Answer:
Intersecting (fourth answer choice)
Step-by-step explanation:
If the lines are perpendicular, parallel, or intersecting, they are not skew. Thus, we need to check if the lines can be classified as either perpendicular, parallel, or intersecting first. If the lines are classified as neither, then they are skew.First, let's convert both lines to slope-intercept form, whose general equation is y = mx + b, where
m is the slope,and b is the y-intercept.Converting y - 3x = 4x to slope-intercept form:
(y - 3x = 4x) + 3x
y = 7x
Thus, the slope of this line is 7 and the y-intercept is 0.
Converting 6 - 2y = 8x to slope-intercept form:
(6 - 2y = 8x) - 6
(-2y = 8x - 6) / -2
y = -4x + 3
Thus, the slope of this line is -4 and the y-intercept is 3.
Checking if y = 7x and y = -4x + 3 are perpendicular lines:
The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other.We can show this in the following formula:
m2 = -1 / m1, where
m1 is the slope of one line,and m2 is the slope of the other line.Thus, we only have to plug in one of the slopes for m1. Let's do -4.
m2 = -1 / -4
m2 = 1/4
Thus, the slopes 7 and -4 are not negative reciprocals of each other so the two lines are not perpendicular.
Checking if y = 7x and y = -4x + 3 are parallel lines:
The slopes of parallel lines are equal to each other.
Because 7 and -4 are not equal, the two lines are not parallel.
Checking if the lines intersect:
The intersection point of two lines have the same x and y coordinate. To determine if the two lines intersect, we treat them like a system of equations.Method to solve the system: Elimination:
We can multiply the first equation by -1 and keep the second equation the same, which will allow us to:
add the two equations, eliminate the ys, and solve for x:-1 (y = 7x)
-y = -7x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-y = -7x
+
y = -4x + 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(0 = -11x + 3) - 3
(-3 = -11x) / 11
3/11 = x
Now we can plug in 3/11 for x in y = 7x to find y:
y = 7(3/11)
y = 21/11
Thus, x = 3/11 and y = 21/11
We can check our answers by plugging in 3/11 for x 21/11 for y in both y = 7x and y = -4x + 3. If we get the same answer on both sides of the equation for both equations, the lines intersect:
Checking solutions (x = 3/11 and y = 21/11) for y = 7x:
21/11 = 7(3/11)
21/11 = 21/11
Checking solutions (x = 3/11 and y = 21/11) for y = -4x + 3:
21/11 = -4(3/11) + 3
21/11 = -12/11 + (3 * 11/11)
21/11 = -12/11 + 33/11
21/11 = 21/11
Thus, the lines y = 3x = 4x and 6 - 2y = 8x are intersecting lines (the first answer choice).
This also means that lines are not skew since lines had to be neither perpendicular nor parallel nor intersecting to be skew.
The value v of a tractor purchased for $13,000 and depreciated linearly at the rate of $1,300 per year is given by v= -1,300t+13,000, where t represents the number of years since the
purchase. Find the value of the tractor after (a) two years and (b) six years. When will the tractor have no value?
a) the value of the tractor after two years is $10,400.
b) the value of the tractor after six years is $5,200.
To find the value of the tractor after a certain number of years, we can substitute the value of t into the equation v = -1,300t + 13,000.
a) After two years:
Substituting t = 2 into the equation, we get:
v = -1,300(2) + 13,000
v = -2,600 + 13,000
v = 10,400
Therefore, the value of the tractor after two years is $10,400.
b) After six years:
Substituting t = 6 into the equation, we get:
v = -1,300(6) + 13,000
v = -7,800 + 13,000
v = 5,200
Therefore, the value of the tractor after six years is $5,200.
To find when the tractor will have no value, we need to find the value of t when v = 0. We can set the equation v = -1,300t + 13,000 equal to 0 and solve for t:
-1,300t + 13,000 = 0
-1,300t = -13,000
t = -13,000 / -1,300
t = 10
Therefore, the tractor will have no value after 10 years.
For more such question on value visit:
https://brainly.com/question/843074
#SPJ8
7. At age 20, Heather began investing $3000 annually
into an account earning 7.5% interest compounded
annually. Lesley invested $6000 annually into a similar
account but began at age 40. They both stopped
contributing at age 65.
a) How much money did Heather and Lesley contribute
to their account?
b) What is the value of each of their investments when
they are 65 years old?
c) At age 65, when the investments mature, who has
more money and by how
much?
a) Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their accounts.
b) Heather's investment is approximately $273,714.17, while Lesley's investment is approximately $191,048.18 when they are 65 years old.
c) Heather has more money by approximately $82,665.99 at age 65.
a) To find out how much money Heather and Lesley contributed to their accounts, we need to calculate the total contributions made by each of them.
Heather:
Heather started investing at age 20 and stopped at age 65, contributing $3000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 20) = 45 years.
Total contributions by Heather = $3000 × 45 = $135,000.
Lesley:
Lesley started investing at age 40 and stopped at age 65, contributing $6000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 40) = 25 years.
Total contributions by Lesley = $6000 × 25 = $150,000.
Therefore, Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their respective accounts.
b) To calculate the value of their investments at age 65, we can use the formula for compound interest:
Future Value = Principal × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
Heather:
Principal (initial investment) = $3000
Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)
Number of years = 65 - 20 = 45
Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1 + 0.075)^45
Lesley:
Principal (initial investment) = $6000
Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)
Number of years = 65 - 40 = 25
Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1 + 0.075)^25
Calculating these values:
Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1.075)^45 ≈ $273,714.17
Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1.075)^25 ≈ $191,048.18
c) To determine who has more money at age 65 and by how much, we compare the future values of their investments.
Heather's investment value at age 65 = $273,714.17
Lesley's investment value at age 65 = $191,048.18
Therefore, Heather has more money at age 65, and the difference in their investments is approximately $273,714.17 - $191,048.18 = $82,665.99.
for such more question on Heather's investment
https://brainly.com/question/1400500
#SPJ8
Find the slope and the y-intercept of the following linear equation. 5. 3x + 2y = 14
Answer:
slope = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] , y- intercept = 7
Step-by-step explanation:
the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is
y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )
given
3x + 2y = 14 ( subtract 3x from both sides )
2y = - 3x + 14 ( divide through by 2 )
y = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] x + 7 ← in slope- intercept form
with slope m = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] and y- intercept c = 7
A gaming system costs $600 and is on sale for 15% off. After the discount, there is a 5% tax. What is the final price of the gaming system?
Answer$535.50
Step-by-step explanation:
15% is equal to .15
So, multiply 600.00x .15=90
600.00 - 90.0=510.
510. 00x .05=25.50
510.00+25.50=535.50
Your answer is $535.5
PLEASE HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, because for each input there is exactly one output. You can have two of the same x values but you cannot have 2 of the same y values. if you have two of the same y values, it is not a function as it doesn't pass the vertical line test.
What is the solution to x – 5 + 2 < 20? –7 < x < 15 –13 < x < 23 x < –7 or x > 15 x < –13 or x > 23
Answer:
Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the inequality x - 5 + 2 < 20, we can simplify it step by step:
x - 5 + 2 < 20
Combine like terms:
x - 3 < 20
Add 3 to both sides of the inequality:
x - 3 + 3 < 20 + 3
Simplify:
x < 23
The solution to the inequality is x < 23.
Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.
Answer and Step-by-step explanation:
Please see the photo for the solution :)
Are the experimental probabilities after 300 trials closer to the theoretical probabilities?
After 300 trials, the experimental probabilities may not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, with more trials, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities for closer alignment.
To examine whether experimental probabilities after 300 trials align closely with theoretical probabilities, let's consider an example of flipping a fair coin.
Theoretical probability: When flipping a fair coin, the theoretical probability of obtaining heads or tails is 0.5 each. This assumes that the coin is unbiased and has an equal chance of landing on either side.
Experimental probability: After conducting 300 trials of flipping the coin, we record the outcomes and calculate the experimental probabilities. Let's assume that heads occurred 160 times and tails occurred 140 times.
Experimental probability of heads: 160/300 = 0.5333
Experimental probability of tails: 140/300 = 0.4667
Comparing the experimental probabilities to the theoretical probabilities, we can observe that the experimental probability of heads is slightly higher than the theoretical probability, while the experimental probability of tails is slightly lower.
In this particular example, the experimental probabilities after 300 trials do not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, it is important to note that these differences can be attributed to sampling variability, as the experimental outcomes are subject to random fluctuations.
To draw a more definitive conclusion about the alignment between experimental and theoretical probabilities, a larger number of trials would need to be conducted. As the number of trials increases, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities, providing a closer alignment between the two.
For more such information on: probabilities
https://brainly.com/question/30390037
#SPJ8
The question probable may be:
Do experimental probabilities after 300 trials tend to align closely with theoretical probabilities? Consider an example scenario and calculate both the theoretical and experimental probabilities to determine if they are close.
7. The Taylor Rule states that the central bank should set the short-term nominal interest rate (i)
based on the inflation gap [the difference between inflation (3.14) and desired inflation (3.14*)] and the
output gap (the percentage difference between real GDP (Y) and potential GDP (Y*) An
example of a Taylor Rule would be the formula
i - 3.14 = 1.5 +0.5(3.14-3.14*) +0.5 (Y-Y*/Y*)
The term on the left-hand side is the real interest rate. Consider the following table
Inflation rate (3.14), %
Target inflation rate (3.14*), %
Output gap, %
Real interest rate
Nominal interest rate
Base Scenario Scenario B Scenario C
4.0
20
2.0
20
0.0
20
20
20
00
a. Fill in the real and nominal interest rates chosen by the policy maker in the base scenano
b. How does scenario B differ from the base scenario in terms of the inflation and output gaps?
Calculate the real interest rate. Has the real interest rate moved in the direction that would
move the inflation rate toward its target?
c. How does scenario C differ from the base scenario in terms of the inflation and output gaps?
Calculate the real interest rate. Has the real interest rate moved in the direction that would
move output toward the potential level?
d. Suppose a new chair of the central bank is appointed and she switches to a new policy rule of
the form given in the next equation. Recalculate the real and nominal interest rates for the
three scenarios. What has been the effect of the change in weights?
i-3.14=1.5 +0.75(3.14-3.14*) +0.25(Y-Y*/Y*)
The weight on the inflation gap has increased from 0.5 to 0.75. The real interest rate is 16.86% and Nominal interest rate is 20%
a. In the base scenario, the real interest rate will be 20%, and the nominal interest rate will be 20%.
b. In scenario B, inflation rate will be higher (4%) compared to the base scenario (3.14%).
Output gap is 0% in both the scenarios, however, in the base scenario inflation gap is 0% (3.14 - 3.14) and in scenario B, inflation gap is 0.86% (4 - 3.14).
Now, let's calculate the real interest rate.
Real interest rate in base scenario = 20% - 3.14%
= 16.86%.
Real interest rate in scenario B = 20% - 3.14% + 1.5 + 0.5 (4-3.14) + 0.5 (0-0/0)
= 19.22%.
The real interest rate has moved in the direction to move inflation rate towards its target.
c. In scenario C, the output gap will be 20% compared to 0% in the base scenario.
Inflation gap is 0% in both the scenarios
Inflation rate is 3.14% and in scenario C, inflation rate is 2%.
Let's calculate the real interest rate. Real interest rate in the base scenario = 20% - 3.14%
= 16.86%.
Real interest rate in scenario C = 20% - 2% + 1.5 + 0.5 (3.14 - 3.14) + 0.5 (20-0/20)
= 20.15%.
Real interest rate in scenario C = 20% - 2% + 1.5 + 0.75 (3.14-3.14) + 0.25 (20-0/20) = 18.78%.
The new policy rule has changed the weight of the output gap in the Taylor Rule from 0.5 to 0.25.
For more related questions on inflation gap:
https://brainly.com/question/31419643
#SPJ8
What is the measure of angle jnk?
The hourly wage, the number of hours and the number of days Jaxon works indicates that the amount Jaxon gets paid is $192
What is the formula for calculating hourly wage?The formula for hourly wage can be presented as follows;
Hourly wage = Total earnings/Total hours worked
The question in the link is presented as follows;
Jaxon gets paid $6 an hour. He works for 8 hours each day for four days. How much will Jaxon get paid
The amount Jaxon gets paid per hour (his hourly wage) = $6
The number of hours he works each day = 8 hours
The number of days Jaxon works = Four days
The amount Jaxin gets paid = Hourly wage × Hours per day × Number of days
Therefore we get;
Amount he gets paid = $6 per hour × 8 hours/day × 4 days = $192
Learn more on hourly wage here: https://brainly.com/question/11641574
#SPJ1
See picture dfown below for refgerecnce
The value of the quadratic function y = x² - 4x + 3 is determined by substituting the given value of x into the equation and performing the necessary calculations.
1. Start with the quadratic function: y = x² - 4x + 3.
2. Determine the value of x for which you want to find the value of y.
3. Substitute the given value of x into the equation.
4. Perform the necessary calculations to simplify the expression.
5. Evaluate the expression to find the value of y.
For example, let's find the value of y when x = 2:
1. Start with the quadratic function: y = x² - 4x + 3.
2. We want to find the value of y when x = 2.
3. Substitute x = 2 into the equation: y = (2)² - 4(2) + 3.
4. Simplify the expression: y = 4 - 8 + 3.
5. Perform the necessary calculations: y = -1.
6. Therefore, when x = 2, the value of the quadratic function y = x² - 4x + 3 is -1.
For more such questions on quadratic, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1214333
#SPJ11
Select all the statements that are true for the following systems of equations.
System A
2x-3y = 4
4x - y = 18
00
System B
3x - 4y = 5
y = 5x +3
All three systems have different solutions.
Systems B and C have the same solution.
System C simplifies to 2x-3y=4 and 4x-y=18 by dividing the second equation by three.
Systems A and B have different solutions.
Systems A and C have the same solution.
Reset
System C
2x-3y=4
12x-3y = 54
Next
The statements that are true about the system of equations are: Options C, D, and E.
How to Find the Solution to a Systems of Equations?Let's analyze each statement and determine whether it is true or false for the given systems of equations:
System A
2x - 3y = 4
4x - y = 18
System B
3x - 4y = 5
y = 5x + 3
System C
2x - 3y = 4
12x - 3y = 54
A. All three systems have different solutions.
To determine if the systems have different solutions, we need to solve them. Solving system A gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Solving system B gives the solution x = -1 and y = -2. Solving system C gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Therefore, this statement is false because systems A and C have the same solution.
B. Systems B and C have the same solution.
As mentioned above, solving system B gives the solution x = -1 and y = -2. Solving system C gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Therefore, this statement is false because systems B and C have different solutions.
C. System C simplifies to 2x-3y=4 and 4x-y=18 by dividing the second equation by three.
To simplify system C, we can divide the second equation by 3, resulting in:
2x - 3y = 4
4x - y = 18
This is exactly the same as system A. Therefore, this statement is true.
D. Systems A and B have different solutions.
As mentioned earlier, solving system A gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Solving system B gives the solution x = -1 and y = -2. Therefore, this statement is true.
E. Systems A and C have the same solution.
As mentioned earlier, solving system A gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Solving system C gives the solution x = 5 and y = -6. Therefore, this statement is true.
In summary:
A. False
B. False
C. True
D. True
E. True
Learn more about systems of equations on:
https://brainly.com/question/13729904
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Select all the statements that are true for the following systems of equations.
System A
2x - 3y = 4
4x - y = 18
System B
3x - 4y = 5
y = 5x +3
System C
2x - 3y = 4
12x - 3y = 54
A. All three systems have different solutions.
B. Systems B and C have the same solution.
C. System C simplifies to 2x-3y=4 and 4x-y=18 by dividing the second equation by three.
D. Systems A and B have different solutions.
E. Systems A and C have the same solution.
Arc BC on circle A has a length of 115,
- inches. What is the radius of the circle?
115/6 pi
138°
The radius of the circle is 25 inches. The length of arc with a central angle of 138° is 115π/6 in
What is an equation?An equation is an expression that shows how numbers and variables are related to each other using mathematical operators.
The length of an arc with a central angle Ф with circle radius (r) is given by:
Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr
Given the length of arc as 115π/6 in and angle of 138°, hence:
Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr
Substituting:
115π/6 = (138/360) * 2πr
r = 25 inches
The radius of the circle is 25 inches.
Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/29174899
#SPJ1
6 minutes 20 seconds into seconds.
Answer:
380 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
Convert 6 minutes to seconds by multiplying 6 times 60, because there are 60 seconds per minute.
6 x 60 = 360
Now add the 20 seconds.
360 + 20 = 380
6 minutes and 20 seconds are equal to 380 seconds.
Select the expression that is equivalent to (n²-25)
A. n² +10n - 25
B. n²-10-25
C. (n+5)(n-5)
D. (n-5) ²
Answer:
C. (n+5)(n-5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Select the expression that is equivalent to (n²-25)
Let's check each option. A and B are wrong, so we only check C & D.
C. (n + 5) (n - 5)
n² - 5n + 5n - 25
n² - 25
D. (n - 5)²
(n - 5) (n - 5)
n² - 5n - 5n + 25
n² - 10n + 25
So, the correct answer is C. (n+5)(n-5)
Toula owns the Pita Pan restaurant. She needs to order supplies for the upcoming weekend rush. She needs 150 bags of pita bread. The bread come in crates of 50, and each crate costs $15.00. She also needs 65 containers of hummus dip. There are 5 containers in a box, and each box costs $20.00 What expressions can Toula use to determine how much the pita bread and hummus dips will cost? What will the total be?
The total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.
To determine the cost of the pita bread and hummus dips, Toula can use the following expressions:
Cost of pita bread:
Number of crates needed = (150 bags) / (50 bags/crate) = 3 crates
Cost of each crate = $15.00
Total cost of pita bread = (Number of crates needed) × (Cost of each crate) = 3 crates × $15.00/crate = $45.00
Cost of hummus dips:
Number of boxes needed = (65 containers) / (5 containers/box) = 13 boxes
Cost of each box = $20.00
Total cost of hummus dips = (Number of boxes needed) × (Cost of each box) = 13 boxes × $20.00/box = $260.00
Therefore, the expressions Toula can use to determine the costs are:
Cost of pita bread = 3 crates × $15.00/crate
Cost of hummus dips = 13 boxes × $20.00/box
The total cost will be the sum of the costs of pita bread and hummus dips:
Total cost = Cost of pita bread + Cost of hummus dips
Total cost = $45.00 + $260.00
Total cost = $305.00
Therefore, the total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.
for such more question on cost
https://brainly.com/question/8993267
#SPJ8
Select the correct answer.
Omar has a gift card for $40.00 at a gift shop. Omar wants to buy a hat for himself for $13.50. For his friends, he would like to buy souvenir bracelets, which are $3.25 each. All prices include taxes.
Which inequality can be used to solve for how many bracelets Omar can buy?
A.
3.25x + 13.50 ≤ 40
B.
3.25x + 13.50 ≥ 40
C.
13.50x + 3.25 ≤ 40
D.
13.50x + 3.25 ≥ 40
Answer:
A.
3.25x + 13.50 ≤ 40
Step-by-step explanation:
Five clubs at Johnson School raised $2000. The incomplete circle graph shows what percent of the money was raised by each club. How much money did the Math Club raise?
$500
$600
$200
$400
$300
The Math Club raised $400.
To find out how much money the Math Club raised, we need to determine the percentage of the total amount raised that corresponds to the Math Club's portion.
Let's assume the Math Club raised "x" amount of money. The total amount raised by all five clubs is $2000.
According to the incomplete circle graph, the Math Club's percentage is missing, but we know the percentages for the other clubs: Computer Club raised 15%, Gardening Club raised 18%, Art Club raised 30%, and Spanish Club raised 17%.
To find the missing percentage for the Math Club, we subtract the percentages of the other clubs from 100%:
Missing percentage = 100% - (15% + 18% + 30% + 17%) = 100% - 80% = 20%
Now we can set up a proportion to determine the amount raised by the Math Club:
(x / $2000) = 20% / 100%
Cross-multiplying:
x = ($2000 * 20%) / 100%
Simplifying:
x = $400
For more such questions on Math Club
https://brainly.com/question/31896144
#SPJ8
quality control expert at LIFE batteries wants to test their new batteries. The design engineer claims they have a standard deviation of 62
minutes with a mean life of 606
minutes.
If the claim is true, in a sample of 99
batteries, what is the probability that the mean battery life would be greater than 619
minutes? Round your answer to four decimal places.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
0.059 and 0.01 which is greater?
The average lifetime of a certain new cell phone is 6 years. The manufacturer will replace any cell phone failing within 2 years of the date of
purchase. The lifetime of these cell phones is known to follow an exponential distribution.
What is the probability that a phone will fail within 2 years of the date of purchase? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
The probability that a cell phone will fail within 2 years is 0.4866.
To solve this problemThe average lifetime of the cell phone is 6 years, so the decay rate is 1 / 6 = 0.1667.
The probability that a phone will fail within 2 years is given by:
[tex]P(x < 2) = 1 - e^{-0.1667 * 2} = 1 - 0.5134 = 0.4866[/tex]
Rounded to four decimal places, the probability is 0.4866.
Therefore, the probability that a cell phone will fail within 2 years is 0.4866.
Learn more about probability here : brainly.com/question/25839839
#SPJ1
What is the volume of the triangular prism?
3 in.
15 in.
13 in.
Find the numbers with the following property three times the sum of four and a number is less than seven times the same number
Let's represent the number with the variable "x". According to the given property, we can write the following equation:
3(x + 4) < 7x
Now, let's solve this inequality to find the range of numbers that satisfy the property.
3x + 12 < 7x
Subtract 3x from both sides:
12 < 4x
Divide both sides by 4 (since the coefficient of x is 4):
3 < x
So, the range of numbers that satisfy the given property is x > 3.
Therefore, any number greater than 3 will satisfy the condition. For example, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc.Step-by-step explanation:
Natalie is selling fruit at the Saturday market. She has a
otal of 48 pears that she wants to sell. She makes bags of
pears and sells them for $5 per bag. In which equation
oes b represent the number of bags of pears?
If Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag, she will be able to sell a total of 12 bags of pears at the Saturday market.
To represent the number of bags of pears, b, that Natalie sells at the Saturday market, we can use the following equation:
b = total_number_of_pears / pears_per_bag
In this equation, "total_number_of_pears" represents the total quantity of pears Natalie has, and "pears_per_bag" represents the number of pears she puts in each bag.
Given that Natalie has a total of 48 pears, we can substitute the value into the equation:
b = 48 / pears_per_bag
Now, we need to determine the number of pears she puts in each bag. The information provided states that Natalie sells bags of pears, and each bag is sold for $5. However, the specific number of pears per bag is not given. To proceed, we need this information.
Let's assume that Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag. We can substitute this value into the equation:
b = 48 / 4
Simplifying the equation gives:
b = 12
So, if Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag, she will be able to sell a total of 12 bags of pears at the Saturday market.
It's important to note that the specific value of "pears_per_bag" will affect the final result. If Natalie puts a different number of pears in each bag, the equation will yield a different number of bags sold.
For more such questions on sell visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24951536
#SPJ8
Which of the following steps indicates the addition property of equality while solving the equation –1 – 6x = x – 15?
A) x = 14∕2
B) –1 – 6x = x – 15
C) 23 – 6x – 24 = x – 15
D) –1 – 6x + 15 = x – 15 + 15
Answer:
-1 - 6x = x - 15
Add 15 to both sides using the addition property of equality.
14 - 6x = x
14 = 7x
2 = x
D) -1 - 6x + 15 = x - 15 + 15
Answer and Step-by-step explanation:
Please refer to the photo for the solution!
se logarithms to solve the problem.
The rule of 70 is a rule of thumb for estimating the doubling time of a quantity (e.g., investment, GDP, population) experiencing growth that is compounded continuously. The rule states that if the growth rate is r% per year, then the time it takes for the quantity to double is approximately 70/r years.
(a)
Use the rule of 70 to estimate the time it takes for an investment to double in value if it grows at the rate of 5% per year compounded continuously.
yr
(b)
What is the exact time it will take for the investment in part (a) to double in value? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
yr
a. The investment to double in value take about 14 years for the funding to double in value.
b. The genuine time it will take for the funding to double in fee is about 13.86 years.
(a) To estimate the time it takes for an funding to double in cost the use of the rule of 70, we want to decide the increase rate. In this case, the increase price is given as 5% per 12 months compounded continuously.
Using the rule of 70, we can calculate the estimated doubling time:
Time to double ≈ 70 / boom rate
Time to double ≈ 70 / 5
Simplifying, we have:
Time to double ≈ 14 years
Therefore, it would take about 14 years for the funding to double in value.
(b) To decide the genuine time it will take for the funding to double in value, we can use the formulation for non-stop compounding:
Doubling time (exact) = ln(2) / (ln(1 + r))
where r is the increase fee as a decimal.
In this case, the increase charge is 5% per year, or 0.05 as a decimal.
Doubling time (exact) = ln(2) / (ln(1 + 0.05))
Doubling time (exact) ≈ 13.86 years (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, the genuine time it will take for the funding to double in fee is about 13.86 years.
For more related questions on investment:
https://brainly.com/question/34043637
#SPJ8
Enter the number that belongs in the green box
The angle C in the triangle is 34.05 degrees.
How to use cosine law to find angles in a triangle?
The sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees. The angle in a triangle can be found using cosine law as follows:
Therefore, let's find the unknown angle in the triangle as follows;
c² = a² + b² - 2ab cos C
Hence,
4² = 5² + 7² - 2 × 7 × 5 cos X
16 = 25 + 49 - 70 cos X
16 = 74 - 70 cos X
16 - 74 = -70 cos X
-58 = -70 cos X
cos X = 58 / 70
X = cos⁻¹ 0.82857142857
X = 34.0478785629
X = 34.05 degrees
learn more on cosine law here: brainly.com/question/21297672
#SPJ1
If f(x)=/x-7 and g(x) - 4x - 8
which statement is true
1 is in the domain
1 isnt in the domain of f(0) g
ANSWERED: 1 is NOT in the domain.
The statement "1 is NOT in the domain" is true because for the function f(x), the expression x - 7 results in division by zero when x equals 1, which makes 1 not a valid input for the function.
To determine if a value is in the domain of a function, we need to consider any restrictions or limitations on the input values.
For the function f(x) = √(x - 7), the square root function is defined only for non-negative values.
Therefore, the expression (x - 7) inside the square root must be greater than or equal to zero. In other words, x - 7 ≥ 0.
Solving this inequality, we find x ≥ 7.
This means that any value of x that is greater than or equal to 7 is in the domain of f(x).
However, the statement is asking specifically about the value 1.
Since 1 is less than 7, it does not satisfy the inequality x ≥ 7 and is therefore not in the domain of f(x).
Similarly, for the function g(x) = 4x - 8, there are no restrictions on the domain.
Any real number can be substituted into the function, including the value 1.
Therefore, the statement "1 isn't in the domain of f(0) g" is not accurate.
It is true that 1 is not in the domain of f(x), but it is in the domain of g(x).
In summary, the correct statement is that "1 is not in the domain."
For similar question on domain.
https://brainly.com/question/26098895
#SPJ8
Triangle NMO has vertices at N(−5, 2), M(−2, 1), and O(−3 , 3). Determine the vertices of image N′M′O′ if the preimage is reflected over x = −1.
N′(5, −2), M′(2, 1), O′(3, 3)
N′(−5, 5), M′(−2, 3), O′(−3, 7)
N′(3, 2), M′(0, 1), O′(1, 3)
N′(−5, −2), M′(−2, −1), O′(−3, −3)
The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).
To determine the vertices of the image N'M'O' after reflecting triangle NMO over the line x = -1, we need to apply the reflection transformation to each vertex.
For a reflection over the line x = -1, we can find the image of a point (x, y) by finding its reflection as (2(-1) - x, y).
Applying this transformation to each vertex of triangle NMO, we get:
N' = (2(-1) - (-5), 2) = (5, 2)
M' = (2(-1) - (-2), 1) = (2, 1)
O' = (2(-1) - (-3), 3) = (3, 3)
The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).
For more such questions on Triangle
https://brainly.com/question/1058720
#SPJ8
Two cyclists, 54 miles apart, start riding toward each other at the same time. One cycles 2 times as fast as the other. If they meet 2 hours later, what is the speed (in mi/h) of the faster cyclist?
Answer:
In summary, the faster cyclist cycles at a speed of 18 mi/h since they travel 36 of the 54 miles in 2 hours while cycling twice as fast as the slower cyclist.
Explanationn:
The two cyclists are 54 miles apart and heading toward each other.
One cyclist cycles 2 times as fast as the other. We will call the faster cyclist A and the slower cyclist B.
They meet 2 hours after starting. This means they travel a total distance of 54 miles in 2 hours.
Since cyclist, A cycles 2 times as fast as cyclist B, cyclist A travels 2/3 of the total distance, and cyclist B travels 1/3 of the total distance.
In two hours, cyclist A travels (2/3) * 54 miles = 36 miles.
We need to find the speed of cyclist A in miles per hour.
Speed = Distance / Time
So the speed of cyclist A is:
36 miles / 2 hours = 18 miles per hour
Therefore, the speed of the faster cyclist is 18 mi/h.
Which linear equation shows a proportional relationship?
y equals negative one sixth times x
y equals one sixth times x minus 8
y = −6x + 1
y = 6
Answer:
y = (-1/6)x represents a proportional relationship.