what is the total stockholders' equity based on the following account balances? common stock $2330000 paid-in capital in excess of par 133000 retained earnings 573000 treasury stock 73000

The situation in which Ellis is involved as a cash-method taxpayer, and whether or not he must include dividends in his gross income is as follows:a) Ellis received a dividend of $100 on September 10.

Ellis purchased 100 shares of XYZ stock on August 1 for $21 per share. Ellis continues to own the stock at the end of the year. Dividend income must be reported by Ellis, and the cost basis of his 100 shares of XYZ stock will be raised by $1 per share to $22.b) Ellis received a dividend of $100 on September 10. Ellis purchased 100 shares of XYZ stock on August 1 for $21 per share. Ellis sold his XYZ shares on September 5 for $23 per share. Ellis, like most shareholders who hold shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period starting 60 days before the stock's ex-dividend date, is entitled to the preferred dividend tax rate.

As a result, Ellis's dividend will be subject to the favorable tax rates that apply to "qualified dividends." Ellis has a $2 per share capital gain ($23 selling price - $21 cost basis). Dividend income and capital gains must be reported separately by Ellis. Ellis must add $100 to his dividend income, and the cost basis of his 100 shares of XYZ stock will be raised by $1 per share to $22. Ellis also has a $200 long-term capital gain.c) Ellis received a dividend of $100 on September 10. Ellis purchased 100 shares of XYZ stock on August 20 for $22 per share. Ellis continues to own the stock at the end of the year. Because Ellis bought the shares on August 20, he was not the shareholder of record on September 1, and therefore not entitled to the dividend.

Therefore, Ellis must return the $100 to XYZ as a return of capital, reducing his basis in his 100 shares of XYZ stock to $21 per share. The stock's fair market value on August 20 has no bearing on this result.What are shares?Shares, also known as equities, are stocks that represent ownership in a corporation or financial asset. Shareholders can own shares of mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other investment products in addition to common and preferred shares of individual firms.What is a taxpayer?A taxpayer is a person or corporation who pays taxes to a country or local government. Taxpayers pay income taxes on their earnings, as well as property taxes on the value of their homes and other properties they own, in many situations.

To learn more about shares :

https://brainly.com/question/32395273

#SPJ11

If the $1,000 was deposited in four payments of $250 each at the end of years 1, 2, 3, and 4, the total future value of the investment at the end of year 4, based on 8 annual compounding, would be $1,115.72.

Assuming an annual interest rate of 8% compounded annually, the future value of a lump-sum investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of year 1 would be:

[tex]FV = PV \times (1 + r)^n = $1,000 \times (1 + 0.08)^4 = $1,360.49[/tex]

Now, suppose that the $1,000 was deposited in four payments of $250 each at the end of years 1, 2, 3, and 4. In this case, we can calculate the future value of each payment individually and add them up to get the total future value of the investment at the end of year 4.

The future value of the first payment of $250 made at the end of year 1 would be:

[tex]FV1 = PV \times (1 + r)^n = $250\times (1 + 0.08)^3 = $310.13[/tex]

The future value of the second payment of $250 made at the end of year 2 would be:

[tex]FV2 = PV \times (1 + r)^n = $250 \times (1 + 0.08)^2 = $285.22[/tex]

The future value of the third payment of $250 made at the end of year 3 would be:

[tex]FV3 = PV \times(1 + r)^n = $250\times (1 + 0.08)^1 = $270.37[/tex]

The future value of the fourth payment of $250 made at the end of year 4 would be:

[tex]FV4 = PV \times (1 + r)^n = $250 \times (1 + 0.08)^0 = $250[/tex]

Adding up the future values of all four payments, we get:

Total FV = FV1 + FV2 + FV3 + FV4 = $310.13 + $285.22 + $270.37 + $250 = $1,115.72

For more question on deposited visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31452666

#SPJ11

You would have $1,126.95 in your account at the end of year 4.  If you deposited $1,000 in 4 payments of $250 each at the end of years 1, 2, 3, and 4, and assuming an annual interest rate of 8% compounded annually.

The calculation would be as follows:

At the end of year 1, you would have $250 in the account.

At the end of year 2, the $250 deposit from year 1 would have grown to:

$250 * (1 + 0.08) = $270

You would also have an additional $250 deposit from year 2, giving you a total of $520 in the account.

At the end of year 3, the $520 in the account would grow to:

$520 * (1 + 0.08) = $561.60

You would also have an additional $250 deposit from year 3, giving you a total of $811.60 in the account.

At the end of year 4, the $811.60 in the account would grow to:

$811.60 * (1 + 0.08) = $876.95

You would also have an additional $250 deposit from year 4, giving you a total of $1,126.95 in the account.

Therefore, you would have $1,126.95 in your account at the end of year 4.

Learn more about payments here:

https://brainly.com/question/15138283

#SPJ11

While sparklines could potentially make financial statements more accessible, there are concerns about oversimplification and increased costs.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) consider allowing the use of sparklines on the face of financial statements, but not necessarily require them. Sparklines are small, simple line graphs that provide a visual representation of data trends over time. They can help investors quickly grasp the performance of a company without having to dive deep into the numbers.

One reason to support the inclusion of sparklines is that they can make financial statements more user-friendly, particularly for non-expert investors. The visual nature of sparklines can help users quickly identify trends and patterns in financial performance. This could lead to better-informed investment decisions.

However, there are also reasons not to require sparklines. One concern is that they might oversimplify complex financial data and potentially lead to misinterpretation. Financial statements contain a wealth of information, and while sparklines can provide a quick snapshot, they may not capture the nuances and details needed for a thorough analysis.

Additionally, the implementation of sparklines could result in increased costs for companies as they would need to develop and maintain systems to create and update these visualizations. This could be particularly burdensome for smaller companies with limited resources.

In conclusion, while sparklines could potentially make financial statements more accessible, there are concerns about oversimplification and increased costs. The SEC should consider allowing their use, but not require them, giving companies the flexibility to choose the best way to present their financial information.

For more about financial statement:

https://brainly.com/question/14951563

#SPJ11

The incorrect statement about marketing analytics is A. While it is true that voice communication cannot be easily converted into digitized data, there are still ways to analyze human communication data.

For example, sentiment analysis tools can analyze the tone and emotional cues in voice communication to derive insights about customer preferences and behaviors. Additionally, there are other forms of data, such as customer feedback surveys or call transcripts, that can be used to understand customer communication patterns. The explosive growth of big data, as mentioned in statement B, is indeed calling for more analytical skills in the field of marketing. Statements C and D are also correct, as social media and various other sources of data provide ample opportunities for marketing analytics to study and analyze customer behavior and preferences.

To learn more about marketing, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25492268

#SPJ11

While it is true that actual results may not always match forecasted results, post-audits are still an important step in the capital budgeting process.  It may be challenging to achieve perfect alignment between actual and forecasted results, post-audits are still an important part of the capital budgeting process.

A post-audit allows companies to evaluate the accuracy of their forecasting methods, identify any errors or biases, and adjust their decision-making processes accordingly. Even if the results are not exactly what was predicted, a post-audit can still provide valuable insights into the performance of a project or investment.
Moreover, post-audits can help companies learn from their mistakes and avoid making similar errors in the future. By analyzing the factors that led to differences between actual and forecasted results, companies can refine their forecasting models and make better-informed decisions in the future.
In addition, post-audits can also help companies evaluate the effectiveness of their management and control systems. By comparing actual results with expected outcomes, companies can identify areas of weakness or inefficiency and take corrective actions.
Overall, while it may be challenging to achieve perfect alignment between actual and forecasted results, post-audits are still an important part of the capital budgeting process. They allow companies to learn from their experiences and improve their decision-making processes, ultimately leading to better business outcomes.

for more such question on post-audits

https://brainly.com/question/24112426

#SPJ11

The value of Verizon's WACC is 5.26%.

The semi-annual coupon rate of 6.2% translates to a semi-annual payment of $31 per bond. With a current selling price of 112% of par, the yield to maturity is calculated as follows:

YTM = [($31 x 2) / $1,120] + [($1,120 - $1,000) / (30 x $1,000 + $1,120)]

= 5.11%

Therefore, the after-tax cost of debt is:

After-tax cost of debt = YTM x (1 - Tax rate)

= 5.11% x (1 - 0.40)

= 3.07%

Next, we need to determine the cost of equity. Using the beta of 0.70 and the 10-year T-bond rate of 2.8%, we can calculate the cost of equity using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM):

Cost of equity = Risk-free rate + Beta x Market risk premium

= 2.8% + 0.70 x (11.2% - 2.8%)

= 8.96%

Finally, we can calculate the WACC:

WACC = (Market value of debt / Total market value) x After-tax cost of debt +

(Market value of equity / Total market value) x Cost of equity

= (0.32 x $1,120 million / ($1,120 million + $2,088 million)) x 3.07% +

(0.68 x $2,088 million / ($1,120 million + $2,088 million)) x 8.96%

= 5.26%

Therefore, based on the given information, Verizon's WACC is 5.26%.

For more such questions on value

https://brainly.com/question/25922327

#SPJ11

'The given statement is false because the increase in government spending resulting from ARRA may have decreased private investment and overall economic growth, rather than boosting it.'

This belief is based on the theory of crowding out, which suggests that increased government spending can lead to higher interest rates and decreased private investment. This can occur because the government may compete with private investors for the same resources, such as borrowing from the same pool of savings.

However, it is important to note that there is still debate among economists regarding the effectiveness of ARRA and the extent of crowding out effects. Some argue that the increased government spending provided a necessary boost to the economy during a time of recession, and that the crowding out effects may have been limited.

Overall, while most economists surveyed in the IGM poll believe that the crowding out effects were stronger than the stimulative effects of ARRA, it is still a topic of ongoing discussion and analysis in the field of economics.

For more such questions on government spending visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14786578

#SPJ11

There will be a change in the demand curve from D to D. From E to E should be the new exchange rate. Consequently, option (D) is the proper one.

In the world of finance, an exchange rate is the cost at which one currency will be exchanged for another. Currency can occasionally be supra-national (like the euro) or sub-national (like Hong Kong), despite the fact that they are typically national currencies.

The exchange rate is also thought to indicate the relative value of one nation's currency to another.

For example, the 131 Japanese yen to the US dollar demand curve interbank rate predicts that 131 will be traded for US$1 or that US$1 will be exchanged for 131.

Learn more about  exchange rate , from :

brainly.com/question/14160520

#SPJ1

The correct answer to your question is a. fake door. A fake door is a technique used in product development where a landing page or a website is created to test the interest of potential customers in a product or a feature before it is actually built.

The landing page may have a "Buy Now" or "Sign Up" button, but clicking on it will lead to a message saying the product is not yet available. This technique helps companies gauge interest, measure demand, and collect feedback before investing time and resources into building a product that nobody wants. The fake door technique is a type of MVP (minimum viable product) that tests the market for a very limited time only, usually less than a week. It's important to note that a fake door is not an impersonator, which is someone who pretends to be someone else for fraudulent or deceitful purposes.

In conclusion, a fake door is a useful technique to test a product idea without actually building it. It allows companies to get feedback and validate assumptions before investing significant resources into a product. While it may seem deceptive, it is an ethical way to validate ideas and ensure that a product will meet customer needs.

To know more about Product visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31859289

#SPJ11

The decision of whether or not to formally announce a firm's future dividend policy can have both advantages and disadvantages.

Pros:

1. Improved transparency: Formal announcements of the future dividend policy can help improve transparency. This can be helpful for shareholders who want to understand the company's plans for distributing profits and who may use this information to make investment decisions.

2. Stability and predictability: When a company formally announces its dividend policy, it can provide stability and predictability to the shareholders. This can increase the confidence of shareholders and help maintain a stable stock price.

3. Credibility: Formal announcements of a company's dividend policy can enhance the credibility of the firm, as it shows the company is committed to maintaining a long-term relationship with its shareholders.

Cons:

1. Reduced flexibility: Once a dividend policy is formally announced, it can become difficult for a company to change it. This can limit the flexibility of a company to adapt to changes in the business environment.

2. Market expectations: Formal announcements of dividend policy can create certain expectations among the market and shareholders, which can put pressure on the company to meet those expectations even if it is not in the best interest of the company.

3. Competitive disadvantage: Formal announcements of a dividend policy can create a competitive disadvantage for the company. Competitors may be able to use this information to their advantage, especially if they choose not to disclose their own dividend policies.

In conclusion, while formal announcements of dividend policies have advantages, they also have disadvantages. Companies must carefully consider their unique circumstances before making a decision.

Learn more about shareholders: https://brainly.com/question/31687599

#SPJ11

As per current tax laws, Net Operating Loss (NOL) cannot be created for an individual taxpayer if there are unreimbursed employee business expenses. However, this may be affected by some limitations.

An "unreimbursed" expense refers to an expense that the employee incurs for business purposes but is not reimbursed by the employer. A "taxpayer" is an individual or entity that pays taxes to the government based on their income or other taxable transactions.

Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, unreimbursed employee business expenses could be deducted as miscellaneous itemized deductions on Schedule A of an individual's tax return, subject to a 2% floor. This means that the deduction was limited to the portion of expenses that exceeded 2% of the taxpayer's adjusted gross income (AGI). In some cases, this could lead to an NOL if the deductions were significant enough to reduce the taxpayer's taxable income below zero.

However, after the TCJA, unreimbursed employee business expenses are no longer deductible for tax years 2018-2025, except for specific categories of employees such as armed forces reservists, qualified performing artists, and certain government officials. As a result, it is now less likely for an individual taxpayer to generate an NOL due to unreimbursed employee business expenses during this period.

In conclusion, unreimbursed employee business expenses can no longer create an NOL for most individual taxpayers after the TCJA. The ability to generate an NOL due to such expenses is now limited to specific categories of employees as mentioned above.

To know more about Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, visit https://brainly.com/question/20397638

#SPJ11

a) The estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, which is  

    $41,560.    

b) The adjusting entry is:

   Debit: Bad Debts Expense $37,760

   Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $37,760

c) The Adjusting entry:

   Debit: Bad Debts Expense $41,260

   Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $41,260

Calculating allowance for Doubtful Accounts using aging of accounts receivable is an important concept in accounting, as it helps businesses estimate the amount of uncollectible accounts they may have and make adjustments to their financial statements accordingly.

Let's look at the table provided in the problem, which shows the Days Past Due and Percent Uncollectible for various categories of accounts receivable. Using this information, we can estimate the balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts by multiplying the balance of each category by its corresponding percent uncollectible and then summing the results.

a. Here is a table showing the estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts using aging of accounts receivable:

Days Past Due Total

0 1 to 30 31 to 60 61 to 90 Over 90

Accounts receivable $580,000 $398,000 $92,000 $38,000 $20,000 $32,000

Percent uncollectible 3% 4% 7% 9% 12%

Estimated uncollectible amount $11,940 $15,920 $6,440 $3,420 $3,840

Estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $41,560

To get the estimated uncollectible amount for each category, we simply multiply the balance of that category by its corresponding percent uncollectible.

For example, the estimated uncollectible amount for accounts receivable that are 1 to 30 days past due is $398,000 x 4% = $15,920. We repeat this process for each category and then sum the results to get the estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, which is $41,560.

b. Now that we have the estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, we can use it to prepare the adjusting entry to record Bad Debts Expense. The entry will debit Bad Debts Expense and credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the estimated balance we just calculated. We also need to take into account the unadjusted balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, which is given as a $3,800 credit. The adjusting entry is:

Debit: Bad Debts Expense $37,760

Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $37,760

c. In part c, we are given a different unadjusted balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, which is a $300 debit. This means that the company has previously overestimated its bad debt expense and needs to adjust for it in the current period. Using the same estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts from part a, we can prepare the adjusting entry:

Debit: Bad Debts Expense $41,260

Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $41,260

In this case, we are debiting a higher amount of Bad Debts Expense because we need to adjust for the previous overestimation. We credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the full estimated balance, which will result in a net balance of zero for the account after the adjustment.

To know more about Bad and Doubtful Debts here

https://brainly.com/question/14301375

#SPJ4

The opportunity cost of income refers to the benefits that you give up in order to earn more money. In other words, it's the value of the next best thing that you could have done with your time instead of working. Therefore, the correct answer to this question is a) leisure time.

When you choose to work longer hours or take on an additional job, you're sacrificing time that you could have spent doing something else, such as pursuing a hobby or spending time with loved ones. This is why it's important to weigh the opportunity cost of income against the potential benefits of earning more money. While increasing your income may be tempting, it's essential to consider how it will impact your overall quality of life and whether it's worth sacrificing other aspects of your life, such as your avocation time or leisure time. In conclusion, making informed decisions about how you spend your time is crucial for achieving a healthy work-life balance.

To know more about avocation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30856051

#SPJ11

According to proponents of a balanced budget, the group that bears the cost of the budget deficit is: future taxpayers. The correct option is D.

A balanced budget is a fiscal policy approach where government revenues equal expenditures, preventing the accumulation of debt. Proponents argue that budget deficits place a financial burden on future generations, as they have to repay the borrowed funds with interest.

This occurs because when the government runs a deficit, it borrows money through the issuance of bonds and other debt instruments. As a result, future taxpayers are responsible for repaying the principal and interest on these borrowings, which could lead to higher taxes and reduced public services for them.

