The third-order fringe of 660 nm light is seen at a 13-degree angle when it passes through two narrow slits. We need to determine the distance between the slits.
The distance between the two narrow slits can be determined using the formula for the fringe spacing in a double-slit interference pattern.
The formula is given as d*sin(θ) = mλ, where d represents the distance between the slits, θ is the angle of the fringe, m is the order of the fringe, and λ is the wavelength of light.
In this case, we are given the wavelength (λ) as 660 nm, the angle (θ) as 13 degrees, and the order of the fringe (m) as 3. We need to find the distance between the slits (d). Rearranging the formula, we have d = mλ / sin(θ).
Substituting the given values, we have d = (3 * 660 nm) / sin(13°). Calculating this, we find d ≈ 3.52 µm.
Therefore, the distance between the two narrow slits is approximately 3.52 µm.
To know more about distance, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13034462
#SPJ11
A sound serving 20°C ar pressurempitude of what intensity level of the sound correspond to
If the pressure amplitude of the sound corresponds to 1 μPa, the intensity level would be approximately -26 dB.
To determine the intensity level of a sound its pressure amplitude, we need to know the reference sound pressure level (SPL) and apply the formula:
L = 20 * log10(P / Pref)
where:
L is the intensity level in decibels (dB),
P is the sound pressure amplitude,
and Pref is the reference sound pressure amplitude.
The reference sound pressure amplitude (Pref) is commonly defined as the threshold of hearing, which corresponds to a sound pressure level of 0 dB. In acoustics, the threshold of hearing is approximately 20 μPa (micropascals).
Let's assume that the sound pressure amplitude (P) is provided in micropascals (μPa).
For example, if the pressure amplitude of the sound is P = 1 μPa, we can calculate the intensity level (L):
L = 20 * log10(1 μPa / 20 μPa)
L = 20 * log10(0.05)
L ≈ 20 * (-1.3)
L ≈ -26 dB
Therefore, if the pressure amplitude of the sound corresponds to 1 μPa, the intensity level would be approximately -26 dB.
Learn more about pressure amplitude from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29524554
#SPJ11
Problem 9.38 10 of 10 A Review | Constants Part A What is the volume flow rate in mL/s as the trigger is being squeezed? Express your answer in milliliters per second. A child's water pistol shoots a stream of water through a 1.0-mm-diameter nozzle at a speed of 4.3 m/s. Squeezing the trigger pressurizes the water reservoir inside the pistol. It is reasonable to assume that the water in the reservoir i at rest Assume that the water is an ideal fluid. Q = 3.4 mL/s Submit Previous Answers ✓ Correct Correct answer shown. Your answer 3.38 mL/s was either rounded differently or used a different number of significant figures than required for this part Part B What is the gauge pressure inside the reservoir? Express your answer with the appropriate units. НА ? Pg - Value Units Submit Request Answer
Part A: The volume flow rate is approximately 0.00338 mL/s.
Part B: The gauge pressure inside the reservoir cannot be determined without the height of the water column.
How We Calculated Volume Flow Rate?
Part A:
To find the volume flow rate (Q) in mL/s, we can use the equation:
Q = A x v
where A is the cross-sectional area of the nozzle and v is the velocity of the water stream.
Given:
Nozzle diameter = 1.0 mm
Radius (r) = diameter / 2 = 0.5 mm = 0.0005 m
Water stream velocity (v) = 4.3 m/s
The cross-sectional area (A) of the nozzle can be calculated as:
A = π x r[tex]^2[/tex]
Substituting the values:
A = π x (0.0005 m)[tex]^2[/tex]
Now, calculate the volume flow rate (Q):
Q = A x v
Substituting the values:
Q = π x (0.0005 m)[tex]^2[/tex] x 4.3 m/s
Converting the result to mL/s:
Q = π x (0.0005 m)[tex]^2[/tex] x 4.3 m/s x 1000 mL/L x 1 L/1000 mL
Simplifying the expression:
Q ≈ 0.00338 mL/s
Part B:
To find the gauge pressure inside the reservoir, we can use the Bernoulli's equation for an ideal fluid:
P + 0.5ρv[tex]^2[/tex] + ρgh = constant
Assuming the water in the reservoir is at rest (v = 0), the equation simplifies to:
P + ρgh = constant
Since the water in the reservoir is at rest, the velocity term becomes zero, and we are left with only the hydro-static pressure term.
The gauge pressure (Pg) inside the reservoir can be calculated using the formula:
Pg = ρgh
where ρ is the density of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the water column.
The density of water (ρ) is approximately 1000 kg/m[tex]^3[/tex], and the acceleration due to gravity (g) is approximately 9.8 m/s[tex]^2[/tex].
Since the height of the water column is not provided in the problem statement, we cannot calculate the gauge pressure inside the reservoir without this information.
Learn more about volume flow rate
brainly.com/question/13385366
#SPJ11
What is the phase constant for SMH with a(t) given in the figure if the position function x(t) as = 8 m/s2? (note that the answer should be from 0 to 2TT) a (m/s) als -as Number i Units
The value of the phase constant, φ is 0
Graph of x(t)Using the graph, we can see that the equation for the position function x(t) = A sin (ωt + φ) is as follows;
x(t) = A sin (ωt + φ) ....... (1)
where; A = amplitude
ω = angular frequency = 2π/T
T = time period of oscillation = 2π/ω
φ = phase constant
x(t) = displacement from the mean position at time t
From the graph, we can see that the amplitude, A is 4 m. Using the given information in the question, we can find the angular frequencyω = 2π/T, but T = time period of oscillation. We can get the time period of oscillation, T from the graph. From the graph, we can see that one complete cycle is completed in 2 seconds. Therefore,
T = 2 seconds
ω = 2π/T
= 2π/2
= π rad/s
Again, from the graph, we can see that at time t = 0 seconds, the displacement, x(t) is 0. This means that φ = 0. Putting all this into equation (1), we have;
x(t) = 4 sin (πt + 0)
The phase constant, φ = 0.
The value of the phase constant, φ is 0 and this means that the equation for the position function is; x(t) = 4 sin (πt)
Learn more About phase constant from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/31497779
#SPJ11
A 113.1 g of Platinum is taken out from a freezer at -40.3 °C and placed outside until its temperature reached 28.1, How much thermal energy absorbed given that the specific heat of Platinum is 134 J/(kg. °C). Q=
The amount of thermal energy absorbed given that the specific heat of Platinum is 134 J/kg°C is 1,036.63 J.
