Twelve large bottles of water cost $9.

a. How many bottles can you buy for $3?
b. What is the cost per bottle of water?
c. How much would 7 bottles of water cost?
Help pls :(

Answer:

800

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up your proportion first (6/20 = 72/x). Then, square 6 and 20 (36/400 = 72/x). Cross multiply and divide (36x = 28800). Divide 28800 by 36 and that gives you 800 as your answer.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

'A' because it asks about pros and cons.

Answer:

$5.40

Step-by-step explanation:

A tax is a compulsory sum levied by the government or an agency of the government on goods and services. Taxes increase the price of good. The items bought would increase by 8%

Tax paid by Dave = 0.08 x $15 = $1.2

total price paid by Dave = 1.2 + $15 = $16.2

Tax paid by Mel = 0.08 x $20 = $1.6

total price paid by Mel = $20 + $1.6 = $21.60

Difference in prices

21.6 -16.2 = $5.40

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]n-4\le 8\\ \\ n\le 12[/tex]

Answer: Function A; 14 meters per seond

Step-by-step explanation:

do Distance/time for Function A: so you can show 140/10, or 280/20, it doesnt matter as they are all constant/consistent.

A has a rate of 14 m/s

B's  rate is given, 13 m/s

So A has a faster rate of 14 meters per second

Answer:

10 sections

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

i converted mixed number into decimals:

2 1/2 = 2.5

1/4= .25

Then 2.5/.25= 10

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

.  .  .             Remainder:   .  .            

.  .  .

.  .  .

.  .  .

.  .  .

.  .  .                      

thats the best i could do with an array

Answer:

She walked 5 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] \frac{1}{ {7}^{14} } [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex](7 {}^{2} ) {}^{ - 7} [/tex]

Rewrite using power rule

[tex]( {x}^{m} ) {}^{n} = x {}^{m + n} [/tex]

[tex]( {7}^{2} ){}^{ - 7} = {7}^{ - 14} [/tex]

Now rewrite using the negative power rule,

[tex]x {}^{ - b} = \frac{1}{x {}^{b} } [/tex]

[tex] {7}^{ - 14} = \frac{1}{ {7}^{14} } [/tex]

The angles can't be the same and why is point f left alone?

Answer:

90 inches

Step-by-step explanation: 7 feet*12 inches= 84 and .5 feet*12 inches= 6.

84 inches+ 6inches=90inches

Answer: 1.2ft × 12

= 14.4"

Step-by-step explanation:

GIVE ME DA BRAINS

Answer:

160

Step-by-step explanation:

vertical angles

Answer:

its 80

Step-by-step explanation:

because of vertical angles the 160 is the same for the other side so you subtract the 80

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are nine numbers on the spinner with 4 even and 5 odd numbers. Flipping a tail is just 1/2 so

P(ETO)=(4/9)(1/2)(5/9)

P(ETO)=20/162

P(ETO)=10/81

Answer:

Y=-x^2 -2x

Step-by-step explanation:

First distribute -1

Y=-x+0(x-2)

Foil and you get

y= x^2-2x

This is in standard form

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 4y = 13

 x - y = 3              Subtracting:

0 + 4y - (-y) = 13 - 3

5y = 10

y = 2.

Plug y = 2 into the second equation:

x - 2 = 3

x = 5.

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

If we have 84 feet of streamers. You cut 24 pieces that are each 1/2 yard long then 48 feet of streamers we left.

A unit of measurement is a definite magnitude of a quantity, defined and adopted by convention or by law, that is used as a standard for measurement of the same kind of quantity.

Given that we have a 84 feet of streamers.

You cut 24 pieces that are each 1/2 yard long.

Need to find the feet of streamers we left.

We know that 1 yard is equal to 3 feet.

Therefore, 1/2 yard is equal to 1.5 feet.

The total length of the streamers that were cut is:

24 pieces x 1.5 feet/piece = 36 feet

To find out how much streamer is left, we can subtract the length of the cut streamers from the total length we started with:

84 feet - 36 feet = 48 feet

Therefore, you have 48 feet of streamers left.

To learn more on Unit of Measurement click:

https://brainly.com/question/14026238

#SPJ2

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The slope is -5

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps....

have a great day!!!

Answer:

x = - 2, y = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparing both the equations,

→ y = y → x + 3 = - 2x - 3

=> x + 3 = - 2x - 3

=> x + 2x = - 3 - 3

=> 3x = - 6

=> x = - 6/3 = - 2

Substitute the value of x in any of these:

=> y = x + 3 = - 2 + 3 = 1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If a solution exists for the system of equations y=y so we can say

x+3=-2x-3 Add 2x to each side

3x+3=-3 Subtract 3 from each side

3x=-6. Divide each side by 3

x=-2, since y=x+3

y=-2+3

y=1

So the solution to the system of equations is the point (x,y)=(-2,1)

Answer:

68.9°

Step-by-step explanation:

Using Sine rule

x/sin X = y/sin Y

4.5/sin X = 4/sin 56

sin X × 4 = 4.5 × sin 56

sin X = 4.5 × sin 56/4

X = arc sin (4.5 × sin 56/4)

X = 68.85449°

Approximately = 68.9°

Answer:

I think the answer is truth

Step-by-step explanation:

ES6 has a new Set data structure for storing sets of unique objects. However it is based on object references as opposed to value comparisons. As far as I can tell this makes it impossible to have a set of pairs of numbers without stringifying.

For example, typing in Chrome's console (needs Chrome 38+):

> var s = new Set(); < undefined > s.add([2, 3]); < Set {[2, 3]} > s.has([2, 3]) < false <--- was hoping for 'true'

This appears to be by design: since I passed a different array of [2, 3] to has(), it returns false, because although the contents is the same it only looks at object references, and I allocated a new and different array to pass to has(). I would need to store a reference to the original array I passed to add() to check with has(), but this is not always possible. For example if the number pairs represent co-ordinates, I might need to check if the set has [obj.x, obj.y], but this will always return false since it allocates a new array.

The workaround is to stringify the arrays and key on strings like "2, 3" instead. However in something performance-sensitive like a game engine, it is unfortunate if every set access needs to make a string allocation and convert and concatenate number strings.

Does ES6 provide any feature to solve this problem without stringifying, or is there any feature on the horizon with ES7 that could help as well?

javascriptperformancedata-structuressetecmascript-6

Share

2

Follow

asked Sep 21 '14 at 13:06



AshleysBrain

20.4k1515 gold badges8181 silver badges119119 bronze badges

Add a comment

3 Answers

ActiveOldestVotes

3

As you've noted [2, 3] === [2, 3] is false, meaning you can't use Set like this; however, is Set really the best option for you?

You may find that using a two-level data structure like this will be better for you

var o = {}; function add(o, x, y) { if (!o[x]) o[x] = {}; o[x][y] = true; } function has(o, x, y) { return !!(o[x] && o[x][y]); } function del(o, x, y) { if (!o[x]) return; delete o[x][y]; // maybe delete `o[x]` if keys.length === 0

Answer:

There are 12 possible salad combonations

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

The person above me is correct ;)

Answer:

8/3 or 2 2/3 gallons of paint

Step-by-step explanation:

If 2/3 of paint covers 1/4 of the wall, you must multiply 2/3 by 4 to get 4/4 (the whole wall).

2/3 x 4 = 8/3 or 2 2/3

Answer:

80,66

Step-by-step explanation:

70 + 82 + 90 = 242

for average: you have 3 tests, so 242÷3 = 80,66667