in texas, voters get to select the individuals who serve on the court of criminal appeals. true or false
is it illegal to flash your headlights to warn of police in texas
what type of committee tries to create a compromise bill?
A compromise bill is being worked on by the Conference committee. Each housework's representative keeps their own bill on file. If a compromise is reached, the Conference Committee drafts a written conference report and submits it to each chamber.
After the House and Senate have enacted differing versions of a measure, conference committees take action. Conference committees are used to create compromise legislation that can be approved by both houses. A bill cannot be delivered to the president unless it has been approved by both houses of Congress.
A measure is returned to both chambers for approval after being worked on by the conference committee. The bill cannot be amended at this time. The bill is sent to the President for approval if it is approved by both houses.
To learn more about conference committee, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28741720
#SPJ4
Issues prosecutor face if the police can’t find the crime victim imagine that the police are prosecutor are very sure a crime has occurred and victim has been disposed of but they can’t find the victim what problem does that cause with regards to the burden of proof
The biggest problem that a prosecutor would face if the police cannot find the crime victim is the burden of proof.
What is prosecutor?A prosecutor is a legal representative of the prosecution in a criminal case, who is responsible for presenting the case against an individual accused of a crime in a court of law. The prosecutor's primary duty is to review evidence gathered by the police and other law enforcement agencies, and decide whether to file criminal charges against an individual.
Without the victim to testify or provide any physical evidence, the prosecutor would have to rely on circumstantial evidence to prove their case. This can be very difficult to do, as circumstantial evidence is often times not enough to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the lack of a victim could potentially lead to challenges from the defense, who might argue that the crime never occurred. Thus, the prosecutor would have to prove the crime occurred without being able to produce a victim.
To learn more about prosecutor
https://brainly.com/question/29649000
#SPJ1
why did the constitutional convention agree to the three-fifths compromise
The Three-Fifths Compromise appeared to ensure that the South would have a disproportionate influence over presidential elections and would be well-represented in the House of Representatives.
During the 1787 Constitutional Convention state delegates came to an agreement known as the "Three-Fifths Compromise." In order to estimate a state's overall population for purposes of representation and taxation, it was decided that three of every five slaves were counted.
3 of the slave population would be tallied for representation purposes, giving southern states greater representatives in the House while the remaining two-fifths of the slave population would remain exempt from paying taxes, as agreed by delegates to a Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.
By increasing the number of Southern electors compared to what would have happened had the slave population been not counted, the Three-Fifths Compromise increased the influence of the South in presidential elections.
Learn more about Three-Fifths Compromise here:
https://brainly.com/question/9175454
#SPJ4
how much can you steal in california without going to jail?
Answer: not alot?
Explanation:
a nation can become a state when it has which of these?
Answer:
Funds
Explanation:
A nation can become a state when it have Funds to provide the needs of his people, also build social amenities such as schools, hospitals and etcetera to improve the development of the country.
Which responsibilities were assigned to the central government under the Articles of Confederation?
Central government under the Articles of Confederation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first system of government established in the United States fully ratified in March 1781. Owing to problems with finance, economics, and foreign policy threats, politicians considered first revising the Articles in 1787. Eventually, at the First Constitutional Convention in 1787, a new system of government was established under the Constitution, which was ratified in March 1789.
The responsibilities in the likes of requesting money from the states, the regulation of armed forces and military, and the appointment of civil servants alongside the declaration of war were assigned to the central government under the Articles of Confederation.
The central government gained the highest scope of power under its jurisdiction after the articles of confederation were being brought into an enforcement. This gave substantial powers as well as responsibilities were granted to them as a part of their formation. They have already been mentioned above.
Learn more about central government here:
https://brainly.com/question/19528787
#SPJ4
Which constitutional amendment freed the slaves ?
Answer: 13th amendment to the US Constitution
Explanation:
Can States propose amendments?
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and its Amendments are the changes made to the original document.
This document outlines the structure of the government and provides the basic rights and freedoms of citizens. As a result, any changes to the document must be made carefully and with a great deal of consideration. One of the main ways to alter the Constitution is through the amendment process. This process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution, and it states that amendments can be proposed by Congress or by a national convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.
The most common way for amendments to be proposed is through Congress. Congress can propose an amendment either through a joint resolution approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or through a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states. For an amendment to be added to the Constitution, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states. The ratification process can be done through the state legislatures, state conventions, or both.
Learn more about United States Constitution at : https://brainly.com/question/25995963
#SPJ4
Write five ‘would-you-rather’ questions about life and law in early America. Please help me come up with some ideas!!
Would you rather live in a small colonial town where everyone knows each other's business, or in a bustling 18th century city where anonymity is possible?
The four Questions are seen below
What are the ‘would-you-rather’ questions?Generally, Would you rather be a wealthy plantation owner with slaves, or a poor white farmer with few opportunities for upward mobility?
