The Feminist IR Theory is grounded on three main assumptions, which are the power-related, gender-related, and knowledge-related assumptions. These assumptions enable feminist scholars to analyze IR issues from a gender perspective and advocate for a more inclusive and diverse approach to global politics.
The Feminist Security Approach seeks to expand the concept of security to include non-military threats and prioritize the inclusion of women in decision-making processes.
The Feminist IR Theory is grounded on three central premises. These are the power-related, gender-related, and knowledge-related assumptions. These assumptions are crucial in understanding the feminist approach to International Relations. Let's examine these assumptions in detail.
Power-related assumptions: Feminist IR Theory assumes that power relations are the primary determinant of social relations, international relations, and global politics. Feminist scholars reject the realist theory of international relations, which asserts that anarchy and the pursuit of power by states shape the global political arena.
Gender-related assumptions: Feminist IR Theory also emphasizes the importance of gender in social relations and politics. It recognizes that women have traditionally been excluded from decision-making processes, which has negatively impacted their position in society. Feminist scholars believe that gender must be incorporated into the study of IR to understand the complexities of global politics
.Knowledge-related assumptions: Feminist IR Theory questions the objectivity of knowledge and the social norms that influence the way knowledge is produced. Feminist scholars believe that the traditional IR discourse and concepts are biased towards male-centric perspectives. They advocate for a more diverse and inclusive perspective in IR discourse that includes women's experiences and gender relations.
Evaluation of Feminist Security Approach The Feminist Security Approach emerged in the 1990s, and it represents a significant shift from the traditional security paradigm, which prioritizes state security and military power. The Feminist Security Approach seeks to broaden the concept of security to include non-military threats such as economic insecurity, political exclusion, gender-based violence, and environmental degradation.
It advocates for the inclusion of women in decision-making processes and the recognition of their experiences as important factors in security issues.
To learn more about Feminist click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547935#
#SPJ11
Steve threw his book on the floor yesterday when he was asked by the teacher to read in front of the class. He was then removed from the classroom and sent to the office. Today, when the teacher announced it was time for oral reading, Steve pushed his desk over on to its side. This is an example of a. Negative reinforcement b. Punishment c. None of the above d. Positive reinforcement
Based on the options provided, the most appropriate answer would be: b. Punishment.
Punishment refers to the application of an aversive stimulus to decrease the occurrence of a behavior. In the given situation, Steve's behavior of pushing his desk over after being asked to read in front of the class can be seen as an act of defiance or frustration. As a consequence, he was removed from the classroom and sent to the office, which serves as a form of punishment.
The purpose of this punishment is to discourage Steve from repeating the disruptive behavior in the future. By experiencing the negative consequences of his actions, Steve is more likely to associate his behavior with the unpleasant outcome, which may serve as a deterrent for similar actions in the future.
Negative reinforcement: Negative reinforcement involves the removal of an unpleasant stimulus to increase the likelihood of a behavior being repeated.
To know more about Negative reinforcement:
https://brainly.com/question/29663095
#SPJ4
If you witness an abusive situation that is dangereus or life-threatening, what whosdd yes do?
If you witness an abusive situation that is dangerous or life-threatening, you should call emergency services immediately. It is important to prioritize the safety of the individuals involved in the situation.
Emergency services are public services that offer immediate assistance to individuals who are in urgent need of help due to an accident, natural disaster, crime, or medical emergency. Emergency services include police, fire departments, and other first responder organizations. Emergency services are available 24/7 and can be contacted through emergency phone numbers like 911.
These services dispatch trained professionals to the location of the emergency to provide assistance and support to those in need. If you witness a dangerous or life-threatening abusive situation, calling emergency services can help ensure the safety and wellbeing of the individuals involved.
Learn more about life-threatening
https://brainly.com/question/29512108
#SPJ11
unable to verify that miguel has abused rosa, the midwife decided that it was a priority that rose know how to
We can see here that the information that is most important for Rosa at this time is: B. The telephone numbers of crisis hot line, battered women's shelter, legal protection agency, and the police
Who is a midwife?A midwife is a healthcare professional who provides care, support, and assistance to women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Midwives are trained and qualified professionals who specialize in providing holistic and personalized care to women and their babies.
Midwives play a crucial role in supporting women throughout the entire childbirth process, including prenatal care, labor and delivery, and postpartum care. They provide comprehensive health assessments, monitor the progress of pregnancy, offer education and counseling, and assist with the physical and emotional well-being of both the mother and baby.
Learn more about midwife on https://brainly.com/question/30070076
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Unable to verify that Miguel has abused Rosa, the midwife decided that it was a priority that Rosa know how to get help if she needed it. Which of the following information is most important for Rosa at this time?
A. The names of several psychiatric clinical nurse specialists who provide in depth insight-oriented psychotherapy
B. The telephone numbers of crisis hot line, battered women's shelter, legal protection agency, and the police
C. A brochure about infant and toddler growth and development
D. A brochure about the effects of drug use on a developing fetus
A firm currently has a debt-equity ratio of 1/5. The debt, which is virtually riskless, pays an interest rate of 6 %. The expected rate of return on the equity is 15 %. What is the Weighted-Average Cost of Capital if the firm pays no taxes? Enter your answer as a percentage rounded to two decimal places. Do not include the percentage sign in your answer.
The Weighted-Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of a firm is the overall expected cost of capital for all of the company's investments.
The WACC formula is:WACC = (E/V x Re) + [(D/V x Rd) x (1-Tc)]where:Re = cost of equity, Rd = cost of debt, E = market value of the company's equity, D = market value of the company's debt, V = E + D, and Tc = corporate tax rate. As per the question, the firm pays no taxes, so the formula reduces to:WACC = (E/V x Re) + (D/V x Rd)Now, let us calculate the values:E/V = 1/6 = 0.1667 (since debt-equity ratio is 1/5, equity-debt ratio will be 5/1 or 1/5, so E/V will be 1/6)D/V = 5/6 (1 - E/V) = 4/6 = 0.6667 (1 - E/V is 5/6 since E/V is 1/6)Re = 15%Rd = 6%.
Now, substituting the values in the WACC formula:WACC = (0.1667 x 15%) + (0.6667 x 6%) = 0.025005 or 2.50% (rounded to two decimal places)Therefore, the WACC of the firm if it pays no taxes is virtually riskless.
Learn more about a firm here:https://brainly.com/question/28039495
#SPJ11
Describe how critically analyzing your topic has positively
informed your personal experience
Topic: police brutality
Police brutality is a complex and multifaceted issue that affects the entire community. It is a problem that requires a comprehensive approach that involves various stakeholders.
As a result of critically analyzing this topic, I have become more informed about the underlying causes of police brutality and its impact on society. I have also gained a better understanding of the importance of accountability, transparency, and community involvement in addressing this problem.
In particular, critically analyzing the topic of police brutality has helped me to recognize the importance of community involvement in policing. Through my research, I have learned about various strategies that communities can use to reduce police brutality, such as community policing, civilian oversight, and independent investigations.
I have also learned about the importance of building trust between the police and the community, and the role that communication and transparency can play in this process.
Furthermore, I have become more aware of the negative impact of police brutality on communities of color, and the need for systemic change to address this issue. I have learned about the ways in which police brutality contributes to a culture of fear and mistrust, and how this can lead to further violence and social unrest. Through my analysis, I have come to recognize that police brutality is not just a legal or law enforcement issue, but a social and political issue that requires a broader approach to address.
Overall, the critical analysis of the topic of police brutality has helped me to become more informed, engaged, and aware of the issues facing our communities. It has given me a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between law enforcement and the public, and the importance of community involvement in addressing these issues.
Through my analysis, I have become more committed to working towards systemic change and promoting greater accountability, transparency, and communication between the police and the community.
To learn more about Police brutality, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28638213
#SPJ11
What other reasons for divorce are applicable under the
Alexander Severus Law? Answer Alexander made significant contributions to defending the legal rights of his men. He verified that whereas citizens had stringent limitations on who may become an heir or receive a bequest
The Alexander Severus Law, which was in place during the Roman Empire, specified several grounds for divorce, including adultery, infertility, and mutual agreement.
The Alexander Severus Law was a set of legal rules that governed marriage and divorce in ancient Rome during the reign of Alexander Severus. It was established in the year 230 AD. In ancient Rome, divorce was a legally recognized event, and there were a variety of reasons for it.
The Alexander Severus Law, on the other hand, stated that divorce could only be granted for specific reasons, such as adultery, infertility, and mutual consent of both partners. It limited the amount of discretion that either partner had when it came to ending the union.
The other reasons for divorce that are applicable under the Alexander Severus Law are as follows:Impotence: If one of the partners was found to be impotent, the other could seek a divorce.Incompatibility: If the couple found that they were incompatible with each other, they could apply for a divorce.
However, this needed to be mutual as the law only recognized mutual consent.Cruelty: If one partner was found to be cruel to the other, they could seek a divorce. For example, if the husband was abusive to his wife, she could apply for a divorce.Forced Marriage: If the marriage was forced by one of the partners or their family, the other partner could apply for a divorce.
The Alexander Severus Law, therefore, introduced stricter laws that made divorce a more controlled and regulated process in ancient Rome.
To know more about Alexander Severus,visit:-
brainly.com/question/1178483
#SPJ11
Prompt: Choose one of the major social movement. Briefly describe the movement and how it has (or is) changed society. Are the changes positive or negative? What would YOU like to change in the world? Requirements: 1 FULL page, double spaced. Grading Expectations: 10 Points Up to 7 Points: Content and depth of reflection Up to 3 Points: Grammar and style
The social movement I have chosen is the feminist movement. Feminism is a social, cultural, and political movement that strives for the equality of all genders. The movement began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and has continued to evolve to this day. Its primary objective is to advocate for women's rights, including reproductive rights, economic equality, the right to vote, and equal opportunities for education and employment.
The feminist movement has undoubtedly transformed society. The most significant change brought about by the feminist movement is the advancement of women's rights. Women can now work in male-dominated fields, own property, and participate in politics. Women's voices are now heard, and their opinions are valued. Moreover, the feminist movement has led to the emergence of many female leaders. In the past, women had very few role models to follow. But today, women are increasingly becoming leaders in different spheres of life.
