for the courts, the appointee must be approved by the Senate. The Constitution grants the President the power to nominate judges, but the Senate must confirm the nominee in order for them to be appointed to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. During the confirmation process, the Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearings to evaluate the nominee's qualifications, judicial philosophy, and past record. The Committee then votes on whether to send the nomination to the full Senate for a vote. If the Senate confirms the nominee, they are officially appointed to the court.
Once the President has formally nominated an individual for the courts, the appointee must be approved by the Senate.
The Senate's role in the nomination and confirmation process is crucial to ensuring that qualified individuals are appointed to serve as judges. The Senate Judiciary Committee reviews the nominee's qualifications, conducts a hearing to question the nominee on their record and legal philosophy, and votes on whether to recommend the nominee to the full Senate for a confirmation vote.
Once the nominee is approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee, the nominee's name is then sent to the full Senate for a confirmation vote. The Senate debate and vote on the nomination, and if the nominee receives a majority vote, they are then appointed to the courts.
The Senate's confirmation process serves as a check on the President's power to appoint judges and ensures that only qualified individuals who are committed to upholding the law are appointed to serve on the courts.
For more about Senate:
https://brainly.com/question/24779287
#SPJ11
If tax revenues are less than the total of government spending plus government transfer payments, which of the following will happen?
A. The tax multiplier will increase
B. The spending multiplier will increase
C. The government budget will be in surplus
D. There will be an inflationary gap
E. The national debt will increase
If tax revenues are less than the total of government spending plus government transfer payments, e) the national debt will increase.
When tax revenues fall short of covering government spending and transfer payments, the government has to borrow money to finance the difference.
This results in a budget deficit, as the government is spending more than it's receiving in tax revenues. As a consequence, the national debt will increase as the government borrows more to cover its expenditures.
So, among the options provided, the correct answer is E. The national debt will increase when tax revenues are insufficient to cover government spending and transfer payments.
To know more about national debt visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3467411
#SPJ11
the militarization of city police forces contradicts the concept of:
The militarization of city police forces contradicts the concept of: Community policing.
Community policing emphasizes the importance of building trust and collaboration between law enforcement and the communities they serve. It focuses on addressing local concerns and implementing problem-solving strategies that take into account community needs and values.
Militarization, on the other hand, involves the acquisition and use of military equipment, tactics, and training by police departments. This approach can lead to a more aggressive and forceful presence, which may exacerbate tensions and create an adversarial relationship between the police and the community.
By arming city police forces with military-style equipment and tactics, the focus shifts from fostering positive community relations to a more confrontational approach. This contradicts the principles of community policing, which prioritizes communication, cooperation, and the overall well-being of the community.
In summary, the militarization of city police forces undermines the concept of community policing by fostering a more aggressive and confrontational atmosphere, rather than building trust and collaboration between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
To know more about Community policing, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28366939#
#SPJ11
What are certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies under 803(12)?
Certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies under Rule 803(12) pertain to certain documents and records that can be used as evidence in legal proceedings.
Rule 803(12) is a part of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which govern the admissibility of evidence in U.S. federal courts. This rule deals specifically with the "Ancient Documents" exception to the hearsay rule. Under Rule 803(12), certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies are considered reliable and trustworthy documents that can be admitted as evidence, despite being hearsay.
Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally not admissible as evidence due to concerns about its reliability. However, ancient documents are an exception to this rule because they are presumed to be accurate and reliable due to their age and the nature of the information they contain.
Certificates of marriage, baptism, and similar ceremonies typically include information about important life events, such as the names of the individuals involved, the date and location of the event, and the person who officiated the ceremony. These documents are often considered public records and can be used to establish various legal matters, such as proving identity, relationships, and dates of important events.
know more about baptism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30749820
#SPJ11
A completed crime requires three basic elements; the act itself (actus reus), a culpable mental state (mens rea) and...
A completed crime requires three basic elements; the act itself (actus reus), a culpable mental state (mens rea) and concurrence of actus reus and mens rea.
The third basic element required for a completed crime is the concurrence of actus reus and mens rea. This means that the guilty act (actus reus) and the guilty mind (mens rea) must occur at the same time. In other words, there must be a direct connection between the physical action and the intent behind it.
For example, if someone intentionally shoots and kills another person (mens rea), but the gun misfires and the victim survives (no actus reus), the crime is not completed.
Similarly, if someone accidentally hits another person with a car (actus reus), but had no intention to harm them (no mens rea), the act is not criminal. Therefore, the concurrence of actus reus and mens rea is a crucial element in determining criminal liability.
For more questions like Crime click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31365862
#SPJ11
If a suspect is found to be "Incompetent to Stand Trial" and never ever gains "competence" it means that he/she will probably,
If a suspect is found to be "incompetent to stand trial," and never ever gains "competence" it means that they are probably unable to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings against them and unable to assist in their own defense.
In other words, they lack the mental capacity to participate in the trial process. If the suspect never gains "competence," it means that they will likely not be able to stand trial and may be committed to a mental health facility for treatment. The length of their commitment will depend on the severity of their mental illness and their ability to gain competence.
In some cases, a suspect may never be able to gain competence and may remain in a mental health facility for an extended period of time. In these cases, the criminal charges against them may be dropped, and they may be civilly committed. This means that they will be required to receive treatment for their mental illness until they are deemed safe to be released back into society.
Overall, if a suspect is found to be incompetent to stand trial and never gains competence, it means that they will likely not face criminal charges and will instead receive treatment for their mental illness. The goal of this treatment is to help the individual achieve a level of competence and eventually reintegrate into society.
know more about competence here:
https://brainly.com/question/26054107
#SPJ11
If an offender completes his or her obligations in a deferred prosecution diversion program, the prosecutor will _________________________________.
If an offender completes his or her obligations in a deferred prosecution diversion program, the prosecutor will dismiss the charges against them.
Despite these programmes' obvious advantages, others have criticised them. Because of their overly reliant reliance on law enforcement officers and prosecutors as programme directors, one such problem is that they could amplify existing inequalities and prejudices within the criminal justice system.
Additionally, community members might show a stronger propensity to report some types of crimes than others, which would lead to uneven law enforcement
Last but not least, it's possible that while establishing community prosecution programmes, political objectives trump sincere efforts to improve community safety.
Community prosecution programmes aim to increase community involvement in the criminal justice system by working with local residents to identify and address crime-related concerns.
Learn more about community prosecution programmes here
https://brainly.com/question/31659224
#SPJ11
The principal used by King Henry II of Englandto enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across the length and breadth of Great Britain was called,
The principle used by King Henry II of England to enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across Great Britain was called the Assize of Clarendon.
Established in 1166, the Assize of Clarendon was a series of legal reforms that aimed to improve the administration of justice and maintain public order. The Assize introduced several important innovations in the legal system, such as the establishment of juries and itinerant judges. Juries, composed of local citizens, were responsible for presenting evidence and determining guilt or innocence. Itinerant judges were appointed by the King and traveled throughout the country to hear cases, ensuring consistent application of the law.
The Assize of Clarendon greatly enhanced the power of the central government by transferring jurisdiction from local feudal lords to the King. This allowed for a more uniform and effective administration of criminal law throughout the nation. The reforms also helped maintain social stability by addressing the public's concerns about lawlessness and the inconsistent administration of justice in the feudal system.
Overall, the Assize of Clarendon was a significant step in the development of the English legal system, as it established key principles that are still in use today. By centralizing criminal law enforcement under the authority of the King, the reforms helped to create a more efficient and standardized system of justice across Great Britain.
Know more about Assize of Clarendon here:
https://brainly.com/question/10925132
#SPJ11
What are public records of vital statistics under 803(9)?
Public records of vital statistics under Rule 803(9) of the Federal Rules of Evidence refer to the official documents maintained by the government that provide important data about the life events of individuals.
These records include information such as births, deaths, marriages, and divorces. They serve as critical legal documents and are often used for various purposes, such as verifying a person's identity, tracking demographic trends, and conducting genealogical research.
Rule 803(9) specifically deals with the admissibility of these records in court as an exception to the hearsay rule. Generally, hearsay is considered unreliable and is not allowed as evidence in court. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule, including the public records exception under Rule 803(9).
The rationale behind this exception is that public records of vital statistics are considered reliable and trustworthy, as they are compiled and maintained by government agencies responsible for ensuring their accuracy. Moreover, these agencies are legally required to maintain and preserve these records. As a result, vital statistics records are seen as an exception to the hearsay rule and can be admitted as evidence in court proceedings.
know more about Public records here:
https://brainly.com/question/30101399
#SPJ11
What are three repercussions or Consequences of administrative breakdown
the consequences of administrative breakdown. Here are three repercussions: Decreased Efficiency, Reduced Morale, and Financial Loss.
1. Decreased Efficiency: When administrative systems fail or become disorganized, tasks and processes can take longer to complete, leading to decreased efficiency. This is because employees may struggle to find necessary information, resources, or support to execute their duties, causing delays and miscommunications. Additionally, it may result in duplication of work or wasted efforts.
2. Reduced Morale: An administrative breakdown can lead to increased stress and frustration among staff members. As employees encounter difficulties in their daily tasks, they may feel unsupported or overwhelmed, which can negatively impact their job satisfaction and overall morale. A workplace with low morale can lead to high employee turnover, resulting in additional costs and disruptions for the organization.
3. Financial Loss: The combination of decreased efficiency and reduced morale can contribute to financial losses for the organization. As tasks take longer to complete and employees become less engaged in their work, the organization's productivity decreases. This can lead to lost revenue opportunities, higher operating costs, and even potential legal issues if administrative errors result in non-compliance with regulations or contractual obligations.
In summary, the consequences of an administrative breakdown include decreased efficiency, reduced morale, and financial loss for the organization. These repercussions can negatively impact the overall performance and stability of the organization, making it crucial for businesses to maintain strong administrative systems and support.
Know more about Financial Loss here:
https://brainly.com/question/28462441
#SPJ11
a(n) is a method of discharging a contract in which a third party becomes bound upon a promise to the obligee.
A (novation) is a method of discharging a contract in which a third party becomes bound upon a promise to the obligee.
The term novation occurs when a third party agrees to take over the obligations and responsibilities of a contract, essentially replacing the original party. A typical example of novation in property law is when a tenant passes the lease over to another person making him or her responsible for rent payments and any property damages according to the original lease contract.
The new party assumes all liabilities and benefits of the original agreement, while the original party is released from any further obligations. Novation can be an effective way to resolve disputes or change the terms of a contract without voiding the entire agreement.
Read more about Contract at brainly.com/question/13037087
#SPJ11
policies that take anomie theory insights into account would focus upon reentry as a means of addressing the potential for delinquency. a. true b. false
True, Anomie theory suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in deviant behavior when they experience a sense of normlessness or a disconnection from society's values and norms.
One way to address this potential for delinquency is through reentry policies that aim to reintegrate individuals back into society after being incarcerated. By providing support and resources for successful reentry, individuals are less likely to feel disconnected from society and more likely to adhere to societal norms and values.
Such policies might include job training programs, mental health services, and housing assistance. Additionally, policies that take into account the unique needs of individuals who have been incarcerated, such as addressing trauma or addiction, can also contribute to successful reentry and a reduced risk of delinquency.
Therefore, policies that consider anomie theory insights can be an effective means of addressing the potential for delinquency among individuals who have been incarcerated.
To know more about Anomie theory visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31239209
#SPJ11
What are records of documents that affect an interest in property under 803(14)?
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence 803(14), a record of a document that affects an interest in property is considered an exception to the hearsay rule.
Here are some additional points to further explain 803(14):
Examples of documents that may affect an interest in property include deeds, mortgages, liens, easements, and leases.The record of the document must be created and kept in the ordinary course of business by someone with knowledge of the information contained in the document.The record must be made at or near the time of the event or transaction, or within a reasonable time after.The record must be kept in a manner that is generally accepted as reliable.The person offering the record must provide a written notice to the other party or their counsel, at least 14 days before trial, of their intention to offer the record as evidence.This refers to a record of any document that affects the ownership or other interest in a particular piece of property, such as a deed, mortgage, or lease. The record of the document can be presented as evidence in court, even if the original document is not available.
Learn More About Hearsay rule
https://brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ11
The United States obtains it's concepts of criminal law and legal traditions from,
The United States obtains its concepts of criminal law and legal traditions from English common law.
The legal system of the United States is rooted in English common law, which is a legal system developed in England over hundreds of years. English common law was brought over to America by English colonizers and has been developed and modified through court decisions and legislation in the United States.
The concepts of criminal law, such as the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, and the right to a fair trial, are all derived from English common law.
Additionally, many of the legal traditions in the United States, such as the use of juries and the adversarial system, are also based on English common law. However, the legal system of the United States has evolved over time and has been influenced by various other legal systems, such as civil law and Native American law.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
__________ allow(s) a state or local prosecutor to act as an uncompensated special assistant to a United States attorney.
Cross-designation, also known as concurrent jurisdiction, allows a state or local prosecutor to act as an uncompensated special assistant to a United States attorney.
This practice facilitates collaboration between federal and state authorities, enabling them to effectively address various legal issues and enforce the law more efficiently.
Cross-designation empowers state and local prosecutors to perform certain federal duties and take on federal cases under the supervision of a United States attorney. By doing so, these prosecutors can leverage their local knowledge and experience to address crimes that span multiple jurisdictions or involve both federal and state laws.
This arrangement benefits both the state and federal legal systems, as it promotes resource sharing, coordination, and mutual support. It also helps to streamline the prosecution process, reducing the time and resources required to bring cases to trial.
In summary, cross-designation enhances the capacity of state and local prosecutors to address complex legal issues, while promoting cooperation and efficiency within the legal system. This practice allows for a more effective and united approach to enforcing the law and ensuring justice is served.
Learn more about concurrent jurisdiction here: https://brainly.com/question/30495628
#SPJ11
Which of the following is one of the four material elements required for meeting the substantially-equal-work condition for application of the Equal Pay Act?
A. Equal training opportunities
B. Equal remuneration
C. Equal responsibility
D. Equal bonus structure
The correct answer is B. Equal remuneration is one of the four material elements required for meeting the substantially equal work condition for the application of the Equal Pay Act. The other three elements include equal skill, effort, and responsibility.
The Equal Pay Act is a federal law that prohibits employers from paying employees of different sexes different wages for substantially equal work. To determine whether the equal-work condition is met, the court examines whether the jobs require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility and whether they are performed under similar working conditions.
If an employer violates the Equal Pay Act, the employee can recover the amount of the underpayment and, in some cases, double the amount of the underpayment as liquidated damages. Employers must ensure that they pay employees fairly and in compliance with the law to avoid potential legal action.
To learn more about Equal Pay Act, visit: https://brainly.com/question/1020025
#SPJ11
Research indicates that judges, and even the public, do not consider ___________ a serious offense.
Research indicates that judges, and even the public, do not consider certain traffic violations, such as speeding or running a red light, a serious offense.
It is against the law to constantly use the left lane to block vehicles. There is a right-hand driving requirement for slow traffic that is in effect "regardless of any apparent speed limit" Traffic law.
First of all, while speeding restrictions are the same for all lanes, vehicles in the left lane are not allowed to drive too fast merely because they are in that lane. The left lane's primary purpose is to give drivers a location to pass slower moving cars. By doing so, you may control traffic, prevent delays, and increase safety. He is preoccupied, which is one of the most frequent reasons drivers go below the speed limit. Mobile phones frequently cause motorists to get inattentive. They aim to slow them down so they can multitask while paying more attention to their phones.
Learn more about Traffic law here
https://brainly.com/question/30278026
#SPJ11
What is reputation concerning personal or family history under 803(19)?
Under 803(19), reputation refers to evidence of a person's or a family's character in the community, as perceived by others who have personal knowledge of them.
Rule 803(19) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows for reputation evidence to be admissible in court if it concerns personal or family history.
This type of evidence may be introduced to establish a person's character or trait, such as honesty, integrity, or peacefulness, and is based on the opinions of members of the community who have personal knowledge of the person or family in question.
Reputation evidence can be used in both civil and criminal cases, and is considered an exception to the hearsay rule because it is not based on statements made by the person or family themselves, but rather on the opinions of others in the community.
For more questions like Federal Rule click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28592086
#SPJ11
Megan's Laws require states to provide communities with information about ____________.
Megan's Laws require states to provide communities with information about convicted sex offenders.
A regulation that mandates officials to inform localities of the whereabouts of convicted sex offenders. New Jersey passed it for the first time in 1995.
Megan Kanka, a 7-year-old child who was sexually raped and killed by a convicted sex offender who lived in her neighbourhood, is the inspiration for Megan's Law.
Megan's Law has encountered legal issues throughout the years, while having noble intentions. The problem of public notification is one of the major difficulties. Some contend that making sex offenders' identities public violates their right to privacy and increases the risk of harassment and vigilante assaults. Others contend that in order to safeguard the neighbourhood from potential peril, public notification is required.
The accuracy of the data on the registry is another issue with Megan's Law. People have occasionally been mistakenly added on the list, which can have a negative impact on their lives and careers.
Learn more about Megan's Laws here
brainly.com/question/9878294
#SPJ11
At common law, an individual who helped plan a crime (say, a Robbery) and sent others out to actually perform the act while he stayed at home was called:
The individual who helped plan a crime and sent others out to actually perform the act while staying at home is called an accomplice.
An accomplice is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, either by helping plan the crime or by actually participating in some way. In some cases, an accomplice may not be present at the scene of the crime but may have played a significant role in its planning or execution.
The law treats accomplices as if they had committed the crime themselves, even if they did not actually carry out the act. Therefore, accomplices may face the same charges and penalties as the person who actually committed the crime.
In the scenario provided, the individual who helped plan the robbery and sent others out to perform the act while staying at home would be considered an accomplice to the crime.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ11
The old common law term used to denote "purpose", "intent" or a "depraved heart" in a homicide crime was:
The old common law term used to denote "purpose", "intent" or a "depraved heart" in a homicide crime was "malice aforethought".
The old common law term used to denote "purpose", "intent" or a "depraved heart" in a homicide crime was "malice aforethought". This term was commonly used to refer to the mental state of a defendant in cases of murder or manslaughter. It indicated a degree of premeditation and an intent to cause harm or death, or a reckless disregard for human life. The term has largely been replaced by modern legal definitions, but its influence can still be seen in the way that intent is evaluated in criminal cases.
You can learn more about malice aforethought at
https://brainly.com/question/14267527
#SPJ11
the type of information conveyed to the expert, amount of time involved in discussions or meetings, and whether the expert provided the attorney with confidential information are three factors courts have used in determining whether to disqualify an expert. true false
Answer:
I believe it's true, but i'm not entirely sure.
Explanation:
One of the most significant factors that affects delinquent behavior is ______.School Age Family Community Setting
One of the most significant factors that affect delinquent behavior is the family environment.
Among school, age, family, and community settings, the family environment has been identified as one of the most significant factors affecting delinquent behavior. This is because family plays a crucial role in a child's upbringing, and it is within the family that children first learn values, morals, and social behaviors. When there is a lack of parental supervision, inconsistent or harsh discipline, or a chaotic home environment, the risk of delinquent behavior increases. Additionally, family factors such as low socioeconomic status, single-parent households, and parental substance abuse can also contribute to delinquency. While school, age, and community settings can also impact delinquency, it is the family environment that serves as the foundation for a child's development and influences their behavior throughout their life.
To know more about delinquent behavior visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31149474
#SPJ11
Gun ______ programs are short-lived and voluntary.
Gun buyback programs are short-lived and voluntary initiatives aimed at reducing the number of firearms in circulation within a community.
These programs typically involve local law enforcement agencies partnering with community organizations to create a safe environment for individuals to surrender their firearms without fear of prosecution or questioning. Participants are often provided with financial incentives, such as gift cards or vouchers, in exchange for turning in their weapons.
The short-lived nature of gun buyback programs is due to their typically being organized as one-time or periodic events, lasting for a day or a few days at most. This is to ensure that the resources required to administer the program, such as personnel and funding, are used efficiently and effectively.
The voluntary aspect of gun buyback programs means that individuals are not compelled or legally required to participate. Participation is entirely at the discretion of the gun owner, who may choose to surrender their firearms for a variety of reasons, such as personal safety concerns, a desire to reduce gun violence, or to dispose of an unwanted or unused weapon.
While the effectiveness of gun buyback programs in reducing crime rates and preventing gun violence remains a topic of debate, these short-lived and voluntary initiatives can serve as a valuable tool for promoting safe firearm storage, disposal, and public awareness on the dangers of unsecured weapons.
Learn more about gun buyback programs here: https://brainly.com/question/28521789
#SPJ11
Criminal sanctions that point the offender out to the public are known as
Criminal sanctions that point the offender out to the public are known as public sanctions. These sanctions are meant to bring attention to the offender's wrongdoing and deter others from committing similar offenses.
They may include things like public shaming, community service, or having to wear an identifying mark or clothing.
In his essay "Shame is Worth a Try," author Dan Kahan claims that the promise of shame as an effective, inexpensive, and humane alternative is what the supporters of shame seem to be getting and the opponents are ignoring.
In his piece "Shame Is Worth a Try," Kahan asserts that those who understand the potential of shame understand that it is "cheap, efficient, and a suitable alternative to short jail sentences." A punishment must be attached to a crime in order to stop it from happening again.
Dan M. Kahan is the Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Law at Yale Law School. His field of expertise is criminal law and evidence, and he is well-known for his theory.
Learn more about Shame is Worth a Try here
https://brainly.com/question/29504716
#SPJ11
100 POINTS [BOTS/SCAMS WILL BE BLOCKED.]
_________ ___________ is when two or more people reach an agreement to resolve a dispute.
- Dispute resolution
- Mutual agreement
- Conflict resolution
- Conflict solution
Answer: Mutual agreement, I'm 87% sure its a mutual agreement
Answer:
Mutual agreement.
Explanation:
The other options are incorrect because they do not accurately represent the concept described in the question.
Dispute resolution: While this term is related to resolving disputes, it typically refers to the process or methods used to settle conflicts or disagreements, rather than the agreement reached between parties.
Conflict resolution: This term specifically refers to the process of resolving conflicts or disputes between parties, but it does not necessarily imply that an agreement has been reached. It focuses on finding a solution to the conflict rather than the agreement itself.
Conflict solution: This term is not commonly used in the context of dispute resolution or conflict resolution. It may not accurately convey the idea of reaching an agreement between parties to resolve a dispute, as it focuses more on the end result or outcome rather than the process of reaching an agreement.
Only "mutual agreement" accurately reflects the idea of two or more parties coming to an agreement to resolve a dispute, as it implies a consensus or understanding reached by all parties involved.
When can a statement against interest be admissible according to 804(b)(3)?
A statement against interest can be admissible under 804(b)(3) if it is against the declarant's interest at the time it was made and if the declarant is unavailable to testify.
The Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 804(b)(3) allows a statement against interest to be admissible in court if it meets two criteria.
Firstly, the statement must have been against the declarant's interest at the time it was made, meaning that the statement tended to subject the declarant to criminal liability, civil liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another.
Secondly, the declarant must be unavailable to testify, which may be due to death, absence, privilege, refusal, or inability to testify. If these two criteria are met, then the statement may be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule.
For more questions like Liability click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30805836
#SPJ11