Would you rather be a member of a religious minority in early America, facing persecution and discrimination, or a member of the dominant religious group?
Would you rather be a colonial woman with limited legal rights, or a Native American facing forced displacement and cultural genocide?
Would you rather be a member of a colonial militia fighting in the American Revolution, or a loyalist forced to flee to Canada after the war?
Read more about colonial town
https://brainly.com/question/13459134
#SPJ1
a form of government that is often totalitarian and authoritarian
it is illegal to coast downhill with the transmission or gears in neutral.
according to john c. calhoun, what could a state do to nullify a federal law?
Can the Supreme Court declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional?
The Constitution is the foundation of the US government, and it is composed of seven articles and 27 amendments.
The Constitution outlines the powers of the three branches of government, and it also protects certain rights for citizens. Amendments are changes or additions to the Constitution that have undergone a special process of ratification, and they become part of the original document.
The Supreme Court is one of the three branches of government, and its primary role is to interpret the Constitution and determine if a law is constitutional or not. The Supreme Court can review laws passed by Congress, executive orders, and policies of the states, and it can declare these laws unconstitutional if they are found to be in violation of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court cannot, however, declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional. This is because the Constitution is a supreme law that cannot be overruled by another law. The Supreme Court cannot change the Constitution, and only the legislative branch can propose amendments and ratify them.
Learn more about Supreme Court at : https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
when were women across the u.s. granted the right to vote?
the family and small business taxpayer protection act
The Internal Revenue Service's projected expansion under the Price Reduction Act of 2022 would be repealed by the planned United States law known as the Family and Small Company Taxpayer Protection Act.
It was the first piece of legislation to be presented to the 118th Congress. Republicans are preventing the Biden government from deploying 87,000 additional IRS agents to target individuals, families, and small companies, as well as their unheard-of rise in IRS audits.
The "Family and Local Business Taxpayer Protection" Act increases the services that Americans expect from their government while canceling all new IRS funding that burdens middle-class families and small businesses. Instead of focusing on them, the IRS must be committed to offering taxpayers high-quality services.
With the nonpartisan Taxpayer First Act, which was signed into law in 2019, House Republicans successfully oversaw significant IRS reforms. Democrats abandoned those measures in favor of massively subsidizing the IRS with an additional $80 billion on top of its $12 billion annual budget.
Learn more about taxpayer protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/8278976
#SPJ4
what did the war cost in terms of the number of civilian deaths
The War cost in terms of the number of civilian deaths Around 11 million more. There are millions of people killed in world wars. Even after those wars the fights between States didn't stop and led to huge losses of human resources.
In World War 2 the deaths are between 3.5 crores to 60 crores. Each country lost thousands of its civilians and most of the loss is for their families who have nothing in the future.
In the USA there were 2.9 lakh people died during the war. Even after the missiles and a nuclear attack at Hiroshima and Nagasaki people still suffer from diseases after so many decades of war.
The war happened between the axis and allied countries. The World war had affected the common people to an extent that decreased the economic conditions, and no benefit is provided to the citizens.
To know more about the war
brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ4
now that rep. conyers has introduced the bill, what step happens next?
Reparation Conyers's bill's replacement would establish a commission to research the history of slavery or racial prejudice in the US since 1619 and come up with suggestions for reparations for African Americans.
Since then, reparations have continued to be suggested and/or delivered in a number of ways. The first incidence of slavery-related reparations in the United States was a pension given to former slave Belinda Royall in 1783. The Special Field Orders of 1865 No
It's crucial to keep in mind that monetary recompense is but one sort of material repair among many others. The restoration of human and civil rights, physical rehabilitation, and granting access to the property, housing, healthcare, or education are some of the other sorts.
Making amends for just wrong is the act of making reparations. USING UNITED NATIONS INFORMATION: The goal of adequate, efficient, and quick compensation is to advance justice by correcting egregious transgressions of global human rights legislation.
Learn more about Conyers bill here:
https://brainly.com/question/13962179
#SPJ4
The process of swearing a person into office in known as?
Answer: Inauguration
Explanation: In government and politics, inauguration is the process of swearing a person into office and thus making that person the incumbent. Such an inauguration commonly occurs through a formal ceremony or special event, which may also include an inaugural address by the new official.
confederate government advantages and disadvantages
Explanation:
Advantage
1) Decentralization of power
2)Co operation
Disadvantage
1) Financial powers
2)sustenance
US consumers have paid ___ prices for goods at many stores such as Wal-Mart due to globalization.
Because of globalization, many companies, including Walmart, have reduced their prices for US customers. Manufacturing costs are generally decreasing as a result of globalization. This implies that businesses can set lower prices for their products.
The average cost of commodities is an important factor that improves quality of life. Furthermore, because of globalization consumers have greater access to a broader range of goods. Giving people access to a more varied and balanced diet has the potential to improve their health in some cases, but it has also been linked to diabetes and an increase in junk food consumption.
As a result of globalization, businesses can take advantage of lower labor costs in developing countries while also employing the expertise and knowledge of more developed economies.
To learn more about globalization, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
Under favorable circumstances including reaction time a motor vehicle with good brakes going 50 miles per hour can be stopped within
Under favorable circumstances, including a driver's reaction time, a motor vehicle with good brakes going 50 miles per hour can be stopped within 229 feet.
This distance takes into account several factors, including the vehicle's speed, the condition of the brakes, and the driver's reaction time.The speed of a vehicle is a significant factor in determining the stopping distance. The faster a vehicle is going, the more energy it has, and the more energy it takes to bring it to a stop.
At 50 miles per hour, a vehicle is traveling at 73.34 feet per second. This means that it will cover a significant distance before it comes to a complete stop.
The condition of the brakes is another important factor in determining the stopping distance. Good brakes are essential for a vehicle to stop quickly and safely. If the brakes are worn or damaged, the stopping distance will be longer. In the case of the question, the brakes are considered to be in good condition which means it will require less distance to stop.
The driver's reaction time also plays a role in determining the stopping distance. The driver's reaction time is the time it takes for the driver to recognize a potential hazard and to react to it by applying the brakes. The quicker the driver can react, the shorter the stopping distance will be.
In conclusion, the stopping distance of a motor vehicle is determined by several factors, including the speed of the vehicle, the condition of the brakes, and the driver's reaction time. Under favorable circumstances, including a driver's reaction time, a motor vehicle with good brakes going 50 miles per hour can be stopped within 229 feet.
Learn more about motor vehicle at : https://brainly.com/question/13163444
#SPJ4
Imagine you are a sergeant in a mid-sized police agency. You have been assigned to the IA unit as a supervisor. The Chief has given you the task of conducting an audit of racial profiling complaints by your fellow officers and reporting back to her with the results. What areas of the department would you look at first and why? How will you conduct this audit of complaints? What would you do to establish the validity of the complaints? What will your recommendations if you find there is indeed racial profiling? What if the audit shows there is no racial profiling going on? What will be some of the pitfalls you might come upon, and how will you address them? Present your findings in a paper.
Conduct briefings, taskings, and debriefings that are intelligence-driven. the planning, oversight, and maintenance of law enforcement activities. Monitor the reaction to serious situations. control inquiries and investigators.
What are the roles and responsibilities of a police sergeant?The Police Sergeant is responsible for monitoring the actions of the police officers who are under his or her supervision. In accordance with the Sergeant's instructions, they are in charge of supervising, planning, organizing, training, and directing the operations of the assigned law enforcement people and apparatus.
In the US and the UK, a police officer directly underneath a lieutenant is referred to as a sergeant, while a police officer immediately beneath an inspector is referred to as a sergeant. The rank of sergeant is equivalent to squad commander in the majority of militaries (or section).
Learn more about police sergeants, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8303097
#SPJ1
Which of these disputes can the Supreme Court take Mcq?
Between citizens of the country.
Between citizens and the government.
Between two or more state governments.
All of these
which law was passed to stop the power of the monopolies?
Answer:
The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in 1890 in the United States to stop the power of monopolies. It is the first federal statute to limit monopolies, and it is still in effect today. The law prohibits "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade," as well as attempts to monopolize any part of trade or commerce.
Stevens, a citizen of the state of Oklahoma, was involved in an automobile accident with Jackson, a citizen of the state of Alabama. Stevens is injured and wishes to sue. What is the jurisdiction and why?
The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.
a plaintiff brought an action in a state court against a defendant, a city police chief in the state, alleging civil rights violations under 42 u.s.c. section 1983. the defendant moves to dismiss the state suit on the ground that the action must be brought in federal court because a federal question is involved. should the court grant the defendant's motion to dismiss? responsespress enter or space to submit the answer
Whether the court should grant the defendant's motion to dismiss the state suit and require the action to be brought in federal court depends on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. Code is a federal law that allows individuals to bring civil rights claims against state and local officials who have violated their constitutional rights.
In order to bring a claim under section 1983, the plaintiff must allege that the defendant, acting under color of state law, deprived them of a right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
If the plaintiff's claim arises under section 1983 and the defendant is a state or local official, the defendant may argue that the action should be brought in federal court because it involves a federal question. However, the court must also consider whether the state court has jurisdiction over the claim and whether the plaintiff's choice of forum should be respected.
To learn more about federal court
https://brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ4
What is the meaning of enumerated rights?
Which principle of government is this a system that allows each branch of government to limit the powers of the other branches in order to prevent abuse of power?
Answer:
It is checks and balances