Which of the following best completes the graphic?

• Change in communication
• Change in transportation
• Change in daily life
• Change in manufacturing

A. Westward expansion
B. Increased immigration
C. Technological innovations
D. Expanded democracy

Answer and Explanation:

Mansa Musa, during is reign as king of Mali, created a great big Mosque (prayer place for Muslims to pray) in Timbuktu that was not only a religious site, but was also a major Islamic university, in which people can come to study and learn. Mansa Musa also made a long journey to Mecca to complete hajj, and while on his journey to Mecca, he used his vast amount of gold to purchase items that exponentially increased inflation in the cities/countries he went through. Mansa Musa built many mosques and public buildings, and a lot of the teachings that were taught in the schools in his kingdom was preserved and found by the Europeans, who then gained a lot of knowledge they didn't know of before.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

Answer:

Resurrection

Explanation:

Answer:

Although in retrospect U.S. entry into World War II seems inevitable, in 1941 it was still the subject of great debate. Isolationism was a great political force, and many influential individuals were determined that U.S. aid policy stop short of war. World War II was inevitable for a multitude of reasons. The foremost reason was the existence of three respective, powerful aggressor states (Germany, Italy, and Japan) with imperial and ideological ambitions that would not hesitate to use force to achieve their goals.

Explanation:

Answer:

happy

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Throughout the history of the United States, Presidents have made

many proposals to deal with issues facing the country. Congress has

not always agreed with these proposals. American society has since

been affected by the outcomes of these proposals. Two of those

situations were caused by President James Polk and his involvement

in the Mexican American War, and President Franklin Roosevelt and

his attempted court packing scheme. Doc 1. In 1846, President James

Polk wanted Congress to declare war on Mexico. He claimed his

reasoning behind this was that the Mexicans had invaded American

lands and murdered American citizens. Aroused by the loss of

American lives, Congress immediately and overwhelmingly voted for

War. Soon after however, many members of Congress began to reconsider

their vote. In document 2, Abraham Lincon, a Whig at the time used

his “spot resolutions” tactic to demand knowledge of the precise “spot”

on American soil in which the conflict had began. President Polk

would not give Lincoln a clear answer to the question. The debate over

the legitimacy of the War would not be the only problem the U.S

would face. After the war ended in 1848 with the treaty of Guadalupe

Hidalgo, the debate over slavery would continue to pick up speed. Doc 3.

In “The West, and illustrated history”, Geoffrey C. Ward wrote that

Congress was split over the issue of slavery, and California’s statehood

threatened that balance. Congress had once hoped the issue of slavery’s

extension had been forever settled by the Missouri compromise of 1820,

which outlawed slavery in most of the West. But with the defeat of

Mexico, and the instant acquisition of vast land, everything changed.

Now the main issue would be whether or not new states such as

California would be free or slave states. President Roosevelt was very

U.S. Hist. & Gov. Rating Guide – Jan. ’17 [61] Vol. 2

Anchor Paper – Document-Based Essay—Level 2 – B

upset that the supreme court ruled that most of the bills enclosed in his

New Deal Recovery Plan were unconstitutional. He then decided to

create a proposal that would increase the number of supreme court

justice’s from 9 to 18 in order to appoint more judge’s favorable of his

New Deal. His proposal shocked many people, including members of

his own party. Doc 8 Congress was severely opposed to his plan,

stating that they would not interfere with the separation of powers put

in place by the United States Constitution. Doc 9. In the aftermath of

the court packing scheme, many felt that the opposition shown by

congress to President Roosevelt should stand as a warning to future

Presidents who are planning to tamper with branches of government

such as the supreme court.

Answer:

It refers to a social relationship with the owner of the property that takes possession of anything

Explanation:

I hope I helped :>

Answer:

So the Papal States are in Italy and England is in the UK. So its safe to say that they are South East of England.

Answer:

The watershed was basined.

Explanation:

if basic means an area of land that is drained by rivers. Then watershed works because a watershed is an area that was drained form a body of water live rivers lakes ect.

Answer:

reserved by the state government only

Answer:

i think ur explanation is good

Explanation:

links:

Supreme Court rules today: Trump is not above the law ...

www.peoplesworld.org/article/supreme-court-rules...

White House makes it official: Trump is above the law ...

www.peoplesworld.org/article/white-house-makes...

Answer:

time make us ..........................

Answer:

Good question though..

Answer:

its an opinion was very brave is an opinion people can think he was not brave or just brave not Very brave so the last one D

Explanation:

Answer: 1

Explanation:

The main goals of gerrymandering are to increase the effect of supporters' votes and to decrease the effect of opponents' votes.

Hope it helps!

Answer:

I think the answer is 2 reduce the number of voters

Answer:

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

Answer:

The US of America was made on July 4, 1776, with the Affirmation of Freedom of 13 English settlements in North America. The association was formalized in the Articles of Confederation, which came into power on Walk 1, 1781.

Answer: the answer is fearless and confident.

Explanation:

Answer:

1 3

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

it honestly depends on what type of force and how much the force is in your situation =)

Answer: These acts protect industry in the North at the expense of the South.

Explanation: The south didn't want to pay the tax because it made their products expensive.

Answer:

These acts protect industry in the North at the expense of the South.

Explanation:

The tariffs that the Southern States had didn't benefit them at all compared to what it did in the North.

Hope this helps  :)

Answer:

There is no doubt that many civilian lives will be lost should we decide to drop the A-bomb. Sadly, many civilian lives will be lost if we are forced to invade Japan, including many more American lives. We’ve already lost over 100,000 soldiers on the islands of Okinawa, Iwo Jima—and the other battles in the Pacific Theater. Invading the Japanese homeland will be a bloodbath in comparison.

