What was "Operation Rolling Thunder" and why was it a big change in American strategy in the war?

Answer:

The religious freedom they offered their subjects. The development of strong trade with the New World. The establishment of the Alternate Attendance Policy. Their military invasion of Siberia and Korea.

Explanation:

Answer:

here is your answer

Explanation:

Lincoln was self-educated. His formal schooling was intermittent, the aggregate of which may have amounted to less than twelve months. He never attended college, but Lincoln retained a lifelong interest in learning

Answer:

False it killed a third.

Explanation:

Answer:

b) vietnamise war

Explanation:

Vietnam War encouraged the use of Heroin in the United States. Hence, option B is appropriate.

Between 1 November 1955 and 30 April 1975, when Saigon fell, there was a conflict in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia known as the Vietnam War. Officially, North Vietnam and South Vietnam engaged in the second of the Indochina Wars.

The Vietnam War was a protracted conflict between nationalist forces seeking to unite Vietnam under a communist regime and American forces working with South Vietnamese support to stop the rise of communism.

In March 1975, North Vietnamese forces launched a significant offensive in the Central Highlands after reorganizing their units and modernizing their supply infrastructure. The battle was finally put to an end on April 30, 1975, when NVA tanks rolled through the Saigon Presidential Palace's gate.

Hence, option B is correct.

Learn more about the Vietnam War here:

https://brainly.com/question/11375126

#SPJ2

Answer:

Personification

Explanation:

Personification is essentially giving nonhuman objects human characteristics

Answer:

10

Explanation:

10 *10=100

so √100 = 10

Answer:

All communication has two parts: a sender and a receiver. The sender has a message he or she intends to transmit, and s/he puts it in words, which, to her/him, best reflect what s/he is thinking. But many things can intervene to prevent the intended message from being received accurately.

If the communication is verbal, tone of voice can influence interpretation. The boss's words, "Hey, I noticed you were taking an especially long break this morning," could be interpreted as an attack if she or he said that in a disapproving tone, while the comment might be seen as a minor reminder about office rules if it was said in a friendly way. If the employee has a health problem that sometimes requires long breaks, the comment might have even been a friendly inquiry about what was happening and whether the employee needed any help. Here, tone of voice as well as situational and relationship factors would influence the interpretation of the message.

Nonverbal cues also are important. Is the sender's posture open and friendly, or closed and cold? Is her facial expression friendly or accusatory? All of these factors influence how the same words will be received.

In addition to how the message is sent, many additional factors determine how the receiver interprets the message. All new information we learn is compared with the knowledge we already have. If it confirms what we already know, we will likely receive the new information accurately, though we may pay little attention to it. If it calls into question our previous assumptions or interpretation of the situation, we may distort it in our minds so that it is made to fit our world view, or we may dismiss the information as deceptive, misguided, or simply wrong.

S.Y. Bowland describes how subtle racial or gender bias can lead to misunderstandings.

If the message is ambiguous, the receiver is especially likely to clarify it for him or herself in a way which corresponds with his or her expectations. For example, if two people are involved in an escalated conflict, and they each assume that the other is going to be aggressive and hostile, then any ambiguous message will be interpreted as aggressive and hostile, even if it was not intended to be that way at all. Our expectations work as blinders or filters that distort what we see so that it fits our preconceived images of the world. (Conflict theorists call these filters "frames." See the essay on Frames, Framing, and Reframing for more information.)

An analogy can be made to an experiment that tested people's interpretation of visual cues. When people were given eyeglasses that turned the world upside-down, they had to suffer through with upside-down images for a week or two. After that, their brains learned to reverse the images, so they were seeing things right-side up again. The same thing happens when we hear something we "know" is wrong. Our brains "fix" it so that it appears as we expect it to.

Cultural differences increase the likelihood of misunderstanding as well. If people speak different languages, the danger of bad translation is obvious. But even if people speak the same language, they may communicate in different ways.

Common differences are between high-context and low-context communication. Low-context communication stands on its own; it does not require context or interpretation to give it meaning. High-context communication is more ambiguous. It requires background knowledge and understanding (context), in addition to the words themselves, for communication. While everyone uses both kinds of communication, Western cultures tend to use low-context communication more often, while Eastern and Latin American and African cultures tend to use high-context communication. If such differences are not understood and adjusted for, misunderstanding is almost inevitable.[1]

Frank Blechman states that surprises offer the intervenor a chance to re-assess the assumptions he/she has made about a conflict.

Culture also affects communication by influencing the recipients' assumptions. As described above, our minds try to twist incoming information to make it fit in our worldview. Since different cultures have very different worldviews, cross-cultural communication is especially likely to change meaning between sender and receiver, as the sender may have a very different worldview from the receiver.

Given our tendency to hear what we expect to hear, it is very easy for people in conflict to misunderstand each other. Communication is already likely to be strained, and people will often want to hide the truth to some extent. Thus the potential for misperception and misunderstanding is high, which can make conflict management or resolution more difficult.

Explanation:

Answer:

FDR's plan to help the country recover from the Great Depression.

Explanation:

President Franklin. D. Roosevelt brought forth the New Deal as a way to tackle and solve the problems brought by the Great Depression. It was this New Deal that brought about significant changes and revival of means of living in the people.

FDR's New Deal was initially brought to deal with the problems such as unemployment, overproduction of agricultural produces, in short, help tackle the financial crisis of the nation. And it was this deal that revived the nation's economy and helped bring afresh a sense of hope among the people.

Thus, the correct answer is the first option.

Answer:

c seems like the best choice

Explanation:

Answer:

The initial conflict to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait began with an aerial and naval bombardment on 17 January 1991, continuing for five weeks. This was followed by a ground assault on 24 February. This was a decisive victory for the coalition forces, who liberated Kuwait and advanced into Iraqi territory.

Explanation:

Hope that helps.

Answer: TRUE The Containment Policy was a strategic foreign plan used by the United States in the late 1940s

Explanation: my good sirs it true