Before 1871, United States government treated the Native American tribes as foreign nations.
Before 1871, the United States government viewed the Native American tribes as separate and distinct foreign nations. This meant that the US government would negotiate treaties with them, and the tribes would be granted certain rights and privileges. In addition, the US government would also provide certain services and protections to the tribes.
However, the US government did not recognize the tribes as citizens of the United States, and the tribes were not allowed to participate in the political process. This changed in 1871, when the US government passed the Indian Appropriations Act, which allowed Native Americans to become citizens of the United States.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
-------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"Which of the following best explains the relationship between the united states government and native American tribes before 1871?
A. United States treated the American tribes as foreign nations.
B. United States treated the American tribes as part of USA."-------
To know more about tribes, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/17086100
#SPJ4
according to the monitoring the future study conducted annually by the university of michigan on marijuana use among 12th-graders, which of the following statements is true of changes over time in the rates of drug use?multiple choice question.while marijuana use increased steadily from 1975 to 1992, its availability declined after 1992, affecting its use.while marijuana use has decreased gradually from 1975 to 1978, the perception of associated risk has remained unchanged.there has been no decline in the rates of marijuana use since 1978.changes in the rates of marijuana use since 1997 have been small.
According to the monitoring, there have been small changes in the rates of marijuana use since 1997.
Cannabis, a psychoactive substance derived from the cannabis plant, is sometimes referred to as marijuana and other names. The cannabis plant, which is native to Central or South Asia, has been used for thousands of years in traditional remedies as well as as a narcotic for entheogenic and recreational purposes.
The primary psychoactive component of cannabis is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), one of the 483 known plant compounds. This number includes at least 65 additional cannabinoids, including cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabis can be used orally, vapourizingly, ingested, or utilized as an extract. Cannabis usage and the risk of psychosis are strongly correlated, while the causal chain's direction is up for debate.
To learn more about drugs: https://brainly.com/question/15308263
#SPJ4
Dostoevsky, Notes from Underground
Who is the main character of the novel?
A) Alyosha
B) Ivan
C) Dmitri
D) None of the above
The main character of the novel Dostoevsky, Notes from Underground is None of the above as he is an anonymous narrator. Thus the correct option is D.
What is the main character in the novel?When one character in a play or film is involved in a conflict or is up against an opponent, they are referred to as the protagonist. In the collection of stories, the main character assumes a leading position.
The Underground Man, the story's unnamed narrator, serves as the story's main character. When The Underground Man first comes to our attention, he is forty years old, has taken early retirement from his civil service profession, and has isolated himself in a shabby apartment
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about the protagonist, here:
brainly.com/question/5396057
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer.
How did powerful families such as the Medici and
the Sforza help spread Renaissance ideas?
• A.
They provided financial support to young artists and writers.
• B.
They educated the poor children living in their own city-states.
• C.
They constructed schools and colleges to teach the humanities
. D.
They borrowed money from banks to invite foreign artists to Italy.
• E
They promoted contemporary works over religious works.
A
Reset
Next
Families like Medici and the Sforza spread Renaissance ideas as they provided financial support to young artists and writers.
Option A is correct.
What were the Renaissance's main ideas?In Italy, a cultural movement known as humanism began to gain traction in the 14th century. Humanism advocated, among other things, the idea that man was the center of his own universe and that people should celebrate human achievements in education, literature, science, and the classical arts.
What were the social effects of the Renaissance?The population was getting richer, which made trade and travel more common and spread new ideas. The rise in wealth also sparked an interest in education, aided in the growth of the arts, and pushed for new scientific discoveries and inventions.
Learn more about Renaissance ideas :
brainly.com/question/672011
#SPJ1
which of the following was one of the primary causes of world war i? group of answer choices the breakup of the austro-hungarian empire a complex set of alliances among european nations the dissatisfaction of russian peasants the exile of mexican general victoriano huerta
One of the primary causes of World War I was a complex set of alliances among European nations.
European nations developed a system of complex alliances in response to the actions taken during the creation/uniting of Germany and also to the spread of nationalism in Europe. Because of these alliances, one act of aggression triggered many nations to be at odds.
What were the main causes of World War I?There were 4 M-A-I-N causes of World War I, which an acronym of Military, Alliances, Imperialism, and Nationalism. The late nineteenth century was the era of military competition, particularly among the major European powers. The policy of establishing a stronger military was judged relative to neighbors, that making a culture of paranoia which heightened the search for alliances. It was fed by the cultural belief that war is good for the nations.
Learn more about World War I at: https://brainly.com/question/4428110
#SPJ4
How is Russia’s government similar to the united states government
Answer:
Both Russia and the United States have a federal system of government, with power divided between the central government and the individual states.
Explanation:
Russia and the United States both have a federal system of government, in which power is divided between the central government and the individual states or regions. This means that both countries have a central government that handles national issues, such as foreign policy and defense, while the individual states or regions handle their own affairs and have some degree of autonomy. In both countries, there are also separation of powers, with the government divided into executive, legislative and judicial branches.
Additionally, both countries have a presidential system of government, with a president as the head of state, who is elected by the people, and a prime minister as the head of government.
However, Russia is considered a semi-presidential republic, where the president has more power than the prime minister and the government is controlled by the ruling party and the president, while the United States is a federal presidential constitutional republic where the president has a limited power and the government is controlled by three branches.
It's important to note that although there are similarities, there are also many important differences between the two countries, in terms of their political systems, history, culture and more.
Why do you think the reading compares Toussaint L'Ouverture to Napoleon?
It is likely that the reading compares Toussaint L'Ouverture to Napoleon because both men were leaders who played significant roles in their respective revolutions.
Who is Toussaint L'Ouverture to Napoleon?Generally, Toussaint L'Ouverture led the Haitian Revolution, which resulted in the independence of Haiti from French colonial rule, while Napoleon Bonaparte led the French Revolution and rose to become the Emperor of France. Both men also had a military background and were known for their strategic tactics and leadership abilities.
Additionally, both Toussaint L'Ouverture and Napoleon Bonaparte were able to establish themselves as powerful figures in their respective revolutions and had a lasting impact on the history of their countries.
Read more about Toussaint L'Ouverture to Napoleon
https://brainly.com/question/29243776
#SPJ1
If you were a patrician would you have granted the plebeians extended participation in the government why or why not?
As a patrician, it is highly doubtful that I would have granted the Plebeians extended participation in government as it would reduce my power in Rome.
How did the Patricians control Rome ?The plebeians' privileges were limited in early Rome. Patriots occupied all of the leadership positions in both the government and the church. The patricians controlled the government, owned the lands, and commanded the army. Both the ability to hold public office and the ability to marry a patrician were denied to plebeians.
The Roman Republic was governed by two consuls, or leaders, who held the top offices in the government. These consuls were chosen by a patrician-dominated senate. Plebeians, or lower-class people, had very little influence over the government at this time.
A patricians would therefore not grant Plebeians extended participation in government as it would mean that they would lose the great power they had.
Find out more on Patricians at https://brainly.com/question/1039293
#SPJ1
We think they [people of African ancestry], are... not included, and were not intended to be included, under
the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that
instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.
-Chief Justice Roger B. Taney
Which Supreme Court decision is excerpted above?
McCulloch v. Maryland
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Gibbons v. Ogden
Marbury v. Madison
DELL
Dred Scott v. Sandford is the supreme court decison that is highlighted in the question that we have here.
What was the Dred Scott v. Sandford case about?The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that Dred Scott, an enslaved man, was not entitled to freedom since he had resided in a free state and territory. In effect, the ruling stated that Scott was not a citizen and could not file a lawsuit in a federal court since he was someone else's property.
Dred Scott, a Black slave, and his wife Harriet filed a claim for freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court in 1846.
Read more on Dred Scot here: https://brainly.com/question/315266
#SPJ1
Imagine that you are Franklin Roosevelt.
Would you agree to allow so much territory
to the Soviet Union? Explain your answer.
Answer:
As Franklin D. Roosevelt, my answer would depend on the specific historical context and the information available to me at the time.
Explanation:
If we are referring to the Yalta Conference in 1945, where the Allies agreed to allow the Soviet Union to have control over a large portion of Eastern Europe as part of the post-World War II reorganization, my answer would likely be yes. At the time, the Soviet Union had made significant contributions to the war effort against Germany and had suffered heavy casualties. Allowing them control of Eastern Europe was seen as a necessary compromise to ensure their cooperation in the ongoing war against Japan and to secure a lasting peace in Europe.
However, if we are referring to a different historical context, my answer would likely be different. My primary goal as President was always the welfare and security of the United States and its people. I would consider the long-term implications of such a decision on the security and prosperity of the United States, and weigh the potential benefits and risks before making a decision.
It is also worth noting that, during the Yalta Conference, the United States was in a position of relative strength, having yet to use the atomic bomb and with a large military presence in Europe, and the Soviet Union was in a position of relative weakness, with most of its resources and troops tied up in the fight against Germany. This dynamic changed dramatically after the war, and the United States would not have agreed to similar terms.
an international conference met in 1912 to discuss controls on the opium trade. great britain wanted blank included as well, because these were replacing opium, which led to several countries agreeing to control international trade and domestic sale and use of these substances.multiple choice question.rum, whiskey, and brandypatent medicines without habit-forming ingredientsmorphine, heroin, and cocaineprescription drugs used by hospitals and clinics
At the International Opium Convention in 1912, Great Britain proposed the inclusion of two new substances, morphine and heroin, which were replacing opium in many countries.
This led to the signatories of the Convention agreeing to control the international trade and domestic sale and use of these substances. Several states and municipalities had statues governing the sale of narcotics, but these were only sporadically enforced. The Convention was seen to have value as an advocacy tool, with it inspiring the 1913 Harrison Act in the United States, which was created to strengthen the restrictions on the sale and use of narcotics. It was hoped that this Convention would help to reduce the amount of narcotics being used worldwide.
To know more about International Opium Convention click below:
https://brainly.com/question/1359252#
#SPJ4
Explain and give examples of how the Roman social and political government structures are similar to the American governments social and political structures in todays world
The Roman social and political government structures have many similarities to the American government structures in today's world.
One similarity is the division of power between different branches of government. In ancient Rome, there were three branches of government: the executive branch (the consuls and praetors), the legislative branch (the Senate), and the judicial branch (the praetors). Similarly, in the United States, there are three branches of government: the executive branch (the President and Vice President), the legislative branch (Congress), and the judicial branch (the Supreme Court).
Another similarity is the concept of representation. In ancient Rome, citizens were represented by their elected officials in the Roman Republic. Similarly, in the United States, citizens are represented by their elected officials in Congress, who make decisions on their behalf.
Additionally, both the Roman and American governments have a system of checks and balances in place to limit the power of any one branch of government. In ancient Rome, the Senate could veto the actions of the consuls and praetors, while in the United States, the legislative branch can override a presidential veto and the judicial branch can declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.
Lastly, in both ancient Rome and the United States, citizens have the right to vote for their leaders. In ancient Rome, citizens voted for their representatives in the Roman Republic, while in the United States, citizens vote for their representatives in Congress, as well as for the President.
In summary, the Roman and American governments share similarities in the division of power between branches, representation, checks and balances and the right to vote.
Answer:
It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years.
Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is expected to play an active role in governing the state.
Explanation:
The Roman concept of the citizen evolved during the Roman Republic and changed significantly during the later Roman Empire. After the Romans freed themselves from the Etruscans, they established a republic, and all males over 15 who were descended from the original tribes of Rome became citizens. Citizens of Rome distinguished themselves from slaves and other noncitizens by wearing a toga; most wore a white toga. During the Empire, each emperor wore a purple toga to distinguish himself as the princeps, or "first citizen."
Citizenship varied greatly. The full citizen could vote, marry freeborn persons, and practice commerce. Some citizens were not allowed to vote or hold public office, but maintained the other rights. A third type of citizen could vote and practive commerce, but could not hold office or marry freeborn women.
In the late Republic, male slaves who were granted their freedom could become full citizens. Around 90 B.C.E., non-Roman allies of the Republic gained the rights of citizenship, and by 212 C.E, under the Edict of Caracalla, all free people of the Roman Empire could become citizens.
<i>Hell's Door</i>
Frescoes line the walls of long-forgotten Etruscan tombs. This painting, found in the Tomb of Augurs in Tarquinia, is titled Hell's Door.
The aristocracy (wealthy class) dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.
Tradition dictated that patricians and plebeians should be strictly separated; marriage between the two classes was even prohibited. Over time, the plebeians elected their own representatives, called tribunes, who gained the power to veto measures passed by the senate.
Gradually, the plebeians obtained even more power and eventually could hold the position of consul. Despite these changes, though, the patricians were still able to use their wealth to buy control and influence over elected leaders.
Why does it matter whether ancient Egyptians were black or white? Why would historians try to argue about it?
The numerous monuments, items, and artifacts that have been rescued from archaeological sites and covered in hieroglyphs that have just lately been deciphered are the primary sources of information about ancient Egypt.
Why did ancient Egypt consider black to be a good color?The life-giving silt left behind by the Nile flood was black (Ancient Egyptian term: "kem"), and as a result, the name "kemet" (the black land) that the Ancient Egyptians gave to their nation came to be. When viewed through the lens of the annual agricultural cycle, black represented fertility, new life, and resurrection.The color black is associated with life, birth, and resurrection in Egyptian culture, as well as with death, gloom, and the underworld.The numerous monuments, items, and artifacts that have been rescued from archaeological sites and covered in hieroglyphs that have just lately been deciphered are the primary sources of information about ancient Egypt.To learn more about Egypt refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/20262049
#SPJ1
If imperialism never happened, would racism still exist today?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
The primary goal of Cai Guo-Qiang's Project to Extend the Great Wall of China by 10,000 Meters: Project for Extraterrestrials No. 10 was to:A. transform our experience of the world.B. express personal feelings.C. elevate functional objects.D. give form to spiritual forces.
Answer:
ss
Explanation:
s
Answer:
A or D
Explanation:
What did all treaties made with Native American tribes around the early 1800s have in common?
A. The treaties created a positive relationship between Native American tribes and the United States.
B. The treaties set aside a specific piece of land in each territory for Native American use.
C. The treaties completely removed American settlements from Native American land.
D.The treaties severely limited the land the United States owned in the Northwest Territory.
Answer:The treaties made with Native American tribes around the early 1800s were The treaties created a positive relationship between Native Americans tribes and the United States, set aside a specific piece of land in each territory for Native American use and limited the land the United States owned in the Northwest Territory. Therefore option (A),B and (D) are correct.
What is treaty?
Treaty refers to the formal agreement between the countries or the two parties.
The early 1800s saw the signing of several treaties with Native American tribes.
The treaties limited the amount of land the United States could control in the Northwest Territory, improved relations between Native American tribes and the country, and set aside a particular area of each territory for Native American us
Are there any controversies surrounding the FBI? If so then name some and tell me about it.
Answer:
The FBI has kept files on United states citizens, mostly well known people or celebrities. They're also known to wiretap things without people knowing. A lot of times people have reported not knowing that the FBI wiretapped their houses. Viola Liuzzo was murdered by the Klu Klux Klan, turns out his murderer was an FBI agent.
Explanation:
Those are just a few controversies, hope they help some :3
In November of 1863, in the midst of the Civil War, a committee invited President Abraham Lincoln to give a "few appropriate
remarks" at the dedication of the National Cemetery at Gettysburg. The famed battle of Gettysburg had been fought the
previousin July, with the North defeating the South in a three-day clash that left tens of thousands of soldiers - from both the
Union and the Confederacy dead and wounded. In January of that same year, Lincoln had issued the Emancipation
Proclamation, adding an additional purpose to the war: to eradicate slavery.
-
Read Lincoln's speech carefully. Then, in a well-developed essay, analyze the rhetorical techniques he uses to achieve his
purpose.
FOUR SCORE and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and
dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long
endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place
for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate - we cannot consecrate we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living
and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor
long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us, the living, rather, to be dedicated here
to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to
the great task remaining before us that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they
gave the last full measure of devotion that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain that this
nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom and that government of the people, by the people, for the people,
shall not perish from the earth.
-
Note that the above prompt is an Analytical Essay. See the Analytical Essay with respect to Lincoln's use of Rhetorical Techniques below.
How did Abraham Lincoln use Rhetorical Techniques in the Gettysburg Speech?Lincoln employs rhetorical strategies such as repetition, parallel construction, and anaphora in his address to accomplish his goal of dedicating the Gettysburg National Cemetery while simultaneously highlighting the significance of continuing the battle for freedom and equality.
He repeats the words "we cannot dedicate, consecrate, or hallow this earth" to underline the troops' sacrifices and to remind the audience that the area has already been dedicated by their sacrifice.
He often used parallel structure, such as "It is for us, the living, rather, to be devoted here to the unfinished job," to underline the significance of continuing the battle for liberty and equality. Note that He also employs anaphora, repeating the phrase "that this country, under God," to highlight the concept that this nation was established by God and must continue to exist under his direction.
Learn more about Analytical essays:
https://brainly.com/question/29233378
#SPJ1
this vocabulary term describes a war started by a shawnee war chief, and his brother. they attempted to join military forces with other tribes in the great lakes, ohio valley, and gulf coast. old tribal conflicts and resentment barred the military campaign from success. tecusmeh resistance
Tecumseh's Resistance was a war led by Shawnee brothers Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa in an attempt to unite tribes and resist American expansion in the Great Lakes, Ohio Valley, and Gulf Coast regions.
Tecumseh's Resistance was a war led by Shawnee brothers Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa in an attempt to unite tribes and resist American expansion in the Great Lakes, Ohio Valley, and Gulf Coast regions. Although they had the support of many tribes, old tribal conflicts and resentment prevented their military campaign from being successful. Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa traveled extensively, trying to convince tribes to join their cause, but they could not overcome the local divisions between them. The war ended with the defeat of Tecumseh's forces in the Battle of Thames in 1813. The brothers were killed and their campaign of resistance was eventually crushed by the American forces.
To know more about Tecumseh's Resistance click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29772891#
#SPJ4
opposing perspectives: technology in modernist literature the modern era was a time of great technical innovation and political upheaval. extending roughly from the 1880s to the 1930s, the machine age of the modern era was noted for mass production and the assembly line; improved transport (car, tram, train, and airplane); modern warfare devices (tanks, submarines, manufactured gasses); radio and phonograph technology; and the high-speed printing press, all of which contributed to social upheaval, such as increased consumerism, cultural leveling, and an enlarged working class.
The modern era was marked by considerable scientific advances and political upheaval.
Mass production and the assembly line, better transportation, contemporary weapons (tanks, submarines, manufactured gases), radio and phonograph technology, and the high-speed printing press were all hallmarks of the machine age of the modern era, which roughly spanned from the 1880s to the 1930s. All of these innovations—increased consumption, cultural equivalence, and a larger working class—contributed to social unrest. The modern era was marked by considerable scientific advances and political upheaval. From about the 1880s through the 1930s, the machine age of the modern era was characterised by mass production and the assembly line, improved modes of transportation, and new weaponry.
Learn more about Modern Era at
https://brainly.com/question/30033202
#SPJ4
in 1264, pope urban announced that plays would be allowed on the thursday following trinity sunday, which was also called the...
Answer:
Festival of Corpus Christi is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Which of these best describes the Catholic Church's role in Europe during the early
1500s?
The Church called for a new Crusade against the Native Americans
The Church had become increasingly corrupt and political
The Church began to issue apologies to Jews and Muslims it had discriminated
against
The Church had lost all of its power after the Black Plague
Answer:
B or D
Explanation:
4. What did Louis agree to do? What did
the crowd demand?
Louis agree to do return to Paris with them, while the crowd revolutionaries demanded that he return to Paris with them and to see Queen Marie Antoinette.
Where did the people want the Louis to relocate?He had to go back to Paris with the revolutionaries, they insisted. He concurred. The mob then clamoured for a glimpse of Queen Marie Antoinette. The queen's extravagant spending habits were largely held responsible for the people's issues.
The mob invaded the palace early the following morning in an effort to locate the Queen's room. A number of guards were executed, then their heads were severed and carried around on pikes (long spear like poles). La Fayette succeeded in persuading the King to grant the people's demand that the monarchy move to Paris.
Learn more about Louis at:
https://brainly.com/question/30299216
#SPJ1
Which of the following explains a result of the Commercial Revolution in Europe? (1 point)
A New World commodities were banned from Old World markets.
B The influx of silver caused inflation in European economies.
C global trade and exchange decreased.
D Spain experienced long-term wealth and economic power.
A result of the Commercial Revolution in Europe was B The influx of silver caused inflation in European economies.
What was the Commercial Revolution in Europe ?The Commercial Revolution, which started in the 11th century and continued until the Industrial Revolution replaced it in the middle of the 18th, was the development of a trade-based economy in Europe. Europeans first rediscovered spices, silks, and other goods that were uncommon in Europe during the Crusades.
In Europe, there has been a significant expansion in trade since the late Middle Ages. It drew inspiration from the exploration journeys made to Africa, Asia, and the New World by England, Spain, and other countries.
This allowed for silver to come in from the colonies and as a result, there developed inflation in Europe.
Find out more on the Commercial Revolution at https://brainly.com/question/5719344
#SPJ1
Are there any controversies surrounding the FBI? If so then name some and tell me about it. Would like a long paragraph please
The FBI's legacy in dealing with religious groups has received a critical review from historians. At the height of the civil rights movement, the Bureau notoriously looked into Martin Luther King Jr. and threatened him.
What was the civil rights movement?The civil rights movement was a nonviolent social and political movement that took place in the United States from 1954 to 1968 with the goal of eradicating institutionalized, legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and racial disenfranchisement. All African Americans, the majority of whom had just recently been slaves, were granted liberation and constitutional rights of citizenship by the Reconstruction Amendments to the United States Constitution following the American Civil War and the subsequent abolition of slavery in the 1860s. African Americans made several attempts to defend their civil and legal rights throughout the course of the following century, notably the civil rights movements of 1865–1896 and 1936–1969. (1896–1954). After widely reported events like the lynching of Emmett Till, the movement was characterized by nonviolent, large-scale demonstrations and civil disobedience.
To learn more about civil rights movement, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15728930
#SPJ1
after the Pearl Harbor attack,
"America transformed into an
arsenal of Democracy?" Explain
this statement in 3 sentences.
Fear swept across the country, but even more so there was a sense of patriotism that incited a desire to fight Japan.
What happened after the Pearl Harbor attack?
When the smoke from Pearl Harbor cleared, the whole nation was in warfare gear. It was more than simply a way of thinking; it was a way of life, and the American economy swiftly changed to reflect this. In addition to tax increases and the issuance of war bonds, banks also invested vast sums of money in the war effort.
Sector played a crucial role in the war effort, particularly the American automobile industry, which stopped producing consumer cars in order to supply the country's armed forces. The entire nation changed course and became instantly focused on doing all it could to defeat the Axis forces.
to learn more about Pearl Harbor click:
https://brainly.com/question/20987447
#SPJ1
someone help please I need help ! asap!
He claimed that communists had infiltrated the government in 1950, which led to the start of a period of paranoia known as "McCarthyism" or the "Red Scare."
What is McCarthyism in simple terms?McCarthyism, which approximately spanned from the late 1940s to the mid to late 1950s, is the term used to describe an era of heightened anti-Communist mistrust in the United States that started at the commencement of the Cold War. The word is named after Wisconsin Republican and U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy.Senator Joseph McCarthy was the only person the government trusted to keep communism in check in America because they were concerned about communist spies.Similar to the McCarthy-era anti-Communist sentiments, paranoia can cause great harm to people and even jeopardise fundamental freedoms.After listening to 32 witnesses and two million words of testimony, the committee came to the conclusion that McCarthy had not improperly influenced Schine on his own behalf, but that Roy Cohn, McCarthy's chief attorney, had.To learn more about McCarthyism refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/613682
#SPJ1
The ideals of Bakunin and others like him are best exemplified in which of the following 19thcentury events? *
1) The Paris Commune of 1871
2) The Revolutions of 1848
3) The assassination of Czar Alexander II
4) the Decembrist Revolt of 1825
The assassination of Czar Alexander II. One of the most influential socialists in Europe throughout the nineteenth century was the Russian revolutionary Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bakunin.
A notable or significant person is assassinated when they are killed, including a head of state, head of government, politician, global leader, member of the royal family, or CEO. Even while they might not directly affect governmental affairs, killing a celebrity, activist, or artist is occasionally regarded as an assassination. citation required An assassination may be ordered by a military, security, insurgent, or secret police force to be carried out, or it may be motivated by political or military goals, or it may be carried out for financial gain, to exact revenge for a wrong, out of a desire for fame or celebrity. Since ancient times, assassinations have been committed. An assassin, often known as a hitman, is a person who commits an assassination.
Learn more about assassination here:
https://brainly.com/question/22943040
#SPJ4
social contract
Enlightenment
philosophes
salon
natural rights
↑
Locke's belief in a person's right to
life, liberty, and property
giving up some personal freedoms in
exchange for government protection
French Enlightenment thinkers
a gathering of influential people for
the discussion and debate of ideas
a movement where philosophers
questioned beliefs about government
The Enlightenment was a philosophical movement that emerged in Europe during the 18th century.
What is Enlightenment philosophes ?It was characterized by a focus on reason, science, and individualism, and a rejection of traditional authority and religious dogma. One of the key beliefs of Enlightenment thinkers was the idea of natural rights, which were thought to be inherent in all human beings.
John Locke, a British philosopher, believed in the natural rights of life, liberty, and property, and argued that individuals have the right to give up some of their personal freedoms in exchange for government protection.
In France, Enlightenment thinkers were known as philosophes, and they often gathered in salons to discuss and debate ideas. These gatherings were attended by influential people from a variety of fields, including politics, science, and literature.
The philosophes questioned traditional beliefs about government and sought to promote reason and progress. Their ideas would go on to influence political revolutions and social movements around the world.
Learn more about social contract here
https://brainly.com/question/30284824
#SPJ5
the influence of traditional african healing practices is evident in the idea that ill health is due to
The influence of traditional african healing practices is evident in the idea that ill health is due to bad luck.
Many people still don't seem to comprehend how traditional African healing links to God and religion/spirituality despite the fact that it has been practised for many generations in Africa. Some individuals appear to think that traditional healers don't worship God, but rather the ancestors. Many people still don't seem to comprehend how traditional African healing links to God and religion/spirituality despite the fact that it has been practised for many generations in Africa. Some individuals appear to think that traditional healers don't worship God, but rather the ancestors.
South Africa is a new democracy in comparison to other nations in Africa. Many fields of endeavour are still split between Western and African mindsets after being freed from the minority Nationalist Party leadership in 1994. One simply needs to listen to the talks and arguments to fully understand these divides.
Learn more about African traditional healing practices at
https://brainly.com/question/14377567
#SPJ4
in greek mythology, if gods can grant godhood, why cant the immortality of the titans be stripped fromthem
in greek mythology, if gods can grant godhood, the immortality of the titans be stripped fromthem In Greek mythology, the gods have the power to grant immortality, but they also have the power to take it away.
The Titans, who were the previous generation of gods, were overthrown by the Olympians and were punished by being banished to the underworld or being confined to specific locations. Additionally, they were not given immortality, unlike the Olympians. However, it is important to note that the Greek myths are not necessarily consistent in their portrayal of the powers and abilities of the gods and Titans.in greek mythology, if gods can grant godhood, the immortality of the titans be stripped fromthem In Greek mythology, the gods have the power to grant immortality, but they also have the power to take it away. Additionally, they were not given immortality, unlike the Olympians. However, it is important to note that the Greek myths are not necessarily consistent in their portrayal of the powers and abilities of the gods and Titans.in greek mythology.
learn more about immortality here:
https://brainly.com/question/16000352
#SPJ4