Answer: media has a responsibility to portray conflicts accurately
Explanation:
Use the primary document to answer the two questions below.
Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?
Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.
* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).
Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.
Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.
Thank you I would appreciate your help.
Question One: The author expresses bias by portraying immigrants as solely interested in money and not becoming Americans, and as socialists or anarchists seeking to overthrow the government. Question Two: The document reveals concerns about immigrants displacing American workers and provides insights into immigrants coming to earn money and potentially returning to their home countries.
In the piece written in 1908, the author demonstrates bias towards immigrants in several ways. Firstly, the author expresses a desire to limit immigration in order to preserve the American spirit, claiming that immigrants come to the United States solely to earn money and then return to their native countries. The author states, "There are numerous individuals who arrive in America with the intention of making money and subsequently returning to their homeland to live off their earnings. The concept of becoming Americans never crosses their minds. Their sole interest lies in the money they can amass and take back home" (Abbott 481). This viewpoint reveals a biased perspective on immigrants' intentions and implies that they are only driven by personal gain.Furthermore, the author exhibits bias towards the political beliefs of immigrants, asserting that a majority of them are socialists, communists, or anarchists seeking to overthrow the government. The author states, "The majority of immigrants hold socialist, communist, or anarchist ideologies. They believe in forcibly overthrowing the government, and they propagate this doctrine among their fellow countrymen residing in America" (Abbott 481). This biased characterization reflects the prevalent anti-immigrant sentiment pervasive in American society during that era.Regarding the world of work in the early twentieth century, the document provides specific insights. Firstly, the author expresses concern about the impact of immigration on job opportunities for American citizens. The author highlights the displacement of American workers by cheap foreign labor, stating, "The American workman is facing displacement due to the presence of low-cost foreign labor" (Abbott 480).Additionally, the document sheds light on the immigrant experience during this period. It suggests that many immigrants arrived in the United States with the primary goal of earning money before returning to their home countries. This sentiment is supported by the statement, "A considerable number of immigrants come to America solely to accumulate wealth, with the intention of subsequently returning to their native lands and living off the interest" (Abbott 481). These insights are crucial for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States, as they reveal the perceptions and treatment of immigrants by American society during the early 20th century. The document implies that immigrants were often viewed as a threat to the American way of life and job market, fostering an environment of hostility and discrimination.For more questions on American workers:
https://brainly.com/question/30413508
#SPJ8
What did the West African Kingdom of Hausa do for protection
What were the challenges faced by the president – and congress – in trying to put the nation back together in 1865? Were they successful in meeting those challenges? If you could "help them out," what would you have done differently?
The 1865 challenges included reconstructing the South, addressing former slaves' status, and healing war wounds. Success varied, lacking full reunification and equal rights. Stronger civil rights enforcement, targeted investments, and reconciliation could have been alternative approaches.
In 1865, the president and Congress faced significant challenges in their efforts to reunify the nation after the Civil War. These challenges included reconstructing the Southern states, addressing the status of former slaves, and healing the deep wounds of the war.
While progress was made, the success in meeting these challenges varied. Reconstruction efforts faced resistance from Southern states and the implementation of policies such as the Freedmen's Bureau and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 encountered opposition. Despite the passage of the Reconstruction Amendments, the restoration of full rights and opportunities for African Americans was hampered by discriminatory practices and the rise of Jim Crow laws. Additionally, the process of reunification and reconciliation between the North and South was slow and complex.If given the opportunity to "help them out," one potential approach could have been a more comprehensive and inclusive plan for Reconstruction that prioritized the protection of civil rights and economic opportunities for freed slaves. This could have involved stronger enforcement mechanisms to combat discrimination, targeted investments in education and economic development in the South, and efforts to foster understanding and reconciliation between former adversaries.By addressing the underlying social and economic disparities and promoting a more inclusive vision of equality, the nation may have been better positioned to heal the wounds of the war and achieve a more lasting reunification.
For more questions on 1865 challenges
https://brainly.com/question/30818502
#SPJ8
what did the Domino theory lead to ?
Lady on boat in war and with other men . Who is the artist who created this work ? Eugene Delacroix, John singleton Copley , Jacques Louis , Francisco Goya ???
The artist who created the work featuring a lady on a boat in war and with other men is Eugene Delacroix.
The artist who created the work depicting a lady on a boat in war and with other men is Eugene Delacroix. Delacroix was a prominent French Romantic painter known for his powerful and expressive style. One of his notable works, "Liberty Leading the People," portrays a female figure as a symbol of liberty leading a diverse group of men during the July Revolution of 1830 in France. This painting captures the spirit of revolution and the fight for freedom. Delacroix's use of vibrant colors, dynamic composition, and emotional intensity made him a significant figure in the Romantic movement and established him as one of the leading artists of his time.In conclusion, The artist who created the work featuring a lady on a boat in war and with other men is Eugene Delacroix.
For more questions on Eugene Delacroix:
https://brainly.com/question/18214188
#SPJ8
3 paragraph journal about U.S foreign policy during the long 19th century
Answer:
Explanation:
During the long 19th century, U.S foreign policy was characterized by territorial expansion and a desire for economic growth. The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, declared that any attempt by European powers to colonize or interfere with states in the Americas would be viewed as a hostile act. This policy was aimed at protecting the newly independent Latin American states from European influence and solidifying U.S dominance in the region.
The U.S also pursued territorial expansion through military conquest and diplomacy. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) resulted in the annexation of Texas and the cession of territory that would become California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma. The U.S also acquired Alaska from Russia in 1867 and Hawaii was annexed in 1898. These acquisitions were driven by a desire for resources, markets, and strategic military positioning.
In addition to territorial expansion, the U.S also pursued economic growth through trade agreements and intervention in Latin America. The Open Door Policy, established in 1899, called for equal trading rights for all nations in China and helped to secure U.S access to Chinese markets. The U.S also intervened militarily in several Latin American countries to protect American business interests and promote political stability. This policy became known as the Big Stick Policy and was exemplified by President Theodore Roosevelt's intervention in Panama to secure control of the Panama Canal Zone.
Overall, U.S foreign policy during the long 19th century was characterized by a desire for territorial expansion, economic growth, and political dominance in the Western Hemisphere.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names Used:
1. History.com
2. Office of the Historian - US Department of State
3. Encyclopedia Britannica
3. How does this context influence your thinking on Japanese- Internment during WWII?
Answer:
In February 1942, just two months later, President Roosevelt, as commander-in-chief, issued Executive Order 9066 that resulted in the internment of Japanese Americans.
Explanation:
What event served as the advent of modern, international terrorism?
Answer:
Explanation:
The advent of modern, international terrorism is commonly traced back to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. These attacks, orchestrated by the extremist group Al-Qaeda, involved the hijacking of commercial airplanes and crashing them into the World Trade Center towers in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. The magnitude of the attacks, the use of civilian aircraft as weapons, and the high number of casualties shocked the world, leading to a significant shift in global security measures and the subsequent "War on Terror" launched by the United States. This event marked a turning point in modern history, shaping the way terrorism is perceived and countered on an international scale.
Hope it helps! :)
The Walking Purchase in 1737 demonstrated:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Walking Purchase in 1737 demonstrated the unfair and forceful acquisition of Native American land by European settlers in colonial Pennsylvania.
The Walking Purchase in 1737 demonstrated the unfair treatment of Native Americans by European settlers and the displacement of indigenous peoples from their land.
Explanation:The Walking Purchase in 1737 was a land agreement between the Penn family and the Lenape Native American tribe. It demonstrated the unfair treatment of Native Americans by European settlers and the displacement of indigenous peoples from their land.
The agreement involved the Penn family claiming a large amount of land in Pennsylvania, beyond what was initially agreed upon, based on a fraudulent walking test. This event highlights the historical context of European colonization and its impact on Native American tribes.
Learn more about Walking Purchase here:https://brainly.com/question/34488233
#SPJ2
Directions: Place a T for true or F for false after each letter.
a. ___ The Articles of Confederation created a President to lead the country.
b. ___ States were still independent under the Articles.
c. ___ The Articles were easy to change.
d. ___ Under the Articles of Confederation, the more people a state had, the more votes it got in Congress.
e. ___ The Congress created by the Articles did not have the power to collect taxes.
f. ___ Under the Articles, states had to obey the laws Congress passed.
g. ___ The Articles of Confederation created the first American government.
h. ___ When planning for the Constitution, everybody agreed the central government should have more power.
i. ___ Some people were afraid states might lose their independence if the government was stronger.
j. ___ Different states had different needs for government to meet.
k. ___ The states all got along with each other.
l. ___ The government created by the Articles of Confederation had everything under control among the states.
3. Compare Native Americans with the Chinese American experience of
citizenship over time. What differences and similarities appear? (Draw on the two
speeches in the Voices of Freedom section for Chapter 16, beginning on p. 636)
Native Americans gained US citizenship in 1924, while Chinese Americans faced discrimination and exclusion but eventually gained the right to naturalize.
Native Americans and Chinese Americans have distinct experiences of citizenship over time. Native Americans, facing colonization and forced assimilation, were not granted US citizenship until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. Chinese Americans, arriving as laborers, were initially denied citizenship due to discriminatory policies like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. They gained the right to naturalize through the Magnuson Act of 1943. Both groups have struggled with cultural preservation and assimilation pressures. Native Americans faced policies discouraging indigenous practices, while Chinese Americans have strived to maintain their cultural heritage while integrating into American society. These experiences highlight the historical discrimination and challenges faced by both groups, albeit in different contexts and with unique trajectories of gaining citizenship rights.In conclusion, while Native Americans gained US citizenship in 1924 and Chinese Americans faced discrimination and exclusion, both groups have navigated unique challenges in their pursuit of citizenship rights and have made significant strides in asserting their place within American society.
For more questions on Native Americans:
https://brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ8
Describe the major accomplishments of the emperors Constantine I, Theodosius I, and Heraclius I. Then evaluate which ones contributed the most to the empire, whether in the areas of culture, economy, the military, politics, and so on.
Constantine I:
Constantine I, also known as Constantine the Great, was a Roman Emperor who ruled from 306 to 337 CE. He is best known for his significant accomplishments:
a. Conversion to Christianity: Constantine played a crucial role in the legalization and promotion of Christianity in the Roman Empire. He issued the Edict of Milan in 313, granting religious tolerance to Christians, and later embraced Christianity himself, which had a profound impact on the empire's culture and religion.
b. Founding of Constantinople: Constantine established a new imperial capital named Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) in 330 CE. This city became a major center of political, economic, and cultural power, serving as the capital of the Byzantine Empire for over a thousand years.
c. Political and Military Reforms: Constantine implemented various political and military reforms to strengthen the empire. He reorganized the administrative structure, introduced new legal codes, and improved the military by establishing the elite comitatenses and limitanei forces, enhancing the empire's defense capabilities.
Evaluation: Constantine I made substantial contributions to the empire in the areas of culture, religion, politics, and military. His conversion to Christianity transformed the religious landscape of the empire and laid the foundation for Byzantine Christianity. The founding of Constantinople as a new capital strategically positioned the empire and facilitated trade and cultural exchange. His military reforms helped stabilize the frontiers and bolstered the empire's defense. Overall, Constantine's impact on the empire was significant and far-reaching.
Theodosius I:
Theodosius I, known as Theodosius the Great, ruled as Roman Emperor from 379 to 395 CE. His major accomplishments include:
a. Edict of Thessalonica: In 380 CE, Theodosius issued the Edict of Thessalonica, making Nicene Christianity the state religion and effectively banning other religious practices. This solidified Christianity's position and established it as the official faith of the Roman Empire.
b. Theodosian Code: Theodosius commissioned the compilation and codification of Roman laws, resulting in the Theodosian Code. This comprehensive legal system served as the foundation for Byzantine law and had a lasting impact on legal practices.
c. Defeat of Barbarian Threats: Theodosius successfully managed to defeat various barbarian groups, including the Visigoths and the usurper Magnus Maximus. He stabilized the empire's borders and maintained peace within the territories under his control.
Evaluation: Theodosius I made significant contributions in the areas of religion, law, and military. His establishment of Nicene Christianity as the state religion solidified the influence of Christianity in the empire. The codification of laws in the Theodosian Code provided a comprehensive legal framework that shaped the empire's legal system for centuries. Additionally, his military victories helped maintain stability and security within the empire. Theodosius' impact on the empire's cultural and economic aspects, however, was less pronounced compared to his contributions in other areas.
Heraclius I:
Heraclius I was a Byzantine Emperor who ruled from 610 to 641 CE. His major accomplishments include:
a. Byzantine-Sasanian Wars: Heraclius successfully waged a series of wars against the Sasanian Persian Empire, reclaiming lost territories and restoring Byzantine influence in the Eastern Mediterranean. These military campaigns secured the empire's eastern borders.
b. Adoption of Greek as the Official Language: Heraclius replaced Latin with Greek as the official language of the Byzantine Empire, reflecting the linguistic and cultural shift that had taken place within the empire.
c. Administrative and Military Reforms: Heraclius introduced administrative and military reforms to strengthen the empire. He reorganized the military structure, improved logistics, and adapted to the fluid warfare tactics employed by Arab forces.
Evaluation: Heraclius I made significant contributions to the empire in the military and cultural spheres. His successful campaigns against the Sasanian Empire halted their advance and restored Byzantine territories. The adoption of Greek as the official language aligned with the empire's cultural reality and promoted linguistic unity. However, his impact on the economy and politics of the empire was less remarkable compared to his military and cultural achievements.
In terms of overall contribution to the empire, Constantine I stands out as the most influential. His conversion to Christianity, the founding of Constantinople, and political and military reforms had profound and enduring effects on the empire's culture, religion, and defense. Theodosius I made significant contributions in religious and legal domains, while Heraclius I's accomplishments were more focused on military successes and cultural adaptations.
How did carnegie become a big business tycoon?
Andrew Carnegie, an industrialist and philanthropist, became a prominent business tycoon through his involvement in the steel industry. Here's an overview of how Carnegie built his empire:
1. Early Career: Carnegie was born on November 25, 1835, in Scotland. His family immigrated to the United States when he was a child, and they settled in Pennsylvania. At the age of 13, Carnegie began working as a bobbin boy in a cotton factory. He later worked as a telegraph messenger and began investing in the stock market, gaining an understanding of business and finance.2. Railroad Industry: In the 1850s, Carnegie entered the railroad industry. He worked for the Pennsylvania Railroad, where he learned about transportation, logistics, and management. This experience gave him valuable insights into the steel industry's needs for railroad tracks and bridges.3. Keystone Bridge Company: In 1865, Carnegie co-founded the Keystone Bridge Company, which specialized in constructing iron bridges. The company's success led him to expand into the steel industry, as steel was stronger and more durable than iron.4. Vertical Integration: Carnegie recognized the potential of vertical integration, which involved controlling every stage of the steel production process, from mining the raw materials to distributing the finished products. He acquired iron and coal mines, coke ovens, and steel mills, creating an integrated production system.5. Carnegie Steel Company: In 1873, Carnegie formed the Carnegie Steel Company, which became one of the largest and most efficient steel producers in the world. He employed advanced production techniques, such as the Bessemer process, which enabled the mass production of steel at lower costs.6. Cost Reduction and Expansion: Carnegie focused on reducing costs by improving efficiency, increasing production, and implementing cost-saving innovations. He invested heavily in modern technologies and equipment to streamline operations. As the demand for steel grew, Carnegie expanded his business by acquiring rival companies and building new steel mills.7. Monopoly and Consolidation: Carnegie's ambition and aggressive business tactics led to the consolidation of the steel industry. He sought to eliminate competitors and gain control over the market. In 1901, Carnegie sold his company to J.P. Morgan's newly formed United States Steel Corporation, creating the world's first billion-dollar corporation.8. Philanthropy: After selling his steel company, Carnegie devoted himself to philanthropy. He believed in the concept of "the Gospel of Wealth," where the wealthy should use their fortunes to benefit society. Carnegie donated a significant portion of his wealth to various causes, including education, libraries, and peace initiatives.Andrew Carnegie's success as a business tycoon can be attributed to his keen business acumen, strategic vision, emphasis on efficiency, and aggressive expansion strategies. Through his contributions to the steel industry, he played a significant role in shaping America's industrial landscape during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
[tex]\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}[/tex]
On March 30, 1942, 257 Nikkei residents of Bainbridge Island, Washington, walked onto a cross-sound ferry under military guard, then boarded a train in Seattle bound for the Manzanar Reception Center in California’s Owens Valley, 200 miles east of Los Angeles. This transport began the forced exile of 92,000 Japanese Americans and their immigrant elders directly from their homes in Washington, Oregon, California, and Arizona into temporary barbed-wire facilities known as “assembly centers.” There they remained for approximately 100 days until their transfer to permanent “relocation centers” located in remote regions of the American West and Arkansas.
The Army’s task of evicting and housing 92,000 men, women, and children was daunting. In early March 1942, planners from the Wartime Civil Control Administration (WCCA), headquartered in San Francisco, appropriated 15 operational public facilities at fairground, racetrack, and livestock pavilion sites, each providing sufficient acreage and infrastructure necessary to assemble the centers quickly. Located near city limits with significant Nikkei populations, 12 new sites were developed in California and one each in Arizona, Oregon, and Washington. Built for temporary occupancy, the centers offered few amenities and meager social services. Inmates would eat in mess halls and sleep in noisy barracks while enjoying little privacy throughout their captivity.
1. Summarize the information above in 2-3 sentences.
On March 30, 1942, 257 Nikkei residents of Bainbridge Island, Washington, were forcibly removed from their homes and transported to the Manzanar Reception Center in California. This marked the beginning of the forced exile of 92,000 Japanese Americans and their immigrant elders from the West Coast into temporary "assembly centers."
These centers, located in various sites including fairgrounds and racetracks, provided basic facilities but limited amenities and services. After approximately 100 days, the Japanese Americans were transferred to permanent "relocation centers" in remote regions of the American West and Arkansas, where they lived in barracks and shared facilities under strict surveillance.
The process of evacuation and internment was carried out by the Wartime Civil Control Administration, which appropriated public facilities and developed new sites for the assembly centers. The centers were established near cities with significant Nikkei populations to facilitate the evacuation process. The conditions in these temporary facilities were challenging, with crowded barracks and minimal privacy for the inmates. The centers provided basic necessities such as mess halls for communal meals but lacked adequate social services.
The forced relocation and internment of Japanese Americans during World War II remains a dark chapter in American history, reflecting the widespread discrimination and violation of civil rights endured by this community at that time.
for more questions on assembly
https://brainly.com/question/1285060
#SPJ8
Use the primary document to answer the two questions below.
Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?
Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.
* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).
Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.
Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.
Thank you I would appreciate your help.
1. We can see here that the author of this piece, written in 1908, expresses bias toward immigrants in the following ways:
Negative portrayal of immigrantsImplication of dependencyGeneralization and stereotyping: The author generalizes the experiences of all immigrants, painting them with a broad brush.What is a primary document?A primary document, also known as a primary source, is an original or firsthand account of an event, period, or topic in history.
2. From this document, several aspects of the world of work in the early twentieth century can be learned:
Limited opportunities for immigrantsSeasonal and distant employment: The document indicates that much of the available work for immigrants was seasonal and located far from urban centers like Chicago. Exploitation and dependency: The author mentions that immigrants were at the mercy of contractors and employment agencies, which suggests that they were vulnerable to exploitation and had limited bargaining power.Learn more about primary document on https://brainly.com/question/896456
#SPJ1