A federal judge issued an opinion on a voting rights case in which she wrote, “The Voting Rights Act of 1965 provides for these commissions. The Supreme Court, in Johnson V. Albemarle (1973) upheld the legality of these commissions. I see no reason today to prevent these commissions from acting.” Based on this opinion, this judge primarily employed the ______ model when coming to a decision in this case.
a.
attitudinal
b.
originalist
c.
legal
d.
strategic
The correct answer is option C. A federal judge issued an opinion on a voting rights case in which she wrote, “The Voting Rights Act of 1965 provides for these commissions. The Supreme Court, in Johnson V. Albemarle (1973) upheld the legality of these commissions. I see no reason today to prevent these commissions from acting.” Based on this opinion, this judge primarily employed the legal model when coming to a decision in this case.
The judge primarily employed the legal model when coming to a decision in this case. The judge referenced the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Supreme Court's ruling in Johnson v. Albemarle (1973) to support the legality of the commissions in question. By citing these legal authorities, the judge demonstrated a reliance on the existing laws and legal precedents to guide her decision-making process. The legal model involves interpreting and applying the law as it exists, considering statutes, regulations, and court decisions to determine the legal basis for a ruling. In this case, the judge's focus on the relevant laws and prior court decisions indicates a primary adherence to the legal model.For more questions on Voting Rights Act:
https://brainly.com/question/744348
#SPJ8