This is why balanced budget supporters advocate for responsible spending and sustainable fiscal policies to protect the financial well-being of future generations.

To know more about budget deficit, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30764699#

#SPJ11

Complete question:

According to proponents of a balanced budget, who bears the cost of the budget deficit?

a. Other nations

b. Current taxpayers

c. The World Bank

d. Future taxpayers

C) consumers of the exported good may be better off. When a domestic market begins to export goods to a foreign market, it means that there is an increase in demand for the goods being produced in the domestic market.

This could lead to an increase in production and economies of scale, which can ultimately lead to lower prices for the consumers of the exported good. However, it is important to note that the impact on producers and consumers of the importing industry will depend on various factors such as competition, tariffs, and exchange rates.
If a domestic market begins to export goods to and import goods from a foreign market, we can assume that C) consumers of the exported good may be better off. This is because exporting goods can lead to increased production and potentially lower prices or higher quality goods for domestic consumers.

To know more about consumer visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15869639

#SPJ11

There seems to be a contradiction between the rising prices of apartments in New York City and the increasing demand for them, which goes against the conventional law of demand.

In this case, the rising prices of apartments in New York City alongside the increasing demand appear to defy the law of demand, which states that higher prices generally lead to lower demand.

Firstly, it's important to consider the concept of a "normal" or "inferior" good. Apartments in a highly desirable city like New York can be considered normal goods, where individuals are willing to pay more for the convenience, amenities, and location. As people's income increases, they may be more willing to spend a larger portion of their income on housing, leading to an upward shift in demand.

Secondly, the demand for apartments in New York City can also be influenced by external factors such as population growth, immigration, job opportunities, and urbanization. If the city experiences an influx of people seeking employment or other opportunities, the demand for housing will naturally increase, driving prices up.

Additionally, supply constraints and limited availability of land in densely populated areas like New York City can contribute to the rise in prices. Insufficient housing supply relative to the growing demand can result in a situation where prices continue to increase despite the expected decrease in demand based on the law of demand.

Learn more about demand, below:

https://brainly.com/question/30402955

#SPJ11

So, when considering the cost of goods sold ($5,345), the increase in accounts payable ($11,281), and the increase in inventory ($18,838), the cash paid to suppliers was $12,902.

Based on the information provided, we need to determine the cash paid to suppliers, taking into account the cost of goods sold, the increase in accounts payable, and the increase in inventory.

1. Start with the cost of goods sold (COGS), which is $5,345.

2. Add the increase in inventory, which is $18,838. This represents the additional inventory purchased during the period.

3. The sum of COGS and the increase in inventory is $5,345 + $18,838 = $24,183. This represents the total cost of inventory purchased during the period.

4. Subtract the increase in accounts payable, which is $11,281. This represents the amount of inventory purchased on credit and not yet paid for.

5. The cash paid to suppliers is therefore $24,183 - $11,281 = $12,902.

So, the cash paid to suppliers was $12,902.

Learn more about Accounts payable:

https://brainly.com/question/30181930

#SPJ11

In banking and accounting, the balance is the amount of money owed on an account.

The balance is the sum owing on an account in banking and accounting. The term "balance" in bookkeeping refers to the difference between the total of debit entries and the total of credit entries made into an account over the course of a certain financial period. The account shows a debit balance when total debits exceed total credits.

In today's fast-paced world, maintaining a balanced existence is more crucial than ever for your personal health and wellbeing.

Learn more about Balance here:

https://brainly.com/question/27154367

#SPJ1

The "paradox of thrift" applied to the basic frugal economy, where C = cbar + cy and d = ibar, implies that if suddenly cbar decreased, equilibrium consumption would decrease, and equilibrium saving would increase.

In this economy, a decrease in cbar represents a reduction in autonomous consumption. The paradox of thrift suggests that when individuals try to save more by reducing their consumption, it can lead to a decrease in overall consumption in the economy. As a result, businesses experience lower demand for their products and services, which leads to reduced production and employment. This, in turn, negatively impacts income levels, further reducing consumption.

As consumption decreases, the economy's saving increases because people are setting aside more of their income. However, the paradox also implies that this increased saving doesn't necessarily lead to higher investment or economic growth.

In fact, it may contribute to an economic slowdown due to lower consumption, production, and employment. Thus, the paradox of thrift demonstrates the potential negative consequences of increased saving in the economy.

Know more about basic frugal economy click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32071400

#SPJ11

To calculate the company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), we need to use the following formula:

WACC = (E/V x Re) + (D/V x Rd x (1 - T))

where:

E = market value of the company's equity

D = market value of the company's debt

V = E + D

Re = cost of equity

Rd = pretax cost of debt

T = tax rate

First, we need to calculate the market value of the company's equity and debt:

Assuming the total value of the company is $1,000, we can calculate the market value of equity and debt as:

Market value of equity = $1,000 x (1 - 0.40) = $600

Market value of debt = $1,000 x 0.40 = $400

Next, we can plug in the given values into the WACC formula:

WACC = ($600/$1,000 x 0.135) + ($400/$1,000 x 0.055 x (1 - 0.21))

WACC = (0.6 x 0.135) + (0.4 x 0.04355)

WACC = 0.081 + 0.01742

WACC = 0.09842 or 9.84%

Therefore, the company's WACC is approximately 9.84%, which is closest to option A, 9.97%.

Know more about average cost here https://brainly.com/question/20743510#

#SPJ11

The current market price of the bond is approximately $108.18, which corresponds to option (b).

The correct answer is option b.

To calculate the current market price of a 20-year, zero-coupon bond with a yield to maturity of 8.68% and a face value of $1,000, we can use the present value formula. Since the interest rate is compounded semi-annually, we'll need to adjust the yield to maturity and the number of periods accordingly.

First, divide the yield to maturity (8.68%) by 2 to account for semi-annual compounding: 8.68% / 2 = 4.34%. Convert this to a decimal by dividing by 100: 4.34% / 100 = 0.0434

Next, double the number of years to account for semi-annual compounding: 20 years * 2 = 40 periods.

Now, we can use the present value formula:

PV = FV / (1 + r)^n

Where PV is the current market price, FV is the face value ($1,000), r is the semi-annual interest rate (0.0434), and n is the number of periods (40).

PV = $1,000 / (1 + 0.0434)^40
PV ≈ $108.18

Therefore, the correct answer is option b.

For more such questions on, bond :

https://brainly.com/question/24202656

#SPJ11

To calculate the current market price of the 20-year, zero-coupon bond, we need to use the formula: P = F / (1 + y/2)^(2n)

where P is the current market price, F is the face value, y is the yield to maturity, and n is the number of periods (in this case, 2 periods per year for 20 years, or 40 periods).Plugging in the given values, we get:

P = 1000 / (1 + 0.0868/2)^(2*20)

P = $182.80

Therefore, the current market price of the bond is $182.80 (option c).

Learn more about price here

https://brainly.com/question/30434965

#SPJ11

The statement that is not true among the given options is option number 2. The statement suggests that corporations are subject to double taxation, which means that owners of a partnership will pay taxes twice by paying the corporate income tax and individual income tax separately.

However, this is not true as only corporations are subject to double taxation, and sole proprietorships and partnerships are not.

Double taxation refers to the situation where the earnings of a corporation are taxed twice, once at the corporate level and again at the individual level when profits are distributed to shareholders. This happens because a corporation is considered a separate legal entity from its owners or shareholders. Therefore, the corporation is taxed on its profits, and when these profits are distributed to shareholders in the form of dividends, the shareholders must pay taxes on those dividends as well.

On the other hand, sole proprietorships and partnerships are not considered separate legal entities from their owners. As a result, the profits earned by these businesses are not taxed at the business level, but instead, they are taxed on the individual tax returns of the business owners. Therefore, sole proprietorships and partnerships do not face double taxation.

In summary, option number 2 is not true, and only corporations are subject to double taxation. Sole proprietorships and partnerships are not subject to double taxation as their profits are taxed on the individual tax returns of the business owners.

Know more about double taxation here:

https://brainly.com/question/8420446

#SPJ11

The relationship between tax rate and budget balance can be attributed to the fact that higher tax rates typically result in increased revenue for the government.

When tax rates are increased, individuals and businesses are required to pay a higher percentage of their income or profits to the government. This results in increased tax revenue for the government, which can positively impact the budget balance by reducing the deficit or increasing the surplus. However, the effect on the budget balance is not solely determined by the increase in tax rates.

Higher tax rates can also have unintended consequences. They can discourage individuals and businesses from working, investing, or spending, leading to reduced economic activity. This can have a negative impact on overall tax collections and potentially offset the initial increase in revenue from higher tax rates. Additionally, higher tax rates can reduce disposable income for individuals, which can affect consumer spending and further impact economic growth.

Therefore, while an increase in tax rates can initially contribute to a decrease in the budget balance through increased revenue, the overall impact on the budget balance will depend on the interplay of various factors, including the elasticity of taxable income, the overall state of the economy, and individual behavioral responses to higher tax rates.

Learn more about budget balance, below:

https://brainly.com/question/11482998

#SPJ11

It is important to note that the three forms of efficiency do not necessarily imply each other.

The three forms of market efficiency are weak form, semi-strong form, and strong form efficiency. The weak form efficiency suggests that all past market data, such as stock prices, trading volume, etc., is already reflected in the current stock prices. The semi-strong form efficiency means that all publicly available information, such as financial reports, news, and press releases, is already incorporated into stock prices. The strong form efficiency proposes that all public and private information, including insider trading, is already reflected in the stock prices. It is important to note that the three forms of efficiency do not necessarily imply each other. For instance, if the market is weak form efficient, it does not imply that it is semi-strong or strong form efficient. Similarly, if the market is semi-strong form efficient, it does not imply that it is strong form efficient. In a nutshell, market efficiency is crucial for investors to make informed decisions and earn profits. Weak form efficiency implies that technical analysis may not lead to abnormal returns, whereas semi-strong and strong form efficiency suggests that fundamental analysis may not lead to abnormal returns. Investors need to be aware of the type of market efficiency to make informed investment decisions and earn returns that are commensurate with the risks involved.

For more such questions on forms

https://brainly.com/question/29641668

#SPJ11

Weak form, semi-strong form, and strong form efficiency are levels of market efficiency, which indicate how well a market reflects all available information in its prices.

1. Weak form efficiency implies that current prices fully incorporate all historical market data, such as past prices and trading volumes. In this form, technical analysis cannot consistently produce excess returns since the market has already accounted for past trends.

2. Semi-strong form efficiency states that current prices not only reflect past market data but also include all publicly available information, such as financial statements and economic indicators. In this form, neither technical nor fundamental analysis can consistently produce excess returns, as public information is already integrated into market prices.

3. Strong form efficiency suggests that market prices fully incorporate all information, including both public and private (insider) information. In this form, no one can consistently achieve excess returns, as all information is already reflected in market prices.

Regarding the implication of one form over another, a higher level of efficiency (semi-strong or strong) would inherently imply the lower level (weak) efficiency. However, weak form efficiency does not necessarily imply semi-strong or strong form efficiency, as there may still be unexploited public or private information not reflected in market prices.

learn more about efficiency https://brainly.com/question/30280642?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

One or more transportation modes were known for poor service. It is referred to as a pipe.

The option (E) is correct

Pipelines move products of strong, fluid, or vaporous materials over tremendous distances by pipes. This method of transport is generally used to convey unrefined and refined oil-based goods like oil and gaseous petrol

Coming up next are the primary impediments to pipeline transport:

Learn more about transportation mode:

https://brainly.com/question/14310766

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

One or more transportation mode(s) was(were) known for poor service. What is being referred to? (best answer). Multiple Choice

(A) Air

(B) Water

(C) rail

(D) water and rail

(E) pipe

(F) pipe and road

To calculate the effective annual rate of interest ​(APR​) for the loan, we need to first find the interest rate for the 90-day period. The interest paid is $35, and the principal amount is $1,000, so we can use the formula:
Interest rate = (Interest paid / Principal amount) x (360 / Number of days)

Substituting the values, we get:
Interest rate = ($35 / $1,000) x (360 / 90) = 0.14 or 14%
Now, we can use the formula to calculate the effective annual rate of interest:
Effective annual rate = (1 + Interest rate / Number of periods)^Number of periods - 1
Substituting the values, we get:
Effective annual rate = (1 + 0.14 / 4)^4 - 1 = 0.152 or 15.2%
Therefore, the effective annual rate of interest ​(APR​) for the loan is 15.2%. it's important for businesses to calculate the effective annual rate of interest when taking out loans to determine the true cost of borrowing. In this case, the SKC Corporation is borrowing $1,000 for a 90-day period and will repay the principal amount plus $35 interest. By using the formulas above, we calculated the interest rate for the 90-day period to be 14%. However, this doesn't reflect the true cost of borrowing over a year. To account for this, we used the effective annual rate formula to calculate the true interest rate, which is 15.2%. By knowing this rate, the SKC Corporation can make better-informed decisions about their borrowing options and ensure they're getting the best deal possible.

