The law that will be enforced depends on the specific circumstances and the hierarchy of laws.
In the given scenario, where there is a conflict between a law that prohibits restrictions on the sale of broccoli and another law that conflicts with it, the determination of which law will be enforced depends on various factors. One crucial factor is the hierarchy of laws. In the United States, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, followed by federal laws, state laws, and local laws.
If the California law that prohibits restrictions on the sale of broccoli is a state law, it would generally take precedence over conflicting local laws. However, if the conflicting law is a federal law, it would supersede the state law.
In this particular case, if the law conflicting with the California law is also a state law, it would create a situation where two conflicting state laws exist. In such situations, courts may need to resolve the conflict based on principles of statutory interpretation and constitutional considerations. Factors such as legislative intent, public policy, and constitutional rights may be taken into account in determining which law should prevail.
Learn more about: Hierarchy
brainly.com/question/14485159
#SPJ11
Rufus is playing soccer with his friends after school. rufus pushes samantha while chasing the soccer ball as part of the game. samantha falls and sprains her wrist. rufus also intentionally kicks bethany while she is lying on the ground after a play has finished. rufus was mad that she had scored a goal on him earlier in the game. alex yells at rufus to get himself under control, and rufus responds by trying to punch alex with a closed fist. who can and cannot bring a successful lawsuit against rufus for battery? how about assault? please define the torts of assault and battery in your answer.
In this scenario, the torts of assault and battery are involved. Assault refers to the intentional act of causing apprehension or fear of harmful or offensive contact in another person.
Battery, on the other hand, involves the intentional and harmful or offensive physical contact with another person without their consent.Based on the information provided, Samantha, Bethany, and Alex can potentially bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for both assault and battery.Samantha can bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for battery because he intentionally pushed her, causing her to fall and sprain her wrist. This constitutes harmful physical contact without her consent.Bethany can also bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for battery because he intentionally kicked her while she was lying on the ground. Again, this constitutes harmful physical contact without her consent.
Alex, on the other hand, can bring a successful lawsuit against Rufus for assault but not battery. When Rufus tried to punch Alex, he caused apprehension or fear of harmful or offensive contact. However, since Rufus did not make actual physical contact with Alex, battery is not applicable.It's important to note that the success of these lawsuits may vary depending on the jurisdiction and other factors. It's advisable for the parties involved to consult with a legal professional for accurate advice specific to their situation.
To know more about apprehension visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32224854?
#SPJ11