What is this expression equivalent to? Will Give Brainliest! Image is below.

Answer:

d,e

Step-by-step explanation:

rational numbers are positive and negative whole numbers.

Answer:

d,e

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

110d + 80 > 1620

d > 14

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount of points from collecting diamonds can be represented by 110d, since you get 110 points for each diamond, d

Add 80 to this to represent the bonus points.

Use a greater than inequality, because you have to get more than 1620 points.

Put this all together:

110d + 80 > 1620

Then, solve for d:

110d + 80 > 1620

110d > 1540

d > 14

So, you have to collect more than 14 diamonds in less than 2 minutes in order to advance to the next level.

Answer:

j=v-k/a

Step-by-step explanation:

It's like order of operations backwards. So first, you would get rid of the k, by subtracting it from both sides. Then, to isolate j you would divide both sides by a.

Answer:

Thus, the measure 660 cm is divided into 300 + 360 in the ratio of 5:6

Step-by-step explanation:

Equations

We are required to divide 660 cm in the ratio 5:6, or 5/6.

Let's call:

x = first part of 660

660 - x = second part of 660

The ratio between them is 5/6.

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{x}{660-x}=\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

The above equation will result in x as the smaller part of 660.

Multiply by (660-x)*6 to eliminate denominators:

[tex]\displaystyle (660-x)*6\cdot\frac{x}{660-x}=(660-x)*6\cdot\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Operating:

[tex]6x=(660-x)*5[/tex]

[tex]6x=3300-5x[/tex]

Simplifying:

[tex]6x+5x=3300[/tex]

[tex]11x=3300[/tex]

Solving:

[tex]\displaystyle x=\frac{3300}{11}=300[/tex]

The other part is 660 - 300 = 360

Thus, the measure 660 cm is divided into 300 + 360 in the ratio of 5:6

Answer:

The answer is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

If you look at the number line and start counting from -8 and count 9 to the right then the number that you end on is the answer.

Answer:

Area of the circle = pi * r^2 = pi * (x+1) ^ 2

Circumference of the circle = 2* pi * r = 2*pi*(x+1)

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

265/53= 5

Answer:

265÷53=5

Step-by-step explanation:

just get a calculator

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

just add up both alternate internal angles as they are both equal

so, the equation is: 2x-10 = 65-x

Answer:

The right equation will be 2x - 10 = 65 - x (you were wrong lol)

Step-by-step explanation:

We have: 2x - 10 = 65 - x

=> 2x - 10 + x = 65

=> 3x = 65 + 10 = 75

=> x = 75/3 = 25

P/S: After some little chats with the others, this might be wrong :(

Answer:

No. √14 + 6.2 is more than 3π - 8.2

Step-by-step explanation:

√14 + 6.2

√20.2

≈ 4.494

π ≈ 3.14159

3(3.14159) - 8.2

9.42577 - 8.2

1.22477

Therefore, the answer is no.

Answer:

Jamie is correct. This is because 41 is a combination of 40 and 1. Salena thinks that the 4 is just a 4, however, the 4 is in the tens place, so the 41 without the 1 is 40. The answer to this 41 times 9 is 369. Not 45.

Step-by-step explanation:

Each skirt is $41

Salena needs 9

(9*40) + (9*1)

360   +   9

    $369

Answer:

6 months is: 15675

2 months is: 5172.75

1 month is: 2586.37

15 months is: 38795.62

the missing number is: 12 months

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I'd say 50

Step-by-step explanation:

I just divided 150 by 3 since I only saw 3 toppings.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  C, M

Step-by-step explanation:

The second quadrant is the upper left quadrant. There, x-values will be negative and y-values will be positive.

__

Point G is on the boundary with the 3rd quadrant, so is probably not considered to be in either of those quadrants.

Answer: C M

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1/10 of 1hr = 1/2 mile

10*(1/10) of 1hr = 10(1/2) mile

(10/10) of 1hr = (10/2) mile

1 of 1hr = 5mile

It says, he can run 5 miles in 1 hour

Answer:

153.615

Step-by-step explanation:

62.7 × 2.45=153.615

letter B 3 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

he needs three more to get 6 meters of wood

Answer:

p = -4.33636363636

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract 2.2 from -4.001 which equals -4.001-2.2=-6.201 and divide -6.201 by 1.43p and that equals -4.33636363636 so p = -4.33636363636

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Given:

⠀[tex]f-¹(x)=\frac{x}{9}-\frac{5}{9}[/tex].