To know more about the effective annual rate of interest ​(APR​) visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31355139

#SPJ11

To determine how to award the money, I would consider several criteria, including performance, teamwork, innovation, and leadership. 2. I would divide up the $35,000 based on individual and team contributions.

I would allocate a portion of the money to individuals who demonstrated exceptional performance, leadership, and innovation.

1. To determine how to award the money, I would consider several criteria, including performance, teamwork, innovation, and leadership. I would also consider any specific goals or objectives that were met or exceeded during the evaluation period. Additionally, I would take into account the level of effort and dedication each individual or team displayed. Finally, I would consider any feedback from supervisors or colleagues who work closely with the team.

2. I would divide up the $35,000 based on individual and team contributions. I would allocate a portion of the money to individuals who demonstrated exceptional performance, leadership, and innovation. I would also allocate a portion of the money to teams who collaborated effectively and achieved specific goals or objectives. This approach recognizes and rewards both individual and team contributions, which can motivate employees to work harder and improve their performance.

3. The potential positive effects of this allocation on behavior and productivity would be improved motivation and morale, as well as increased cooperation and teamwork. The recognition and reward for their hard work and achievements would encourage employees to continue performing at a high level and strive for future success. However, there is also a risk of negative effects if the allocation is perceived as unfair or if it creates conflicts among employees or teams.

4. It would be advisable to bring team members into the decision-making process to ensure transparency and fairness. To do this, I would invite employees to provide feedback on the criteria used for the allocation, as well as the amount and distribution of the money. This would give employees a voice in the process and increase their buy-in to the final decision.

5. I would distribute the money through their paychecks, as this is the most efficient and equitable method. I would distribute the money to individuals who meet the criteria, and I would also allocate a portion to teams who worked collaboratively. This approach ensures that each individual and team receives recognition for their contributions, and it also provides an opportunity for employees to celebrate their achievements as a group.

To know more about leadership visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31906311

#SPJ11

An increase in U.S. imports from Japan means that U.S. consumers are buying more Japanese goods, which in turn requires more yen to be exchanged for dollars to pay for these goods.

This increase in demand for yen in the foreign exchange market will cause the value of the yen to appreciate relative to the dollar.

As a result, the supply of dollars in the foreign exchange market will increase, as U.S. exporters will have to exchange their dollars for yen to sell their goods to Japanese consumers.

This increase in supply of dollars will cause the value of the dollar to depreciate relative to the yen.

Therefore, an increase in U.S. imports from Japan will cause the demand for yen in the foreign exchange market to increase and the supply of dollars in the foreign exchange market to increase.

To know more on exchange market visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22999015

#SPJ11

The statement "In the formula for a minimum transfer price, opportunity cost is the contribution margin of goods sold externally" is true.

The minimum transfer price should be determined by considering the opportunity cost of transferring the goods internally rather than selling them externally. This opportunity cost is represented by the contribution margin of goods sold externally, which is the difference between the selling price and the variable cost per unit. By including the contribution margin in the calculation, the minimum transfer price ensures that the selling division is not worse off when transferring goods internally compared to selling them externally.

A company that transfers goods between multiple divisions needs to establish a transfer price so that each division can track its own efficiency. Companies will use various methods to determine the minimum transfer price, factoring in different costs related to production and what the goods would normally sell for in the retail marketplace.

Learn more about transfer price here: https://brainly.com/question/30046534

#SPJ11

This means that Payne Corporation has 50 cents in debt for every dollar it has in equity. An essential measure of a company's financial leverage and solvency is its debt to equity ratio. An organisation with a higher debt to equity ratio has more debt than equity, which could be riskier for investors. A lower debt to equity ratio, on the other hand, denotes a company's better financial standing and decreased reliance on debt funding.

The debt to equity ratio is a financial ratio that measures the proportion of a company's total liabilities to its equity. It is calculated by dividing total liabilities by total equity. In the case of Payne Corporation, the debt to equity ratio at December 31, 2018 can be calculated as follows:

Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Equity
Debt to Equity Ratio = $20,000 / $40,000
Debt to Equity Ratio = 0.5 or 50%

This means that for every dollar of equity that Payne Corporation has, it also has 50 cents of debt. The debt to equity ratio is an important indicator of a company's financial leverage and solvency. A higher debt to equity ratio indicates that a company has more debt relative to its equity, which may make it riskier for investors. Conversely, a lower debt to equity ratio suggests that a company has a stronger financial position and is less reliant on debt financing.

To know more about equity click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13278063

#SPJ11