Which of the following BEST describes why civil war broke out between different ethnic and religious groups in Iraq?

A.
They disagreed about who should control certain cities and regions.

B.
They disagreed about whether Islam should be the country's official religion.

C.
They disagreed about how to deal with the rise of ISIS.

D.
They disagreed about the form of government that Iraq should have.

ANSWER NEEDED ASAP

'Letter from Birmingham Jail' is an open letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. on April 16, 1963.

It says that people have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws and to take direct action rather than waiting potentially forever for justice to come through the courts.

Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who was one of the most prominent leaders in the civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination in 19681. He led the civil rights movement in the United States from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968.

James Earl Ray assassinated Martin Luther King Jr. at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 196812. Ray was an American fugitive convicted for assassinating Martin Luther King Jr.

To know more about James Earl Ray, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/1131325

#SPJ1

Demaratus' response: Spartans would fight to the death even when much outnumbered; Greece is impoverished. Xerxes is pessimistic that the Greeks would be able to compete with his greater numbers.

Significant advancements were made by the Greeks in astronomy, math, philosophy, even medicine. Greek culture gave literature and theater a high priority, which influenced modern plays. Greek architecture and art are well renowned for their elaborate designs.

As opposed to this, Greeks call themselves "v"—Hellenes. The word "Greek" is derived from the Latin "Graeci," and thanks to Roman influence, it has come to be used in most languages to refer to Greek people and culture. Yet, "Greek" and "Hellenic" are also used in English.

To know more about Greeks visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18798633

#SPJ1

Answer:

Dear [Name],

I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to you regarding some of the recent developments in our community following the natural disaster that occurred. Specifically, I am concerned about two situations that have arisen and would like to discuss them with you.

The first situation I would like to address is the government's suspension of the right of habeas corpus. As you may know, this right guarantees that individuals have the ability to see a judge after an arrest to determine if their imprisonment is lawful. This is protected by the Fifth Amendment. While I understand that the government may have felt this was necessary to maintain order in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, I believe that this is a dangerous precedent to set. Suspending the right of habeas corpus is a direct violation of our Constitutional protections and undermines the very foundations of our democracy. It is crucial that we uphold these protections even in times of crisis.

The second situation that concerns me is the government's decision to force people to evacuate from their homes. This action could be seen as a violation of the Third Amendment, which prohibits the government from quartering troops in private residences without the owner's consent. While I understand that the government may have felt that this was necessary to ensure the safety of the residents and protect order, I believe that there were other options available. Instead of forcing residents to leave their homes, the government could have worked with local law enforcement to ensure that order was maintained in the area. In addition, the government could have provided alternative shelters for those who were unable to remain in their homes.

Overall, I believe that it is crucial that we protect our Constitutional rights and uphold our democratic values, even in times of crisis. While it may be tempting to make exceptions in the face of danger, we must remember that our rights and values are what make our country great. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns, and I hope that we can work together to ensure that our community remains a safe and free place to live.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[For the second situation, replace the first paragraph with the following:]

The second situation that concerns me is the government's decision to prevent citizens from bringing legally owned firearms to storm shelters. This action could be seen as a violation of the Second Amendment, which protects the right to bear arms. While I understand that the government may have felt that this was necessary to ensure the safety of those in the shelters, I believe that it is crucial that we protect our Second Amendment rights. By preventing citizens from bringing legally owned firearms to the shelters, the government is denying them the ability to protect themselves and their families in a dangerous situation. Instead, the government could have implemented safety measures to ensure that firearms were not used improperly in the shelters.

Explanation:

Answer:

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Chicago crusade was a nonviolent campaign that aimed to end discrimination and segregation in the city's housing and education systems. The campaign faced strong opposition from local authorities and community members, but ultimately led to important reforms and progress towards racial equality in Chicago.

Explanation:

Answer: The apartheid regime's influx control measures and pass laws were what women feared the most and reacted to most vehemently. Their fears were not unfounded. In 1952 the Native Laws Amendment Act tightened influx control, making it an offense for any African (including women) to be in any urban area for more than 72 hours unless in possession of the necessary documentation. The only women who could live legally in the townships were the wives and unmarried daughters of the African men who were eligible for permanent residence.

In the same year, the Natives Abolition of Passes and Coordination of Documents Act was passed. In terms of this act the many different documents African men had been required to carry were replaced by a single one - the reference book - which gave details of the holder's identity, employment, place of legal residence, payment of taxes, and, if applicable, permission to be in the urban areas. The act further stipulated that African women, at an unspecified date shortly, would for the first time be required to carry reference books. Women were enraged by this direct threat to their freedom of movement and their anti-pass campaign, as Walker puts it ‘was one of the most vociferous and effective protest campaigns of any at the time

Answer:

Delegates gave the Continental Congress the power to request money from the states and make appropriations, regulating the armed forces, appointing civil servants, and declaring war.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Rashidun were also responsible for the adoption of an Islamic calendar, dating from Muhammad's emigration (Hijrah) from Mecca to Medina (622), and the establishment of an authoritative reading of the Qurʾān, which strengthened the Muslim community and encouraged religious scholarship.

Explanation:

Nettl's analysis of the Soviet Union and technology is significantly different from Graham's argument. Nettl emphasizes the limitations of Soviet technology and its inability to keep up with the West. He argues that despite Soviet propaganda, the country lagged behind the West in several key areas, including computers and microelectronics. Nettl suggests that the Soviet Union's centralized economic system hindered technological progress, as the government was unable to allocate resources efficiently and lacked the incentives for innovation and efficiency that existed in the West.

In contrast, Graham argues that the Soviet Union was able to achieve technological progress in certain areas, such as space exploration and nuclear technology, due to its centralized planning and strong government support. He suggests that the Soviet Union's achievements in these areas were a result of the country's ability to mobilize resources for specific goals and its willingness to invest heavily in technology.

While both Nettl and Graham acknowledge the role of the Soviet government in technological progress, their views on the effectiveness of Soviet central planning and government support are significantly different. Nettl's analysis emphasizes the limitations of Soviet technology and the inefficiencies of central planning, while Graham's argument highlights the potential benefits of strong government support for technological innovation.

Overall, Nettl's analysis is more critical of Soviet technology and its limitations, while Graham's argument is more optimistic about the potential for central planning and government support to drive technological progress.

The answer is Americans turn their wartime experiences into lasting personal gains after the war was over.

The reasons were- After WWII, veterans of wars receive compensation from the government.

The other veterans  missed this opportunity because they were traumatized after the war and most of them were dead.

A war is a armed struggle that has nations, governments, society, or paramilitary organizations like mercenaries, insurgents, and militias.

A war can start because of an invasion, it can be ended by using it as bigger strategy, or it can start as a result of the invasion. Invasions are large-scale operations that require military resources and intricate preparation. They also have a good influence on the target region.

To know more about War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3445478

#SPJ1

Answer: The ruling in this Supreme Court case upheld a Louisiana state law that allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races." During the era of Reconstruction, Black Americans' political rights were affirmed by three constitutional amendments and numerous laws passed by Congress.

In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) that separate accommodations based on race were constitutional. 58 years later in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) the court ruled that separate accommodations based on race were inherently unequal and so unconstitutional.

Answer:

The process of ratification of the United States Constitution faced several difficulties. The first significant obstacle was the opposition from the Anti-Federalists, who believed that the Constitution granted too much power to the central government and would threaten individual liberties. They feared that the Constitution did not contain a Bill of Rights that would protect citizens' fundamental rights. Additionally, they believed that the large and diverse country would not be able to govern itself effectively under one central government. The Anti-Federalists, led by figures such as Patrick Henry and George Mason, argued that the new Constitution should be amended to include a Bill of Rights and limit the power of the central government.

Another significant challenge was the issue of slavery. Many delegates at the Constitutional Convention recognized the immorality of slavery and wanted to abolish it. However, due to opposition from slaveholding states, the Constitution did not explicitly ban slavery. This issue led to intense debates and disagreements during the ratification process. Anti-slavery advocates, such as Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, argued that slavery was incompatible with the principles of the new nation and should be abolished. However, the pro-slavery advocates, such as John C. Calhoun and James Madison, defended slavery as necessary for the economic success of the country and argued that it was a states' rights issue. Ultimately, the issue of slavery would lead to the Civil War and the eventual abolition of slavery in the United States.

(Please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest you could also follow me so that you could easily reach out to me for any other questions)

The elected representatives of of the citizens of the USA are the voices of the citizens itself. Naturally, increasing citizen's power would help to reduce corruptions caused by politicians to make the nation better.

On the above-mentioned note, the Progressive movement of the USA, of 20th Century helped the citizens of the USA to get fair judgment in the fields of; domestic policies development, maintaining trusts with the governance, regulation of thresholds and transports, food, and drugs.

Hence it can be concluded, as per the Progressive movement of the USA, giving proportional power to citizens would help to make the nation a better example to curb political corruption.

To know more about the Progressive movement of the USA:

brainly.com/question/9369850

brainly.com/question/17104960

The Supreme Court's case on Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that Louisiana's state Separate Car Act B. helped maintain public peace and good order.

The court's decision allowed for equal but separate accommodations for white and colored races.

Plessy v. Ferguson case started when Homer Plessy who was of mixed race, boarded a train car for whites-only in New Orleans, violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890 which stipulated equal but separate railroad accommodations for whites and colored passengers.

Plessy was charged under Louisiana's Separate Car Act but his lawyers claimed that the case should be dismissed on the grounds that the Act was unconstitutional which judge John H. Ferguson denied.

Then Plessy appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, the court decided that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution in so far as the accommodations for each race were equal in quality.

Thus, the court case of Plessy v. Ferguson pronounced that Louisiana's state Separate Car Act helped maintain public peace and good order.

Learn more about Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890 at brainly.com/question/1403520.

#SPJ1

Question completion:

I think part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision ruled that Louisiana’s Separate Car Act

A. promoted unconstitutional segregation.

B. helped maintain public peace and good order.

C. did not constitute segregation.

D. was required under the Fourteenth Amendment

When the Ottoman Empire weakened, Europe reacted by trying to take more control of Ottoman lands. Last option is correct

European powers saw the weakening Ottoman Empire as an opportunity to expand their own influence in the region. This led to a period of imperialism and colonization, with European powers carving up the Ottoman Empire into spheres of influence and colonies.

The construction of a canal for trade with the Ottoman region (referring to the Suez Canal) occurred after this period of European colonization, as a means to facilitate trade and transportation between Europe and Asia. The idea of helping Ottoman nations achieve independence did not become a significant factor until later, as nationalist movements began to take root within the Ottoman Empire itself.

Read more on Ottomans here:https://brainly.com/question/788257

#SPJ1

Answer:

trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.

Explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

He combined all old roman laws into a big book with them all together

Answer:

It's C.

Explanation:

C. The Middle colonies developed a shipbuilding industry is the economic difference between the Middle and New England colonies. The Middle colonies, which included New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, had a strong economy based on agriculture, trade, and manufacturing. The Middle colonies had access to natural resources such as iron, coal, and timber, which allowed them to develop a shipbuilding industry. This industry was a major source of employment and revenue for the Middle colonies. In contrast, the New England colonies, which included Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, had a primarily agricultural economy that relied on subsistence farming and fishing. While there were some shipbuilding activities in New England, it was not as significant as in the Middle colonies.

Hope this helps! If not, sorry! If you need more help, you may ask me! :]

Answer:

Explanation:Andrew Jackson accused John Quincy Adams of "stealing the election" in 1824 because he believed that Adams had made a "corrupt bargain" with Henry Clay, one of the other candidates, to secure the presidency. Jackson had won the most popular votes and the most electoral votes, but because no candidate had won a majority of the electoral votes, the decision was left to the House of Representatives. Adams won the presidency in the House vote, and shortly after, he appointed Clay as his Secretary of State.

This conflict affected the Democratic-Republican Party in the presidential election of 1828 in several ways. First, it led to the formation of a new political party, the Democratic Party, which was led by Jackson and his supporters. Second, it created a deep divide within the Democratic-Republican Party, with many of Jackson's supporters feeling betrayed by the party's failure to support him in 1824. Third, it increased the level of voter participation and engagement in the election, as Jackson's supporters mobilized to support him and defeat Adams. Ultimately, Jackson won the presidency in 1828, and his victory marked a turning point in American politics, as it signaled the rise of a new political party and a new era of political mobilization and engagement.

Answer:

Statement B best describes the effect of President Warren Harding's economic policies.

Answer:

The idea of a Supreme Court as the highest court in the land, with the power of judicial review, was then enshrined in the United States Constitution. Article III of the Constitution established the Supreme Court and granted it the power to hear cases arising under the Constitution, federal law, and disputes between states.

Over time, the idea of a Supreme Court has been adopted by many other countries around the world, often as part of a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. Today, most democratic countries have some form of a Supreme Court or constitutional court to interpret their laws and ensure that they are consistent with their respective constitutions.

Answer:

During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, two different plans were proposed for the structure and organization of the United States government. These plans were known as the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The differences between the two plans were primarily centered around the issue of representation in the legislative branch.

The Virginia Plan, also known as the large-state plan, was proposed by James Madison and was supported by the larger states. It called for a bicameral legislature, with representation based on population in both houses. This meant that larger states would have more representatives and more power in the government. The Virginia Plan also proposed a strong central government with the power to veto state laws, which was controversial among smaller states.

The New Jersey Plan, also known as the small-state plan, was proposed by William Paterson and was supported by the smaller states. It called for a unicameral legislature, with equal representation for all states regardless of population. This would have given smaller states more power in the government. The New Jersey Plan also proposed that the central government only have limited powers and that state laws could not be vetoed.

The debate between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan was resolved through the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, which created a bicameral legislature with representation based on population in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. This compromise balanced the power between larger and smaller states and helped to establish the structure of the United States government that still exists today.

In summary, the Virginia Plan called for representation based on population, a strong central government, and the power to veto state laws, while the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for all states, limited central government power, and no veto power over state laws.

Explanation:

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were two different proposals presented during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Virginia Plan advocated for representation based on population, while the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for all states. The debate among the delegates eventually led to the Great Compromise.

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were two different proposals put forward during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to address the issue of representation in the newly formed government. The Virginia Plan, also known as the large state plan, called for a bicameral legislature with representation based on population. The New Jersey Plan, also known as the small state plan, proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for all states.

The main differences between the two plans were in regards to the method of representation and the power given to the states. The Virginia Plan favored larger states and their representation was based on population, which gave them an advantage. The New Jersey Plan, on the other hand, favored smaller states as it provided equal representation to all states regardless of their population.

These differences led to a debate among the delegates, which ultimately resulted in the Great Compromise. This compromise merged elements of both plans, creating a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate giving each state equal representation.

https://brainly.com/question/33606170

#SPJ2

Answer: Washington remained above the fray; he wanted to be a president of all American citizens. The most important reason was he believed unity, not division, was necessary for a democratic republic to survive. Washington believed that political parties would divide and destroy the young United States.

Explanation:

The Holocaust, also known as the Shoah, was a genocide that took place during World War II, where approximately six million Jews were systematically murdered by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. The Holocaust can be divided into several phases, including:

The Holocaust was a horrific event in human history that resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people. It serves as a reminder of the dangers of prejudice, discrimination, and hatred, and the importance of promoting tolerance and respect for all people, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, or background.

The House and Senate's legislative committees carry out the bulk of the actual work of Congress. The most influence rests with those committee chairs.

The committee system helps the Senate and House of Representatives operate more effectively. Lawmakers are not expected to be experts in every topic. As a result, the Senate and House of Representatives established committees with a variety of specializations.

The members of the US Congress act as representatives for their constituents by holding hearings, proposing legislation, and participating in voting. Before being forwarded to the President for his signature, all bills must first receive approval from Congress.

Learn more about US Congress: https://brainly.com/question/12695227

#SPJ9

Answer:

It focuses on quality, simplicity, and efficiency.

The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) investigated Hollywood to uncover communist influences in the film industry. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. In the 1940s and 1950s, the HUAC was concerned about the perceived spread of communism in the United States, and they believed that Hollywood was a hotbed of communist sympathizers who were using films to spread their ideology. As a result, the committee conducted investigations and hearings to identify and punish individuals suspected of being associated with communism, including many Hollywood actors, writers, and directors.

The Nazi government was known for using violence to enforce its racial ideologies,but it also made sure to pass laws that legalized discrimination practices.

The Nuremberg Laws were anti-Semitic and racist laws that were promulgated in Nazi Germany on September 15, 1935, at a special meeting of the Reichstag two measures based on race Laws issued on September 15, 1935, personally approved by Hitler,deprived Jews of German citizenship, prohibited Jewish households from having German maids. The Nazi government was known for using violence to enforce its racial ideologies,but it also made sure to pass laws that legalized discriminatory practices.In 1935,when the Nuremberg Laws were passed, the Nazi party successfully consolidated its power and appointed Adolf Hitler Führer, or leader.

To learn more about Nuremberg Laws please click on below link.

https://brainly.com/question/9286721.

#SPJ1

Answer:

trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.

pls mrk me brainliest

Answer: Our competitive approach to the PRC has two objectives: first, to improve the resiliency of our institutions, alliances, and partnerships to prevail against the challenges the PRC presents; and second, to compel Beijing to cease or reduce actions harmful to the United States' vital, national interests and those of our ...