The feminist movement has undoubtedly made positive changes in society. However, it is still far from achieving its goals. There are still many challenges that women face today, including sex-ual harassment, violence against women, and unequal pay in the workplace. Therefore, more work needs to be done to eradicate gender inequality.
In my opinion, the world needs to eradicate all forms of gender inequality. Women should not be held back from reaching their full potential because of their gender. I believe that women should have access to education, healthcare, and equal pay. The world needs more female leaders, and we should strive to create a world that is fair and just for all. Finally, I believe that everyone should have the right to choose what they want to do with their bodies, regardless of their gender.
Learn more about feminist movement: https://brainly.com/question/29546655
#SPJ11
Drawing from the Tomslake case study, explain why it might be a problem for the state to have a monopoly of violence/have the sole legitimate use of force. Define this feature of the state (monopoly of violence) and examine one example of the use of force/violence by the state that makes its actions illegitimate.
The police's use of force in this case is illegitimate because it violates the basic human rights of citizens, as well as the democratic principles of peaceful protest and freedom of speech. This use of force by the state, rather than preserving order and security, has resulted in widespread civil unrest and increased social tensions.
The Toms lake case study, the monopoly of violence, and an example of the illegitimate use of violence by the state are all linked and will be discussed below:
Drawing from the Toms lake case study, it might be problematic for the state to have a monopoly of violence, which means that the state is the only entity with the legitimate use of force. It might be a problem in the Toms lake case study since the power of the state has been used to violate the fundamental rights of the citizens.
The state's monopoly on violence is one of the most critical features of the modern state. The state's authority to govern and impose laws and regulations is based on the idea that it has the exclusive right to use violence and that it will use it to preserve order and security. This is one of the ways that the state maintains law and order in society.
Examining one example of the illegitimate use of violence by the state, consider the recent protests and uprisings in the United States in response to police brutality and systemic racism. Many police departments have been documented to use excessive force, and in some cases, lethal force against unarmed and peaceful protestors.
The police's use of force in this case is illegitimate because it violates the basic human rights of citizens, as well as the democratic principles of peaceful protest and freedom of speech. This use of force by the state, rather than preserving order and security, has resulted in widespread civil unrest and increased social tensions.
to know more about fundamental rights visit :
https://brainly.com/question/6573104
#SPJ11
Define and compare the authoritarian system and the totalitarian system of government. Provide examples of each. Can there be a direct or representative democracy in an authoritarian or totalitarian government? Explain why or why not. No film/video reference is required.
The authoritarian system and the totalitarian system of government are two types of government systems that vary in their structure, their policies, and their principles.
The authoritarian system of government is characterized by a single ruler or a small group of individuals who make decisions and enforce policies without any kind of support from the people, while the totalitarian system of government is characterized by a government that has complete control over all aspects of life in the society.
Below is a comparison between the two government systems:
The authoritarian system of government: In an authoritarian system, the ruling class is made up of a single person or a small group of individuals who control all aspects of the government and the society. In this system, the government has complete control over the media, the economy, and the people.
The main feature of the authoritarian system is that the ruling class has no obligation to consider the views and opinions of the people when making decisions. Examples of countries that have an authoritarian system of government include North Korea, Cuba, and China.
The totalitarian system of government: The totalitarian system of government is characterized by a government that has complete control over all aspects of life in the society. This means that the government controls the media, the economy, the social life, and the political life of the people. The totalitarian system is a more extreme form of the authoritarian system and is often associated with dictatorships and oppressive regimes.
Examples of countries that have a totalitarian system of government include Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge.Regarding the last part of your question, it is not possible to have a direct or representative democracy in an authoritarian or totalitarian government.
This is because both systems of government are characterized by a lack of freedom, a lack of democracy, and a lack of participation from the people. In an authoritarian or totalitarian government, the people do not have the freedom to express their views, to participate in the decision-making process, or to elect their leaders. Therefore, a direct or representative democracy is not possible in these kinds of government systems.
To learn more about authoritarian system, here:
https://brainly.com/question/25755352
#SPJ11
Which one of the following statements is true?
a "Freedom for" means the absence of restraints.
b Reward can have significant influence on people’s freedom of choice.
c Universal causal determinism claims that people are responsible for their own moral choices since they have free will.
d J. S. Mill believes that freedom and determinism are incompatible.
The correct option is b which states that reward can have a significant influence on people's freedom of choice.
Among the given options, the statement that is true is b) Reward can have a significant influence on people’s freedom of choice. The reward is an incentive given to individuals to encourage them to behave in a certain manner. Rewards and punishment are important motivators that influence individual behavior. Rewards have a positive effect on the person receiving the reward, making them more likely to repeat the behavior that resulted in the reward. Reward is a positive reinforcement that encourages an individual's behavior, it can increase the freedom of choice.
It is a type of motivator that leads people to take actions that they may not have taken otherwise. When a person is rewarded for an action, they are more likely to choose that action again in the future. Therefore, it can be concluded that Rewards can have a significant influence on people’s freedom of choice.
To know more about the Freedom visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32285039
#SPJ11
______ and state governors can issue executive orders requiring officials in the executive branch to perform their functions in a particular manner.
The president and state governors can issue executive orders requiring officials in the executive branch to perform their functions in a particular manner.
