Answer: false
Explanation:
Describe what the chain of command is and its purpose in the investigation.
Answer:
The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.
Does this help?
Need help?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
need help quick! , which one is it ?
it should be the 4th one.
Which of the following is the Latin term that refers to the physical part of a criminal
act?
A.) Mens rea
B.) Actus reus
C.) Omission
D.) Complicity
Answer:
omission physical part of a criminal act
 A president usually honors the principle of senatorial courtesy in appointing judges to district courts. Why is this?
Answer:
The United State constitution says that ALL Judiciary appointments by the President are to be taken up by the United States Senate. A president can do that to fill the courts with Conservative or Liberal Views, or because he wants to fill as much as possible.
whats a good explanation for civil law?
Answer:
Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
Explanation:
hopefully this helps!
:> have an amazing day, and sorry if it doesn't hep.
Damian owns a small business with about 20 employees. He knows that pilferage can cost his company a lot over the course of a year, even if it is just small things. What is MOST effective way for Damian to prevent his employees from stealing?
A. Install cameras all over to watch the employees
B. Pay his employees a decent wage, so they are happy
C. Publicly fire any employee who is caught pilfering
C. Report any missing items immediately to law enforcement.
Do you believe the Federal Government is abiding by the 10th Amendment? Why or why not? How should states use the 10th Amendment to their advantage against the Federal Government?
Which of the following BEST completes the blank line in diagram above?
A. Build strong communities
B. Organize events
C. Elect representatives
D. Create jobs
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Question 34
Which of the following is a right protected through procedural due process?
O A) the right to free speech
O B) the right to jury
ting
O C) the right to travel
O D) the right to vote
Answer:
D) the right to vote
Out of these options the answer that is a right protected through procedural due process is the right to Jury. The answer to this question is option B.
The procedural process refers to the process that the government of the United States has to follow before they can deprive a citizen of several of his rights.
The due process that has to be followed has to do with the right to the establishment of the jury.
The judge would have to carry out the sentencing only after the jury have established their facts.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15242689?referrer=searchResults
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
(LC)Approximately what percent of wrongful convictions can be attributed to informant testimony?
5 percent
10 percent
15 percent
20 percent
What is presumption of innocence ?
What is the difference between the standard of proof and the burden of proof?
What does beyond reasonable doubt mean to you?
Answer:The presumption of innocence until proven guilty means that the burden of proof is always on the government to satisfy you that [defendant] is guilty of the crime with which [he/she] is charged beyond a reasonable doubt. ... This burden never shifts to [defendant].
It is clear that when people commit crimes, they can be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted. What if a
person only thinks about committing a crime? Alternatively, what if a person attempts to commit a crime,
but is not actually able to carry it out? Do you think it is right for a person to be arrested and charged for
almost committing a crime if no crime occurred? Explain your reasoning and provide an example to
illustrate your point.
Which statement is true about joint committees?
They are permanent, dedicated to working on a specific kind of bill.
They are primarily investigative, performing research and impact studies.
They contain members from both houses of Congress.
They are controlled by members of the majority party.
Answer:
CExplanation:
They contain members from both houses of Congress.
The true statement about joint committees is that they contain members from both houses of Congress.
Joint congress committees are those committees that are made up of members that are from the two houses in the congress.
Such a type of committee has very narrow jurisdiction and they do not have the powers to report jurisdiction.
The chairperson is always alternated between the members that are either from the house or the senate.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/20727979?referrer=searchResults
Put the continuum of force in order from least to greatest force:
A. Verbal Officer + Presence + Lethal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal
B. Less Lethal + Empty Hand + Lethal + Verbal + Officer Presence
C. Officer Presence + Verbal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal + Lethal
Answer:
C. Officer Presence + Verbal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal + Lethal
Explanation:
Less lethal should come before lethal and lethal should come last. Used process of elimination.
what is the difference between their there and they´re
Answer:
Their shows ownership,there is a location,and they're is short for they are.
Explanation:
Hope this helped Mark BRAINLIEST!!!
A(n) ________ is a professional who investigates the ethical issues regarding a real-world situation and assesses their legal or regulatory implications in terms of compliance.
A. institutional review board member
B. applied ethics committee member
C. ethics and compliance officer
Answer:
C
Explanation:
C.ethics and compliance officer
Which is an example of an individual bioethical decision?
A. whether or not to fight against human suffering
B. whether or not the United States should help Liberia’s Ebola crisis
C. whether or not to vote for a candidate who is for compulsory vaccination
D. whether or not to take steroids
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I think it’s right
A health insurance company wants the opportunity to cover the accounts of all county employees. In order to land this account. they must get the approval of the county board of directors. The board members mention that they are taking some time off to prepare for the holidays and say that the company might stay on their minds if they were given some holiday spending cash. What kind of crime is this an example of?
A. individual Occupational Crime
B. Professional Occupational Crime
C. State Authority Occupational Crime
D. Organizational Occupational Crime
Answer:
C. State Authority Occupational Crime
Explanation:
State Authority Occupational Crime: these are crimes by officials through the authority of the office. This category of crimes is restricted to those holding public office and their employees. Accepting bribes in return for political favors would be an example in this category.
please give brainliest
Order the CRIMINAL jurisdiction of the following courts from the LOWEST to the HIGHEST (smallest court to the biggest court) 1. Supreme Court of the U.S. 12. Court of Appeals * 3. Justice of the Peace Court 14. District Court 15. County Court at Law 6. Court of Criminal Appeals
Answer:
huh what do you what us to do
Explanation:
The overall genetic variation between human beings is tiny; most of our DNA is identical.
True
False
What is the degree of influence an officer must exert over the suspect to take him or her safely into custody?
A. Restraint
B. Deadly force
C. Control
D. Reasonability
Answer:
C. Control
Explanation:
In all cases, control is that degree of influence the officer must exert over the violator to take the person safely into custody.
Answer:
C. Control
Explanation:
The control is the degree of influence an officer must exert over the suspect to take him or her safely into custody.
Why is robbery, which is the theft of property from another, considered a crime against persons rather than a property crime?
a. Robbery is not a crime against a person.
b. It is the criminal act of forcing an individual to give up property that constitutes robbery.
c. It is the criminal act of escaping with another’s property that constitutes robbery.
d. It is the selling or pawning of another’s property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.
Answer:
D. It is the selling or pawning of Another's property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.
Explanation:
Their are several charges that can on a person or a property, on a person, is like Assault and Murder, while Selling or pawning items is considered a crime on property. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) states: "The object of Crimes Against Property, e.g., robbery, bribery, and burglary, is to obtain money, property, or some other benefits"
Robbery is considered a crime against persons rather than a property crime because It is the selling or pawning of another’s property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.
What do you mean by Crime?Crime is the deliberate performance of an act that is generally regarded as socially destructive or dangerous and is expressly banned by, and subject to, criminal sanctions.
There are many accusations that can be brought against either a person or a piece of property. For example, assault and murder are crimes against people, whereas selling or pawning objects is a criminal against property. The goal of crimes against property, such as robbery, bribery, and burglary, is to obtain money, property, or other benefits, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI).
Therefore, Robbery is considered a crime against persons rather than a property crime because It is the selling or pawning of another’s property without his or her approval that constitutes robbery.
Learn more about Crime, here;
https://brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ2
Pick all the answers that describe changes in British policy toward the American colonies after 1763.
Britain forbid colonists to settle desirable western lands.
Britain punished the colonies because they had lost the French and Indian War.
Britain taxed the colonists directly on everyday items like tea and sugar.
Britain passed fewer laws concerning what colonists could and could not do.
Britain kept a military presence in the colonies to enforce the new laws.
Britain became more “hands on” in the way it governed its colonies.
Answer:
All of above.
PLEASE HURRY
The idea that the white race is superior to other races is called______.
A) White Supremacy
B) White Dominance
C) Constitutional Law
D) Racial Equality
Principles that apply to all crimes are known as what?
A.) Criminal law
B.) Specific criminal law
C.) General criminal law
D.) Common law
Answer:
I think its d but im.not 100% so if I'm wrong please tell me
Which of the following is NOT a circumstance outlined in Tennessee v. Garner which justifies the right for an officer to use deadly force?
A. When an officer witness firsthand the suspect breaking into private property
B. When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon
C. When an officer believes the suspect poses a threat of serious harm to the officer or another
D. When the officer believes the suspect has committed a crime involving threatened or actual serious physical harm or death to another
Answer:
B. when an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon
Explanation:
When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon is not a circumstance outlined in Tennessee v. Garner which justifies the right for an officer to use deadly force.
Negotiation is the process by which people involved in a dispute discuss their problem and try to reach a solution acceptable to all.
True
False
5. ¿Cuándo hablamos de una república popular o socialista?
Answer:
Al hablar de una república popular o socialista nos referimos a naciones con gobiernos organizados en torno a un sistema económico y político comunista, es decir, en los cuales se ejerce un control férreo y absoluto de la economía por parte del gobierno y donde se restringen libertades individuales de los ciudadanos con el objetivo de mantener dicho control absoluto sin dar lugar a ningún tipo de alteración del orden pretendido, como podrían ser manifestaciones por parte de la ciudadanía. Un claro ejemplo de este tipo de republicas es Corea del Norte.
Why are the US Military expenses so high financially?