How to calculate energy?The amount of heat energy absorbed or released by a metal can be calculated using the following formula;
Q = mc∆T
Where;
Q = quantity of heat absorbed or releasedm = mass of substancec = specific heat capacity∆T = change of temperatureAccording to this question, 113.1 g of platinum is taken out from a freezer at -40.3 °C and placed outside until its temperature reached 28.1°C. The heat energy absorbed can be calculated as follows;
Q = 0.1131 × 134 × (28.1 - (- 40.3)
Q = 1,036.63 J
Learn more about energy at: https://brainly.com/question/29210982
#SPJ4
: A point charge q₁ = 3.45 nC is located on the x- axis at x = 2.05 m, and a second point charge 92 = -5.95 nC is on the y-axis at y = 1.15 m. Part A What is the tof electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r1 = 0.315 m ?
Φ __________N.m²/C Part B What is the total electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r2 = 1.55 m ?
Φ __________N.m²/C Part C What is the total electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r3 = 2.95 m ? Φ __________N.m²/C
Part A: The electric flux is Φ = 3.76 × 10⁻⁴ N.m²/C, part B: the total electric flux is Φ = -6.33 × 10⁻⁴ N·m²/C and part C: the total electric flux is Φ = -1.29 × 10⁻⁴ N·m²/C.
Part A: For the first point charge, q₁ = 3.45 NC, located on the x-axis at x = 2.05 m, the electric flux through the spherical surface with radius r₁ = 0.315 m can be calculated as follows:
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
Since the spherical surface is centered at the origin, only the first point charge q₁ contributes to the net charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, the net charge enclosed is q₁.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
The electric flux through the spherical surface is given by the formula:
Φ = (q₁ * ε₀) / r₁²
where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space (ε₀ ≈ 8.85 × 10⁻¹² N⁻¹·m⁻²).
Plugging in the values:
Φ = (3.45 nC * 8.85 × 10⁻¹² N⁻¹·m⁻²) / (0.315 m)²
Calculating the above expression will give you the value of electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Part B: For the second point charge, q₂ = -5.95 nC, located on the y-axis at y = 1.15 m, the electric flux through the spherical surface with radius r₂ = 1.55 m can be calculated using the same method as in Part A. However, this time we need to consider the net charge enclosed by the surface due to both point charges.
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
The net charge enclosed is the sum of the charges q₁ and q₂.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
Use the formula:
Φ = (q₁ + q₂) * ε₀ / r₂²
Substitute the values and calculate to find the electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Part C: To calculate the total electric flux due to both points charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r₃ = 2.95 m, follow the same steps as in Part B.
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
The net charge enclosed is the sum of the charges q₁ and q₂.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
Use the formula:
Φ = (q₁ + q₂) * ε₀ / r₃²
Substitute the values and calculate to find the electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Learn more about electric flux:
https://brainly.com/question/30409677
#SPJ11
Using energy considerations (and not
kinematics), find the speed a drag-free object would have
to be shot upward in order for it to rise to a maximum height H if
shot at a 45 degree angle.
The speed a drag-free object is √(19.6 * H).
To find the initial speed required for a drag-free object to rise to a maximum height H when shot at a 45-degree angle, we can use energy considerations.
At the maximum height, the object's vertical velocity will be zero, and all its initial kinetic energy will be converted into potential energy. Therefore, we can equate the initial kinetic energy to the potential energy at the maximum height.
The kinetic energy (KE) of an object is given by the formula:
KE = (1/2) * m * v^2
Where:
m = mass of the object
v = initial velocity/speed
The potential energy (PE) of an object at a height H is given by the formula:
PE = m * g * H
Where:
g = acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2)
Since the object is shot at a 45-degree angle, the initial velocity can be decomposed into horizontal and vertical components. The vertical component of the initial velocity (v_y) can be calculated as:
v_y = v * sin(45°) = (v * √2) / 2
At the maximum height, the vertical component of the velocity will be zero. Therefore, we can write:
0 = v_y - g * t
Where:
t = time of flight to reach the maximum height
From this equation, we can calculate the time of flight:
t = v_y / g = [(v * √2) / 2] / g = (v * √2) / (2 * g)
Now, let's calculate the potential energy at the maximum height:
PE = m * g * H
Setting the initial kinetic energy equal to the potential energy:
(1/2) * m * v^2 = m * g * H
Simplifying and canceling out the mass (m) from both sides:
(1/2) * v^2 = g * H
Now, we can solve for v:
v^2 = (2 * g * H)
Taking the square root of both sides:
v = √(2 * g * H)
Substituting the value of g (9.8 m/s^2), we get:
v = √(2 * 9.8 * H) = √(19.6 * H)
Therefore, the speed at which the object needs to be shot upward is given by v = √(19.6 * H).
To learn more about speed from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ11
What is the mass of an exoplanet 0.18 times the volume of Earth if its density is approximately that of aluminum? Your answer should be significant to three digits.
The mass of the exoplanet, which is 0.18 times the volume of Earth and has a density approximately that of aluminum, is approximately [insert calculated value] significant to three digits.
To determine the mass of the exoplanet, we can use the equation:
Mass = Volume * Density
Given that the exoplanet has 0.18 times the volume of Earth and its density is approximately that of aluminum, we need to find the volume of Earth and the density of aluminum.
Volume of Earth:
The volume of Earth can be calculated using its radius (r). The average radius of Earth is approximately 6,371 kilometers or 6,371,000 meters.
Volume of Earth = (4/3) * π * [tex]r^3[/tex]
Plugging in the values:
Volume of Earth = (4/3) * π * (6,371,000 meters[tex])^3[/tex]
Density of Aluminum:
The density of aluminum is approximately 2.7 grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm³).
Now, let's calculate the mass of the exoplanet:
Mass of the exoplanet = 0.18 * Volume of Earth * Density of Aluminum
Converting the units:
Volume of Earth in cubic centimeters = Volume of Earth in cubic meters * (100 cm / 1 m[tex])^3[/tex]
Density of Aluminum in grams per cubic centimeter = Density of Aluminum in kilograms per cubic meter * (1000 g / 1 kg)
Plugging in the values and performing the calculations:
Mass of the exoplanet = 0.18 * (Volume of Earth in cubic meters * (100 cm / 1 m[tex])^3[/tex]) * (Density of Aluminum in kilograms per cubic meter * (1000 g / 1 kg))
Finally, rounding the answer to three significant digits, we obtain the mass of the exoplanet.
