tim falls and lands face first in chicken broth
The great gatsby love essay
"Click here to read and refer to "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" by Rudyard Kipling in order to answer the question
below."
What is a possible theme of the story?
trust
fear
Olove
honesty
Answer:
I would think it's trust because Rikki-Tikki was trusted to go fight the two married cobras.
SHE TOLD ME PUT MY HEART IN THE BAG AND NO BODY GETS HURT NOW I AM RUNNING FROM YOUR LOVE I AM NOT FAST SO I AM MAKING IT WORST NOW I AM DIGGING UP A GRAVE FROM MY PAST IMA WHOLE DIFFERENT PERSON ITS THE GIFTED THE CURSE BUT I CANNOT REVERSE ITTTT u not a legend if u dont know this song
Please help me and DO NOT ANWSER IF U DO NOT KNOE
Answer:
1. D
I only know one
Explanation:
Sorry but hope it helps
Answer:
1. Prof. Quirrell
2. Snape's robe catches on fire
Explanation:
I'm not 100% sure on the second one since it's been awhile but I'm pretty sure it's right. :)
Do you think the U.S. should drill for oil in Alaska? Explain.
Yes because Alaska still runs on oil. Alaska's north slope has responsibly produced more than 18 billion barrels of oil since the discovert of the prodhoe bay oil field.
But he said if I want to get smart I got to do what he says. I told him I dint think I was going to get smart and he puts his hand on my sholder and said Charlie you dont know it yet but your getting smarter all the time. You wont notice for a while. I think he was just being nice to make me feel good because I dont look any smarter.
How does Charlie feel in this passage?
be
How does Roosevelt use appeals to convince the
audience of her claim that the Declaration of Human
Rights should not be amended by a totalitarian
government? Select three options
Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by
sharing data that prove that totalitarian
governments do not allow their people freedom
Read the excerpt from Eleanor Roosevelt's speech
"The Struggle for Human Rights."
The field of human rights is not one in which
compromise on fundamental principles are possible.
The work of the Commission on Human Rights is
illustrative. The Declaration of Human Rights provides
"Everyone has the right to leave any country, including
his own." The Soviet Representative said he would
agree to this right if a single phrase was added to
it—"in accordance with the procedure laid down in the
laws of that country." It is obvious that to accept this
would be not only to compromise but to nullify the
right stated. This case forcefully illustrates the
importance of the proposition that we must ever be
alert not to compromise fundamental human rights
merely for the sake of reaching unanimity and thus
lose them...
Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience
by referring to Hitler's rise to power and the tragic
consequences of his government.
Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by
noting that the interests of the people are not
considered in a one-party government.
Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by
explaining reasons why the amendment would
Save and Exit
Next
Submit
Mark this and return
Answer:
Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by referring to Hitler’s rise to power and the tragic consequences of his government. Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by noting that the interests of the people are not considered in a one-party government. Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by explaining reasons why the amendment would allow the Soviets to ignore a human right.In this excerpt, Eleanor Roosevelt explains why a compromise on human rights issues is often equivalent to nullifying the protection. She does this by first describing an issue in which compromising (with the Soviets) would eliminate the protection of the right. She also appeals to the logic of the listeners when she explains that in one-party systems, the rights of citizens are often ignored. Finally, she emphasizes this fact by reminding the reader of Hitler's regime and its consequences.
Explanation:
Hope this helps, brainliest would be nice too<3
Not be in the best interest of the people, such as compromising fundamental human rights.
Who was Roosevelt?Roosevelt makes an appeal to the audience's sense of morality by emphasising the significance of protecting basic human rights and avoiding making concessions on these fronts in the sake of achieving consensus.
Roosevelt makes an appeal to the audience's authority by invoking the United Nations and the role it plays in defending and advancing human rights.
Learn more about Roosevelt, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29797674
#SPJ2
Why do some people put a space before punctuation?
Answer:
Because they not smart ^^
What are the literary elements in the adventure of the German student?
Answer:
the adventure of the german student appears to be about morality.
10 POINTS PLEASE I. NEED THIS ASAP. Question 3 of 10
Which phrase breaks the rule of parallel structure?
O A. Dependable
O B. Honest
C. Punctuality
D. Courageous
Answer:
D...................
why should we not do violence ?
Answer: Violence is dangerous and people can get hurt by it
Explanation:
My name starts with an M
Try again
I also have a name of a famous singer
I am also a girl
Say it in the answer section not the comments please
Answer:
Mariah??
Miley???
Megan???
button, button ommonlit
Answer:
lol
Explanation:
STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt
By S. E. Forman
1911
THE MATCH
There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match.
Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.
In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.
What was the main problem with relying on nature to start a flame?
Fire could only be collected with "sticks of wood" that were hard to find.
Fire had to be "carefully guarded," requiring someone to stay behind from hunting.
Fire had to be "carried to the home," which could be dangerous and awkward.
Fire was likely hard to find, requiring a "long journey and a deal of trouble."
Answer:
The main problem with relying on nature to start a flame was that Fire was likely hard to find, requiring a "long journey and a deal of trouble."
Explanation:
If nature started a fire, the people would have to carry that fire to the place where they lived at that time and guard it as much as they could. These journeys were sometimes long and dangerous and it was not a reliable way of procuring fire.
Give a brief description of satirical writing:
factual writing:
descriptive writing:
Answer:
Descriptive writing: My hair is Light-Brown my eyes are also Light-Brown I'm wearing a Navy blue shirt with dark blue jeans.
Satirical writing: My friend and I got ice cream from a fancy restaurant and it was super delicious like it was so sweet and so tasty.
Factual writing:Sad fact South Korea is filled with pollution so they have to wear mask daily, Fact that no dogs get eaten by Chinese peopleso those saying they do they don't.
Select the correct answer.
How does the writer develop the claim in paragraph 2?
A. By using data to compare the salaries of a college graduate to someone with high school degree
B. By listing the top paying professions college student should pursue
C. By using data to show the rising number of jobs that require a college degree
D. By telling a personal story about finding a job after college
Answer:
A. By using data to compare the salaries of a college graduate to someone with high school degree
Explanation:
The development of data in paragraph two is true due to the fact that, he compared salaries of people with different levels of certificates- college graduate with degree certificates with those with high school certificates. This could be seen in the example of report on those with associate degree earning approximately $53,000 as compared with high school certificate holder earning approximately $36,000
Answer:
By using data to compare the salaries of a college graduate to someone with high school degree
Explanation:
Please help this is due today please :)
Answer:
A. When two clauses are joined by a semicolon, they can usually be separated into two sentences.
Explanation:
A semicolon (;) is used to join two independent sentences into one written sentence. This semicolon is used when the two sentences are seen to be closely related to be separated by the use of a full stop. Also, it is used when there is no connecting word that require the use of comma.
But in actual sense, a semicolon can be replaced by a full stop thereby forming two different sentences.
The two clauses joined by a semicolon can be separated into two sentences.
During the summer, Baby Luigi doesn’t use air conditioning. Instead, he stuffs his pockets with ice packs.
Is this a sentence or a fragment?
These are sentences.
Answer:
fragment
Explanation:
I think it is fragment.it is not complete sentence...so the answer is fragment
what two questions can you ask yourself when deciding if you need cite something you have paraphrased?
Answer:
Did I paraphrase or change the answer? Does the text still make sense?
Explanation:
Answer:
Is this general knowledge? For example, "The sun sets in the west."
Did I read about this and am now putting that new knowledge into my own words?
Explanation:
I had this question and I put this. Hope this helps and have a good day! (:
please help me with that
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:
Trust.............
Read the dialogue from the passage below. Then write an inference about Papa's feelings about women's suffrage meetings and explain your reasoning.
“Does Papa know where we are going?” I asked. I knew the answer, but I wanted to shake Mama up a bit. Mama looked away as she answered nervously, “I'll tell him later. I wanted to point out that if Mama felt uncomfortable telling Papa where we were going, perhaps we shouldn't be going there at all, but I held my tongue.
Answer:
What was the picture? I'll put the answer in the comments but the picture won't load for me. I just want to confirm theres nothing else I'm not missing before I send in the answer just in case.
1. I visited Italy, there I saw a .... .... Tower
depression
massive
happy
square
2. Muslims have many .. . practices in their daily life
-sad
-spiritual
-happy
-difficult
3. is one of the most dangerous mental illnesses in the world....
-Depression
-Quality
-Immune
-Sadness
4. things cant make you happy..
magical
massive
spiritual
material
5. You can buy phone of good ... for a good price
quality
immune
depression
regret
Answer:
1 massive
2 spiritual
3 depression
4 material
5 quality
What similar messages do the poems identity and to a daughter leaving home" share about the role of independence in creating an identity
Answer: The messages of spirituality, Identity/self and journey
Explanation: The poem "Identity" talks about how the speaker would rather be himself, even If people see him as ugly, weird, and creepy, just like an ugly weed, than being someone "perfect" for society, and be tied to expectations just to have approval. On the other hand, in the poem "To a daughter leaving home," the speaker tells her journey as a mother from raising their daughter, to watching her find their way and part from home one day. Both poems share a message of spirituality, Identity/self and journey.
What is the purpose of satire?
Answer:
teach readers something about society.
Explanation:
thats the purpose of satire in books, also i took the quiz
1. ) Which of the following places was NOT part of the triangular slave trade?
2.) slavery first came to America with which group of people?
3.) who helped found the American abolition society in 1775?
Answer:
1. South America
2. Colonists
3. Anthony Benezet
Explanation:
Which is an action in the poem that is not described in the selection?
А.
Storing food in tree bark
B.
Allowing feet to become cold
C.
Drinking water from Icicles
D
Burning fat all night long
Answer:
Drinking water from icicles
Explanation:
Plz help! (This is in English because of propaganda)
How did the Nazis use propaganda during World War II?
Answer:
to facilitate war and genocide.
Explanation:
Answer:
to facilitate war and genocide.
Just require 3 simple answers...
Answer:
Saving safe robbed
Local girl goes loud
Town stormed
Explanation:
Saving safe robbed : The saving safe iseant to represent the bank. A place whereby money is meant to be kept safe as much as possible. The bank got penetrwted and the perpetrator was not apprehended.
Local girls goes loud echoes a rose to stardom about a girl that initially has very little to no recognition. But made a huge statement by emerging as the winner on international stage.
The heading town stormed showcases an heading which established how a town was ravaged by an heavy storm.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP!
Read the following discussion:
JOHN:
I loved Animal Farm. I thought it was a really great
critique of the way patriotism blinds people to the
abuses committed in their names by their leaders. They
think they are doing their patriotic duty, but they are
being taken advantage of.
KARLIN:
I didn't get that at all. I thought it was making a very
specific point about the Cold War.
LASHON:
I think it's speaking more generally about the way
people in power abuse those under them. Are you
saying, Karlin, that you don't think it's still relevant today
just because the Cold War is over?
KARLIN:
I think it can still be relevant, but its primary point is
about the Soviet Union. Look at the class structure of
the book, with the absolute power of those in charge,
and the way the animals just agree to work extra for
less food. They're naïve in the same way Orwell was
saying Soviet citizens were. Don't you think?
MARTA:
I agree that he was making that point, but I think you
have to look more broadly too. His questioning of
power structures was really radical. You can even apply
his ideas to our own society, with the way people vote
against their own interests because their leaders
persuade them to do it. Look at your own government,
Orwell was saying. That's why the book is so powerful.
Which student is most clearly using evidence to support his or
her opinion in this discussion?
A. John
OB. Karlin
O C. Marta
D. Lashon
Answer:
B. Karlin
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Student Karlin is most clearly using evidence to support his opinion in this discussion.
What Karlin is referring to?Karlin is referring to the class structure in the book, with the absolute power of those in charge and the way the animals agree to work extra for less food, to support his argument that Orwell was specifically making a point about the Soviet Union.
In this discussion, all four students are expressing their opinions about the novel "Animal Farm" by George Orwell. However, the question asks which student is most clearly using evidence to support their opinion. Based on the conversation, it appears that Marta is the one who is most clearly using evidence to support her opinion.
Marta mentions how Orwell's questioning of power structures in the novel was radical and how it can be applied to our own society, with examples of people voting against their own interests because their leaders persuade them to do so.
Marta's argument is supported by evidence from the novel and also by real-world examples, which make her opinion more convincing. While the other students also express their opinions about the novel, they do not provide as much evidence to support their arguments as Marta does.
Learn more about opinions at:
https://brainly.com/question/30713127
#SPJ7
(only 5-7 sentences pls help)
- What are your thoughts now that you have finished the novel, The Giver? What do you think happened to the Community after Jonas Left? What do you think happens to Jonas and Gabriel? Explain why you believe that. What might be a possible theme to this story?
Answer:
The Giver ends with Jonas’s rejection of his community’s ideal of Sameness. He decides to rescue Gabriel and escape the community, and they grow steadily weaker as they travel through an unfamiliar wintery landscape. At the top of a hill, Jonas finds a sled and rides it down toward a community with lit windows and music. Lowry does not confirm whether the two survive, because the reader can either interpret the sled as a hallucination of Jonas’s dying mind, or as a fortunate coincidence. Upon first seeing the top of the hill, Jonas believes that he remembers the place, and it is “a memory of his own,” as opposed to one from the Giver. Because Jonas doesn’t have his own memories of snow, the meaning of this sentence is not obvious. This confusion could signify Jonas’s deterioration.
Explanation: