"[T]he terrorists are still active, and they are still trying to strike America and they are still trying to kill our people. … Another reason the terrorists have not succeeded is because our government has changed its policies and given our military, intelligence and law enforcement personnel the tools they need to fight this enemy and protect our people and preserve our freedom. … Captured terrorists have unique knowledge about how terrorist networks operate. They have knowledge of where their operatives are deployed and knowledge about what plots are under way. This intelligence—this is intelligence that cannot be found any other place. And our security depends on getting this kind of information. To win the war on terror, we must be able to detain, question and, when appropriate, prosecute terrorists captured here in America and on the battlefields around the world. … [T]hese are enemy combatants who are waging war on our nation. We have a right under the laws of war, and we have an obligation to the American people, to detain these enemies and stop them from rejoining the battle."—George W. Bush, from his "Speech on Terrorism," September 6, 2006

How did the policies described in this excerpt generate debate within the United States?

Many Americans grew concerned that their own civil liberties were being threatened or restricted.
Few people agreed that prisoners of war should be allowed any type of trial or legal assistance.
The War on Terror expanded the military budget and led to severe cuts in social welfare programs.
No proof existed that the government's efforts had successfully thwarted any new terrorist attacks.

The policies described in this excerpt generated debate within the United States due to many Americans growing concerned that their own civil liberties were being threatened or restricted. These policies, which included detaining and questioning terrorists captured both domestically and internationally, raised questions about the balance between national security and individual rights. Critics argued that the methods employed by the government, such as enhanced interrogation techniques and prolonged detention without trial, violated constitutional protections and undermined fundamental principles of justice. This debate highlighted the tension between security measures and the preservation of civil liberties, sparking discussions about the appropriate balance in counterterrorism efforts.

Please let me know if you have any further questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with!

Please rate this answer on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, and feel free to leave any comments or follow-up questions you may have. Don't forget to save this answer as "BRAINLIEST" to support me. Thank you!