Answer: Loose constructionism is a type of interpretation of a document that relies on the broad interpretation of the text in the said document. It often applies to the type of interpretation done on laws and the Constitution.
Pro: It will cases that are explicitly stated in the document.
Con: It will lead to misinterpretation and bias.
Explanation: This should help
GUYS. PLEASE, HELP ME!
The Convention in 1787 was NOT originally supposed to do what when it met in Philadelphia?
a
Discuss possible amendments to the Articles
b
Write the Bill of Rights
c
Propose amendments to the Articles
d
Write a new Constitution
Answer:
d
Explanation:
In 1787 the constitution of a new country was written in Philadelphia.
In your opinion, which provisions should be revised, removed, or added to strengthen the check-and-balance mechanism when martial law in imposed? Justify your answer
Answer:
Can I please get the essay or something I can look at to answer your question? Thanks.
Explanation:
After Napoleon seized control of Spain and held its king captive, juntas formed both in Spain and in Latin America. What were juntas?
representatives of Pope Pious VI, who sent them to inspire revolution in Latin America
local governments claiming loyalty to King Ferdinand VII, and independence from French control
newly elected office holders in the Latin American territories, put in place by Napoleon
local armies that joined with Napoleon Bonaparte's forces in spreading Enlightenment ideas
PLEASE HELP IL GIVE EXTRA ILL 5 STRA AND THANK U PLEASE
Answer:
The Spanish American wars of independence were the numerous wars against Spanish rule in Spanish America during the early 19th century. With the aim of political independence, these began shortly after the French invasion of Spain in 1807 during Europe's Napoleonic Wars. Although there has been research on the idea of a separate Spanish American ("creole") identity separate from that of Iberia,[4] political independence was not initially the aim of most Spanish Americans, nor was it necessarily inevitable.[5] With the restoration of Ferdinand VII in 1814, the King rejected any type of popular sovereignty, as seen in the Spanish Constitution of 1812 passed by the Cortes of Cádiz – the parliamentary Regency in place while Ferdinand VII was deposed. The Liberal Triennium of 1820 also did not change the position of the Cádiz constitution against separatism, while Latin Americans were increasingly radicalized seeking political independence.[6]
Answer:
local governments claiming loyalty to King Ferdinand VII, and independence from French control
Explanation: