The total area under the standard normal curve to the left of zequalsnegative 1 or to the right of zequals1 is

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

We calculate the z-score for each

Mathematically;

z-score = (x-mean)/SD

z1 = (1.9-2.1)/0.2 = -1

z2 = (2.3-2.1)/0.2 = 1

So the proportion we want to calculate is;

P(-1<x<1)

We use the standard score table for this ;

P(-1<x<1) = P(x<1) -P(x<-1) = 0.68269 which is approximately 68%

Answer:

68

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/ (x2-x1)

and the given points

m = ( 8 - -1)/( 2-2)

    = (8+1) / 0

We cannot divide by 0 so the slope is undefined

Answer:

A= 20x

B= 15n

C= 15x+ 9

D= a + 15

E= 9x + 3y

F= 10w + 10z

Step-by-step explanation:

hello

[tex]A-B=\left[\begin{array}{cc}4-(-2)&7-5\\-3-7&8-(-1)\\-5-(-3)&-2-2\end{array}\right] \\\\=\left[\begin{array}{cc}4+2&2\\-10&8+1\\-5+3&-4\end{array}\right] \\\\=\left[\begin{array}{cc}6&2\\-10&9\\-2&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]

hope this helps

Using matrices A  and B, the result of A-B is

[tex]A-B=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}6&2\\-10&9\\-2&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]

Given :

Two matrices A  and B. We need to subtract both matrix

Lets find out A-B

Given matrices  A  and B  are

[tex]A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4&7\\-3&8\\-5&-2\end{array}\right] \\B=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2&5\\7&-1\\-3&2\end{array}\right][/tex]

When we subtract A-B  we need to subtract the corresponding elements in that matrix

[tex]A-B=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4&7\\-3&8\\-5&-2\end{array}\right] -\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-2&5\\7&-1\\-3&2\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}4-(-2)&7-5\\-3-7&8-(-1)\\-5-(-3)&-2-2\end{array}\right] \\A-B=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}6&2\\-10&9\\-2&-4\end{array}\right][/tex]

The above is the resultant matrix .

Learn more:  brainly.com/question/12579158

Answer:<5 and <4 are exterior angles

Step-by-step explanation:

Because they are the only ones outside it they are the only ones that are exterior angles!

<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>

Answer:

for AL Its 3 and 4

Answer:

The answer is below

Step-by-step explanation:

They would be written like this:

Arithmetic Progression:

Explicit formula

Tn = a + (n-1) * d

Recursive formula

Tn = Tn-1 + d

Where a is the first term, d is the common differance and n is the number of terms.

Geometric Progression:

Explicit formula

Tn = a * r ^ (n-1)

Recursive formula

Tn = Tn-1 * r

Where r is common ratio

Answer:

A) 360

B) 360

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A)

Given that there are a total of 6 people and 4 person subcommittee is to be selected.

Number of ways to select 1st person = 6

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 5

Number of ways to select 2nd person = 5

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 4

Number of ways to select 3rd person = 4

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 3

Number of ways to select 4th person = 3

So, total number of ways = 6[tex]\times[/tex]5[tex]\times[/tex]4[tex]\times[/tex]3 = 360

Part B)

Given that there are a total of 6 people in the committee

Number of ways to select president  = 6

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 5

Number of ways to select vice president = 5

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 4

Number of ways to select secretary = 4

Now, 1 person is selected, total persons left are 3

Number of ways to select treasurer = 3

So, total number of ways = 6[tex]\times[/tex]5[tex]\times[/tex]4[tex]\times[/tex]3 = 360

This is a great question!

When we are given ( r - c )( 3 ), we are being asked to take 3 as x in the functions r( x ) and c( x ), taking the difference of each afterwards -

[tex]r( 3 ) = ( 3 )^2 + 5( 3 ) + 14,\\x( 3 ) = ( 3 )^2 - 3( 3 ) + 4[/tex]

____

Let us calculate the value of each function, determine their difference, and multiply by 100, considering r( x ) and c( x ) are measured in hundreds of dollars,

[tex]r( 3 ) = 9 + 15 + 14 = 38,\\x( 3 ) = 9 - 9 + 4 = 0 + 4 = 4\\----------------\\( r - c )( 3 ) = 38 - 4 = 34,\\34 * 100 = 3,400( dollars )\\\\Solution = 3,400( dollars )[/tex]

Therefore, ( r - c )( 3 ) " means " that George's new store will have a profit of $3,400 after it's third month in business, given the following options,

( 1. The new store will have a profit of $3400 after its third month in business.  

( ​​2. The new store will have a profit of $2400 after its third month in business.

( 3. ​The new store will sell 2400 items in its third month in business.

( 4. The new store will sell 3400 items in its third month in business.

The required answer is , [tex](r-c)(5)[/tex] means the revenue less expenses in 5 months i.e. the new store will have a profit of $ 5400 after 5 months.

The substitution method is the algebraic method to solve simultaneous linear equations.

Given function is,

[tex]r(x) = x^2+5x+14[/tex]...(1)

And [tex]c(x) = x^2-4x+5[/tex]...(2)

Now, substituting the value into the equation (1) and (2).

[tex]r(5) = (5)^2+5(5)+14=64[/tex]

[tex]c(5) = (5)^2-4(5)+5=10[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex](r-c)(5)=r(5)-c(5)\\=64-10\\=54[/tex]

Now, [tex](r-c)(5)[/tex] means the revenue less expenses in 5 months i.e. the new store will have a profit of $ 5400 after 5 months.

Learn more about the topic Substitution:

https://brainly.com/question/3388130

The 90% confidence interval for the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment is approximately -1.799 to 7.199, suggesting that the effectiveness of garlic in reducing LDL cholesterol is not statistically significant.

We have,

To construct a 90% confidence interval estimate of the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment, we can use the formula:

CI = X ± (Z * (σ/√n))

where:

CI is the confidence interval

X is the sample mean

Z is the critical value corresponding to the desired confidence level (90% confidence level corresponds to Z = 1.645 for a large sample size)

σ is the population standard deviation

n is the sample size

Given that the sample mean X of the net change in LDL cholesterol is 2.7, the standard deviation (σ) is 17.8, and the sample size (n) is 47, we can calculate the confidence interval as follows:

CI = 2.7 ± (1.645 * (17.8/√47))

Calculating the standard error (SE):

SE = σ/√n = 17.8/√47 ≈ 2.587

Substituting the values into the confidence interval formula:

CI = 2.7 ± (1.645 * 2.587)

Calculating the upper and lower bounds of the confidence interval:

Upper bound = 2.7 + (1.645 * 2.587) ≈ 7.199

Lower bound = 2.7 - (1.645 * 2.587) ≈ -1.799

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval estimate for the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment is approximately -1.799 to 7.199.

Interpreting the confidence interval:

Since the confidence interval contains both positive and negative values, it suggests that the effectiveness of garlic in reducing LDL cholesterol is not statistically significant.

The interval includes zero, indicating that there is a possibility that the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment could be zero (no change).

However, it is important to note that further studies or a larger sample size may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

Thus,

The 90% confidence interval for the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment is approximately -1.799 to 7.199, suggesting that the effectiveness of garlic in reducing LDL cholesterol is not statistically significant.

Learn more about confidence intervals here:

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ4

The 90% confidence interval suggests that the true mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment lies between -1.57 and 6.97 mg/dL. Since the interval contains both positive and negative values, it indicates that the garlic treatment may or may not be effective in reducing LDL cholesterol.

To construct a 90% confidence interval estimate of the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment, we can use the formula:

CI = mean ± (Z * (standard deviation / √n))

Here, n represents the sample size (47), Z is the critical value corresponding to a 90% confidence level (Z = 1.645 for a 90% confidence level), and the mean is 2.7 with a standard deviation of 17.8.

Plugging in the values:

CI = 2.7 ± (1.645 * (17.8 / √47))

CI = 2.7 ± (1.645 * (17.8 / 6.856))

CI = 2.7 ± (1.645 * (2.596))

CI = 2.7 ± 4.270

CI = 2.7 + 4.270  ;  CI = 2.7 - 4.270

CI = 6.97             ;  CI = -1.57

Thus, the 90% confidence interval estimate for the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment is approximately (-1.57, 6.97).

The confidence interval suggests that the effectiveness of garlic in reducing LDL cholesterol is inconclusive. The interval spans both positive and negative values, indicating that the true mean change in LDL cholesterol could be anywhere within this range. Further research or a larger sample size might be needed to draw a more definitive conclusion about the effectiveness of garlic in lowering LDL cholesterol.

Read more about confidence interval here: https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ1

Answer:

54

give me brainliest please please please and follow my page

Step-by-step explanation:

To find length of KC...we need to find the length of HM and MU first ...

so....HM= 96- 78 = 14

JU = 96 + HM = 96 + 14 = 110

....

KU = 110 - JK = 110 - 82 = 28

....

UN = 105+ 82 -( 96 + 14 )

187 - 110

= 77

UC = 77 - 51 = 26

KC = UC + KU = 26 + 28 = 54

The length of [tex]\overline{KC}[/tex] along line [tex]\overline{JN}[/tex] is given as 54 (Option A) See the computation below.

To determine the length of [tex]\overline{KC}[/tex], the length of [tex]\overline{HM}[/tex] and [tex]\overline{MU}[/tex]must first be derived.

[tex]\overline{HM}[/tex] = 96 - 78

[tex]\overline{HM}[/tex] = 14

[tex]\overline{JU}[/tex] = 96 + [tex]\overline{HM}[/tex]

= 96 + 14

[tex]\overline{JU}[/tex]= 110

[tex]\overline{KU}[/tex] = 110 - [tex]\overline{JK}[/tex]

= 110 - 82

[tex]\overline{KU}[/tex]= 28

[tex]\overline{UN}[/tex] = 105+ 82 -( 96 + 14 )

=187 - 110

[tex]\overline{UN}[/tex]= 77

[tex]\overline{UC}[/tex] = 77 - 51

[tex]\overline{UC}[/tex]= 26

Thus,

[tex]\overline{KC}[/tex] = [tex]\overline{UC}[/tex] + [tex]\overline{KU}[/tex]

[tex]\overline{KC}[/tex]= 26 + 28

[tex]\overline{KC}[/tex]= 54

Learn more about computing length of lines at:
https://brainly.com/question/1597347
#SPJ6

Answer:

a) -8x^3 + x^2 + 6x

b)16x^2 -9

c) 24x^4 + 37x^3 +13x^2 -18x

Step-by-step explanation:

a) distribute -2x to x and 4x^2 then do the same for the other part and then add the ones w the same exponent.

b) do foil ( multiply first outside inside last) which will be 4x times 4x then 4x times 3 then -3 times 4x and 3 times -3. add like exponents

c) do the same as above

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf \ \ \ ax^2+bx^{-10} \ \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

let's follow the advise and proceed with the substitution

first estimate y'(x) and y''(x) in function of y'(t), y''(t) and t

[tex]x(t)=e^t\\\dfrac{dx}{dt}=e^t\\y'(t)=\dfrac{dy}{dt}=\dfrac{dy}{dx}\dfrac{dx}{dt}=e^ty'(x)<=>y'(x)=e^{-t}y'(t)\\y''(x)=\dfrac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\dfrac{d}{dx}(e^{-t}\dfrac{dy}{dt})=-e^{-t}\dfrac{dt}{dx}\dfrac{dy}{dt}+e^{-t}\dfrac{d}{dx}(\dfrac{dy}{dt})\\=-e^{-t}e^{-t}\dfrac{dy}{dt}+e^{-t}\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}\dfrac{dt}{dx}=-e^{-2t}\dfrac{dy}{dt}+e^{-t}\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}e^{-t}\\=e^{-2t}(\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}-\dfrac{dy}{dt})[/tex]

Now we can substitute in the equation

[tex]x^2y''(x)+9xy'(x)-20y(x)=0\\<=> e^{2t}[ \ e^{-2t}(\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}-\dfrac{dy}{dt}) \ ] + 9e^t [ \ e^{-t}\dfrac{dy}{dt} \ ] -20y=0\\<=> \dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}-\dfrac{dy}{dt}+ 9\dfrac{dy}{dt}-20y=0\\<=> \dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2}+ 8\dfrac{dy}{dt}-20y=0\\[/tex]

so the new equation is

[tex]y''(t)+ 8y'(t)-20y(t)=0[/tex]

the auxiliary equation is

[tex]x^2+8x-20=0\\<=> x^2-2x+10x-20=0\\<=>x(x-2)+10(x-2)=0\\<=>(x+10)(x-2)=0\\<=> x=-10\text{ or }x=2[/tex]

so the solutions of the new equation are

[tex]y(t)=ae^{2t}+be^{-10t}[/tex]

with a and b real

as

[tex]x(t)=e^t\\<=> t(x)=ln(x)[/tex]

[tex]y(x)=ae^{2ln(x)}+be^{-10ln(x)}=ax^2+bx^{-10}[/tex]

hope this helps

do not hesitate if you have any questions

Answer:

x = 2, y = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

   y=6x-7

   9x-2y=8

can be written as

   (1) 6x - y = 7

   (2) 9x -2y = 8

(2)-2*(1) gives

   9x -2y -12x +2y = 8 - 2*7 = 8 - 14 = -6

   <=> -3x=-6

   <=> x = 6/3=2

and we replace it in (1)

  y = 6*2-7=12-7=5

hope this helps

Answer:

GOOGLE :)

equation:

y=mx+b

m= slope (how steep the line is(negative is \ positive is /))

b= y intercept (where it is on the vertical line(up and down line))

step by step

1. locate y intercept and plotthe point

2.from that point use slop to find second point and plot

Answer:

Hello!

________________________

5c + 16.5 = 13.5 + 10c

Exact Form:  c = 3/5

Decimal Form: c = 0.6

Step-by-step explanation: Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Hope this helped you!

Answer:

3000+3d=noods

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is 60cm^2.

hope it helps..

Answer:

Third graph from the top

Step-by-step explanation:

A proportional relationship is a straight line that goes through the point (0,0)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The third straight graph, since a proportion is a relationship in which a second variable is changed by a same value all the time (linear).

Hope this helps, if not, tell me and I shall try again

Answer:

[tex]a_n = 10-3(n - 1)[/tex]

10 + 7 + 4 + 1 + -2 + -5

Step-by-step explanation:

Explicit Arithmetic Formula: [tex]a_n = a_1 + d(n-1)[/tex]

To find d, take the common difference between 2 numbers.

To find the other terms of the sequence, plug them into the explicit formula or subtract 3 from the given numbers.

Answer:

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that there is a significant difference in the proportion of vines infested using Pernod 5 as opposed to Action.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that there is a significant difference in the proportion of vines infested using Pernod 5 as opposed to Action.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (Pernod 5), of size n1=400 has a proportion of p1=0.06.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=24/400=0.06[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=400 has a proportion of p2=0.1.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=40/400=0.1[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.04.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.06-0.1=-0.04[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{24+40}{400+400}=\dfrac{64}{800}=0.08[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.08*0.92}{400}+\dfrac{0.08*0.92}{400}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.000184+0.000184}=\sqrt{0.000368}=0.019[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.04-0}{0.019}=\dfrac{-0.04}{0.019}=-2.085[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(z<-2.085)=0.037[/tex]

As the P-value (0.037) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that there is a significant difference in the proportion of vines infested using Pernod 5 as opposed to Action.

Answer:

w=7

Step-by-step explanation:

1. -8+5w=27

2. add 8 to both sides: 8+-8+5w=27+8

3. Simplify: 5w=35

4. Divide both sides by 5: 5w/5=35/5

5. w=7

Hope This Helps :)

Answer:

w = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

-8 + 5w = 27

Add 8 on both sides.

-8 + 5w + 8 = 27 + 8

5w = 35

Divide both sides by 5.

5w/5 = 35/5

w = 7

Answer:

Y=1/4x-4

Explanation: The y intercept is -4 that is your B. Using the rise over sun method the line rises 1 and goes to the right 4 making the slope 1/4 or .25

Answer:

  B)  112°

Step-by-step explanation:

After the double reflection the point is effectively rotated by an amount that is double the angle between the lines of reflection:

  2·56° = 112°

_____

In the attached, lines l and m are separated by 56°, as required by the problem statement.

Answer:

It's written as

[tex]2.6 \times {10}^{ - 3} [/tex]

Hope this helps you

Answer:

2.6 × 10⁻³

Step-by-step explanation:

To write a number in scientific notation, move the decimal to the right or left until you reach a number that is 1 or higher.

In the decimal 0.0026, the first number that is 1 or higher is 2.

0.0026 ⇒ 2.6

When trying to figure out the exponent, here are some things to keep in mind:

- when you move the decimal to the right, the exponent is negative

- when you move the decimal to the left, the exponent is positive

You moved the decimal to the right three places. So the exponent will be -3.

The result is 2.6 × 10⁻³.

Hope this helps. :)

First find the distance it is reflected:

D = 20.0 x 10.0 /(20-10) = 200/10 = 20cm away.

Now calculate the magnification: -20/ 20 = -1

Now calculate the height:

-1 x 2.50 = -2.50

The negative sign means the image is inverted.

The mirrored image would be inverted, 2.50 cm tall and 20 cm in front of the mirror.

Answer:

2x-y=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Standard form of a line: Ax+by=c

Use slope intercept form: y=mx+b

slope= 2

y=2x-4

Add 4 to both sides.

y+4=2x

subtract y from both sides.

4=2x-y

Rotate the equation

2x-y=4

Answer:

2x-y=4

Step-by-step explanation:

y=2x-4 is the slope intercept.

y-2x=-4

-2x+y=-4

2x-y=4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes. At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount.

The random variable is the sample mean amount of mercury in the bass fish from the lakes of Florida.

The population parameter is the mean amount of mercury in the bass fish of Florida lakes.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the amount of mercury significantly differs from 1 mg/kg.

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the amount of mercury is not significantly different from 1 mg/kg.

[tex]H_0: \mu=1\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete.

There is no data provided.

We will work with a sample mean of 0.95 mg/kg and sample standard deviation of 0.15 mg/kg to show the procedure.

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount (1 mg of mercury per kg of fish).

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=1\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 1[/tex]

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample has a size n=53.

The sample mean is M=0.95.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=0.15.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{0.15}{\sqrt{53}}=0.0206[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{0.95-1}{0.0206}=\dfrac{-0.05}{0.0206}=-2.427[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=53-1=52[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 52 degrees of freedom and t=-2.427, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t<-2.427)=0.019[/tex]

As the P-value (0.019) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount.

Answer:

B. e^x+3

Step-by-step explanation:

Y=e^x

the graph is moving 3 units up

y= y+3

y=e^x+3

answer = y=e^x+3

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  2 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of soil needed is ...

  (14/3 yd)(26/3 yd)(2/36 yd) = 728/324 yd³ = 2.247 yd³

The nearest higher quarter-yard is 2.250 yd³. That's how much you need to order.

  You need to order 2 1/4 cubic yards.

___

There are 3 ft or 36 inches to a yard.

Answer:

94 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for finding the circumference of a circle is;

Circumference = 2πr

where π = [tex]\frac{22}{7}[/tex] or 3.14 and

r = radius

Here radius is 15 cm so;

Circumference = [tex]2 * \frac{22}{7} * 15[/tex]

                         = [tex]\frac{660}{7}[/tex]cm

                         = 94.28cm

                         = 94 cm (  rounded to the nearest centimetre )