What is an executive orderAn executive order is a directive or command issued by the President of a country or by the chief executive of a state or local government, that manages operations of the executive branch or directs how laws should be enforced. The Constitution, statutes, or current laws empower the president with inherent rights that are the source of executive orders' authority.
Executive orders are considered legally binding and have the force of law, but they are subject to review by the judiciary. If an executive order exceeds the President's constitutional authority or conflicts with existing laws, it may be challenged and potentially overturned by the courts.
Learn more about executive branch of government here
https://brainly.com/question/838027
#SPJ4
How are the articulations of spoken language and signed
languages similar? In linguistics, Give 2 examples
The articulations of spoken language and signed languages are similar in the sense that they both make use of some common basic principles of phonetics and phonology.
In linguistics, the following are two examples of the similarities between the articulations of spoken language and signed languages:
1. Location and movement In spoken language, articulation depends on the movement of the vocal cords, as well as the position and movement of the tongue, lips, and other parts of the mouth. In signed languages, articulation is dependent on the location and motion of the hands, as well as the facial expressions, head movements, and body posture of the signer.
2. Hand shapes In signed languages, there is a wide range of handshapes that are used for articulation. This is similar to the way that in spoken language, there are different sounds that are produced by different movements and positions of the mouth and vocal cords.
Learn more about spoken language Here.
https://brainly.com/question/30588492
#SPJ11
Alison is seeing a psychologist for anxiety. After several sessions, there has been no known cause for Alison's anxiety. This is diagnosed with
Alison is seeing a psychologist for anxiety. After seve
It is important for Alison to continue working with her psychologist to manage her anxiety symptoms effectively and improve her overall well-being.
What is the possible diagnosis for Alison's anxiety if no known cause has been identified after several sessions with a psychologist?If Alison is seeing a psychologist for anxiety and no known cause has been identified after several sessions, she may be diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
GAD is a mental health condition characterized by excessive and uncontrollable worry and anxiety about various aspects of life, often without a specific trigger.
The diagnosis of GAD is based on the presence of excessive anxiety and worry for at least six months, accompanied by symptoms such as restlessness, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, irritability, muscle tension, and sleep disturbances.
In Alison's case, the psychologist may explore various factors, such as her upbringing, personality traits, and life experiences, to better understand the underlying causes of her anxiety and develop an appropriate treatment plan.
Learn more about symptoms effectively
brainly.com/question/18562748
#SPJ11
When Amir was a teenager, his mother nagged him repeatedly to clean his room. He learned that if he cleaned his room on Saturday mornings, she would not start nagging at all. What does this example illustrate? Select one: a. negative punishment b. positive reinforcement
c. avoidance learning d. escape learning.
The raccoons used by the Brelands learned to deposit single coins into a slot for food, but they could not learn to deposit two coins into the slot. Which statement is supported by this result Select one: a. Some betuviours are easily learned by animals, but only through clauk
b. It is nearly impossible to operantly condition raccoons
c. it is nearly impossible to classically condition raccoons d. Instinctive patterns of behaviour can interfere with conditioning conditioning
When Amir was a teenager, his mother nagged him repeatedly to clean his room. He learned that if he cleaned his room on Saturday mornings, she would not start nagging at all. Illustrates the concept of avoidance learning.
Avoidance learning refers to the process by which an individual learns a behavior to avoid an unpleasant or negative outcome, such as punishment or negative reinforcement.On the other hand, positive reinforcement refers to the process by which an individual learns a behavior due to the positive outcome or result obtained by performing that behavior.
Negative punishment refers to the removal of a positive stimulus as a result of an undesired behavior, while escape learning refers to the process of learning a behavior to remove oneself from an unpleasant or negative situation.
The statement supported by the result that raccoons used by the Brelands learned to deposit single coins into a slot for food but they could not learn to deposit two coins into the slot is that instinctive patterns of behavior can interfere with conditioning conditioning.
Therefore, option C. it is nearly impossible to classically condition raccoons is incorrect, and option D. Instinctive patterns of behavior can interfere with conditioning conditioning is the correct option.
To know more about avoidance learning visit:-
brainly.com/question/32422588
#SPJ11
What is the problem with an extraneous variable? Select one: A. It can cloud the situation and make it difficult to draw conclusions about how the independent variable: affects the dependent variable. B. It depends on random sampling. C. It cannot be measured. D. It cannot be controlled for. What conditions differ between the experimental and control groups? Select one: A. both the dependent and independent variables B. only the independent variable C. only the dependent variable D. nothing conditions are perfectly controlled between the two groups
The correct option is A. It can cloud the situation and make it difficult to draw conclusions about how the independent variable affects the dependent variable.
The problem with an extraneous variable is that it can cloud the situation and make it difficult to draw conclusions about how the independent variable affects the dependent variable.
An extraneous variable is a variable that has an impact on the dependent variable that is not related to the independent variable.
It confounds the findings of an experiment since it is an uncontrolled variable that may change the outcome of the experiment. As a result, extraneous variables must be controlled or removed as much as possible.The conditions that differ between the experimental and control groups are only the independent variable.
The independent variable is the variable that the experimenter controls and manipulates, while the dependent variable is the variable that is being measured. By comparing the results of the experimental and control groups, the independent variable's impact on the dependent variable is determined.
The correct option is B. only the independent variable.
