How did carnegie become a big business tycoon?
Andrew Carnegie, an industrialist and philanthropist, became a prominent business tycoon through his involvement in the steel industry. Here's an overview of how Carnegie built his empire:
1. Early Career: Carnegie was born on November 25, 1835, in Scotland. His family immigrated to the United States when he was a child, and they settled in Pennsylvania. At the age of 13, Carnegie began working as a bobbin boy in a cotton factory. He later worked as a telegraph messenger and began investing in the stock market, gaining an understanding of business and finance.2. Railroad Industry: In the 1850s, Carnegie entered the railroad industry. He worked for the Pennsylvania Railroad, where he learned about transportation, logistics, and management. This experience gave him valuable insights into the steel industry's needs for railroad tracks and bridges.3. Keystone Bridge Company: In 1865, Carnegie co-founded the Keystone Bridge Company, which specialized in constructing iron bridges. The company's success led him to expand into the steel industry, as steel was stronger and more durable than iron.4. Vertical Integration: Carnegie recognized the potential of vertical integration, which involved controlling every stage of the steel production process, from mining the raw materials to distributing the finished products. He acquired iron and coal mines, coke ovens, and steel mills, creating an integrated production system.5. Carnegie Steel Company: In 1873, Carnegie formed the Carnegie Steel Company, which became one of the largest and most efficient steel producers in the world. He employed advanced production techniques, such as the Bessemer process, which enabled the mass production of steel at lower costs.6. Cost Reduction and Expansion: Carnegie focused on reducing costs by improving efficiency, increasing production, and implementing cost-saving innovations. He invested heavily in modern technologies and equipment to streamline operations. As the demand for steel grew, Carnegie expanded his business by acquiring rival companies and building new steel mills.7. Monopoly and Consolidation: Carnegie's ambition and aggressive business tactics led to the consolidation of the steel industry. He sought to eliminate competitors and gain control over the market. In 1901, Carnegie sold his company to J.P. Morgan's newly formed United States Steel Corporation, creating the world's first billion-dollar corporation.8. Philanthropy: After selling his steel company, Carnegie devoted himself to philanthropy. He believed in the concept of "the Gospel of Wealth," where the wealthy should use their fortunes to benefit society. Carnegie donated a significant portion of his wealth to various causes, including education, libraries, and peace initiatives.Andrew Carnegie's success as a business tycoon can be attributed to his keen business acumen, strategic vision, emphasis on efficiency, and aggressive expansion strategies. Through his contributions to the steel industry, he played a significant role in shaping America's industrial landscape during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
[tex]\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}[/tex]
Use the primary document to answer the two questions below.
Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?
Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.
* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).
Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.
Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.
Thank you I would appreciate your help.
Question One: The author expresses bias by portraying immigrants as solely interested in money and not becoming Americans, and as socialists or anarchists seeking to overthrow the government. Question Two: The document reveals concerns about immigrants displacing American workers and provides insights into immigrants coming to earn money and potentially returning to their home countries.
In the piece written in 1908, the author demonstrates bias towards immigrants in several ways. Firstly, the author expresses a desire to limit immigration in order to preserve the American spirit, claiming that immigrants come to the United States solely to earn money and then return to their native countries. The author states, "There are numerous individuals who arrive in America with the intention of making money and subsequently returning to their homeland to live off their earnings. The concept of becoming Americans never crosses their minds. Their sole interest lies in the money they can amass and take back home" (Abbott 481). This viewpoint reveals a biased perspective on immigrants' intentions and implies that they are only driven by personal gain.Furthermore, the author exhibits bias towards the political beliefs of immigrants, asserting that a majority of them are socialists, communists, or anarchists seeking to overthrow the government. The author states, "The majority of immigrants hold socialist, communist, or anarchist ideologies. They believe in forcibly overthrowing the government, and they propagate this doctrine among their fellow countrymen residing in America" (Abbott 481). This biased characterization reflects the prevalent anti-immigrant sentiment pervasive in American society during that era.Regarding the world of work in the early twentieth century, the document provides specific insights. Firstly, the author expresses concern about the impact of immigration on job opportunities for American citizens. The author highlights the displacement of American workers by cheap foreign labor, stating, "The American workman is facing displacement due to the presence of low-cost foreign labor" (Abbott 480).Additionally, the document sheds light on the immigrant experience during this period. It suggests that many immigrants arrived in the United States with the primary goal of earning money before returning to their home countries. This sentiment is supported by the statement, "A considerable number of immigrants come to America solely to accumulate wealth, with the intention of subsequently returning to their native lands and living off the interest" (Abbott 481). These insights are crucial for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States, as they reveal the perceptions and treatment of immigrants by American society during the early 20th century. The document implies that immigrants were often viewed as a threat to the American way of life and job market, fostering an environment of hostility and discrimination.For more questions on American workers:
https://brainly.com/question/30413508
#SPJ8
Directions: Place a T for true or F for false after each letter.
a. ___ The Articles of Confederation created a President to lead the country.
b. ___ States were still independent under the Articles.
c. ___ The Articles were easy to change.
d. ___ Under the Articles of Confederation, the more people a state had, the more votes it got in Congress.
e. ___ The Congress created by the Articles did not have the power to collect taxes.
f. ___ Under the Articles, states had to obey the laws Congress passed.
g. ___ The Articles of Confederation created the first American government.
h. ___ When planning for the Constitution, everybody agreed the central government should have more power.
i. ___ Some people were afraid states might lose their independence if the government was stronger.
j. ___ Different states had different needs for government to meet.
k. ___ The states all got along with each other.
l. ___ The government created by the Articles of Confederation had everything under control among the states.
Use the primary document to answer the two questions below.
Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?
Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.
* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).
Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.
Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.
Thank you I would appreciate your help.
1. We can see here that the author of this piece, written in 1908, expresses bias toward immigrants in the following ways:
Negative portrayal of immigrantsImplication of dependencyGeneralization and stereotyping: The author generalizes the experiences of all immigrants, painting them with a broad brush.What is a primary document?A primary document, also known as a primary source, is an original or firsthand account of an event, period, or topic in history.
2. From this document, several aspects of the world of work in the early twentieth century can be learned:
Limited opportunities for immigrantsSeasonal and distant employment: The document indicates that much of the available work for immigrants was seasonal and located far from urban centers like Chicago. Exploitation and dependency: The author mentions that immigrants were at the mercy of contractors and employment agencies, which suggests that they were vulnerable to exploitation and had limited bargaining power.Learn more about primary document on https://brainly.com/question/896456
#SPJ1
What did the West African Kingdom of Hausa do for protection