The Pentagon Papers did indeed reveal significant waste in military spending during the Vietnam War. The Pentagon Papers were a classified study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Defense that examined U.S. involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. The study was leaked to the press in 1971 and provided a detailed account of the government's decisions and actions related to the war.
Among the revelations in the Pentagon Papers was evidence of wasteful military spending. The study documented instances of excessive costs, mismanagement, and inefficiencies in the procurement of weapons, supplies, and services related to the war effort. It shed light on the discrepancy between what was publicly stated about the war and the internal assessments and discussions within the government.
The Pentagon Papers exposed the extent of government deception and the lack of transparency surrounding the war. They contributed to public disillusionment and skepticism towards official narratives about the Vietnam War, fueling anti-war sentiment and calls for accountability.
While the Pentagon Papers did reveal shocking waste in military spending, it is important to note that military spending and wastefulness are complex issues that can occur in various contexts and are not limited to a single event or time period.
To know more about pentagon visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33633680
#SPJ11
A benifit of a bicmeral legislature is that it
Which group was prohibited from settling in texas?
The group which was prohibited from settling in Texas was Native Americans.
Native Americans were prohibited from settling in Texas. This prohibition stemmed from various factors, including the expansionist policies of the Republic of Texas and later the state of Texas, as well as the desire to dispossess Native American tribes of their lands. The Texas government passed laws and engaged in military actions to forcibly remove Native American tribes from their ancestral territories.
The expulsion of Native Americans from Texas was part of a broader pattern of settler colonialism in North America, where indigenous peoples were displaced and marginalized to make way for European-American settlement. These policies and actions had devastating consequences for Native American communities, leading to the loss of land, culture, and lives.
To learn more about Native American visit: https://brainly.com/question/514661
#SPJ11
the blank is the outline of the government of the united states
The Constitution is the outline of the government of the united states.
The Constitution of the United States serves as the outline or framework for the government of the United States. It establishes the structure, powers, and limitations of the federal government and sets forth the rights and liberties of the American people.
The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1788, creating a system of government based on the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.
It outlines the three branches of government: the legislative branch, headed by Congress and responsible for making laws; the executive branch, headed by the President and responsible for implementing and enforcing laws; and the judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court and responsible for interpreting the laws.
The Constitution delineates the powers and responsibilities of each branch, ensuring a system of shared powers and preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful. This system of checks and balances allows for accountability and prevents the abuse of power.
For such more question on government:
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ8
john f. kennedy was able to carry texas and win the presidency in 1960 because .
John F. Kennedy was able to carry Texas and win the presidency in 1960 due to a combination of strategic campaigning, his appeal to certain demographics, and the influence of his running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson.
In the 1960 presidential election, Texas played a significant role in Kennedy's victory. Kennedy and his campaign team recognized the importance of winning the state and strategically focused their efforts on appealing to Texas voters. Kennedy's running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson, a native Texan and well-known figure in the state, played a crucial role in mobilizing support and securing votes.
Additionally, Kennedy's campaign made significant efforts to connect with various demographics in Texas. He targeted urban areas, where he had strong support among African American voters and young people. Kennedy also appealed to the growing Hispanic population in Texas, recognizing their influence and addressing their concerns. By focusing on key issues such as civil rights, economic growth, and national security, Kennedy was able to resonate with a broad range of Texas voters.
Furthermore, Kennedy's charisma, youthful energy, and effective use of media, particularly televised debates, helped him gain popularity and sway undecided voters in Texas and across the country. His performance in the debates, along with his overall campaign strategy, positioned him as a fresh and dynamic alternative to his opponent, Richard Nixon.
In conclusion, Kennedy's ability to carry Texas and win the presidency in 1960 can be attributed to strategic campaigning, the influence of his running mate, and his appeal to diverse voter demographics in the state.
Learn more about John F. Kennedy.
brainly.com/question/1577421
#SPJ11
The COMMON law system is the system of law that courts follow in the U.S. It was borrowed from the British system and still exists in most countries that were once part of or still are part of the British Empire. In the COMMON law system, judges follow old decisions of previous courts if the facts and circumstances are the same. These old cases are called PRECEDENT, a phrase you've probably heard before. However, one you probably haven't heard is the fancy Latin phrase STARE DECISIS, which means literally "stand" and decide," or roughly "Let the decision stand," another way of saying that old cases and the judge's decisions, or holdings, in them, should be followed by future courts.
The COMMON law system in the U.S. is based on precedents and the principle of stare decisis.
What is the significance of stare decisis in the COMMON law system?Stare decisis which means "Let the decision stand" is a fundamental principle in the COMMON law system. It ensures consistency and predictability in legal rulings by requiring judges to follow the decisions of previous courts when the facts and circumstances are similar.
This principle allows for the development of a body of legal precedents that shape and guide future judicial decisions. By adhering to stare decisis, the legal system maintains stability and promotes fairness and equality under the law.
Read more about stare decisis
brainly.com/question/371342
#SPJ4