To know more about dependent variable visit:-
brainly.com/question/1479694
#SPJ11
What did the Milgram electric shock experiment supposedly show?
What factors might have made people suspect that it was not a "real
experiment"? What did you think?
The Milgram electric shock experiment supposedly showed that ordinary people are capable of inflicting pain on others if instructed by an authority figure.
Some of the factors that made people suspect that it was not a "real experiment" include the following: The experiment was conducted in an artificial setting, so it lacked ecological validity. The participants were not randomly selected, but rather volunteered, which means they may not be representative of the general population.
The experimenters knew what the participants were doing and could influence their behavior. The participants were not informed of the true nature of the experiment, which means they did not give informed consent. I am an AI language model and therefore cannot have personal opinions or thoughts.
However, the Milgram experiment was controversial and sparked debate about its ethical implications. The experiment demonstrated that individuals may blindly follow orders given to them by authority figures, even when those orders go against their own moral code.
To know more about Milgram electric shock refer here : brainly.com/question/29102164
#SPJ11
Symbolize the following statement in our language of propositional logic. Use capital letters to represent affirmative English sentences. Provide a translation key: i.e., state which letter stands for which English sentence. Write whole sentences in the key. Do not abbreviate. Mehmet goes to the game only if Sicun does, but Kemal doesn't go to the game if Mehmet does. You can either copy the symbols below or use similar looking ches you find on your keyboard, as you prefer: va For the toolbar, press ALT+F10 (PC) or ALT+FN+F10 (Mac). MacBook Air Question 28 Symbolize the following statement in our language of propositional logic. Use capital letters to represent affirmative English sentences, Provide a translation key; i.e., state which letter stands for which English sentence. Write whole sentences in the key. Do not abbreviate. Johnny or Robert is a good dancer, but not both. You can either copy the symbols below or use similar looking ones you find on your keyboard, as you prefer: = כ V • ~
The first statement is symbolized as M → SK → ~M, indicating the conditions for Mehmet, Sicun, and Kemal attending the game. The second statement is symbolized as (J ∨ R) ∧ ~(J ∧ R), representing the situation where either Johnny or Robert is a good dancer, but not both.
To symbolize the given statement "Mehmet goes to the game only if Sicun does, but Kemal doesn't go to the game if Mehmet does" in our language of propositional logic, we can use the following symbols:
M: Mehmet goes to the game
S: Sicun goes to the game
K: Kemal goes to the game
Now, the given statement can be symbolized as follows:
M → SK → ~M
Giving the translation key as follows:
M: Mehmet goes to the game
S: Sicun goes to the game
K: Kemal goes to the game
Thus, the symbolization of the given statement is complete. Now, let's move to the second part of the question.
In order to symbolize the given statement "Johnny or Robert is a good dancer, but not both" in our language of propositional logic, we can use the following symbols:
J: Johnny is a good dancer
R: Robert is a good dancer
Now, the given statement can be symbolized as follows:
(J ∨ R) ∧ ~(J ∧ R)
Giving the translation key as follows:
J: Johnny is a good dancer
R: Robert is a good dancer
Thus, the symbolization of the given statement is complete.
To know more about symbolization, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/27072130#
#SPJ11
Dear Students, your first assignment is to watch at least 5 TED talks that are done on effective business communication. After watching the videos, you have to write an assignment in which you are required to provide the summary of all the TED talks along with the title of the TED talk and the name of the speaker. You are also required to mention what you learned from these
videos. Some of the suggested TED talks are as followed. You can choose other TED talks too as long as they fall under the given topic. How to speak so that people want to listen
The secret structure of great talks
10 ways to have a better conversation
After watching a series of TED talks on effective business communication, I have learned valuable insights and techniques for improving my communication skills, including how to captivate an audience, structure compelling talks, and engage in meaningful conversations.
Effective communication is a vital skill in the business world, and the TED talks I watched provided valuable lessons on how to communicate with impact. The first TED talk I watched was "How to speak so that people want to listen" by Julian Treasure. In this talk, Treasure emphasized the importance of using powerful and persuasive language, employing vocal variety, and being mindful of our words to engage and connect with others effectively.
The second TED talk, "The secret structure of great talks" by Nancy Duarte, shed light on the importance of storytelling and creating a compelling narrative in presentations. Duarte emphasized the significance of structuring talks with a clear beginning, middle, and end, and using visuals to enhance the audience's understanding and retention of the message.
The third TED talk, "10 ways to have a better conversation" by Celeste Headlee, provided practical tips for engaging in meaningful and authentic conversations. Headlee highlighted the importance of listening actively, avoiding multitasking, and being fully present in conversations to establish genuine connections with others.
Learn more about business communication
brainly.com/question/30796756
#SPJ11
How
deductive and inductive reasoning can lead to different kinds of
research?
Deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning lead to different kinds of research because deductive reasoning starts with a general theory or idea and then looks at specific examples to confirm or reject the theory.
Whereas inductive reasoning starts with specific examples and tries to develop a general theory from them. Deductive reasoning is used in quantitative research, which involves testing a hypothesis and using statistical analysis to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or rejected. For instance, if a researcher hypothesizes that all swans are white, he or she would look at specific examples of swans to test this theory, such as by taking a random sample of swans and observing their color. This method provides a way to confirm or reject the hypothesis based on the data collected.
On the other hand, inductive reasoning is used in qualitative research, which involves collecting and analyzing data through observation, interviews, or other methods to develop a theory or understanding of a phenomenon. For example, a researcher might observe how students interact in a classroom and use this information to develop a theory about how social dynamics affect learning. This method provides a way to explore and develop new ideas or theories based on the data collected.
To learn more about Reasoning visit here:
brainly.com/question/30612406
#SPJ11
In lecture we watched a video in which we had to count how many times the double-dutch players in green landed a jump. Most people didn't notice that the background color was constantly changing, nor that a man dressed as a chicken walked through. This illustrated the phenomenon known as , in which we often fail to see what we are not expecting. [two words]
In lecture, we watched a video in which we had to count how many times the phenomenon green landed a jump. Most people didn't notice that the background color was constantly changing, nor that a man dressed as a chicken walked through.
This illustrated the phenomenon known as inattentional blindness, in which we often fail to see what we are not expecting Inattentional blindness is a phenomenon where we tend to miss important visual information when we are occupied with a different task that requires attention.
The majority of people fail to see what they are not anticipating. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in a range of scenarios, from the failure of radiologists to identify cancerous cells on x-rays to drivers failing to see pedestrians while looking for a parking space.The video we saw in the lecture that involved counting how many times demonstrated inattentional blindness. The video purposely had several unexpected events happening, including the background color constantly changing, and a man dressed as a chicken walked through, while most viewers were focused on counting the jumps.
To know more about Phenomenon visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31814237
#SPJ11
In this activity, you will work on the second part of the critical analysis of your topic in diversity. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity and use your responses to inform this assignment. Throughout the process, you will support your analysis with reliable evidence from varied sources, which include at least two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. For this activity, you will assess factors that may influence engagement with your topic and then explain one potential obstacle that could interfere with constructive conversation about your topic. Finally, you will describe a possible outcome of your proposed engagement that might influence societal conversations about your topic.
You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
1. Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
1. It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
2. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
3. You will be evaluated on both criteria
Topic: Police Brutality
The issue of police brutality has been a short topic for a long time. In this activity, you will work on the second part of the critical analysis of your topic in diversity. For this analysis, you should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity and use your responses to inform this assignment.
Throughout the process, you will support your analysis with reliable evidence from varied sources, which include at least two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. You are also required to integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis. Reliability is an essential factor when choosing sources for the analysis of police brutality. These reliable sources can be in the form of official reports, media coverage, eyewitness accounts, and statistical data from non-governmental organizations. Such sources will be interwoven throughout the paper itself while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work. You will be evaluated on both criteria.
to know more about diversity here:
brainly.com/question/31080631
#SPJ11
Extending a research finding to another situation Example you critique two articles that demonstrate the utility of treatment in D one situation (say, impatient therapy) and propose a study of whether this same technique can profitably be applied in a different situation (say, outpatient therapy). - What will be the setting used in this new study? - What other setting might be interesting to study, to see if the results from that population parallel the results you read? - What would be the RH: and basic design for this study?
Explicit comparison of two procedures/techniques/treatments that have each been compared to some control, but not to each other. Example -- "first article" demonstrates that cognitive-behavioral technique "A" for social anxiety works better than a control treatment, the second article demonstrates that cog-beh Technique "B" also works better than the control and you propose a direct comparison of techniques "A" and "B". - What will be the IV and DV of your study? . - What would be the RH: and basic design for this study?
Extending a research finding to another situation involves critiquing existing articles that demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment in one situation and proposing a study to investigate whether the same technique can be applied successfully in a different context. In this case, the new study will focus on the application of a treatment technique (e.g., impatient therapy) in a different setting (e.g., outpatient therapy).
To explore the effectiveness of the treatment technique in outpatient therapy, a suitable setting for the study could be a mental health clinic or a counseling center where individuals receive outpatient therapy. This setting would provide a controlled environment for the researchers to assess the impact of the treatment technique on the participants.
In addition to the outpatient therapy setting, it might be interesting to study another population to see if the results parallel the findings from the articles. For example, the researchers could consider studying a different demographic, such as adolescents or older adults, to determine if the treatment technique produces similar outcomes across different age groups.
In terms of the research hypothesis (RH) and basic design for this study, the main goal would be to conduct an explicit comparison between the two treatment techniques (A and B) that have each been previously compared to a control. The independent variable (IV) would be the specific treatment technique (A or B), while the dependent variable (DV) would be the effectiveness of the treatment in reducing symptoms or improving the participants' well-being.
The research hypothesis would state that there will be a significant difference in the outcomes between treatment technique A and treatment technique B. The basic design for this study could involve randomly assigning participants to one of the two treatment groups (A or B) and comparing the post-treatment outcomes between the groups using appropriate statistical analyses.
In summary, extending a research finding to another situation involves critiquing existing articles and proposing a study to examine the applicability of a treatment technique in a different setting. The study would compare the effectiveness of two treatment techniques, with the IV being the specific technique and the DV being the treatment outcomes. The research design would involve randomly assigning participants to the treatment groups and analyzing the results to determine if there are significant differences between the techniques.
Learn more about therapy
brainly.com/question/32093774
#SPJ11
The advantage of light microscopy over electron microscopy is that _____. group of answer choices
The benefit of light microscopy over electron microscopy is that light microscopy grants one to see dynamic cycles in living cells.
The option (C) is correct.
Unlike electron microscopy, which typically requires samples to be fixed and prepared in a way that can alter or destroy living cells, light microscopy allows for observations to be made on living specimens in real time. This means that dynamic processes such as cell division, movement, and interactions can be studied directly, providing valuable insights into the functioning and behavior of living organisms.
Electron microscopy, although capable of higher magnification and resolving power, is not suitable for capturing dynamic processes in the same way as light microscopy.
Learn more about light microscopy:
https://brainly.com/question/12243716
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
The advantage of light microscopy over electron microscopy is that _____. group of answer choices.
A) light microscopy provides for higher magnification than electron microscopy.
B) light microscopy provides for higher resolving power than electron microscopy.
C) light microscopy allows one to view dynamic processes in living cells.
D) light microscopy provides higher contrast than electron microscopy.
E) specimen preparation for light microcopy does not produce artifacts.
What is the Big Five personality profile of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder? O low neuroticism, low openness to experience, high conscientiousness O high neuroticism, high extraversion, high openness to experience O low neuroticism, low extraversion, low oponness to experience O high euroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousness the term________refers to activities or occupations that a person might be The term interested O vocational interests O job requirements O human resources O job satisfaction
Individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder tend to score high on neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience, and low on conscientiousness. (2)
Neuroticism is a personality trait that refers to how easily a person experiences negative emotions, such as anxiety, anger, and sadness. People with high neuroticism are more likely to experience mood swings, which is a hallmark of bipolar disorder.
Extraversion is a personality trait that refers to how much energy a person gets from interacting with others. People with high extroversion are more likely to be outgoing, talkative, and assertive. This can be a positive trait for people with bipolar disorder, as it can help them to stay engaged and motivated.
Openness to experience is a personality trait that refers to how willing a person is to try new things and explore new ideas. People with high openness to experience are more likely to be creative, curious, and imaginative. This can be a positive trait for people with bipolar disorder, as it can help them to stay motivated and engaged in their treatment.
Conscientiousness is a personality trait that refers to how organized, reliable, and hardworking a person is. People with low conscientiousness are more likely to be disorganized, unreliable, and lazy. This can be a challenge for people with bipolar disorder, as it can make it difficult for them to manage their symptoms and stick to their treatment plan.
Learn More about bipolar disorder
https://brainly.com/question/10958617
#SPJ11
What is the Big Five personality profile of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder?
low neuroticism, low openness to experience, high conscientiousnesshigh neuroticism, high extraversion, high openness to experiencelow neuroticism, low extraversion, low openness to experiencehigh neuroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousnessPeople with aphantasia
Question 8 options:
are unable to use imagery at all.
perform well on tasks that involve visual imagery, but poorly on tasks that involve spatial imagery.
may perform well on tasks that involve spatial imagery, but perform poorly on tasks that involve visual imagery.
perform equally well on tasks involving visual and spatial imagery.
People with Aphantasia Option A. are unable to use imagery at all.
Aphantasia is a condition in which a person is unable to generate mental images. People who have aphantasia are unable to visualize imagery in their minds. This condition can affect one's ability to form mental imagery and visualize things or even recall memories, thus, the option "A. are unable to use imagery at all." is correct. People with aphantasia may find it difficult to visualize objects, people, faces, or events in their minds.
The degree of this condition may vary, from complete to partial aphantasia. People with aphantasia may use other senses to fill in the gap left by the absence of visual imagery. They may use sound or touch to compensate for their inability to visualize things. Aphantasia is not a disorder or a disease, but rather a variation of human experience. This condition affects people differently, and some may have an easier time with certain tasks than others.
For instance, people with aphantasia may find it challenging to recall information that is stored in their visual memory, such as someone's face or a scene from a movie. However, they may perform well on tasks that involve spatial memory, such as reading maps or navigating through space. So, option "C. may perform well on tasks that involve spatial imagery but perform poorly on tasks that involve visual imagery." may also be correct.
In conclusion, people with aphantasia are unable to generate mental images, and they may find it challenging to recall visual information. They may use other senses to compensate for their inability to visualize things. The degree of this condition may vary, and some people may perform better on tasks that involve spatial imagery than those that involve visual imagery. Therefore, the correct option is A.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
People with aphantasia
Question 8 options:
A. are unable to use imagery at all.
B. perform well on tasks that involve visual imagery, but poorly on tasks that involve spatial imagery.
C. may perform well on tasks that involve spatial imagery, but perform poorly on tasks that involve visual imagery.
D. perform equally well on tasks involving visual and spatial imagery.
Know more about Aphantasia here:
https://brainly.com/question/24292325
#SPJ8
Compare the American and French Revolutions.
What are their key aspects and results?
Why did they turn out so differently?
Explain how Edmund Burke responded to the revolutionary period?
Would you want to be a leader during such a time?
How does a revolution differ from a revolt?
The American Revolution was fought for independence, while the French Revolution was fought against inequality and the monarchy.
The American Revolution and French Revolution are two of the most significant revolutions in history. Both revolutions occurred in the late 18th century and had a profound impact on their respective countries and the world. Key aspects of the American Revolution include its goal of independence from Great Britain, the leadership of figures such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, and the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. The French Revolution, on the other hand, was sparked by inequality, poverty, and political oppression, leading to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic.
Edmund Burke responded to the revolutionary period by criticizing the violent tactics used by revolutionaries and arguing for a gradual change instead of an abrupt revolution.
Being a leader during such a time would be a difficult and risky proposition as it requires making tough decisions and navigating a complex political landscape. A revolution differs from a revolt in that it is a more fundamental and far-reaching change to the political or social order, while a revolt is a more localized and limited uprising against authority.
To know more about the American Revolution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28702646
#SPJ11
According to several lectures, prejudice is exactly postjudice, but it comes before. True O False
According to several lectures, prejudice is exactly post-judice, but it comes before. This statement is false.
Prejudice and postjudice have different meanings and cannot be used interchangeably. Prejudice is a preconceived notion or judgment about a person or group that is not based on reason or actual experience. According to several lectures, prejudice is exactly postjudice, but it comes before. This statement is false.
On the other hand, post-judice refers to a negative attitude towards someone or a group of people that develops after a specific event or experience. It is essential to know the distinction between these two terms to understand their true meanings and implications.
Learn more about post-judice Visit : brainly.com/question/25756666
#SPJ11
"How has illness often come to be seen as a moral failing? What
event in the Judeo-Christian tradition is the associated with? What
might an example of illness as moral failing be?
Illness has come to be seen as a moral failing due to the cultural and religious ideas held by many people. It is because of blind faith that if a person was living a righteous life, they wouldn't have become sick. As a result, those who are sick are thought to have done something wrong, causing them to become ill.
Though the suffering is said to be result of human sin in some scripture of The Judeo-Christian tradition, it is not believed to be true even by all the religious people. The tradition describes that diseases and illnesses were often thought to be a punishment from God. It means that illnesses are the result of one's sinful behavior, such as adultery, gluttony, or other immoral behaviors. The example of illness as a moral failing is that the people who are now suffering from ill health is the effect of harm they have caused to others. Thus, people who are sick are treated as immoral and deserving of their illness by some narrow minded orthodox people which is not the case in reality.
Moral failing https://brainly.com/question/15163293
#SPJ11
Shirley is a new assistant teacher at a local preschool. One of the things she has noticed—and is curious about—is the different types of play she is observing. For example, one day she noticed Zion, Deandre, Isabella and Alyssa use a variety of wooden blocks to build a tower. They then gathered construction signs and toy construction vehicles to turn the tower into a construction site.
Describe Piaget’s stages of cognitive play and Parten’s stages of social play.
Identify which stages of cognitive and social play Shirley witnessed her students engaging in with the blocks.
Shirley noticed her students engaging in Symbolic Function Substage and Parten's Cooperative Play. Piaget’s stages of cognitive play and Parten’s stages of social play are the two major classifications of play.
Piaget's four stages of cognitive development comprise the Sensorimotor stage, the Preoperational stage, the Concrete Operational stage, and the Formal Operational stage. Each of these phases includes various stages of play that are influenced by the child's cognitive development. The four stages of Piaget's theory of cognitive play include the following: Functional play, Constructive play, Symbolic Function Substage, and Games with Rules
According to Parten, there are six distinct phases of social play. These include the following: Unoccupied play, Onlooker play, Solitary play, Parallel play, Associative play, and Cooperative play. Children are social beings, and play serves as a means of socialization, particularly in the development of peer relationships.
When children are engaged in cooperative play, they must learn how to communicate effectively, take turns, share resources, and be good sports. They must learn to take on different roles and work collaboratively toward a common goal.
Shirley observed her students engaging in Symbolic Function Substage and Parten's Cooperative Play while using blocks. This is because while playing with blocks, they began with functional play (dropping blocks, holding them, stacking them), which turned into constructive play (building a tower).
However, when the students used construction signs and toy construction vehicles to create a construction site, they began using symbols. This symbolic play is called the Symbolic Function Substage. The students then shifted from parallel play (working beside each other but not interacting much) to cooperative play (working together on a common goal). Therefore, Shirley observed her students participating in Parten's Cooperative Play.
Learn more about Cognitive development:
https://brainly.com/question/9741540
#SPJ11
After an afternoon of Christmas shopping in Toronto, Jay got off the subway and witnessed a violent man attack a woman on the subway platform. He quickly intervened and stopped the man. Other people clearly also noticed the attack, but did not do anything about it. What best explains other people's failure to intervene when witnessing this attack? O The chameleon effect O The bystander effect O The Robbers Cave Experiment O Misattribution of arousal
The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect.
What is the bystander effect?The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to the tendency for individuals to be less likely to provide assistance during an emergency situation when other people are present.
The presence of other people around makes it less likely for an individual to step forward and help, which is known as the bystander effect. The main answer for the question above is: "The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect."
In the given scenario, the bystander effect is the most evident reason why other people around the subway platform did not intervene when Jay intervened and stopped the violent man from attacking the woman.
Learn more about bystander effect: https://brainly.com/question/3164279
#SPJ11