What does extraneous solution mean?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A: $0.1(x) + 25(y) = x + 25

B: $0.05(x) + $40(y) = x + 40

Because they didn't give a certain amount of miles traveled, we have to go with we do know.

**this is probably wrong.

Answer:

9x^2=-25

X^2=-25/9

X^2=-2. 77

X= root - 2.77

A. yes

B. Yes

C. No

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

y= -(1/5)x +1

Step-by-step explanation:

Find slope:

(2+1)/(-5-10) = -1/5

Plug a point and slope into equation (I used -5,2):

y-2=-1/5(x+5)

Change it to slope-intercept form:

y-2=-1/5(x+5)

y-2=-1/5x-1

y=-1/5x+1

Answer: 65.88 km/h

Step-by-step explanation:

When multiplying conversion factors, make sure the only remaining units are the desired units.

Answer:

the cost of gas i think

Step-by-step explanation:

i dont really know

Answer:

I think it is, B( The length of the route

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x is 18

Step-by-step explanation:

x is 18 because 18 x 2 = 36

Answer:

-6 and 6 are values of x on number line

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test :)

Answer:

-2x-24

Step-by-step explanation:

-5x+3x-24 = - 2x-24

Answer:

-2x-24 hope dis helped

Answer: x+5/21532020

Step-by-step explanation:

This question simply implies that if we need to know the chances of getting the  chance value it would be 21532030 times smaller for the x+5.

Answer:

Everything with a dilation so B and E

Step-by-step explanation:

The second and last one, because dilations are only transformation that makes figures SIMILAR!

Answer:

Can i be brainlest i neeed it

Answer:

x= -12 x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in 5

5^2-5(4)+7=12

===========================================

Work Shown:

A.

f(x) = 3x-8

f(5) = 3*5-8 ... replace every x with 5; simplify with PEMDAS

f(5) = 15-8

f(5) = 7

We can cross choice A off the list since we got 7 as an output, instead of 12.

---------------

B.

f(x) = x^2-4x+7

f(5) = (5)^2-4(5)+7

f(5) = 25-4(5)+7

f(5) = 25-20+7

f(5) = 5+7

f(5) = 12

We got the output we wanted. So we can stop here.

---------------

If you're curious about the others, then,

C.

f(x) = -x+14

f(5) = -5+14

f(5) = 9

That doesn't work, so we cross choice C off the list.

---------------

D.

f(x) = |x-7|

f(5) = |5-7|

f(5) = |-2|

f(5) = 2

Choice D is crossed out as well.

So only choice B works.

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The new height requirements are minimum of 64.1875 inches and maximum of 68.3 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

To exclude the tallest 50% of men and shortest 5% of men, we need to find the critical z-value for a significance level of 0.5 & 0.05 and then solve for x in the z-score equation.

For significance value of 0.5, z = 0

We are given;

μ = 68.3 in

σ = 2.5 in

Thus from z = (x - μ)/σ, we have;

0 =(x - 68. 3)/2.5

0 = x - 68. 3

x = 68.3 inches for men max

Similarly, for significance value of 0.05, z = -1.645

Thus to find x;

-1.645 = (x - 68. 3)/2.5

-4.1125 = x - 68.3

x = 68.3 - 4.1125

x = 64.1875 inches for men min

Step-by-step explanation:

165 bc all you had to do was 825 divided by 500.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-1/3

Answer:

C) The resulting figure will be congruent to the original rectangle, because dilations with a scale factor of 1 have the same coordinates.

Step-by-step explanation: Multiplying any number by 1 will result in the same number, this applies to coordinates as well.  

Answer:

the angles change

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

-1/2 + 3/4 - 3/8 = -1/8

Can I have Brainliest please?

Answer:

[tex]\frac{-1}{8}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

So first find the greatest common factor of the denominators

GCF of 2 , 4 and 8 is 8

Then :

[tex]\frac{-4 + 6 - 3}{8}[/tex]

So you do this to get the above answer:

8 divided by the denominator times the numerator.

You still need to work it out

-4 + 6 = 2

[tex]\frac{2- 3}{8}[/tex]

2 - 3 is -1

Thus the answer is [tex]\frac{-1}{8}[/tex]

HOPE THIS HELPED

Answer:

[tex](x_2,y_2) = (2x_m - x_1 ,2y_m - y_1 )[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\left(\frac{x_1+\:x_2}{2},\:\:\frac{y_{1\:}+y_2}{2}\right)\:=\:\left(x_m,\:y_m\right)[/tex]

Required

Determine x2, y2

Start by splitting the expression

[tex]x_m = \left(\frac{x_1+\:x_2}{2})[/tex] and [tex]y_m = (\frac{y_{1\:}+y_2}{2})[/tex]

Solving for x2 in [tex]x_m = \left(\frac{x_1+\:x_2}{2})[/tex]

Multiply through by 2

[tex]2 * x_m = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{2} * 2[/tex]

[tex]2x_m = x_1 + x_2[/tex]

Make x2 the subject;

[tex]x_2 = 2x_m - x_1[/tex]

Similarly:

[tex]y_m = (\frac{y_{1\:}+y_2}{2})[/tex]

Multiply through by 2

[tex]2 * y_m = \frac{y_1 + y_2}{2} * 2[/tex]

[tex]2y_m = y_1 + y_2[/tex]

Make y2 the subject;

[tex]y_2 = 2y_m - y_1[/tex]

Hence:

[tex](x_2,y_2) = (2x_m - x_1 ,2y_m - y_1 )[/tex]

Answer:

7/25

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is simple. It's a simplified fraction of 28%, or 28/100.

Answer:

both

Step-by-step explanation:

both plus power = neither

Answer:

a + b = 5 ...........1

6a + 4b = 24.50 ......... 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let a be the amount of pounds of apricot bought

Let b be the amount of pounds of banana bought

If he buys a total pounds of 5 pounds then;

a + b = 5 ...........1

Also if a pound's of apricots for $6 per pound, total amount of aprciots bought will be $6a

Also if b pound's of banana is for $4 per pound, total amount of banana bought will be $4b

If he spends a total of $24.50 on both banana and apricots, then:

6a + 4b = 24.50 ......... 2

The system of equations that represents the constraints in the situation is:

a + b = 5 ...........1

6a + 4b = 24.50 ......... 2

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I believe the answer is B.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you think about it, none of the other answers really make sense. This is the only one that I can see that actually makes sense. If I am wrong, I am very sorry.

Answer:

It's proved below

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

- K is the midpoint of JL

- M is the midpoint of LN

By definition of mid points, we can say that;

JK = KL and LM = MN

Now, we are given that JK = MN.

Thus, by substitution, we can deduce that; KL = LM

Thus is because JK can be replaced with KL and MN can be replaced with LM.

Thus, it is proved that KL = LM