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • To find out:

⠀Is a function [tex]f-¹(x)=\frac{x}{9}-\frac{5}{9}[/tex] or not.

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Hello, ZoFlo2020!

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Answer (Response Explanation):

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀No, it is not. Such an example is not even possible to solve, to be honest. It doesn’t have a single solution to find at least an approximate part of its solution and answer.

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Sincerely, Your ElskerNorge! :)

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

Answer:

Yes blue liquid is toxic

Step-by-step explanation:

H0: p1 = p2

H1: p1>p2

For blue

We calculate proportion as

37/40 = 0.925

For white

9/40 = 0.2250

To get p

(X1 + x2)/(n1 + n2)

= 0.5750

After calculating the z as statistic (please check attachment) I got 6.33

P value = 0.0000

We reject null hypothesis and say in conclusion that enough evidence exists for us to say blu liquid is toxic!

Thank you!

Answer:

x = 2/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write equation

20x + x - 2 = 4

Step 2: Solve for x

Step 3: Check

Plug in x to verify it's a solution.

20(2/7) + 2/7 - 2 = 4

40/7 + 2/7 - 2 = 4

42/7 - 2 = 4

6 - 2 = 4

4 = 4

Answer:

x = 2/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Collect like terms:

20x + x = 21x ----> 21x - 2= 4

Move the constant to the right hand side and change the sign of the constant:

21x = 4 + 2

Calculate:

21x = 4 + 2 ---> 21x = 6

Divide both sides by 21:

21/21 and 6/21 = 2/7

Solution:

x = 2/7 or x= 0.285714

-5.33333333333

I used a calulator can I get brainliest please

Step-by-step explanation:

When metamorphic rock melts it turns into magma.

Answer:

The sum is positive.

Step-by-step explanation:

The 20 is a far greater value than -8, so no matter what, when you add them the sum will be positive. Though this would not be the same were the -8 greater than -20.

Hope this helps!

Answer: the answer is -947 hope this helped.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.x=3

2. x= -7    

3. x=7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24.85 or rounded to 24.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Conversion

K H D____D C M

The number of miles did Tina ride when (1 mile ≈ 1.6 kilometers) so it should be considered as the 25 miles.

Since

By the end of Tina’s bike ride, she traveled a distance of 40 kilometers.

And we know that

1 mile ≈ 1.6 kilometers

So,

[tex]= 40 \div 1.6[/tex]

= 25 miles

hence, The number of miles did Tina ride when (1 mile ≈ 1.6 kilometers) so it should be considered as the 25 miles.

Learn more about miles here: https://brainly.com/question/13208356

Answer:

area: 153.86

Circumference: 43.96 :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Responds to my friend

Decision rule

 Fail to reject the null hypothesis

Conclusion

There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian  

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we are going to consider this question

For example, you may believe that the proportion of adults in California who are vegetarians is more than the proportion of adults in New Hampshire who are vegetarians. In two independent polls, you may find that 109 out of 380 California residents are vegetarians and 39 out of 205 New Hampshire residents are vegetarians.

Here we are going to be solving the hypothesis test problem and we will be making use of the p-value method

From the question the we are told that

     The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 380[/tex]

       The second sample size is [tex]n_2 = 205[/tex]

       The number of California residents that are vegetarian is [tex]k = 109[/tex]

       The number of New Hampshire resident that are veterinarian is [tex]u = 39[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for California residents is

      [tex]\^ p_1 = \frac{k}{n_1}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =\frac{109}{380}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =  0.2868 [/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for New Hampshire residents is

     [tex]\^ p_2 = \frac{39}{205}[/tex]

=>  [tex]\^ p_2 = 0.1902 [/tex]  

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  p_1 -p_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  p_1 -p_2 > 0[/tex]

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented  as

[tex]t  =  \frac{(\^ p_1 - \^ p_2 ) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^p_1 )}{n_1}  + \frac{\^ p_2 (1- \^p_2)}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t  =  \frac{( 0.2868 - 0.1902) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.2868 (1-0.2868 )}{380}  + \frac{0.1902(1- 0.1902)}{205} } }[/tex]  

=>  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df  =  n_1 + n_2 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  380 + 205 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  583/tex]

Generally the probability of  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex] at a degree of freedom of   [tex]df  =  583/tex]  from the t- distribution table is  

      [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  0.036) =  0.48564732[/tex]

Let take the level of significance to be [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

So from the values obtained we see that  [tex]p-value  >  \alpha[/tex] hence the decision rule is  

   Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

  There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian