Todd, as he permitted his underage daughter to use a vehicle. The legal age to receive a driver's license and legally operate a motor vehicle on public roads is known as the minimum driving age.
What was the minimum age of driving ?The legal drinking age is set by each jurisdiction and is often set at 18, though under strict supervision, trainee drivers may be allowed to drive sooner. The person seeking the license would typically be tested for driving prowess and understanding of traffic laws before being awarded a licence, assuming he or she is over the minimum driving age.
This would happen before achieving the requisite age for a driver's license or anytime later. places where the driving age is the lowest (17 and below)include Australia, The Bahamas, Canada, Malaysia, New Zealand, United States, Zimbabwe, and the United Kingdom (Mainland). Drivers can be as young as 14 in several areas in the United States and Canada (with parental supervision)
Learn more about driving age here
https://brainly.com/question/16740116
#SPJ5
FORUM DESCRIPTION
Is it fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety? Do we need to consider other issues to determ
the U.S. corrections system is too large? What might some of those reasons be? Are they more important than money?
Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
It is fair that financial pressures determine how much will be spent to promote justice and public safety. The consequences of the correction system must be taken into account to determine whether this system is too large. These consequences are more important than money.
Why is it fair that financial pressures determine spending on justice and public security?Justice and public security are financed with the payment of citizens' taxes.All citizens must contribute to this, as these are two essential elements for the good functioning of the country and good quality of life.However, given the country's income inequality, it is fair that the financial pressures of each determine how much each should contribute.Wealthier individuals, with less financial pressure, should contribute more money, while poorer citizens, with more financial pressure, should contribute less.This also promotes social justice, as it promotes a decrease in inequality in the country.
Regarding social justice, we can say that the correction system is very large and it spends a lot of public money, but we cannot ignore that the consequences of this system are much greater and cause very positive effects on society, which are more important than public spending.
More information on social inequality at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/937415