Answer:
I think c please dont hate if wrong
Explanation:
This is me wanting to know your opinion, You will get Brainliest if your opinion has a good explanation.
King explains why he doesn't want to be told to "wait" for equal rights. If he could see our country today, do you think he would say justice has been obtained, or do you think he'd say we're still "waiting"? Explain.
Answer: in progress of being obtained
Explanation:
I would say no because today we have many people sharing out their personal stories, and speaking out to the public about. We also have many protests about acts of injustice and how the want the people to be equal. But since justice has not been yet obtained I would say it’s a work in progress.
plzz help im being timed!! Read Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Why did women attempt to use the 14th Amendment to secure their right to vote? It addresses equality for all citizens. It claims to protect their lives. It describes who is a citizen of the country. It promises citizens equal protection under the law.
Answer:
The answer is that In several ways, the Fourteenth Amendment shifted the balance of power from the states to the federal government. Section 1 of the amendment says, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”
Explanation:
Where do most of Central Africa’s people live? How do they make their living?
what are 2 laws the explained how they specifically impacted the colonists.
Answer:
Hope this helps
Explanation:
I. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men.
Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature. All men have a right to remain in a state of nature as long as they please; and in case of intolerable oppression, civil or religious, to leave the society they belong to, and enter into another. When men enter into society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions and previous limitations as form an equitable original compact. Every natural right not expressly given up, or, from the nature of a social compact, necessarily ceded, remains. All positive and civil laws should conform, as far as possible, to the law of natural reason and equity. As neither reason requires nor religion permits the contrary, every man living in or out of a state of civil society has a right peaceably and quietly to worship God according to the dictates of his conscience. “Just and true liberty, equal and impartial liberty,” in matters spiritual and temporal, is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to by the eternal and immutable laws of God and nature, as well as by the law of nations and all well-grounded municipal laws, which must have their foundation in the former. In regard to religion, mutual toleration in the different professions thereof is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practised, and, both by precept and example, inculcated on mankind. And it is now generally agreed among Christians that this spirit of toleration, in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society, is the chief characteristical mark of the Church. Insomuch that Mr. Locke has asserted and proved, beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground, that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society. The only sects which he thinks ought to be, and which by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach doctrines subversive of the civil government under which they live.
In short, it is the greatest absurdity to suppose it in the power of one, or any number of men, at the entering into society, to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights; when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution, is for the support, protection, and defence of those very rights; the principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property. If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.
II. The Rights of the Colonists as Christians.
These may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institutes of the great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament. By the act of the British Parliament, commonly called the Toleration Act, every subject in England, except Papists, &c., was restored to, and re-established in, his natural right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience. And, by the charter of this Province, it is granted, ordained, and established (that is, declared as an original right) that there shall be liberty of conscience allowed in the worship of God to all Christians, except Papists, inhabiting, or which shall inhabit or be resident within, such Province or Territory. Magna Charta itself is in substance but a constrained declaration or proclamation and promulgation in the name of the King, Lords, and Commons, of the sense the latter had of their original, inherent, indefeasible natural rights, as also those of free citizens equally perdurable with the other. That great author, that great jurist, and even that court writer, Mr. Justice Blackstone, holds that this recognition was justly obtained of King John, sword in hand. And peradventure it must be one day, sword in hand, again rescued and preserved from total destruction and oblivion.
George Washington was sent by the Virginia colony to order the French to leave the Ohio River valley. What was Washington’s position at that time?
Answer:
second in command I'm assuming
Explanation:
.
Why did Martin Luther
King, Jr. promote nonviolent forms of protest to combat inequality? Was this the most
effective way to fight inequality? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and
other literature, art, or history in your answer. I will mark Brainliest
Answer:
King’s notion of nonviolence had six key principles. First, one can resist evil without resorting to violence. Second, nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding” of the opponent, not to humiliate him Third, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed. Fourth, those committed to nonviolence must be willing to suffer without retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids “external physical violence” and “internal violence of spirit” as well: “The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him”.
Explanation:
Answer:
King’s notion of nonviolence had six key principles. First, one can resist evil without resorting to violence. Second, nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding” of the opponent, not to humiliate him Third, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed. Fourth, those committed to nonviolence must be willing to suffer without retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids “external physical violence” and “internal violence of spirit” as well: “The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him”.
Explanation:
Single Combat Part 1: What do you think his lasting impression on society was?
In 2-3 complete sentences, A) name the Mesoamerican civilizations and B) name the South American, or Andean, civilizations. The First American Civilizations.
Use the "RAP" method to answer this short-answer question:
Restate the question
Answer the question
Prove your answer by citing textual evidence from the course.
Don't forget to use complete sentences and proofread your answer.
Answer:
The mesoamerican cililizations where Olmec, Maya, Zapotec, Teotihuacan, Mixtec, and Mexica (or Aztec). The Norte Chico civilization in Peru is the oldest civilization in the Americas and one of the first six independent civilizations in the world
Explanation:
ASAP HELPPPPP ALL U NEED IS PIC BELOW
Answer:
The answer Is A :)
Explanation:
i studies this last week so i know alot about this lol
What statement completes the diagram?
Select one:
A. Power is held by local government over central government.
B. Power is shared between local and central governments.
C. Power is held by international associations.
D. Power is held by a small group of elites.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
How did human error help cause the Dust Bowl?
1.Government policies kept farmers from making decisions on what to plant and how.
2.High prices for wheat encouraged farmers to plow under thousands of acres of grasslands.
3.Crop rotation led to thin topsoil and poor nutrients.
4.There was little rainfall for several years
Angry Pennsylvania farmers clashed with the American government during the Washington Administration.
Answer:
Whiskey Rebellion
Explanation:
The Whiskey Rebellion was a 1794 uprising of farmers and distillers in western Pennsylvania in protest of a whiskey tax enacted by the federal government. ... Opposition to the whiskey tax and the rebellion itself built support for the Republicans, who overtook Washington's Federalist Party for power in 1802.
help please please please!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Democracy
Explanation:
Democracy because its our power we have on the people
Answer:
It's either the 1st one or the 3rd one.
Explanation:
Why did the Catholic Church send people to the Americas?
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
Next
Previous Activity
What is the main irony in the resolution of the text " An Hour with Abuelo"?
hi, i was just curious. as an 11/12 yr i am curious about boy nd female puberty. i am learning about boys and its disgusting. can u tell me more..?
Answer:
Well buddy this is gonna be (interesting)
OKAY SO LETS gET BASICS
BOTH:
Both genders starts getting taller and many will experince growth spurts. Your voice could be deeper and hair could start growing to protect your body. Your ill start maturing and your rains ill start to know what is right and what is wrong and what makes sense or not. Your brian should be fully developed by the end.
boys:
Increase in Strength, height, and voice. Usually starts growing hair. Making poor decisoons but it really depends, your Brian is in a tug of war right now. The genital system starts developing for your adult life. (sexually)
Girls:
I have no clue bcause i am not a girl, all I’m saying comes from my teachers. the girl will start getting used to having a baby (your periods) and its natrual. Same thing growth, strength, height and brain maturity. The shift is the period. THE END
(DONT BULLY I’m ONLY REPEATING WHAT MA TEACHER SAID THIS :((((
Answer:
uhh ask ur health or PE teacher
Explanation:
HELP ME PLSSS
Write a short journal entry from the perspective of either a Loyalist or a Patriot. In your journal entry talk about:
How did the Sugar, Stamp, and Townshend Acts make you feel?
How might you feel about the other perspective or viewpoint? (If you are writing as a Loyalist - How would you feel about how the Patriots are acting? If you are writing as a Patriot - How would you feel about those who are loyal to the British King?)
Include evidence from the primary source and/or readings to support your answer?
do not use g0ogle, if you dont know the answer ignore this
How did the Aryans come to take India?
The Caspian Sea
crossing the desert
The Indian Ocean
mountain passes
Answer:
Its c
Explanation:
Answer:
The thorniest, most fought-over question in Indian history is slowly but surely getting answered: did Indo-European language speakers, who called themselves Aryans, stream into India sometime around 2,000 BC – 1,500 BC when the Indus Valley civilisation came to an end, bringing with them Sanskrit and a distinctive set ...
Explanation:
Help me with this
Pleaaaaaasssseeeeee
Answer: A
Explanation: he would have to work for his freedom. based on most government law systems.