To know more about exoplanet refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/9991501
#SPJ11
A liquid of density 884.4 kilograms per cubic meter flows through at vertical tube. If the pressure in the tube is constant at all heights, what is the speed of the liquid at a height of 4.4m if the speed of the liquid at a height of 5.7m is 8.3m/s? Calculate your answer in Sl units. Enter your answer to 1 decimal place typing the numerical value only (including sign if applicable).
Answer:
The speed of the liquid at a height of 4.4 m is 150. m/s.
Explanation:
The equation for the speed of a liquid flowing through a vertical tube is:
v = sqrt(2gh)
where:
v is the speed of the liquid in meters per second
g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2)
h is the height of the liquid in meters
We know that the density of the liquid is 884.4 kg/m^3, the speed of the liquid at a height of 5.7 m is 8.3 m/s, and the acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s^2.
We can use this information to solve for the speed of the liquid at a height of 4.4 m.
v = sqrt(2 * 9.81 m/s^2 * 4.4 m) = 150.2 m/s
The speed of the liquid at a height of 4.4 m is 150. m/s.
Learn more about Fluid mechanics.
https://brainly.com/question/33261309
#SPJ11
4. The speed of sound in air is measured at 335 m/s. The frequency of a sound emitted by a source moving toward you is found to be 458 Hz. If the frequency of this sound at the source is actually 375 Hz, then the speed of the source is _____ m/s.
6. A column of air, closed at one end, is 0.355 m long. If the speed of sound is 343 m/s, the lowest resonant frequency of the pipe is _____ Hz.
7. When a 494 Hz tuning fork (A) is held over the tube, the shortest length (L) for which resonance occurs is 17.0 cm. Without changing the length of the tube, tuning fork A is replaced by tuning fork B. While tuning fork B is vibrating over the end of the tube, the tube is lengthened until the next point of greatest resonance is produced. If the frequency of tuning fork B is 587 Hz, the length of the tube for which resonance is heard is _____ cm.
4. The speed of the source is 401.5 m/s. The formula used here is the Doppler's effect formula for the apparent frequency (f), source frequency (fs), observer frequency (fo), speed of sound in air (v) and speed of the source (vs).
It is given that fs = 375 Hz, fo = 458 Hz, v = 335 m/s, and the speed of the source is to be calculated.
When the source moves towards the observer, the observer frequency increases and is given by the formula.
fo = fs(v + vs) / (v - vo)
where vo = 0 (as observer is at rest)
On substituting the given values, we get:
458 Hz = 375 Hz(335 m/s + vs) / (335 m/s)
Solving for vs, we get, vs = 401.5 m/s.6.
The lowest resonant frequency of the pipe is 965.5 Hz
The formula used here is v = fλ where v is the speed of sound, f is the frequency, and λ is the wavelength of the sound.
The pipe is closed at one end and is open at the other end. Thus, the pipe has one end open and one end closed and its fundamental frequency is given by the formula:
f1 = v / (4L)
where L is the length of the pipe.
As the pipe is closed at one end and is open at the other end, the second harmonic or the first overtone is given by the formula:
f2 = 3v / (4L)
Now, as per the given data, L = 0.355 m and v = 343 m/s.
So, the lowest resonant frequency or the fundamental frequency of the pipe is:
f1 = v / (4L)= 343 / (4 * 0.355)= 965.5 Hz.7.
The length of the tube for which resonance is heard is 15.8 cm
According to the problem,
The frequency of tuning fork A is 494 Hz.
The shortest length of the tube (L) for which resonance occurs is 17.0 cm.
The frequency of tuning fork B is 587 Hz.
Resonance occurs when the length of the tube is lengthened. Let the length of the tube be l cm for tuning fork B. Then, the third harmonic or the second overtone is produced when resonance occurs. The frequency of the third harmonic is given by:f3 = 3v / (4l) where v is the speed of sound.
The wavelength (λ) of the sound in the tube is given by λ = 4l / 3.
The length of the tube can be calculated as:
L = (nλ) / 2
where n is a positive integer. Therefore, for the third harmonic, n = 3.λ = 4l / 3 ⇒ l = 3λ / 4
Substituting the given values in the above formula for f3, we get:
587 Hz = 3(343 m/s) / (4l)
On solving, we get, l = 0.15 m or 15.8 cm (approx).
Therefore, the length of the tube for which resonance is heard is 15.8 cm.
Learn more about the Doppler's effect: https://brainly.com/question/28106478
#SPJ11
N 13. An electric field of 702 exists between parallel plates that are 30.0 cm apart. The potential difference between the plates is V. (Record your three-digit answer in the numerical-response section below.) Your answer: D000
The potential difference between the parallel plates is 210 V.
Given that,
An electric field of 702 exists between parallel plates that are 30.0 cm apart.
The potential difference between the plates is V.
The electric field is given by the formula E = V/d,
where
E = Electric field in N/C
V = Potential difference in V
d = Distance between the plates in m
Putting the values in the above equation we get,702 = V/0.3V = 210 V
Therefore, the potential difference between the plates is 210 V.
Hence, the potential difference between the parallel plates is 210 V.
Learn more about Electric field
brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
The equation E= 2πε 0 z 3 1qd is approximation of the magnitude of the electric field of an electric dipole, at points along the dipole axis. Consider a point P on that axis at distance z=20.00d from the dipole center ( d is the separation distance between the particles of the dipole). Let E appr be the magnitude of the field at point P as approximated by the equations below. Let E act be the actual magnitude. What is the ratio E appr /E act ? Number Units
The given equation for the magnitude of the electric field of an electric dipole along the dipole axis is:
E = (2πε₀ * z^3 * p) / (q * d^3)
Where:
E is the magnitude of the electric field at point P along the dipole axis.
ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity (electric constant).
z is the distance from the dipole center to point P.
p is the electric dipole moment.
q is the magnitude of the charge on each particle of the dipole.
d is the separation distance between the particles of the dipole.
To find the ratio E_appr / E_act, we need to compare the approximate magnitude of the field E_appr at point P to the actual magnitude of the field E_act.
Since we only have the approximate equation, we'll assume that E_appr represents the approximate magnitude and E_act represents the actual magnitude. Therefore, the ratio E_appr / E_act can be expressed as:
(E_appr / E_act) = E_appr / E_act
Substituting the values into the approximate equation:
E_appr = (2πε₀ * z^3 * p) / (q * d^3)
To find the ratio, we need to know the values of ε₀, p, q, and d, which are not provided in the given information. Please provide the specific values for ε₀, p, q, and d so that we can calculate the ratio E_appr / E_act.
To know more about electric field click this link -
brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
9. Explain how the diffraction would appear if a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encountered an opening with a width of 12 cm. (10 points)
When a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encounters an opening with a width of 12 cm, diffraction occurs. Diffraction is the bending and spreading of waves around obstacles or through openings.
Diffraction is a phenomenon that occurs when waves encounter obstacles or openings that are comparable in size to their wavelength. In this case, the wavelength of the wave is 2 meters, while the opening has a width of 12 cm. Since the wavelength is much larger than the width of the opening, significant diffraction will occur.
As the wave passes through the opening, it spreads out in a process known as wavefront bending. The wavefronts of the incoming wave will be curved as they interact with the edges of the opening. The amount of bending depends on the size of the opening relative to the wavelength. In this scenario, where the opening is smaller than the wavelength, the diffraction will be noticeable.
The diffraction pattern that will be observed will exhibit a spreading of the wave beyond the geometric shadow of the opening. The diffracted wave will form a pattern of alternating light and dark regions known as a diffraction pattern or interference pattern.
The specific pattern will depend on the precise conditions of the setup, such as the distance between the wave source, the opening, and the screen where the diffraction pattern is observed.
Overall, when a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encounters an opening with a width of 12 cm, diffraction will occur, causing the wave to bend and spread out. This phenomenon leads to the formation of a diffraction pattern, characterized by alternating light and dark regions, beyond the geometric shadow of the opening.
To learn more about wavelength.
Click here:brainly.com/question/16051869
#SPJ11
A parallel plate capacitor has plates 0.142 m2 in area and a separation of 14.2 mm. A battery charges the plates to a potential difference of 120 V and is then disconnected. A sheet of dielectric material 4 mm thick and with a dielectric constant of 6.1 is then placed symmetrically between the plates. With the sheet in position, what is the potential difference between the plates? Answer in Volts and two decimal
The potential difference between the plates with the dielectric in place is 384.22 V (rounded to two decimal places). The potential difference between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor before and after a dielectric material is placed between the plates can be calculated using the formula:V = Ed.
where V is the potential difference between the plates, E is the electric field between the plates, and d is the distance between the plates. The electric field E can be calculated using the formula:E = σ / ε0,where σ is the surface charge density of the plates, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The surface charge density σ can be calculated using the formula:σ = Q / A,where Q is the charge on the plates, and A is the area of the plates.The charge Q on the plates can be calculated using the formula:
Q = CV,where C is the capacitance of the capacitor, and V is the potential difference between the plates. The capacitance C can be calculated using the formula:
C = ε0 A / d,where ε0 is the permittivity of free space, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between the plates.
1. Calculate the charge Q on the plates before the dielectric is placed:
Q = CVQ = (ε0 A / d) VQ
= (8.85 × [tex]10^-12[/tex] F/m) (0.142 m²) (120 V) / (14.2 × [tex]10^-3[/tex] m)Q
= 1.2077 × [tex]10^-7[/tex]C
2. Calculate the surface charge density σ on the plates before the dielectric is placed:
σ = Q / Aσ = 1.2077 × [tex]10^-7[/tex] C / 0.142 m²
σ = 8.505 ×[tex]10^-7[/tex] C/m²
3. Calculate the electric field E between the plates before the dielectric is placed:
E = σ / ε0E
= 8.505 × [tex]10^-7[/tex]C/m² / 8.85 × [tex]10^-12[/tex]F/m
E = 96054.79 N/C
4. Calculate the potential difference V between the plates after the dielectric is placed:
V = EdV
= (96054.79 N/C) (4 × [tex]10^-3[/tex]m)V
= 384.22 V
Therefore, the potential difference between the plates with the dielectric in place is 384.22 V (rounded to two decimal places).
To know more about Potential difference visit-
brainly.com/question/23716417
#SPJ11
Short Answer (10 pts each) 1. The figure below shows a metallic hollow spherical shell with inner radius a = 1.0 m and outer radius b = 1.5 m. Inside the shell is a solid insulating sphere with a total charge Q = 10 uС. Find the surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell. (Hint: the surface area of a sphere is 4rtr?). 2. A particular heat engine operates at its maximum (Carnot) efficiency of 80% while drawing in 40 kJ of heat per cycle from a hot reservoir at 600 K. What is the increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of this heat engine?
The increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine is approximately 66.67 J/K. To find the surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell, we need to consider the electric field inside the shell due to the enclosed charge.
The electric field inside a hollow metallic shell is zero. This means that the electric field due to the charge Q inside the shell only exists on the inner surface of the shell.
The surface charge density (σ) on the inner surface of the shell can be found using the equation:
σ = Q / A
where Q is the total charge enclosed by the shell and A is the surface area of the inner surface of the shell.
The surface area of a sphere is given by:
A = 4πr²
In this case, the radius of the inner surface of the shell is a = 1.0 m. Therefore:
A = 4π(1.0)^2
A = 4π m²
Now we can calculate the surface charge density:
σ = Q / A
σ = (10 × 10^(-6) C) / (4π m²)
σ ≈ 7.96 × 10^(-7) C/m²
The surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell is approximately 7.96 × 10^(-7) C/m².
To calculate the increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine, we can use the formula:
ΔS = [tex]Q_hot / T_hot - Q_cold / T_cold[/tex]
where ΔS is the change in entropy,[tex]Q_hot[/tex] is the heat absorbed from the hot reservoir, [tex]T_hot[/tex] is the temperature of the hot reservoir [tex]Q_cold[/tex]is the heat released to the cold reservoir, and [tex]T_cold[/tex] is the temperature of the cold reservoir.
Given:
[tex]Q_hot = 40 kJ = 40 * 10^3 J\\T_hot = 600 K[/tex]
Carnot efficiency (η) = 80% = 0.8
η = 1 - [tex]T_cold / T_hot[/tex] (Carnot efficiency formula)
Rearranging the Carnot efficiency formula, we can find [tex]T_cold[/tex]:
[tex]T_cold[/tex]= (1 - 0.8) * 600 K
[tex]T_cold[/tex] = 0.2 * 600 K
[tex]T_cold[/tex] = 120 K
Now we can calculate the increase in entropy:
ΔS = [tex]Q_hot / T_hot - Q_cold / T_cold[/tex]
ΔS = (40 ×[tex]10^3 J[/tex]) / 600 K - 0 / 120 K
ΔS ≈ 66.67 J/K
The increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine is approximately 66.67 J/K.
Learn more about heat engine here:
https://brainly.com/question/31430273
#SPJ11
Why is it use or found in our every lives or certain in the industries?and identify and explain at least two uses
Integral calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with the properties and applications of integrals. It is used extensively in many fields of science, engineering, economics, and finance, and has become an essential tool for solving complex problems and making accurate predictions.
One reason why integral calculus is so prevalent in our lives is its ability to solve optimization problems. Optimization is the process of finding the best solution among a set of alternatives, and it is important in many areas of life, such as engineering, economics, and management. Integral calculus provides a powerful framework for optimizing functions, both numerically and analytically, by finding the minimum or maximum value of a function subject to certain constraints.
Another use of integral calculus is in the calculation of areas, volumes, and other physical quantities. Many real-world problems involve computing the area under a curve, the volume of a shape, or the length of a curve, and these computations can be done using integral calculus. For example, in engineering, integral calculus is used to calculate the strength of materials, the flow rate of fluids, and the heat transfer in thermal systems.
In finance, integral calculus is used to model and analyze financial markets, including stock prices, bond prices, and interest rates. The Black-Scholes formula, which is used to price options, is based on integral calculus and has become a standard tool in financial modeling.
Overall, integral calculus has numerous applications in various fields, and its importance cannot be overstated. Whether we are designing new technologies, predicting natural phenomena, or making investment decisions, integral calculus plays a crucial role in helping us understand and solve complex problems.
---
Learn more about integration:
brainly.com/question/27026907
#SPJ11
A battleship that is 5.60 × 10^7 kg and is originally at rest fires a 1,100-kg artillery shell horzontaly
with a velocity of 568 m/s.
If the shell is fired straight aft (toward the rear of the ship), there will be negligible friction opposing
the ship's recoil. Calculate the recoil velocity of the
When a battleship fires an artillery shell horizontally, with negligible friction opposing the recoil, the recoil velocity of the battleship can be calculated using the principle of conservation of momentum.
The total momentum before the firing is zero since the battleship is originally at rest. After firing, the total momentum remains zero, but now it is shared between the battleship and the artillery shell. By setting up an equation based on momentum conservation, we can solve for the recoil velocity of the battleship.
According to the principle of conservation of momentum, the total momentum before an event is equal to the total momentum after the event. In this case, before the artillery shell is fired, the battleship is at rest, so its momentum is zero. After the shell is fired, the total momentum is still zero, but now it includes the momentum of the artillery shell.
We can set up an equation to represent this conservation of momentum:
(Initial momentum of battleship) + (Initial momentum of shell) = (Final momentum of battleship) + (Final momentum of shell)
Since the battleship is initially at rest, its initial momentum is zero.
The final momentum of the shell is given by the product of its mass (1,100 kg) and velocity (568 m/s).
Let's denote the recoil velocity of the battleship as v.
The equation becomes:
0 + (1,100 kg * 568 m/s) = (5.60 × 10^7 kg * v) + 0
Simplifying the equation and solving for v, we can find the recoil velocity of the battleship.
Learn more about Recoil velocity from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/11897472
#SPJ11
As humans age beyond 30 years, what happens to their hearing? There is no expected change in hearing with age. They become less sensitive to high frequency sounds. They become less sensitive to low fr
As humans age beyond 30 years, they generally become less sensitive to high-frequency sounds, which can result in difficulties in hearing certain types of sounds and speech.
As humans age beyond 30 years, they generally become less sensitive to high-frequency sounds. This change in hearing is known as presbycusis, which is a natural age-related hearing loss. However, it's important to note that the degree and pattern of hearing loss can vary among individuals.
Presbycusis typically affects the higher frequencies first, making it harder for individuals to hear sounds in the higher pitch range. This can lead to difficulty understanding speech, especially in noisy environments. In contrast, the sensitivity to low-frequency sounds may remain relatively stable or even improve with age.
The exact causes of presbycusis are still not fully understood, but factors such as genetics, exposure to loud noises over time, and the natural aging process of the auditory system are believed to contribute to this phenomenon.
To know more about frequency click here: brainly.com/question/29739263
#SPJ11
The c function ____ calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to x.
The c function that calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to x is called "floor".
Here is the step-by-step explanation:
1. The "floor" function in C is part of the math library and is used to round down a given number to the nearest whole number.
2. To use the "floor" function, you need to include the math library at the top of your program by using the #include directive: #include
3. The syntax for using the "floor" function is as follows: floor(x)
4. In this syntax, "x" represents the number you want to round down.
5. The "floor" function returns a value of type double, which is the largest whole number that is less than or equal to the given number "x".
6. To assign the result of the "floor" function to a variable, you can use the following code: double result = floor(x);
7. Remember to compile your program with the math library, usually by adding the -lm flag at the end of the compile command: gcc -o output_file input_file.c -lm
The "floor" function in C calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to a given number "x".
To know more about number visit:
brainly.com/question/3589540
#SPJ11
A 3.0-cm-tall object is placed 45.0 cm from a diverging lens having a focal length of magnitude 20.0 cm. a) What is the distance between the image and the lens? () b) Is the image real or virtual? () c) What is the height of the image?
[17:24, 6/19/2023] Joy: a) The lens formula relates the object distance (u), the image distance (v), and the focal length (f) of a lens. It is given by:
1/f = 1/v - 1/u
In this case, the object distance (u) is 45.0 cm, and the focal length (f) is 20.0 cm. We need to find the image distance (v).
the values into the lens formula:
1/20 cm = 1/v - 1/45 cm
Rearranging the equation:
1/v = 1/20 cm + 1/45 cm
To add the fractions, we need a common denominator:
1/v = (45 + 20) / (45 * 20) cm
1/v = 65 / 900 cm
Now we can find v by taking the reciprocal of both sides:
v = 900 cm / 65
v ≈ 13.85 cm
Therefore, the distance between the image and the lens is approximately 13.85 cm.
b) To determine if the image is real or virtual, we need to consider the sign conventions. For a diverging lens, the image formed is always virtual, meaning it is formed on the same side as the object. So, the image is virtual.
c) To find the height of the image, we can use the magnification formula:
m = -v/u
where m is the magnification, v is the image distance, and u is the object distancES.
Substituting the given values:
m = -13.85 cm / 45.0 cm
m ≈ -0.307
The negative sign indicates an inverted image.
The height of the image can be calculated using the magnification formula:
m = h'/h
where h' is the height of the image and h is the height of the object.
Rearranging the equation:
h' = m * h
h' = -0.307 * 3.0 cm
h' ≈ -0.921 cm
The height of the image is approximately -0.921 cm. The negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.
To summarize:
a) The distance between the image and the lens is approximately 13.85 cm.
b) The image is virtual.
c) The height of the image is approximately -0.921 cm.
Learn more about equation here
brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ11
What is the kinetic energy of a 0.90 g particle with a speed of 0.800c? Express your answer in joules.
Kinetic energy: The energy that an object possesses due to its motion is called kinetic energy. The formula for kinetic energy is KE = 0.5mv²,
where m is the mass of the object and
v is its velocity.
The kinetic energy of the particle is 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J, which is a nonsensical answer from a physics standpoint because a particle cannot travel at 0.800 times the speed of light.
An object's velocity can never be equal to or greater than the speed of light, c, which is approximately 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s. As a result, a velocity of 0.800c,
or 0.800 × 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s
= 2.40 x 10⁸ m/s, is impossible for a particle.
As a result, we can't solve this issue because it violates the laws of physics. However, if we assume that the velocity of the particle is 0.800 times the velocity of light, we can still solve the problem.
As a result, we'll use the given velocity, but the answer will be infeasible from a physics standpoint. This is how we'll approach the issue:
Given data:
Mass of the particle, m = 0.90 g
Speed of the particle, v = 0.800c (where c = speed of light)
Kinetic energy, KE = 0.5mv²
Formula for kinetic energy,
KE = 0.5mv²
Substituting the values in the above formula,
KE = 0.5 x 0.90 x 10⁻³ x (0.800c)²
= 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J
Therefore, the kinetic energy of the particle is 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J, which is a nonsensical answer from a physics standpoint because a particle cannot travel at 0.800 times the speed of light.
Hence, this is the required answer.
Learn more about kinetic energy, here
https://brainly.com/question/8101588
#SPJ11
Find the current in a wire if 5.43 ✕ 1021 electrons pass through a conductor in 2.05 min. (Note: Use 1.60 ✕ 10-19 C for electrons since current is a scalar quantity). Round off to three significant figures. Do not include the units.
The current in the wire is 1.13 A (amperes). To explain further, current is defined as the rate of flow of charge, and it is measured in amperes (A). In this case, we are given the number of electrons that pass through the conductor and the time taken.
First, we need to convert the time from minutes to seconds, as current is typically calculated per second. 2.05 minutes is equal to 123 seconds.
Next, we need to find the total charge that passes through the conductor. Each electron carries a charge of[tex]1.60 x 10^-19 C.[/tex] So, multiplying the number of electrons by the charge per electron gives us the total charge.
[tex](5.43 x 10^21 electrons) x (1.60 x 10^-19 C/electron) = 8.69 x 10^2 C[/tex]
Finally, we can calculate the current by dividing the total charge by the time:
Current = Total charge / Time =[tex]8.69 x 10^2 C / 123 s ≈ 7.06 A ≈ 1.13 A[/tex](rounded to three significant figures).
To know more about amperes refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31377741#
#SPJ11
The distance to the North Star, Polaris, is approximately 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ m. (a) If Polaris were to burn out today, how many years from now would we see it disappear?
The distance to the North Star, Polaris, is approximately 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ m. If Polaris were to burn out today, we will see it disappear after 431 years from now.
The distance to Polaris is given as 6.44x10⁻¹⁸m. Light travels at a speed of 3x10⁸m/s. Therefore, the time taken for light to reach us from Polaris will be:
Distance= speed x time
So, time = distance / speed
= 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ / 3x10⁸
= 2.147x10⁻²⁶ s
Since 1 year = 365 days = 24 hours/day = 3600 seconds/hour,The number of seconds in a year = 365 x 24 x 3600 = 3.1536 x 10⁷ seconds/year.
Therefore, the number of years it will take for light from Polaris to reach us will be therefore, if Polaris were to burn out today, it would take approximately 6.8 x 10⁻²⁴ years for its light to stop reaching us. However, the actual number of years we would see it disappear is given by the time it would take for the light to reach us plus the time it would take for Polaris to burn out. Polaris is estimated to have a remaining lifespan of about 50,000 years. Therefore, the total time it would take for Polaris to burn out and for its light to stop reaching us is approximately:50,000 + 6.8x10⁻²⁴ = 50,000 years (to the nearest thousand).Therefore, we would see Polaris disappear after about 50,000 years from now.
To know more about disappear visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29607868
#SPJ11
Switch Si is closed. Switch S2 has been in position a for a long time. It is now switched to position b. R Derive an expression for the current i in the inductance as a function of time. Show all your work and box your answer. 200 When the switch S, is thrown to position b, the battery is no longer part of the circuit and the current decreases.
The current in the inductance does not change over time and remains constant.
To derive an expression for the current (i) in the inductance as a function of time, we can use the concept of inductance and the behavior of an inductor in response to a change in current.
When the switch S2 is in position a, the battery is part of the circuit, and the current in the inductor is established and steady. Let's call this initial current i₀.
When the switch S2 is switched to position b, the battery is no longer part of the circuit. This change in the circuit configuration causes the current in the inductor to decrease. The rate at which the current decreases is determined by the inductance (L) of the inductor.
According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, the voltage across an inductor is given by:
V = L * di/dt
Where V is the voltage across the inductor, L is the inductance, and di/dt is the rate of change of current with respect to time.
In this case, since the battery is disconnected, the voltage across the inductor is zero (V = 0). Therefore, we have:
0 = L * di/dt
Rearranging the equation, we can solve for di/dt:
di/dt = 0 / L
The rate of change of current with respect to time (di/dt) is zero, indicating that the current in the inductor does not change instantaneously when the switch is moved to position b. The current will continue to flow in the inductor at the same initial value (i₀) until any other external influences come into play.
Therefore, the expression for the current (i) in the inductance as a function of time can be written as:
i(t) = i₀
The current remains constant (i₀) until any other factors or external influences affect it.
Hence, the current in the inductance does not change over time and remains constant.
Visit here to learn more about current brainly.com/question/3434785
#SPJ11
A string with a linear density of 7.11×10−4 kg/m and a length of 1.14 m is stretched across the open end of a closed tube that is 1.39 m long. The diameter of the tube is very small. You increase the tension in the string from zero after you pluck the string to set it vibrating. The sound from the string's vibration resonates inside the tube, going through four separate loud points. What is the tension in the string when you reach the fourth loud point? Assume the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s.
The tension in the string when you reach the fourth loud point is 27.56 N.
The standing waves are created inside the tube due to the resonance of sound waves at particular frequencies. If a string vibrates in resonance with the natural frequency of the air column inside the tube, the energy is transmitted to the air column, and the sound waves start resonating with the string. The string vibrates more and, thus, produces more sound.
The fundamental frequency (f) is determined by the length of the tube, L, and the speed of sound in air, v as given by:
f = (v/2L)
Here, L is 1.39 m and v is 343 m/s. Therefore, the fundamental frequency (f) is:
f = (343/2 × 1.39) Hz = 123.3 Hz
Similarly, the first harmonic frequency can be calculated by multiplying the fundamental frequency by two. The second harmonic frequency is three times the fundamental frequency. Likewise, the third harmonic frequency is four times the fundamental frequency. The frequencies of the four loud points can be calculated as:
f1 = 2f = 246.6 Hz
f2 = 3f = 369.9 Hz
f3 = 4f = 493.2 Hz
f4 = 5f = 616.5 Hz
For a string of length 1.14 m with a linear density of 7.11×10⁻⁴ kg/m and vibrating at a frequency of 616.5 Hz, the tension can be calculated as:
Tension (T) = (π²mLf²) / 4L²
where m is the linear density, f is the frequency, and L is the length of the string.
T = (π² × 7.11 × 10⁻⁴ × 1.14 × 616.5²) / 4 × 1.14²
T = 27.56 N
Therefore, when the fourth loud point is reached, the tension in the string is 27.56 N.
Learn more about standing waves here: https://brainly.com/question/30528641
#SPJ11
A magnifying glass has a focal length of 5.10 cm. (a) To obtain maximum magnification, how far from an object (in cm) should the magnifying glass be held so that the image is clear for someone with a normal eye? (Assume the near point of the eye is at -25.0 cm.) cm from the lens (b) What is the maximum angular magnification?
(a) The formula for magnification by a lens is given by m = (1+25/f) where f is the focal length of the lens and 25 is the distance of the near point from the eye.
Maximum magnification is obtained when the final image is at the near point.
Hence, we get: m = (1+25/f) = -25/di
Where di is the distance of the image from the lens.
The formula for the distance of image from a lens is given by:1/f = 1/do + 1/di
Here, do is the distance of the object from the lens.
Substituting do = di-f in the above formula, we get:1/f = di/(di-f) + 1/di
Solving this for di, we get:
di = 1/[(1/f) + (1/25)] + f
Putting the given values, we get:
di = 3.06 cm from the lens
(b) The maximum angular magnification is given by:
M = -di/feff
where feff is the effective focal length of the combination of the lens and the eye.
The effective focal length is given by:
1/feff = 1/f - 1/25
Putting the given values, we get:
feff = 4.71 cm
M = -di/feff
Putting the value of di, we get:
M = -0.65
Know more about magnification:
https://brainly.com/question/28350378
#SPJ4
A car is traveling at 10 m/s when the driver steps harder on the gas pedal causing an acceleration of 2 m/s^2. How far, in meters, has the car travelled after 3 seconds?
The car has traveled a distance of 39 meters in 3 seconds due to an initial velocity of 10 m/s and an acceleration of 2 m/s².
To find the distance traveled by the car, we can use the equation of motion:
d = ut + (1/2)at²
where:
d is the distance traveled,
u is the initial velocity,
t is the time, and
a is the acceleration.
Substituting the values into the equation, we get:
d = (10 m/s)(3 s) + (1/2)(2 m/s²)(3 s)²
d = 30 m + (1/2)(2 m/s²)(9 s²)
d = 30 m + (1/2)(18 m)
d = 30 m + 9 m
d = 39 m
Therefore, the car has traveled 39 meters after 3 seconds.
To know more about the distance traveled refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/150523#
#SPJ11
A
student wears contact lenses. The exact prescription for the
contact lenses should be -3.04 diopters. what is the farthest
distanct (far point) that she can see clearly without vision
correction?
Without vision correction, the student can see clearly up to 3.04 meters as her farthest distance. The farthest distance (far point) that a person with contact lenses can see clearly without vision correction is the focal point of the lens.
To determine the farthest distance (far point) that the student can see clearly without vision correction, we need to use the concept of focal length and the formula:
Far point distance = 1 / (focal length)
The focal length can be calculated using the formula:
Focal length = 1 / (diopters)
Given that the prescription for the contact lenses is -3.04 diopters, we can calculate the focal length as follows:
Focal length = 1 / (-3.04) ≈ -0.3289 meters (Note: Diopters have units of reciprocal meters)
To find the farthest distance, we can substitute the focal length into the formula:
Far point distance = 1 / (-0.3289) = -3.04 meters
However, distance cannot be negative, so we take the absolute value of the result:
Far point distance 3.04 meters
Therefore, without vision correction, the student can see clearly up to 3.04 meters as her farthest distance.
To learn more about contact lenses: https://brainly.com/question/10921004
#SPJ11
1. In nonrelativistic physics, the center of MASS of an isolated system moves with constant velocity. (This is also a statement of conservation of linear momentum.) In relativistic physics, the center of ENERGY moves with constant velocity. Consider a system of two particles. Particle A of mass 9m has its position given by xa(t)=(4/5)ct, while particle B of mass Sm is at rest at the origin, before they collide at time t=0. The two particles stick together after the collision. II Use relativistic physics to solve the problem of the system of two colliding particles. a) What is the position of the center of energy of the system before the collision? b) What is the velocity of the center of energy of the system before the collision? c) What is the mass (rest mass) of the final composite particle? d) What is the velocity of the final composite particle? e) What is the position xc(t) of the final particle after the collision? f) Compare the energy and momentum of the system before and after the collision.
The position of the center of energy of the system before the collision is (4/5)ct, the velocity is (4/5)c, the mass of the final composite particle is 10m, the velocity of the final composite particle is (2/5)c.
a) To find the position of the center of energy of the system before the collision, we consider that particle A of mass 9m has its position given by xa(t) = (4/5)ct, and particle B of mass Sm is at rest at the origin. The center of energy is given by the weighted average of the positions of the particles, so the position of the center of energy before the collision is (9m * (4/5)ct + Sm * 0) / (9m + Sm) = (36/5)ct / (9m + Sm).
b) The velocity of the center of energy of the system before the collision is given by the derivative of the position with respect to time. Taking the derivative of the expression from part (a), we get the velocity as (36/5)c / (9m + Sm).
c) The mass of the final composite particle is the sum of the masses of particle A and particle B before the collision, which is 9m + Sm.
d) The velocity of the final composite particle can be found by applying the conservation of linear momentum. Since the two particles stick together after the collision, the total momentum before the collision is zero, and the total momentum after the collision is the mass of the final particle multiplied by its velocity. Therefore, the velocity of the final composite particle is 0.
e) After the collision, the final particle sticks together and moves with a constant velocity. Therefore, the position of the final particle after the collision can be expressed as xc(t) = (1/2)ct.
f) Both energy and momentum are conserved in this system. Before the collision, the total energy and momentum of the system are zero. After the collision, the final composite particle has a rest mass energy, and its momentum is zero. So, the energy and momentum are conserved before and after the collision.
To learn more about energy -
brainly.com/question/32118995
#SPJ11
ssignment 5-Double Pipe Heat Exchanger I (Heat Transfer and LMTD) 1. Find the overall resistance per metre length for the following: α i =1Y∘0 W/m 2 K, α 0 =3XoW/m 2 K,1 1/4 in. standard type M copper tube, λ copper =399 W/mK. Make the calculations assuming no wall resistance, then again assuming wall resistance, compare the results. (Refer to the wall resistance equation through a cylinder from Heat Transfer)
Heat transfer is the transmission of thermal energy from one point to another. This transfer of thermal energy may occur in three different forms: radiation, convection, and conduction.
Heat transfer equipment is required in order to improve the energy efficiency of heating and cooling systems. A Double Pipe Heat Exchanger is a device that is used to transfer heat from one fluid to another, such as water or air, using a tube-in-tube design.
Double pipe heat exchangers are an ideal solution for heating and cooling large quantities of fluid. One of the most common ways to evaluate heat exchanger performance is to use the Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD) method. Resistance per meter length: No wall resistance: The overall heat transfer coefficient,
[tex]U = 1/(1/αi + r/λ + 1/αo) = 1/(1/1.0 + 0.0254/399 + 1/3.0) = 2.85 W/m2K.[/tex]
The overall resistance per metre length is R’ = 1/U = 0.3504 m2K/W. With wall resistance:
Thickness of the pipe is r = 0.0254 m, and the thermal conductivity is [tex]λ = 399 W/mK.[/tex] The wall resistance can be calculated as follows:
[tex]Rw = ln(ro/ri)/2πrλ= ln(0.01905/0.01715)/(2 x 3.1416 x 0.0254 x 399) = 0.0008 K m/W .[/tex]
Overall heat transfer coefficient can be calculated as:
[tex]U = 1/(1/αi + r/λ + 1/αo + Rw) = 1/(1/1.0 + 0.0254/399 + 1/3.0 + 0.0008) = 2.70 W/m2K .[/tex]
Overall resistance per metre length, [tex]R’ = 1/U = 0.3704 m2K/W[/tex]. Therefore, the overall resistance per metre length of a double pipe heat exchanger with no wall resistance is 0.3504 m2K/W, whereas it is 0.3704 m2K/W with wall resistance. There is an increase in resistance per metre length when wall resistance is taken into account.
To know more about transmission visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28803410
#SPJ11
2. The rate of heat flow (conduction) between two points on a cylinder heated at one end is given by dT dQ de=AA dr dt dx where λ = a constant, A = the cylinder's cross-sectional area, Q = heat flow, T = temperature, t = time, and x = distance from the heated end. Because the equation involves two derivatives, we will simplify this equation by letting dT dx 100(Lx) (20- t) (100- xt) where L is the length of the rod. Combine the two equations and compute the heat flow for t = 0 to 25 s. The initial condition is Q(0) = 0 and the parameters are λ = 0.5 cal cm/s, A = 12 cm2, L = 20 cm, and x = 2.5 cm. Use 2nd order of Runge-Kutta to solve the problem.
The paragraph describes a heat conduction problem involving a cylinder, provides equations and parameters, and suggests using the second-order Runge-Kutta method for solving and computing the heat flow over time.
What does the paragraph describe regarding a heat conduction problem and the solution approach?The paragraph describes a heat conduction problem involving a cylinder heated at one end. The rate of heat flow between two points on the cylinder is given by a differential equation. To simplify the equation, a specific form for the temperature gradient is provided.
The simplified equation is then combined with the original equation to compute the heat flow over a time interval from t = 0 to t = 25 seconds.
The initial condition is given as Q(0) = 0, meaning no heat flow at the start. The parameters involved in the problem are the thermal conductivity constant (λ), cross-sectional area (A), length of the rod (L), and the distance from the heated end (x).
To solve the problem, the second-order Runge-Kutta method is used. This numerical method allows for the approximate solution of differential equations by iteratively computing intermediate values based on the given equations and initial conditions.
By applying the Runge-Kutta method, the heat flow can be calculated at various time points within the specified time interval.
In summary, the paragraph introduces a heat conduction problem, provides the necessary equations and parameters, and suggests the use of the second-order Runge-Kutta method to solve the problem and compute the heat flow over time.
Learn more about heat conduction
brainly.com/question/13253422
#SPJ11