This is a society that is dedicated to protecting their Emperor at any cost, and many are willing to give their own lives in the process. We should not have to sacrifice the lives of any more Americans when a quick, decisive solution is at our fingertips. If they refuse to accept our surrender offer, we have no other choice than to drop the bomb, Mr. President.

Explanation:

Answer:

Printing Press

Explanation:

The invention of the printing press allowed books and pamphlets to be made faster and more cheaply. This new technology helped spread the revolutionary ideas of the Renaissance and Reformation.

Answer:

Because Europe is a huge peninsula, most land in Europe lies within 300 Miles of a seacoast. This further encouraged trade and the growth of economy.

Explanation:

Answer:

There was a decline in the system of feudalism, too, as many nobles sold their lands to fund their travels, freeing their serfs in the process. The conquest of the Muslim-held territories in southern Italy, Sicily, and the Iberian peninsula gave access to new knowledge, the so-called 'New Logic'.

Explanation:

Answer:

There was a decline in the system of feudalism, too, as many nobles sold their lands to fund their travels, freeing their serfs in the process. The conquest of the Muslim-held territories in southern Italy, Sicily, and the Iberian peninsula gave access to new knowledge, the so-called 'New Logic'.

Explanation:

Answer:

answer is b. Loreta Janeta Velázquez

Answer:

Here. What was the 26 amendment about, and how did it affect in america  

Explanation:

Answer:

FALSE IS THE CORRECT ANSWER BELIEVE ME

GODBLESS❣️

The Putsch

By November 1923, Hitler and his associates had concocted a plot to seize power of the Bavarian state government (and thereby launch a larger revolution against the Weimar Republic) by kidnapping Gustav von Kahr (1862-1934), the state commissioner of Bavaria, and two other conservative politicians.

(If you can please give me brainiest)

Restoration is easy, if one only has the power and the will; creation is not easy, even if one has both. Restoration is reversion to the known, the certain; creation is a venture into the unknown and the uncertain, and is highly conducive to divergencies of thought, to division in the ranks; while an army of restoration knows precisely what it wishes to do, namely, to set up again the old landmarks—and that, too, as speedily as possible—to bring back the good old times, to renew the broken connection with the past. Whether we like it or not, ours is the more difficult task. If the five Great Powers of 1919 were anxious to restore the map of 1914, they could not do it; whereas the five Great Powers of 1814 found it easy to reverse the cartographical innovations of Napoleon Bonaparte. The work of Lenin and Trotzky will not be so easily undone. Fortunately for the peace of his spirit, Napoleon does not know that. Napoleon, Lenin, and Trotzky—an incongruous trio of actors on the Russian stage! Napoleon, a Frenchman, bent upon conquering Russia, was the direct means of heightening the influence and increasing the territory of Russia, as all the world saw in 1815. Lenin and Trotzky, Russians, have not only coöperated zealously in destroying the prestige of their country: they have consented and contributed, to the best of their ability, to the colossal dismemberment of Russia and its utter impotence. Russia has become merely a geographical expression, the combined achievement of German militarism and Russian Socialism. There is not Russia. What was once Russia is a disorganized aggregation of local governments, presenting, among other things, a wild tangle of territorial problems—and territorial problems resembling those of primeval chaos, with most landmarks entirely obliterated. The one outstanding landmark in contemporary Russia is that set up on March 3, 1918—the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. That treaty has never been recognized by any of the victorious Allies; nevertheless, it dogs them night and day in the time of triumph, embittering peace, if not preventing it, darkening counsel, and putting a strain upon friendship. The treaty of Brest-Litovsk may be repudiated by the conferees of Paris; it may be dead as far as Germany, its chief author, is concerned; but it is far from being a negligible factor in the history of the present. On the contrary, it, and the things it represents and embodies in its fell phrases, are bound to exercise a profound and disturbing influence upon the future. Where does one find anything in Germany parallel to this inner transformation? The history of Germany during the last forty years, during the last ten years, has shown the contrary phenomenon: a growing and not a decreasing harmony between the governors and the governed. If one wishes to test this statement, let him compare the stand taken by the only so-called opposition party in the war of 1870 and the war of our own day. In the former, the Socialists, who were few in number, were opposed to militarism, to aggrandizement, to the declaration of war, and to the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine, and their leaders, Bebel and Liebknecht, paid for their opposition by being thrown into prison. The Socialists of to-day, vastly more numerous and with far greater powers of opposition, have compromised with militarism, have warmly approved annexations by voting for the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and have on every and all occasions, in the year of our Lord 1918, joined in the general clamor that Alsace-Lorraine must never be surrendered. It would seem to be the business of an opposition to oppose. Should there emerge from the Assembly of Weimar a German democracy, that democracy will be the expression of German psychology. German psychology caused the war and kept it going. The ruling classes would never have risked the war, had they not known the temper and the nature of the German people. Nothing has yet occurred to show that the great masses of the people differed in 1914 from their rulers, either in their conceptions of the nature and the duty of the state, in their moral indifferentism, or in their arrogance and conceit. The defeat Germany has sustained may abate somewhat her contempt of other nations. It is not likely to diminish her hatred of them. It is far more likely to intensify that hatred. Men do not love their enemies any the more because their enemies have compelled them to bite the dust. What we know about the Germans does not lead up to believe, either that they have changed in essentials, or that they are changing, or that they are likely to change and to give the world the spectacle of the miracle of a new psychology. The majority of the members of the National Assembly of Weimar were members of the Reichstag, and belonged to parties that enthusiastically supported the policies of the Empire.

Explanation: Facts

Answer:

They thought that fighting in foreign wars was cost lives and accomplished nothing.

Explanation: