The Terry Schiavo case raised several ethical issues about death education, including living wills and euthanasia. Weigh in on this particular case and justify your position.
Answer:
Terry Schiavo was a US woman who was in a vegetative state for over 15 years before her actual death. This is despite the poor prognosis for meaningful neurologic recovery, standard and experimental therapies that were administered to her, to no effect, for 3 years.
My position on this particular case is that, the power of attorney (right to decide what would happen) of someone in a vegetative state should lie with the spouse of the patient if married or with the immediate family members, if unmarried. Everyone has a right to decide the condition upon which to be kept.
Terry Schiavo expressely told her husband about her wish not to be kept in any life supporting machine. Because, she knew that the agony and saddness would be prolonged further both for her husband and her immediate family members rather than her being griefed for a short while and forgotten. Euthanasia is a welcomed thing especially in situations where it is medically and physically proved beyond measures that the patents would never recover from his or her vegetative state.
Explanation:
Marianne makes an educated guess that children who enter school having had no preschool exposure will have underdeveloped social skills that will need extra attention. This is an example of a(n) ________ hypothesis.
The correct answer is the following.
Although the question does not provide options, we can answer the following.
Marianne makes an educated guess that children who enter school having had no preschool exposure will have underdeveloped social skills that will need extra attention. This is an example of a predictive hypothesis.
What Marianne is doing is to take a guess based on her previous experience in educational environments. Although a predictive hypothesis does not guarantee anything because it does not provide hard facts, it serves as a reference due to the background of the individual in certain fields of study. It could include a projection, a forecast, or a probable scenario, according to the conditions presented in the past.
After Mateo, a student in your class, reads a series of scientific articles discussing the value of multiple vitamin supplements in preventing heart disease, he approaches you and remarks, "I’m confused. If all of these scientists are studying the same issue and are all using the scientific method, why aren’t they all coming to the same conclusions?" your response should emphasize:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The question does not include options. However, we can answer it in the following way.
After Mateo, a student in your class reads a series of scientific articles discussing the value of multiple vitamin supplements in preventing heart disease, he approaches you and remarks, "I’m confused. If all of these scientists are studying the same issue and are all using the scientific method, why aren’t they all coming to the same conclusions?"
My response should emphasize the fact that studies and experiments include different data, scenarios, people, and the interpretation of results is not always the same. It varies according to the purpose of the study and the premises.
That is something important to consider in these kinds of studies. Scientists and researches often interpret the results according to their goals, experience, expectations, and variables. That is why there is a variety of conclusions regarding one topic of study.
Leleti believes that her friend spilled soda all over her backpack in order to get revenge for a remark Leleti made a few days ago, even though her friend claims that the incident was an accident. Leleti is making a:
Answer:
causal attribution
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that Leleti is making a causal attribution. This term refers to the process of trying to determine the actual causes to an individual's specific behavior, in a personal or situational case. This is what Leleti is doing since, to her, the action of her friend spilling soda over her backpack is a personal action in order to get revenge.
While Jonathan was jogging in the park, he saw a small girl crying for help. He also saw many people standing nearby not taking any action. This made Jonathan wonder if the girl really needed help. According to one of the models of the helping process, which of the following steps was not followed by Jonathan that affected his helping behavior?
a. Noticing a person, event, or situation that may require help
b. Interpreting the event as one that requires help
c. Deciding on and implementing the form of helping
d. Assuming responsibility for helping
Answer:
I think is A I hope this helps.
According to one of the models of the helping process, " Interpreting the event as one that requires help affected his helping behavior. The appropriate response is option B.
What is helping process?The Family Partnership Model's central process is helping . It is a series of activities that, taken together, allow professionals to collaborate with parents with the goal of assisting them in deepening their understanding of both themselves and their children as well as in bringing about good changes in their family dynamics.
Helping process involves . By actively listening to the client's story, the counselor can:
1) comprehend the client's problem;
2) learn the client's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors;
3) identify the client's strengths, assets, and personal power; and
4) establish a rapport with the client.
To learn more about Interpreting
https://brainly.com/question/29573798
#SPj2
Karen's teacher maintains a book that records every instance of misconduct by her students. Every time a student misbehaves, she adds a point against his or her name in the book. Karen's students now stop misbehaving in class because they fear that the teacher will add points against their names. This is an example of
Answer:
What Karen's is doing by adding a point against the name of the students who misbehave is simply punishment.
She is using punishment as a means to give negative feedback when a student displays unproper behavior, with the hope that the punishment will condition students to behave well.
And according to the information in the question, the punishment is working.
Privatization of a stateminusowned monopoly can A. allow governments to capture future producer surplus. B. reduce bribery of government officials. C. allow governments to be more efficient. D. increases chances of reelection for politicians.
Answer:
C. allow governments to be more efficient.
Explanation: