Why is Thomas Jefferson's view on slavery considered controversial
Well, Thomas Jefferson was the person who wrote "all men are created equal" yet enslaved hundreds of people over his life. He also publically said that White people are superior to Black people. So I think it's safe to say his view on slavery would get him publically crucified today. Granted he did attempt to end any importation of enslaved Africans at one point in his life, under his watch, the act of slavery did not go down, rather went up. He also profited in many ways through slavery.
1825
-1826 Photography
-1831 Reaper
1837 Telegraph
1846 Sewing Machine
Answer:
i would say photograph and telegraph
Explanation:
See verse 22.39 in the Qur'an (Doc B). Does this verse conflict with Doc C or help explain it?
Answer:
It conflicts it
Explanation:
In the verse 22.39 in the Qur'an it is about how muslims are allowed to fight when being attacked and Doc C conflicts it because this map the expansion of Islam that depend on military campaigns which lead to muslims having to use violence with weapons.
How did increased trade affect the way that ancient people exchanged goods and services?
It reduced the demand for goods and services.
It made goods and services more expensive.
It made different civilizations interact less often.
It led to standard measures and then currency.
Answer:
It led to standard measures and then currency.
Explanation:
The increase in trade enables people from different culture/society to engage and trade with one another.
In the past, a problem can occurs if both parties involved do not used the same medium of exchange. (for example, some society used gold to as a medium of transaction while some society used barter method for transaction)
As the times goes by, more and more people start looking for solution to solve this issues. Standard measures and currency are the things that can be used for that.
Standard of measures allowed people to ensure that they get the most value from their transaction (for example buying 1 bag of rice can be riskty since we can't really know how much rice contained in it. Buying 1 kg of rice on the other hand make us understand exactly what we're buying), and currency allowed people to use one recognized medium of exchange for the transaction.
Answer:
It's D
If you can, please make the answer above me Brainliest.
What were two of the materials used in the construction of
colonial houses?
Answer:
(1) brick (particularly in prosperous areas where clay was available)
(2) wood
(3) stone
Explanation:
Answer:
brick, wood, stone
Explanation:
which branch of government is responsible for making and passing laws
Answer:
Legislative branch
Explanation:
The Legislative Branch of our government makes the laws. The Executive Branch of our government enforces our laws. What are the two parts of our Congress? Senate and House of Representatives.
Answer:
Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch of our government makes the laws. The Executive Branch of our government enforces our laws. What are the two parts of our Congress? Senate and House of Representatives.
Explanation:
The forth amendment protects citizens from________.
Did great britain gain land in the french and indian war?
AnswerThey gained land
Explanation:
In early cities, who generally managed the allocation of resources?
i will mark brainlyiest
Now you write about how Cortes conquered the Aztecs. Write as many details from beginning to the end. Finally be sure and mention what the effects of this battle were for Spain and the Aztecs. Discuss what this area is presently called today. Finally, discuss how you feel about what happened and the consequences of this battle for Spain and the Aztec empire
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Hernan Cortez arrived in the Americas on March 4, 1519. He specifically arrived at the Yucatan Peninsula, in the Mexican territory. Five months later, on November 8th, 1519, he finally arrived at the center of the Aztec Empire: the great city of Tenochtitlan, the capital of the Aztecs.
Cortez realized that Spaniards alone, it was going to be impossible to defeat the mighty Aztec Army. That is why in 1521, Cortez made alliances with Native Tribes that were enemies to the Aztecas. Specifically, the Chollulans and the Tlaxcalteans.
On July 1, 1520, the Cortez army is defeated by the Aztecs in what is known as the "Sad Night." They had to retreat and plan another strategy. In that year, Emperor Cuithlahuac substitutes Moctezuma II, as the new ruler, but he suddenly died from smallpox. Cuáhutemoc became the Emperor. He was the last emperor of the Aztecs.
On August 13, 1521, the Aztec Army surrendered the city to Cortez. The Spaniards had conquered Tenochtitlan and killed Cuauhtémoc.
This area of Tenochtitlan, today is downtown Mexico City. The ruins of the pyramids can be visited next to the main square(Zócalo in Spanish), and the Cathedral.
The consequences of the conquest were meaningful. Never before seen diseases brought by Spaniards almost wipe out 80% of the Aztecs population. Diseases such as smallpox, chickenpox, malaria, cholera, and influenza.
Spaniards also evangelized the Aztecs into the religious teachings of Catholicism.
Grover Cleveland believed in bimetallism. True or false ?
Answer:
The answer is true. :)
Lesson
4
Words to Know
Understanding the following words will help you read this lesson:
TERMS & NAMES
primary source
secondary source
oral history
How Historians
Study the Past
Build on What You Know You may know where your parents or ancestors came from and some of the stories about them. Relatives and their stories help people understand their family history. Now learn what historians use to help them understand the past.
Understanding the Past
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What questions do historians ask to help them understand the past?
People investigate their family history to find out about their ancestors. In the process, however, they also find out about themselves. We study world history for the same reasons.
Why Study History? What has already happened to a person, a family, or a
society affects what will occur today and in the future. But history is much more than simply recounting and studying past events. Examining a historical event also involves studying a society’s culture, religion, politics, and economics.
When historians examine past events, they try to find patterns. They look for causes and effects that explain how and why events happened. They also try to understand why some ideas and traditions last and why others die out. Just as important, historians attempt to see the past through the eyes of the people who lived it. By doing so, historians gain greater insight into human nature and answer important historical questions.
Asking Historical Questions As historians study the past, they ask themselves questions like those below. These questions help historians compare different societies and draw conclusions about the past.
• How have groups or societies interacted, and what have been the results?
• How have leaders governed societies?
• How have belief systems developed and changed?
• How have societies dealt with differences among their people?
• How have societies tried to protect people’s security?
• How are societies similar and different?
Why do we study history?
The Historian’s Tools
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What methods do historians use to help them answer questions about what happened in the past? When you hang up a picture, you use a hammer to pound in the nail. Historians also use tools to do their job. These tools include primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
Primary Sources A primary source is something written or created by a person who witnessed a historical event. You will learn about an ancient primary source on the next page. Primary sources include letters, diaries, eyewitness articles, videotapes, speeches, and photographs. Artifacts, such as the human-made tools, are also primary sources.
loading...
How Knowledge of the Past Changes
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What steps do historians take as they answer historical questions?
Detectives use fingerprints and other evidence to solve crimes. Historians act as detectives too. They use evidence from primary, secondary, and oral sources.
Fact or Fiction? Historical evidence isn’t always as simple as a bloodstain at a crime
scene. Historians sometimes have more information than they can use when they try to answer a question. They must sort through all of the information and choose what’s most important and most trustworthy as evidence. In addition, sometimes what historians thought was true turns out to be false. For instance, one historian proved that the so-called mummy’s
curse was false. According to legend, the curse would kill anyone who entered the tomb of an ancient Egyptian ruler. Many people believed the curse had caused the death of English archaeologist Lord Carnarvon. He died suddenly in 1923, shortly after entering the tomb
of ancient Egyptian ruler “King Tut.” People believe that the other archaeologists who had entered the tomb between 1923 and 1926 would also die as a result of the curse. However, a historian later examined the archaeologists’ death records. Their average age at death was
70 years. The evidence did not support the existence of the mummy’s curse.
Drawing Conclusions The mummy’s curse was easy to disprove. But not all historical questions are so easily answered. Sometimes different historians arrive at different conclusions based on the same facts.
Answer the following questions
2. What is the difference between primary and secondary sources?
Answer:
sorry what?
Explanation:
its not possible
What are the pillars of culture?
A. Food and music
B. clothing and festivals
C. Spirituality and language
D.art and holidays
Answer:
a.) Spirituality and language
Explanation:
Answer:
They all sound about right but if I had to choose I'd say C) spirituality and language
In 1821, _________ ___________ paved the way for Anglo-American colonization of Texas.
Answer:
Moses, Austin
Answer:
Moses, Austin that is the answer
Explanation:
Hope this helps make me brainlliest please. :)
Which of the following is one way that Booker T. Washington believed that African Americans could achieve equality?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
through education and learning job skills
on edge
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Gaming
Cause and Effect Why was civil service reform needed?
definition of a safe state?
Answer:
A "safe state", on the other hand, is a state that is going to almost always vote a certain way. For instance, Texas is considered to be a "safe" state for Republicans, as they have only lost the state once in the last 10 elections.
Explanation:
This term is used to describe the pre-Columbian Native American pueblo culture that inhabited a small area of what is now northwestern New Mexico between 900 and 1150 CE.
Answer: Chaco Culture
Explanation:
NEED HELP ASAPPPPPP !!!! Read the passage below and answer the question that follows. “I love the land and the buffalo, and will not part with any . . . . I love to roam over the wide prairie, and when I do it I feel free and happy; but, when we settle down we grow pale and die.” Which chief made these remarks during the Medicine Lodge Council? A. Satanta B. Satank C. Big Tree D. Standing Bear
Answer:
A!!
Explanation:
i got it right on the quiz :)
(edge)
Compare the lifestyles of hunter-gatherers with those of settlers of early agricultural communities. The Neolithic Revolution (4 points) Question options: 1) led people to lead lives based on hunting and gathering 2) allowed people to live in permanent settlements 3) reduced people’s need for food and resources 4) prevented the advance of civilization
And its not C i already tried it!
Answer:
B allowed people to live in permanent settlements
Explanation:
the agriculture communities helped reduce their need for food but the permanent setting allowed them to grow food and raise livestock thus reducing the need for hunting and gathering.
How will young men be able to start fighting in World War 1?
Explain how the leadership style and practices of the native americans affected their relationship with the american gorvenment
Answer:
At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
Answer:
At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
Explanation:
Got it right on the test
PLEASE HELP MEEE!!
Which of the following was a major cultural difference between england and the communities established by the first english settlers in North America?
A)levels of religious freedom
B)reliance on farming
C)acceptance of christianity
D)language
The higher levels of religious freedom was a major cultural difference between England and the communities established by the English settlers in the North American region. Therefore, the option A holds true.
What is the significance of religious freedom?Religious freedom can be referred to or considered as a condition wherein the society and the people in it are free to follow the beliefs and ideologies of their choice of religious practice. Moreover, no authorities could stop them from doing so.
Religious freedom was most relevant in the English societies in their homeland. New England was much in contrast to that of the settlers in the American region. This was because of the discriminative practices in the American region.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of religious freedom.
Learn more about religious freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/10094964
#SPJ2
Y did many of the newly independent Americans want a government that couldn’t do much
Answer:
The newly independent Americans want a government that couldn’t do much is explained below in details.
Explanation:
Their experience under the oppressive British government left the recently independent Americans a little bit afraid. Basically, they desired a government that couldn't do much. They commenced by inducting a document named the Articles of Confederation. Each state was autonomous and had its administration.
pleaseeee i will give you the brainliesttt!
Answer:
Hello its B and this is second account lol
Explanation:
What part of the negotiations at Velasco did many Texas settlers dislike?
a.
Many Texas settlers disliked that Santa Anna was allowed to live.
b.
Many Texas settlers disliked that Santa Anna would convince Mexico to recognize Texas independence.
c.
Many Texas settlers disliked that the negotiations were held at Velasco.
d.
Many Texas settlers disliked that the negotiations were all done secretly.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Many Texas settlers disliked that Santa Anna was allowed to live.
Explanation:
I took the quiz and got it right.
Hope this Helps!
Which statement is an example of how the judicial branch can check the power of the legislative branch?
A. The Supreme Court can overturn rulings of lower courts.
B. The Supreme Court reviews bills before they become laws.
C. The Supreme Court can rule that laws are unconstitutional.
D. The Supreme Court rules on cases involving federal officials.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The correct option is C. The Supreme Court can rule that laws are unconstitutional is an example of how the judicial branch can check the power of the legislative branch.
By declaring a statute to be unconstitutional, the judicial branch can supervise the legislative branch. By deeming executive action unconstitutional, the Judicial Branch keeps the Executive Branch under check.
Examining legislation for constitutionality, it controls the legislative branch. Any law may be contested on the grounds that it infringes upon rights guaranteed by the US Constitution.
How can the judicial branch check the power of other branches?A process called judicial review allows the Supreme Court and other federal courts to deem laws or executive orders unconstitutional. The Supreme Court's decisions can be effectively checked by Congress by passing changes to the Constitution.
Judicial review and judicial interpretation are the two basic ways that the judiciary can influence Congress. In order to assess if congressional laws are unconstitutional, judges have the authority to review them. Judges have the authority to determine the meaning of legislative laws and how they should be applied in certain circumstances.
Learn more about Judicial Branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/17479440
#SPJ6
A middle-aged woman goes to the marketplace to buy her family food for supper. She speaks openly to her friends and the merchants but avoids the forums where political and philosophical discussions take place in public. Upon returning home, she instructs her children on the importance of family. When her husband returns home, he treats her with respect and looks to her for wise counsel. In which of the following civilizations does this middle-aged woman reside?
Answer:
The Roman Empire
Explanation:
The Civilization in which the Middle-aged Woman resides is the Roman Empire.
What is a Civilization?
A civilisation (or civilization) is any complex society that is characterized by the development of a urbanization, political state, social stratification, and symbolic systems of communication basically beyond natural spoken language (namely, a writing system).
Civilizations are intimately associated with the additional characteristics such as the domestication of plant and animal species (including humans), centralization, specialization of labour, culturally-ingrained ideologies of progress, monumental architecture, taxation, societal dependence upon farming, and expansionism.
What is the Roman Empire?
The Roman Empire was basically the post-Republican period of ancient Rome. As a polity, it included the large territorial holdings around the Western Asia, Mediterranean Sea in Europe, and North Africa, ruled by emperors.
From the elevation of Caesar Augustus as the first Roman emperor to the military anarchy of the 3rd century, it was a principate with Italy as the megalopolis of its provinces and the city of Rome as its capital. Later, the Empire was ruled by many emperors who shared control over the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire.
To know more about the Roman empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ2
they were a south american indian culture that was devestated by pizarro and the spanish in the 1530s
Answer:
Incas
Explanation:
Incas were a South American Indian culture that was devastated by Pizarro and the Spanish in the 1530s.
Explain the term “division of labor” as it related to freemen on a landlord’s manor.
Division of labor, or the split of a work process into a number of jobs, each of which is carried out by a distinct individual or group of individuals One of the fundamental organizational concepts of the assembly line, is most frequently used in systems of mass manufacturing.
Why is the division of labor important?Due to the fact that it enables individuals to specialize in particular occupations, the division of labor is crucial to economic development. Because of their increased efficiency as a result of specialization, employees can produce things or render services for less money overall.
A highly developed hierarchy-based land management system, the manor system. A manor lord served as the head of the hierarchy and was in charge of all the other social classes that resided in the manor, worked the land, or rendered other services.
Learn more about the division of labor here:
https://brainly.com/question/24691008
#SPJ2