What contributed to the migration of Jews to Palestine in the early 1900s? lack of available land in Europe due to overpopulation increased anti-Semitism in Germany and throughout Europe more positive relations between Arabs and Jews increased civilian casualties during WWI
Please help and CORRECT ANSWERS PLS

Question

savanah.bashirian · Accepted Answer

Answer:increased anti-Semitism in Germany and throughout EuropeExplanation:I guess this is right if it is wrong I apoligize

bcartwright · Answer

Answer:stated that the Entente Powers are determined that the Arab race shall be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world So far as Palestine is concerned, we are determined that no people shall be subject to another. 3. Six months after General Allenbys forces had occupied Jerusalem, another declaration, referring to areas formerly under Ottoman dominion, occupied by the Allied Forces during the present war, announced the wish and desire of His Majestys Government that the future government of these regions should be based upon the principle of the consent of the governed, and this policy has and will continue to have support of His Majestys Government. 4. A joint Anglo-French declaration (7 November 1918) was more exhaustive and specific, affecting both British and French spheres of interest (the term Syria still being considered to include Lebanon and Palestine): The object aimed at by France and Great Britain in prosecuting in the East the War let loose by the ambition of Germany is the complete and definite emancipation of the [Arab] peoples and the establishment of national governments and administrations deriving their authority from the initiative and free choice of the indigenous populations. In order to carry out these intentions, France and Great Britain are at one in encouraging and assisting the establishment of the indigenous governments and administrations in Syria and Mesopotamia now liberated by the Allies, and in the territories the liberation of which they are engaged in securing, and recognizing these as soon as they are actually established.5. The Committee on the Husain-McMahon correspondence. While these British assurances of independence to the Arabs were in unequivocal terms, the British position, since the end of the war, had been that Palestine had been excluded, an assertion contested by Palestinian and Arab leaders. During the Husain-McMahon correspondence, the British made a determined effort to exclude certain areas from the territories to achieve independence, on the grounds that the interests of our ally, France, are involved. Sherif Husain reluctantly agreed to suspend, but not surrender, Arab claims for independence to that area, stating that the eminent minister should be sure that, at the first opportunity after this war is finished, we shall ask you (from what we avert our eyes today) for what we now leave to France in Beirut and its coasts. The area in question had been described by McMahon as portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo. This would appear to correspond to the coastal areas of present-day Syria and the northern part of Lebanon (map at annex II), where French interests converge. Prima facie it does not appear to cover Palestine, a known, identifiable land with an ancient history, sacred to the three great monotheistic religions, and which, under the Ottomans, approximated to the independent sanjak of Jerusalem and the sanjaks of Acre and Balqa (map at annex III).In 1939, shortly after the Husain-McMahon papers were made public, a committee consisting of both British and Arab representatives was set up to consider this specific issue. Both sides reiterated their respective interpretations of the Husain-McMahon letters and were unable to reach an agreed view, but the British delegation conceded that the ArabExplanation:

Answers

Related Questions

Answers

Answers

Answers

Answers